*<.

,i

'

i?'

:=::i:

.+::

Nor{h Gounty

Tactical UYorking
Group

Talking Points for Armored Vehicle

Background (Rat) o North Alameda County agencies formed together as a working group o ldentified concerns commorl to all 3 agencies o Large incidents in one jurisdiction often impact the other jurisdictions
ln progress crimes or warrant services Funding already approved to get training in MACTAC We want to enhance our capability with an Armored Tactical lntervention Vehicle, we feel would be a regional asset and has a nexus to terrorism.

o o o o o

'

: S3if3tnat uc

Berkerev

o The Proposal (Adan). Through UASI funding, purchase a Armored Tactical lntervention Vehicle for use by the 3 agencies. Sustaining costs would be shared by the partner agencies, as would training and maintenance. Because of its strategic position, the Armored Tactical lntervention Vehicle would be a regional asset for use in SF, Marin and Contra Costa Operational Areas, as it is very close to each of these areas. Although there are agencies nearby who have similar equipment, they are often in use. Plus, a call to another agency means they have to put their personnel on it to drive it to our incident. Over a period time, that becomes a drain on the sending agency.

The product (Mike) We are requesting UASI funding for a Lenco Bearcat. The Bearcat is a proven armored vehicle designed to carry personnel and equipment.

o o

o o o

Our request can be found in the HS Responder Knowledge Base and is listed with a number and qualifying for UASI funding.

Sumrnary (Rat) A tactical intervention vehicle staged in this part of Alameda County will enhance the capabilities of the area and the region' The vehicle will be positioned regionally, but maintained locally with the goal to enhance the ability to disrupt, investigate and apprehend criminals.

Subject: Attachments:

Upson, Erik M. Wednesday, April 04, 201212:50 PM Reece, XeUn A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L'; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew, Ohlson, Lynne; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward;Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Durbin, Michael R.; Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation 9266 BERKELEY.pdf

From: Jim Massery fmailto:jmasserv@lencoarmor.csm] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:08 PM To: Upson, Erik M. Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Erik,

Here is your official used Lenco BearCat Quotation. We are very excited about the prospect of providing you a Lenco BearCat.

I promise

you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

All that is needed is for your depaftment to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9266 and the Dollar Value of the Quote. Upon receipt of an approved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediately added to our Schedule.
NO DEPOSIT is required and payment is NOT due until AFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat.

Give me a call if you have any questions Thank you again for this opportunity to assist you. Sincerely Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 800-444-5362 ext, 114
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mailand any files transmitted with it may contain confidential, privileged and proprietary information of Lenco Armored Vehicle! and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom if'ey are addressed. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. lf you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender. This email may also contain technical data relating to a "Defense Article" within the meaning of the lnternational Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Part 120). The transfer or disclosure of this information to any non-U.S. person or company without an jxport license approved oy ine United States Department of State, Direetorate of Defense Trade Controls is prohibited under federal law.

Ohlson, Lynne

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, April 03, 2012 9:A2 PM Rateaver, Andrew Adan Tejada; DanielAdams; Eric Tejada; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; Curtin, Tom; Andersen, Ryan M. UASI Update: above the Line

Thanks to all of you who responded to this urgent request. We were able to turn things around and get UASI a quick answer. l, myself, was out on a snowfield 3 miles from the nearest anything when my email buzzed.lt was UASI calling saying we could have $ 167,000 if we could make the purchase for that amount. But we had like... hours to decide, before the monies were passed on. Putting out the call, I got ahold of Tom, who put out the word. ln the meantime, I was hearing back from Joe in Japan, Ryan in Hawaii, Alyson in Tahoe, Dave in Vacaville... and many of you in places other than work.
Erik was able to get us a quote on the fly. lt is for a Bearcat, albeit a 2009 lease return. Don't know all the details, but as soon as they become available, they will be passed on. I updated UASI. Late word is our $167,000. is actually $168+.

So... Thank you everyone. Tom, Erik: good job.

Rat.

On Apr 3,2012, al2.32 PM, "Rateaver, Andrewl' <ARateaver@ci.berkeley.ca.us> wrote:

> UASI has $167,000 for us, as first up "below the line".
> Can we purchase an AV for this amount? I doubt it, > Need to give UASI an answer soon. Like 24 hours. > BPD has come up with a possible solution. Read next email. Advise me on what you think. > Send me your feedback ASAP. > Sent via tactical uplink, from Tahoe

Ohlson, Lynne
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Thursday, March 29,201212:50 PM Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; danno136@9mail.com, Daniel Adams; Mike Larrick Alyson FJart; Reece, David K.; Okies, Joseph;Andersen, Ryan M.; Smith, Katherine; Galvan, Edward; Ohlson, Lynne RE: UASI Advisory Group Meeting March 29,2012,9:30 am, 4985 Broder Blvd. Dublin, CA

Subject:
Good afternoon:

No significant action was made today on ourr project. lt was important to be in attendance, if not just to see and hear the process take place. But also, to show that we are committed to our project.

One thing we did discover was UASI erroneously removed "UC Polide" from our proposal, and inserted "Emeryville". Adan, Ryan and I brought this to the attention of the Board and the.correction was made on the spot.
As Ryan and I were leaving, the Hub Coordinator took us aside and conveyed to us that funding still may yet be available. He assured us that our position is solid, and we have a good chance of getting looked at as the first "below the line" project. That is certainly a good sign. Other projects have not been so fortunate.

Thanks again for your work.

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 20tZ 7:06 AM To: Adan Tejadai Eric Tejada; danno136@gmail.com; Daniel Adams; Mike Larrick
Cc: Alyson Hart; Reece, David K.; Okies, Joseph; Andersen, Ryan M.; Smith, Katherine; Galvan, Edward Subject: FW: UASI Advisory Group Meeting March 29, 20L2, 9:30 am, 4985 Broder Blvd. Dublin, CA

Group:

This just came in late tast

night.

'

I have yet to do mone than bniefly scan it. . . but my gnoup should have a representative at this meeting.
Right now,

finst

impression

is that our wonking

am planning on

attending, pending cleanance fnom Patrol

I
t'd

throw

know
L

if

vou in case vou want to attend as thene ane any significant developments.

this out to

we1l.

Regandless,

I will let the group

- ----0riginal Message----From: Houghtetling, Dennis, Sheriff Imailto:DHoughtellins(aacgov.ong] Sent: Tuesday, March 27,2OL2 9:36 PM To: EKLAUS@ci.alameda.ca.us; McCammon, Bi1I, ACFD; Sean Fawell (sfawe@so.cccounty.us); Stephen Roderick; Lee Harris; Bruce Martin; mpoinier@oaklandnet.comi RADomingo@oaklandnet.com; Bynon Berhel(dci.richmond.ca.us; swarn@so.cccountv.us; Mike Bunton (mbunt@so.cccountv.us); Pan M.D., Erica, PubIlc Health, DCDCP; Rateaver, Andrew; Mike Sena Cc: Craig Dziedzi"c (cnaig.dziedzic@sfgov.ons); Teresa Senata (teresa.serata{Osfgov.ong); Mary

Subject: UASI Advisory Group Meeting Manch 29,2OL2,9:30 am, 4985 Bnoder B1vd. Dublin,
East Bay Hub Subject Matter Experts,

Landers (Mary.Landers@sfgov.org); Mike

Sena
CA

As f mentioned at the East Bay Hub Meeting on Manch 19, the next step in the Hub Planning Process is for the UASI Advisony Group to review the proposals that were moved forward by the Hubs. The Advisony Group Meeting is on March 29,201,2,9:3@ a.m., at the Dublin OES. A11 proposals that were placed above the funding line by the Hub w111 be reviewed by the Advisory 6noup. The Advisory Group may have additional questions negarding youn projects. I would like to invite those of you with proposals above the line to attend the meeting so you can answer questions that may be asked about youn project. If you cannot attend, someone familiar with your project may answen questions on your behalf. If no one is present to repnesent your pnoject I would be hapgiy to answer the questions the best I can, based on youn pnoposals and the presentations you made to the Hub. The finst pnoject below the 1lne, (Armored Rescue Vehicle-Andrew Rateaver), NAy also be discussed by the group, therefore, the proposer of this project is also receiving this notification.

Please let me know as soon as possible if you will be attending the meeting, someone will be attending the meeting in youn pIace, or if you would like me to addness questions regarding your proposal.

N0TE: The Advisory Gnoup will be making necommendations regarding youn proposals to the UASI Appnoval Authority at their meeting on April L2. You should al"so considen attending the meeting on April 12th to answer any questions that may arise duning the final review/discussion of the projects by the Appnoval Authonity.
Advisony Group Meeting
Thunsday, March
Alameda County

29, 2O!2, 9:30

a.m.
OES

Sheriff's Office

4985 Bnoden Blvd.

Dublin,
Thanks, Dennis

CA

Alameda County Sheriff's Office Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Services Ce11 (514) 225-589L << Agenda 0329L2.pdf >>

Dennis Houghtelling,

Commander

File:

Advisot'y

Ohlson, Lynne
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Rateaver, Andrew Wednesday, March 28,2012 7:19 AM Ohlson, Lynne FW: UASIAdvisory Group Meeting March 29,2012,9:30 am, 4985 Broder Blvd. Dublin, CA

My apologies: this should have gone to you as well....

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, March 28,20lZ 7:06 AM To: 'Adan Tejada'; Eric Tejada; danno136@omail.com; 'Daniel Adams'; Mike Larrick Cc: 'Alyson Haft'; Reece, David K.; Okies, Joseph; Andersen, Ryan M.; Smith, Katherine; Galvan, Edward Subject: FW: UASI Advisory Group Meeting March 29, 2O!2,9:30 am, 4985 Broder Blvd, Dublin, CA

Gnoup:

This just

came

in late last night is that our working

f have yet to do more than bniefly scan it... but my finst impression gnoup should have a nepnesentative at this meeting.
Right now, I
am

planning on attending, pending cLearance fnom Patrol

Regardless,

f throw this out to vou in case vou want to attend as well. know if there ane any significant developments.
nat

I will let the group

--

--Original

Message- - - -

Houghtelling, Dennis, Sheniff Imailto:DHouehtelling{Aalgev.!rg] Sent: Tuesday, Manch 27, TOLZ 9:35 PM To: EKLAUS@ci.alameda.ca.usl McCammon,8i11, ACFD; Sean Fawe1l (sfawe@so.cccountv.us); Stephen Rodenick; Lee Hanris; Bnuce Mantin; mpoirier@oaklandnet.com;
Fnom: RADomingo@oaklandnet.com; Byron Berhel(dci.richmond.ca.us; swarn@so.cccountv.us; Mike Burton (mburt@so.cccountv.us); Pan M.D., Erica, Public Health, DCDCP; Rateaver, Andrew; Mike Sena Cc: Craig Dziedzic (crais.dziedzic@sfgov.ors); Teresa Senata (tenesa.ser ata@sfsov.ors); Mary Landens (Marv.Landers@sfgov.org); Mike Sena Subject: UASI Advisory Group Meeting March 29,2012,9:30 am, 4985 Bnoden B1yd. Dublin, CA

East Bay Hub Subject Matter Experts, As I mentioned at the East Bay Hub Meeting on Manch 19, the next step in the Hub Planning Process is for the UASI Advisory Group to neview the proposals that wene,movird forward by the Hubs. The Advisory Gnoup Meeting is on March 29,20L2,9230 a.m., at the Dublin 0ES. A11 pnoposals that wene placed above the funding line by the Hub will be reviewed by the Advisory Group. The Advisony Gnoup may have additional questions regarding youn projects. I would like to invite those of you with proposals above the line to attend the meeting so you can answen questions that may be asked about your projbct. If you cannot attend, someone familiar with your project may answer questions on youn behalf. If no one is present to repnesent your pr oject I would be happy to ansulen the questions the best I can, based on your proposals and the presentations you made to the Hub. The fir st pnoject below the line,

(Anmored Rescue Vehicle-Andnew Rateaver), may

proposer

of this project is also neceiving this notiflcation,

also be discussed by the gnoup, therefore, the

Please 1et me know as soon as possible if you will be attending the meeting, someone will be attending the meeting in your p1ace, or if you would like me to address questions negarding youn pnoposal. NOTE: The Advisony Group will be making necommendations negarding your proposals to the Approval Authority at thein meeting on April 1"2. You should also consider attending the meeting on April L2th to answer any questions that may arise during the final nevlew/discussion of the projects by the Approval Authority.
Advisor
UASI

Group Meeting

Thunsday, March
Alameda County

29,20L2, 9:30

a.m.
OES

Sheriff's Office

4985 Broder Blvd.

Dublin,
Thanks, Dennis

CA

Dennis Houghtelling,
Alameda County

Commanden

Sheriff's Office
Advisory Agenda 032912'pdt

Office of

Homeland

Security and Emergency Senvices CeIl

(5L0

) 225-5891

Ohlson, Lynne

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

Ohlson, Lynne Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:25 PM Curtin, Tom FW: UASI Working Group: New Meeting Scheduled MACTAC ProposalAlameda County.docx

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Monday, February 27,20L211:28 AM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.orgi Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail,com; Upson, Erik M.; Durbin, Michael R. Subject: RE: UASI Working Group: New Meeting Scheduled New meeting time scheduled

Wednesda V

2l2g 1430

hrs.

BPD Detective Conference Room

The funding is there and will not expire. However, it would be in our best interest to

commit to scheduling.

UASI. We then work directly with the SSI to have the training.
Thank you.

rat

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Thursday, February L6, 2AIZ 4:22 PM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece; Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M,; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik M.; Durbin, Michael R.

SubjecU UASI2/16 Update: Working Group

I want to thank you for your participation in this effort. I realize my update emails are lenglhy and certainly not the only email you have to read. I am trying to keep them concise, and only send them out when I have several
substantial items to convey to the group. Thank you for being accommodating.

MACTAC Update:

As mentioned in the previous update: UASI funding for our MACTAC proposal has been approved. UASI is pleased with our efforts and will be using us as a testimodel. If we are successful, they may if it is feasible to bring this training to the rest of the operational arealregion.

see

UASI has identified and approved a vendor for our use. They are Security Solutions lntemational (SS], based out of Florida. Joe Witty, one of the developers of MACTAC out of LAPD is associated with this group, You may see more about their MACTAC program at the following website:
inH

http ://www. hom elandsecuritvssi.comfmactac-active-shooter-train

SSI is proposing the following format for our training:

'

Hold 2 of these four day classes training all 3 departments in whomever they wish to
send.

. . o o
See attached

We send our prospective instructors to this TTT class

Note:

these prospective instructors should have attended one of the

first 4-day ciasses.

drafl contract.

Action Items

>
The funding is there and will not expire. However, it would be in our best interest to

commit to scheduling.

UASI. We then work directly with the SSI to have the training.

Armored Car o The AV proposal was

sent to the Hub Coordinator in draft

a

form

o o .

It needs to be tweak it needs to read.

little, but otherwise, we are on solid grand and the proposal reads the way

The deadline for submitt al is

3ll3l|2. Thatwill

not be an issue for us.

Realize this is a long term project, and we will be into 2013 before this really gets off the ground.

Ryan has done some outstanding follow-up with the Armored Group to address some of our concerns from the last meeting. Please see his comments attached. See also two quotes from the Armored Group that reflect our concerns.

Lastly on this issue, Ryan has gotten approval for us to Visit Napa, where the latest BATT was delivered. We can make arrangements to visit Napa and see another version of a BATT if the group f,eels we need to re-visit this issue.

Ohlson, Lynne
From: Sent: To:
Ohlson, Lynne Tuesday, April 03, 20121'.26 PM Curtin, Tom FW: UASI 2116 Update: Working Group SSI MACTAC ProposalAlameda County.docx; Comments from Ryan Andersen.docx; BATT by TAG JJ120213A.pdt 2-16-12.pdf; BATT S AP by TAc JJ12a2138.pdf 2-16-12.pdt

Subject: Attachments:

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Thursday, February L6, Z0L2 4:27 PM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik M.; Durbin, Michael R.

Subject: UASI 2/16 Update: Working Group

I want to thank you for your participation in this effort. Ircalize my update emails are lengthy and certainly not the only email you have to read. I am trying to keep them concise, and only send them out when I have several substantial items to convey to the group. Thank you for being accommodating. MACTAC Update:

As mentioned in the previous update: UASI funding for our MACTAC proposal has been approved. UASI is pleased with our efforts and will be using us as a test/model. If we are successful, they may see if it is feasible to bring this training to the rest of the operational arcalregion.

UASI has identified and approved a vendor for our use. They are Security Solutions Internationat (SS|, based out of Florida. Joe Witry, one of the developers of MACTAC out of LAPD is associated with this group, You may see more about their MACTAC program at the following website:

httn ://www. homelandsecuritvssi.com/mactac-active-shooter-training

SSI is proposing the following format for our training:

Hold 2 of these four day classes training all 3 departments in whomever they wish to
send.

. I .
See attached

We send our prospective instructors to this TTT class

Note: thesc prospeetive instruetors should have attended one of the first 4-day
draft contract.

elasses.

:-i---

I
.1

,i

Curtin, Tom
From: Sent: To:
Curtin, Tom Tuesday, April 03, 2A12 12:28 PM Rateaver, Andrew REQUEST UPDATE

Subiect:

Rat,

Ryan's on vacation in Hawaii. Okies is away in Japan. Who else has been working with you/Ryan re the armored car project? Who's your "Plan B" person to contact a vendor? [f there's no one, let me know who the vendors are and l'll try to make calls and proxy your solicitation for a StOZt< purchase. I hope there are specs already established....

Tom/S34

rtin, Tom
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, April03, 2012 12:33 PM Curtin, Tom RE: REOUEST UPDATE

Sent via tactical uplink On Apr 3,2072, al12:28 PM, "Curtin, Tom" <TCurtin@ci.berkeley.c?.us> wrote:
Rat,

Ryan's on vacation in Hawaii. Okies is away in Japan. Who else has been working with you/Ryan re the

armored car project? Who's your "Plan B" person to contact a vendor? lf there's no one, Iet me know who the vendors are and l'll try to make calls and proxy your solicitation for a Sf0Zf purchase. I hope there are specs already established....
Tomr/534

Curtin Tom
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Curtin, Tom Tuesday, April 03, 201212:34 PM Rateaver, Andrew RE: REQUEST UPDATE

Rat,

l'm standing by for further direction. l'm happy to help, if I can.

Tom/S34

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, April 03,201212:33 To: Cuftin, Tom Subject: Re: REQUEST UPDATE
copy....
Sent via tactical uplink

PM

On Apr 3,2O!2, at L2:28 PM, "Curtin, Tom"

Rat,

<TCurtin@ci.berke

> wrote:

Ryan's on vacation in Hawaii. Okies is away in Japan. Who else has been working with you/Ryan re the

armored car project? Who's your "Plan B" person to contact a vendor? lf there's no one, Iet me know who the vendors are and l'll try to make calls and proxy your solicitation for a Sf6Zf purchase. I hope there are specs already established....
Tom/S34

urtin. Tom
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Curtin, Tom Tuesday, April03, 20122:07 PM Rateaver, Andrew UPDATE RE REQUEST

Rat,

Capt. Upson made some calls and his silver tongue got a commitment to sell/purchase a 2009 Bearcat G2 (4dr, 50 cal rated, copula, lo-person capacity, running boards, intercomm, etc.) for S167K. lt's a lease-return vehicle currently with an undisclosed Fed agency, mileage unk at this time. Particular specs will be forwarded from Bearcat to Capt Upson

tomorrow,
So, Capt Upson says, "Pioceed". Let's get the S and move forward (as far as we can, that is).

Advise ASAP of any issues/changes/dramas. Tom/S34 For Capt Upson.

From: Sent: To:

Gc:

Subject:

Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, April 03, 2012 2:34 PM Curtin, Tom Upson, Erik M. RC: UPDATE RE'REQUEST

We need to check with allthe stakeholders, first. Before anything. This is not BPD money. lt belongs to 3 agencies.
Let me find out what they want Sent via tactical uplink On Apr 3,2AL2, at2:f,G PM, "Curtin, Tom" <TCurtin@ci.berkelev.ca.us> wrote:
Rat,

to do.

Capt. Upson made some calls and his silver tongue got a commitment to sell/furchase a 2009 Bearcat G2{4dr,50 cal rated, copula, 1O-person capacity, running boards, intercomm, etc.)forS167K. lt's a lease-return vehicle currently with an undisclosed Fed agency, mileage unk at this time. particular specs will be forwarded from Bearcat to Capt Upson tomorrow.
So, Capt Upson says,

"Proceed". Let's get the

S and move

forward (as far as we can, that is).

Advise ASAP of any issues/changes/dramas. Tom/S34 For Capt Upson.

thr-

Curtin, Tom
From:
Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, April 03, 2012 9:02 PM Rateaver, Andrew

Subject:

Adan Tejada; DanielAdams; Eric Tejada' mlarrick@albanyca.org; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; Curtin, Tom; Andersen, Ryan M. UASI Update: above the Line

Thanks to all of you who nesponded to this urgent nequest. We were able to tunn things around and get UASI a quick answen. I, myself, was out on a snowfield 3 miles from the nearest anything when my email buzzed. It was UASI calling saying we could have $ L67,OOO if we could make the purchase fon that amount. But we had 1ike... hours to decide, before the monies were passed on.

Putting out the cal1, I got ahold of Tom, who put out the word.

In the meantime, I was heaning back from loe in Japan, Ryan in Hawail, in Vacavil1e... and many of you in places other than wonk.

Alyson

in

Tahoe,

Dave

Enik was able to get us a quote on the fly. It is fon a Bearcat, albeit a 2O@9 lease return. Don't know all the details, but as soon as they become availabte, they will be passed on.

I updated UASI. Late word is our $167,006. is actually $f6S+.

So...
Rat.
On Apr Thank you everyone. Tom,

Erik:

good job.

3,

20L2,

at 2:32 PM, "Rateaver, for us, as first

Andnew" <ARateaven@ci.benkelev.ca.us> wnote:

> UASI has

$1,67,0@0

up "below the Iine". doubt

> Can we purchase an AV for

this amountl I

it.

> Need to give UASI an answer soon. Llke 24 hours. >

BPD

has come up
me

with a possible solution.

ASAP.

Read

next email. Advise

me

on what you think.

> Send

your feedback

> Sent via

tactical uplink,

fnom Tahoe

Ohlson. Lynne
From: Sent: To:
Ohlson, Lynne Friday, March 23,2A12 12:48 PM McClellan, Cynthia FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome East Bay Ranking Sheet-FlNAL.xls
High

Subject: Attachments: lmportance:

FYI From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Friday, March 23,201211:30 AM To: AdanTejada; EricTejada; DanielAdams; danno136@gmail.com; Mike Larrick;llart, Alyson L.; Reece, David
Andersen, Ryan M.; Galvan, Edward Cc: Smith, Katherine; Meredith, Matt B.; Ohlson, Lynne; Louis, Jennifer A.; Wilson, Brian D.; Okies, Joseph Subject: FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

K.;

Impoftance:

High

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the members in the working group for their contribution to this regional effort. Members from all 3 agencies worked hard on our proposals, and devoted a significant amount
of time to our cofftmon effort.
On Wednesday, March2l,Lt. Adams, Adan Tejada and I took the armored vehicle proposal and presented it to the UASI Hu-b Approval Board. This board was made up of police and fire chiefs, an assistant sheriff, emergency management and other public safety officials. We were given no more than 5 minutes to state our case. The North County proposal was one of 20 being presented. Our proposal, however, did not make the funding cut. The East Bay UASI Hub decided not to firnd our armored vehicle.

Although this is not the outcome we had hoped for, I am encouraged by some additional factors, as well as off line feedback I have received since the meeting. First, our proposal was administratively sound. There were at least 4 proposals that were withdrawn or disqualified even before they were presented. We were on solid ground. Next, the EBRCSA radio system was slated to get $1 million right at the start. So, going into the process, there was already less funding to be had for us, making the competition even tougher as there were fewer dollars available. We previously did not know this. Moreover, there was at least one other armored vehicle proposal made. They also, did not getting funding. In fact, most large equipment purchases that were proposed (fire boat, rescue caches, anything with wheels...) was generally not funded. What was funded appeared to be smaller ticket items. This is not the case in all respects, but is generally what my impression is. You may see for yourself in the attached chart. What is significant to point out is: if there was a place for second best: then: WE ARE THERE. There is a wait list or what UASI is calling "below the line". If additional monies are found, the north county proposal will be first to receive that fiurding. The "below the line" proposals were ranked and we are first on that list.

Ohlson, Lynne

From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ohlson, Lynne Monday, April09, 2012 5:08 PM Rateaver, Andrew Tentative: UASI Update

Ohlson, Lynne
From: Sent: To:
Ohlson, Lynne Friday, March 23,20121'l:35 AM Meehan, Michael; Harris, Cynthia; Upson, Erik M.; Greenwood, Andrew FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

Subject:

FYI From: Ohlson, Lynne Sent: Friday, March 23,20L211:35 AM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams; danno136@gmail.com; Mike Larrick; Had, Alyson L.;
Reece, David K.; Andersen, Ryan M.; Galvan, Edward Cc: Smith, Katherine; Meredith, Matt B.; Louis, Jennifer A.; Wilson, Brian D.; Okies, Joseph Subject: RE: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

Thanks for the update. I am sorry that we were not in the first cut but neither was our robot proposal the first time we applied. We continued to attend the meetings and make our need known and eventually left over funding gelled to provide sufficient dollar amounts to support our request. Let us hope the same is true. Good job by all. Lynne
From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Friday, March 23,20L211:30 AM To: Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams; danno136@qmail.com; Mike Larrick; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David
Andersen, Ryan M.; Galvan, Edward Cc: Smith, Katherine; Meredith, Matt B.; Ohlson, Lynne; Louis, Jennifer A.; Wilson, Brian D.; Okies, Joseph Subject: FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

K.;

Impoftance:

High

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the members in the working group for their contribution to this regional effort. Members from all 3 agencies worked hard on our proposals, and devoted a significant amount
of time to our cofilmon effort.
On Wednesday, March2l,Lt. Adams, ,A.dan Tejada and I took the armored vehicle proposal and presented it to the UASI Hub Approval Board. This board was made up of police and fire chiefs, an assistant sheriff, emergency management and other public safety officials. We were given no more than 5 minutes to state our case. The North County proposal was one of 20 being presented.
Our proposal, however, did not make the funding cut. The East Bay UASI Hub decided not to fund our armored vehicle.

Although this is not the outcome we had hoped for, I am encouraged by some additional factors, as well as off line feedback I have received since the meeting. First, our proposal was adininistratively sourd. There were at least 4 proposals that were withdrawn or disqualified even before they were presented. We were on solid ground. Next, the EBRCSA radio system was slated to get $i million right at the start. So, going into the process, there was already less funding to be had for us, making the competition even tougher as there were fewer dollars 'We previousiy did not know this. avaiiable.

Deruit thqftrclling, erunandeu

Alameda County Sheriffs Office Bay Area UASI Regional Training and Exercise Program Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Services 4985 B1oder Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568 Cell (510) 22s-s891

11

Ohlson, Lynne

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Ohlson, Lynne Friday, March 23,2A1211:35 AM Rateaver, Andrew, Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams; danno136@gmail.com; Mike Larrick; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.;Andersen, Ryan M.; Galvan, Edward Smith, Katherine; Meredith, Matt B.; Louis, JenniferA.; Wilson, Brian D.; Okies, Joseph RE: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

Thanks for the update. I am sorry that we were not in the first cut but neither was our robot proposal the first time we applied. We continued to attend the meetings and make our need known and eventually left over funding gelled to provide sufficient dollar amounts to support our request. Let us hope the same is true. Good job by all. Lynne
From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Friday, March 23,201211:30 AM To: Adan Tejada; Eric iejada; Daniel Adams; danno136@gmail.com; Mike Larrick; Haft, Alyson L.; Reece, David
Andersen, Ryan M.; Galvan, Edward Cc: Smith, Katherine; Meredith, Matt B.; Ohlson, Lynne; Louis, Jennifer A,; Wilson, Brian D.; Okies, Joseph Subject: FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

K.;

Impoftance:

High

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the members in the working group for their contribution to this regional effort. Members from all 3 agencies worked hard on our proposals, and devoted a significant amount. of time to our coilrnon effort.
On Wednesday, March2l,Lt.Adarns, Adan Tejada and I took the armored vehicle proposal and presented it to the UASI Hub Approval Board. This board was made up of police and fire chiefs, an assistant sheriff, ernergency management and other public safety offrcials. We were given no more than 5 minutes to state our case. The North County proposal was one of 20 being presented. Our proposal, however, did not make the funding cut. The East Bay UASI Hub decided not to fund our arrnored vehicle.

Although this is not the outcome we had hoped for, I am encouraged by some additional factors, as well as off line feedback I have received since the meeting. First, our proposal was administratively sound. There were at least 4 proposals that were withdrawn or disqualified even before they were presented. We were on solid ground. Next, the EBRCSA radio system was slated to get $1 million right at the start. So, going into the process, there was already less funding to be had for us, making the competition even tougher as there were fewer dollars available. We previously did not know this. Moreover, there was at least one other armored vehicle proposal made. They also, did not getting funding. In fact, most large equipment purchases that were proposed (fire boat, rescue caches, anything with wheels...) was generally not funded. What was funded appeared to be smaller ticket items. This is not the case in all respects, but is generally what my impression is. You *ay see for yourself in the attached chart.

t2

What is significant to point out is: if there was a place for second best: then: WE ARE THERE. There is a wait list or what UASI is calling "below the line". If additional monies are found, the north county proposal will be first to receive that funding. The "below the line" proposals were ranked and we are first on that list.
been told the board was impressed with our presentation and our proposal. They took note of the low cost we were able to deliver and saw the importance of what we were asking for.

I have

We did not win this round, but we are still in the game. We still may get some funding, if it is found.

In the meantime, we still have our work cut out for us. MACTAC is coming. We are in the process of getting that training POST certified and will be working to get that scheduled. I will of course keep in touch with you with any future developments.

From: Houghtelling, Dennis, Sheriff IDHoughtelling@acgov,orE] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2072 4:22 PM To: McCammon, Bill, ACFD; Stephen Roderick; Rateaver, Andrew; eklaus@ci.alameda.ca.us; imoorhead@lpfire.org;
rkiefer@cillivermore.ca,us; Bruce Martin; Schnepp, Rob, ACFD; Houghtelling, Dennis, Sheriff; Pan M.D., Erica, Public Health, DCDCP; mooirier@oaklandnet.com; csimm@so.cccountv.us; echri@so.cccounty.us; echri@so.cccounty.us; rkov@so.cccounty.us; LitwinA@usa.redross.ot'g; dwats@cccfpd.orq; byronberhel@r:ichmond.ca.us; Lee Harris Cc: Craig Dziedzic (craig.dziedzic@sfgov.org); Serata, Teresa; Mary Landers (mary.landers@sfqov.org); Blau, Jeff; McKen na, Kath leen;' kevin.jensen @sheriff .sccgov.org' Subject: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome This email is being directed to everyone who presented/submitted project proposals to the East Bay Hub Group on Wednesday, March 2L, 2012. I would like to thank all of you very much for the time and effort you put into developing your projects, The decisions for the voting members of Hub was very difficult. Every project submitted certainly would have provided a valuable benefit to the Region. As many of us recently discussed, interoperability has been and continues to be a very important priority for our Region, therefore, a significant amount of funding was earmarked for

that purpose.
have attached a spreadsheet that outlines the East Bay Hub's recommendation for the allocation of the funding. You will note on the spreadsheet that projects, not recommended for funding at this time, were ranked and placed below the Iine for future consideration in the event additional funding becomes available.

As a reminder, the recommendations from the Hubs will be presented to the UASI Advisory Group at their meeting on, March 29,2012. From there, the Advisory Group will make recommendations to the UASI Approval Authority on, April 12, 2fr12, and the ApprovalAuthority will make final decisions on how the funds will be allocated.
PLFASE NOTE: THE RECOY1MENDA\-ION; AUTHORTTY,

]N

THE,{TTACTIED SPRE,4DSHE{,'T"AR.E frJfrT FIN"AL UNTTL,LPPRCVED EY THE UAST APPROVAL

Thank you again very much for your valuable participation in this process.
Dennis

Oerui,t thryfr*0hfury, eommandu.

Alameda County Sheriffs Office Bay Area UASI Regional Training and Exercise Program Office of Homeland Security and Emergenc,v Serviees 4985 Broder Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568 Cell (510) 22s-5891
13

Ohlson, Lynne

From: Sent: To: Subject:

Ohlson, Lynne Monday, March 12,20122:57 PM Rateaver, Andrew RE: Monday Meet

I am waiting for a phone call and once I complete it, I will come looking for

you. Or come in now and i

will kick you out when the call comes?

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Monday, March 12,2012 2:56 To: Ohlson, Lynne Subject: Monday Meet

PM

Do you have any time to meet with me today/this afternoon re: UASI?

I have been told the timeline on the proposal has changed.... AGAINI And that what I put down needs to be recalculated. I would like your input. Deadline is tomorrow. Thanks in advance.

15

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent:
To: Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Friday, March 23,201211:30 AM nJan'iejaOa; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams; danno136@gmait.com; Mike Larrick; Hart, Alyson L.; Reec-e, David K.;Andersen, Ryan M';Galvan, Edward S*itn, Kaiherine; Meredith, Matt B.;Ohlson, Lynne; Louis, JenniferA.;Wilson, Brian D'; Okies, Joseph FW: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome East Bay Ranking Sheet-FlNAL.xts
High

Subject: Attachments: lmportance:

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the members in the working group for their contribution to this amount regional effort. Members from all 3 agencies worked hard on our proposals, and devoted a significant
of time to our colnmon effort. to on Wednesday, March2l,Lt.Adams, Adan Tejada and I took the armored vehicle propbsal and presented it sheriff, the UASI HubApproval Board. This board was made up of police and lue chiefs, an assistant to state our emergency management and other public safety officials. We were given no more than 5 minutes case. The North County proposal was one of 20 being presented. to fi.rnd our Our proposal, however, did not make the funding cut. The East Bay UASI Hub decided not armored vehicle.
as well as off Although this is not the outcome we had hoped for, I am encouraged by some additional factors, line feedback I have received since the meeting.

or First, our proposal was administratively sound. There were at least 4 proposals that were withdrawn disqualified even before they were presented. We were on solid ground.
process, there Next, the EBRCSA radio system was slated to get $l miltion right at the start, So, going into the there were fewer dollars was already less funding tobe had for us, making the competition even tougher as available. We previously did not know this'

getting funding' In Moreover, there was at least one other armored vehicle proposal made. They also, did not with wheels" ') was fact, most large equipment purchases that were propor"d 1fite boat, rescue caches, anything generally not funded. is generally what What was fi.xrded appeared to be smaller ticket items. This is not the case in all respects, but my impression is. You may see for yourself in the attached chart.
There is a What is significant to point out is: if there was a place for second best: then: WE ARE THERE. ,lbelow the line'i If additional monies are found, the north county proposal wait list or what UASi is calling *iiiu" nrrt to receive that funding. The "below the line" proposals were raxked and we are first on that list'

of the low I have been told the board was impressed with our presentation and our proposal. They took note cost we were able to deliver and saw the importance of what we were asking for.
is found' We did not win this round, but we are still in the game. We still may get some funding, if it
process of getting In the.meantime, we still have our work cut out for us. MACTAC is coming. We are in the keep in touch with you that training poST certified and will be working to get that scheduied. i wiil of course with any fut*" developments.

Quotation 9098
Pmtr*mg Orv Nfl trlrfi 5 DefenDers*
10

Bet[

Industrial Drive

PH {413) 443-7359

- Pittsfield, MA 01201 - FAX (4r 3) 44s-7865

QuotationDate:
Tax ID

#:

A2/07112

04-2719777

WARNINGT Information Subject to Export Control laws

The technical data in this document is restricted by theArms Export Control Act ftitle 22,U.5.C,5ec2757, etseq.) orthe ExportAdministration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, U.S.C., App.2401et seq. and which may not be exported, released or disclosed to non-U.S. persons [i.e. persons who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents ["green card" holders]J inside or outside the United States, without first obtaining an ex-oort license. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe civil, criminal and administrative penalties
THE WRTTTEN APPROVAL OFTHE DIRECTORATE OF US DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS AND LENCO JNDUSTRIE' INC, MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE RESELLING, IRANSFERRING, TRANSSHIPING, OR DISPOSING OF A DEFENSE ARTICLE TO ANY END UsEB, END USE OR DESTINATION OTHER THAN AS STAIED ON THIS LENCO QUOTE OR THE SHIPPER,S EXPORT DECLARATION IN CASES WHERE AN EXEMPTION IS CLAIMED UNDER THIS sUBCHAPTER ITAR 123.9(A},

WE ARE PLEASED TO SUBMIT TIIE ABOYE QUOTATION FOR YOIIR CONSIDERATION. SHOULD YOU PLACE AN oRDE& BE ASSURED IT WrLL RECEM OUR PROMPT ATTENTION. TrrIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS. THEREAFTIR,IT IS SUBJECT TO CEANGE WITHOUT NOTICE

ACCEPTAN CE OF PROPOSAL - rt "ho""pricsrrcirttrrctory rod rrc b.rby rccaDlcd. yo[ ft rulhorircd to do tt sork I rpsili.d. Fnymrnt tix bc qrd. s
oudinrd rbovc

LENCO INDUSTRIES INC. Authorized Signaturc

Authorized Signature
Please

and return

Thank You

Hart, Alyson L.
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Meredith, Matt B. Monday, February 06,2012 9:17 AM Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M., mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward;Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Meredith, Matt B. RE: UASI Zl2Update: AV-BerkeleyPDdiscounted(1 ).xlsx; BearCat 2A12 Price List.xlsx

Subject: Attachments:

USAI-Group

We are set for the 1230 hrs Conference call with lim Massery, Government Sales Manager for Lenco/Bearcat. Jim sent me the above attached bid, 30 minutes ago. I also attached the price list of additional options for the Bearcat so you can compare costs. Please try and review, so we can ask Jim any euestions or concerns we may have. Thanks Matt Meredith #i02

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Monday, February A6,2012 B:09 AM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; dannol36@gmail.com; Upson, Erik M.; Meredith, Matt B. Subject: RE: UASI 2l2Update:
For today's meeting:

1L30:
1,230:

at BPD: multi-purpose room. I hope to have the Regional Parks BATT here, but it is out on an assignment now.
Conference Callwith Lenco: arranged by Matt Meredith

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Thursday, February 02,2012 6:14 PM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; DanielAdams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Haft, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik
M,

Subject:
Everyone:

UASI 212 Update:

Some concerns have been raised about the BATT being our primary choice for an AV. To that end, I want to re-visit the discussion of our AV and re-evaluate what we have thus far.

What has recently come to light is some information that the BATT has been having problems in the field. Additionally, when recently contacted, the makers of the BEARCAT, Lenco, said they may be able to offer us a competitive price for a fully armored vehicle when compared to the BATT. What I would like to do is discuss this further on Monday.
scheduled. The change of time will allow us to have a conference call (hoping) to get both products here: a BATT and a BEARCAT, so we can see them side by with Lenco. I am also hoping
side.

1}S Smt This is 1.5 hour"s later than origina!!y

Thank you for your indulgence. Please let me know if you can accommodate the change of time.

rat
.

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, February 0L,2AL2 3:09

PM

Tor Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; DanielAdams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik
M.

Subject: RE: UASI: Wed 217 update

to our Hub Coordinator todarT. Commander Houghtelling is with ACSO and the coordinator for the Training and Exercise Group, in addition to being the POC for the Hub. He is up to speed on our project, and I see this as a good thing. Based on my conversation with him today, here is some updated info:
I was able to get through

We submit our AV proposal to the Hub, where the local staff vets our work. lt then goes to the Approval Authority, a group representing the bay area. This group will verify that our proposal is "regionol and not redundant". The ApprovalAuthority then prioritizes all proposals, and submits them to Cal EMA in Sacramento, for funding via UASI. As you can probably guess, there is a lot that needs to happen between now and then... and our project may get low priority and not be funded until sometime in the future. The new deadline for submission of our AV proposa I is 2/M. However, in talking with the Hub today, we should stay on target and plan to have our proposal readv bu2l9. We don't have to submit it then, but if it is ready by 2/9,the Hub can take a look at it, and offer us feedback. We then have a few days to tweak it as needed. We should stav on target for 2/9, best we can. At this time, there are no meetings or presentations we need to be set submission date). The review of our proposal will done in April by the Approval Authority.

for.

Just the deadline ot 2/9 (for

ZlM

attaching the final draft proposal form we need to use for the AV proposal. lt is a Word document, so we may enter data right on it.
I am

2, under "Equipment", the form asks about the login website called Responder Knowledge Base. We talked about this briefly on wwW.rkb.us This is a fitrnn
Tuesday.

: On the proposal form page marked

Our Business Manager, Lynne Ohlson here at BPD has access to that site and has made a request of us. Director Ohlson has requested that we contact 2-3 other AV vendors listecj on lhis site as comparison prociucts. Note that on this website, the BATTS vehicle is listed. But it is not the only one.

rryffiEEffi.*i mEEIEilEm
P?"[cctiflil

lClUtrlI
Oul Nittiou's
Dcfe rrilrrrs"'

Effective Date: June 19, 2009 BearCat & Procat Official GSA Net Price List w/ Option Prices LENCO CONTRACT # GS-07F-0390M . Contract End Date June 30,2012 Schedule Number 084 SIN #426 58

PROPRIETARY

ltem:
I

Product #
*J1cn; counter a4anced)
l

a;n;o eeaicri (AwD, Ro_tating

E

$
$
,

GSA Ne! Prige188,793.00

q9 9!U1t ?trrnaeq rymor !:qye!

94ion+
U

Diq_sel E1gir1,e, Q1L Tqrbg

BCDLEN Fllp

7,4_8_6.0q

ydraUltq .(q11t

_Upg

ra{q
(Re_qr
S_ee!_q

4lDoqr Configqrqllon

,lerlVbnAM
Includgd)

EC4DR

$
$ $ $

Q,18Q,00

7,858.00

2as$17.90
.

Lenco Does Not Collect County tax rotai Cosiortti tenCo a_earcai roe ae*etey, cR

209,617.00.

4-Wheel Drive Electronic Shift on the Fly (Diesel) Auto Transmission (6) Speed with Tow Haul Feature 3 year Bumper to Bumper Limited Warranty on Chassis State Depatment Armor Level E (with documentation) Defeats .30 Caliber AP Rounds and all lesser threats All Windows Exceed NII IV, Defeat .50 Caliber and .30 Caliber AP, Slqte, Depqrtmqn! Armor le,vei Windows 2.5 inches thick(66mm) All Doors, All Windows Overlapped with .5 inch thick Mil Spec Steel
q
:

Roof Hatch Operates with one Hand, Zero Gra';ity Feature Blast Resistant Floor Material, Mil Spec Steel Aberdeen Performance Tested, Minimum 36.8 degree side slope (with doqumentatlgn) Adjustable Height 19" Flush to the Floor Gunner/Sniper Stand -Gunports, (f i) Standard Including t3) 7" Vertical Ports Extra Wide Running Boards, Side and Rear, made of Mil Spec Steel Ram Bumper with Locking Storage Compartment Fully Armored Hood Non Siip Tacticai Surtace on Rooi Padded Bench Seats,, Solid Stell with Storage underneath 40 Gallon Fuel Tank Armored Fuel Tank Traditional Opening Hood Front Ram Bumper with Bumper Guards
I

MultiBle Pull Points Front and Rear Front and Rear HD Floor Mats Interior Tie Offs -,..,,-_-l I -- --j-- .----,-.,,--..i Rear Door Flip-up Threshold ii Front and Rear Area LED's (your choice of color) i.. .. ... l .ll Front and Rear Area Wig Wag Lights :: '-!:'i Rear Stealth Feature 200 Watt Siren and PA (6) Interior Red & White Dome Lights Custom made Back Lit Panel Console Battle Bolts on ail Doors l Chemical Agent Resistant Coating Paint (S-Colors Flat Black, OD Grqen,4[_Gfg,efr',D,e-s_qrtTqr1, Navr Forward Opening Front Doors with Lock Open Feature Rear Doors Can Be Locked Open at 180 or 90 Degrees Numerous Interior and Exterior Tie Down Points -.,. ,One Piece Side Walls 5 lb Fire Extinguisher Tilt Wheel :l Cruise Control i--l Am/FM Radio, with CD Player Cup Holders Front and Rear Carpeting Emergency Exit Door-lock Override f Z Volt Plug-in adapter Tow Haul Feature with Compression Brake Electronic Idle Control Driver Seat Arm Rests
.. :..
I
1

I.EIftrII
E|trtrEffi*-EmTTrilffi
Pltrteciiru1 Or.tr Nrrtiou's Dcfc rilr.'.r.s ^'

Effective Date: June 19, 2009 BearCat & Procat Official GSA Net Price List wl Option Prices LENCO CONTRACT # GS-07F-0390M - Contract End Date June 30, ZO12 Schedule Number 084 SIN #426 58 Item: Lenco Bgqfqt (4WD, Rotating Hatch; Counter Balqnc.qd)
Y1q Gu!9!ill9 Ensme is Standard

PROPRIETARY
.

P,q,o{ugJ# BC55003

copmgp!ql
197,250iA

GSA Net Price

188,793.00

,@ Enging, Diesel
lgar

,qq 9!at" q=pql1p-ell^II9f IsYqi

i(2)

iElptotye Gaq,o-e,i-ej1ien-ay-item tl e_e]ed wi1lslteld UPgt-qq_e

Back up Camqq Syqle1rt_WitJt MqnLlqt Electric Power Heated Mirrors ,Electric Power Winch (Qgletes Fplt Stor,qge Area,q1 Eqmp-er)

AC-QE Poygi llvqtq 1,8!Q [{g!! wi Pe]tery _C-[argq Fgqtyle ;AC;DC P,ey_e1_Lnye_(9l E,9,0_0-!ve!_t V F,ellery Q.hargp Fea-!919

Q.7L T-Upq A19e Eleqqic Fqtq

:BCDLEN ;BC2RELFAN

7,8:21 00

7,486,q9
Qq_0,09

;EEp,ltrv2
iE.C]P,LNV19

"$

313.00 4.65-q,99
l

i$

$
$

+,4t189
4,412,q0 2,297.00
1,50-8,0q'

iBCBU

B-EMM
TBQWIIQH

:$ i$ :$
_$ _$

5,qq!.7q
a1!9,QQ

1,!Z!,!_!

$ $

$
-$

q,8-9_9,7q

:e9-o89
:E_Ql19W

!,?qQ,q_0

$
$

2,2i0,00
'!,40-g,q_3

Hlgh l!:rtq!si!y p1i_y119 _L!g[tg, in Frgq! B-urypqr ln tel-c-q ry sr_sle fn ;_ Ufqi$_e, _t9 Qy !9 id e llqqq4g U I S qpql ligct _Qq u1e,
I

iBCH!DL

.PENf
;BCKUSS

$ $
$

3,0_09,qq
e87_
?_3-

ECILB
lnsiQq Sttach Pgi1tg

52_!,99

:$ ,$ t$
$ $

$ $

5,643.00 q,q?5,09 ?,.1!3 00 1,g4o,qq 2,871.00

e!5 00
qq_?,q9
?5__6!9,0_0

iBCSBA
t9-ER4.D--

26,850.24 $ q
$

5.4Q9.00

q,qzq- qq
5o?,0_q

,BQ!,ILSRA

q2l,0q
2,000.00

iEs^_q

.$ ,$
$

1,914.00
:!,q0_4,q9

,qQRCSI!
.BCTI
.

l,!q0.qq
30,000.00
4.?50_

29,714,99
1,q,Qg,_0_q

BCVSPL

qq $ .

lqorryE].8

-9cLED

?,12E.q,q , $ 3.0!-5 go j $

2,q9{q0
2,924 9A
i,g++-,"0_o-

.!-CEIHI
1-EqIl4NL

,$ a

2,13_5,.9.9

ga_,99
1,300,00

$
$

.qqs-El-r

i$
:$ ,$ :$
$

4!5,0q
1,244.40

i-

]BC3WOFFRD
:,aP-BFq-

29!?L0_4_0-, $ 6,9_q0.qq , $

i_Eq,9IBF iBCRF225

l&,5:nra
iBCTWU

2,1!Q,19_ ,-$ 7,1Q0,,2:9 : $ 2,7q1,q0 i $

sc_{gqrRF

_q

7-910.!9-,

$,

,qaglz
lBa{D-R
:BCBSRS
l,B,QttsAM

i6

q.17q.9?,- $ 158.81 . $
g_a1o

1,500.00 I $
$ $

o0 , $

1!?.0,Q z,q_sq 0,Q

1,4!q,gq
4,{99,qq, 5,480.00
6-,qlQ,q_q

,BCGIU iBCHGP

-B_C,ftYDRAM

$ $
-$

6,Zqg,0Q
5.0__3,,9q

rE9,P-LAS?

,,EQB-]qWR
iBCVSPT

$
$
$ $ $ $
$-

1,ogq._o-g '!1,_0_q2,0! 1._9!_0,0q _2,q5J,0_g

jEc$BEQTS:S
IP-CPJ
,

iE-c*l4rllR
iBCMBS

18,66_1!_q

Center Moq4tqd Qg.nq[ 9e-?!Eg yvilh :ECCENTMB . BearCat G4 Off-Road Pkg w/RunFlats/4-Drllg Tinted Windows/2-Rear Seats rBCG4

S,lqfage

?.q_q9.0q I

49r800:18

$
$

1,579.00
2_,4_8_9,90

41,665.00

BCBMIGS TeQESE-AI9

1,5!9 t8_ .

1,484_.qO

Miltery_9lylq_9*Upo_lqry/Ee[j_s_tjq
!

WrlC_ow9 &

ltlgchglicql_r!ryel
Nu

$rs_!_em

1flqoq Jac! 3.5 Tons with Lug Wrench p g r Ai$ q /_B la qt sf i e td 1,9 upp elpr te! E!

jB_CjLi
]BCSFA

,EclAq iectracupou -

:BEElvlf?{q

gco LE e a! c et

9)

iBearCat VlP, SUV Pkg

I

n'

,_eCiicat MedEvac (4) Litter Pkg iBearCat MedEvac LAPD TEMS Version lBearCat MedEvac LASD TEMS Version
Ls hUry-ersh! Aeqe! lt !.itlerq rTactical Fast Board Bea pq! !o p Pkg{Rgbot Dqp! gyq e1t D99rn-1gck
i

efg"lqy E9qqpg {atch

i$
l$

20,715.16:$ aq,7ti qo i $
?-9!715-"q9 "$
-!,QQQ.9-0-r $
9-9--5,9-0 $

l,qz!.'2g.$

rfto11! ULC llvdlggltqEeP-q.! !i!u-,D__q!iveqy

Work CounterlControl Station w/Swivel Seat/l.qq1bqr Sqppqf! Silgle Side Personnel Door wruuinoowlcrnporuAdl H[ Gunner Stano 4-Channel DVR 160 GR 1 Zll Flqt Pe,ryel !_c,Q I o-a !l-q
Spqo!/Qqqynd & $ogf _Lqq{

PLat!-qry4tvilqh__,.

Jlen

s i o_n/,Ra

sed Roof
_

iBCEOD
;ECFfuIHVNO

;ECWKCT
BCSSPD

I
$
$
$

2=e?94!0':9 7,Q3,6,,Q9 , Q 5,224.Q0 : $

5,224,AA
1,82S

?q,qq0,qq
z,!0_9,q0
Q,QQ9 QO
!,q,q-o_,0_0

,$
$
$ $ $

'BC4CHDVR
:

0q i $

1Z50,qq
1,750.00

B.iTFFLCD

1,q?q q9

jLtelglqllglt ql Qqq! Quppl!-ed_tjlgt

Te l9 q q9 pln

:I

,141u-9!_Q9nv_qI9l_olSy-s!eq;?:cyqlq-Bqt!q1!e_s-QRq,,WQ q-gm p9 n _enl nle1g Gli q n q! 9.q q! 9ltppli_g d M o.1 1!o r1C_o tnp !t !9q.
q_pt1q
lvl_t

:E-c21vq_9Ys ,Bq_qu_9I_uoN :BCCUSFIBR

rc,oqq!9
1,9q200?.,qq7,09
79:1.90-

$
$

:aCCusfAia
.E9PAt[I!,Lr
BCTELMAS

$ $

M e

sJ,S-yg!q

11

;'!

0'

yrtl_C

gmp

re-s-s_o 1

$-

lqxj

ty Swl

!q[

$ $ 20,896.00 I $

'!9,9?e.qq

FOB: Origin (TBD) Prepaid and Added

Specifications Subiect to Change.

Hart. Alvson L.
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Adan Tejada [adan@berkeley.edu] Wednesday, February 01,2012 3:15 PM Rateaver, Andrew; 'Eric Tejada'; 'Daniel Adams' Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward;Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; 'Steve Roderick' RE: UASI: Wed2ll update

Subject:

Excellent news ! I'11 work on the form and I agree that having Ed involved in the additional vehicle questions makes the most sense, given the gneat wonk he's already done on the BATT
document
Tha
n

Rat,

ks,

Adan
----

-Or"iginal

Message- - - - -

From: Rateaven, Andnew Imailto:ARateaver@ci.berkeley.ca.us] Sent: talednesday, February 0L, 2OL2 3:09 PM To: Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrewl Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlanrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik M. Subject: RE: UASI: Wed 2/! update
was able to get thnough to oun Hub Coordinator today. Commander Houghtelling is with ACSO and the coordinator for the Training and Exercise Gnoup, in addition to being the POC for the Hub. He is up to speed on oun project, and I see this as a good thing. Based on my conversation with him today, here is some updated info:

h]e submit our AV pnoposal to the Hub, where the local staff vets wonk. It then goes to the Approval Authority, a gnoup nepnesenting the bay area. This group will venify that our proposal is "regional and not redundant". The Approval Authority then pr.ioritizes all proposals, and submits them to Cal EMA in Sacramento, for funding via UASI. As you can pnobably guess, there is a lot that needs to happen between now and then. and oun project may get 1ow priority and not be funded until sometime in the futune.

our-

The new deadline fon submission of our AV pnoposal is 2/1'4in talking with the Hub today, we should stay on tanget and plan to have oun proposal ready by 2/9. hJe don't have to submit it then, but if it is ready by 2/9, the Hub can take a look at it, and offer us feedback. We then have a few days to tweak it as needed. We should stay on tanget for 2/9, best we can.

However,

At this time, there ane no meetings or presentations set for. lust the deadline of 2/9 (for 2/L4 submission date).

we need

to be

The review

of our proposal will

done
I

in Apnil by the Approval

Authority.

I am attaching the final draft proposal fonm we need to use for . the AV proposal. It is a hJord document, so we may enter data right on it.
Attention: AV committee: On the proposal fonm page manked 2, "Equipment", the fonm asks about the www.r'kb.us <http://www.rkb.us> This is a FEMA under login website caIled Responder Knowledge Base. We talked about this bniefly on Tuesday.

Equipment List the equipment and the Authonized Equipment List number the www.nkb.us <http: / /www.nkb.us> website

fnom

Oun Business Manager, Lynne Ohlson here at BPD has access to that site and has made a request . of us. Dinector Ohlson has requested that we contact 2-3 othen AV vendons listed on this site as comparison products. Note that on this website, the BATTS vehicle is listed. But it is not the only one. What I need the AV committee to do is to contact 2-3 of the other vendons listed and ask for a quote, just like we did fon the BATTS

Adan: f am not able to send the RKB website info via email. I only have it hard copy. If I may, I would ask the BPD membens of the AV committee: Ryan, Ed and Katie to have this assignment. I will put the hard copy info in your boxes. A11 you wilt need to do is contact these other vendons and ask for a proposal similar to what we did on the BATTS. This needs to be done soon. I will let you decide who
does what vender, etc.

.
submitted

I have requested a copy of a pnoposal that to use as a guide. That is forthcoming.

Our next group meeting

has alneady

been

is slated for 2/6, 1"t00 at the PSB.

Thank you.

From: Rateaver, Andnew Sent: TuesdaY, JanuarY 3L, 2Ot2 3:47 PM Adams To: Rateav"", nnd""*;-Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; DanielHart, Alyson L'; Reece' David K'; Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Oki6s, Joseph; M.;.mlirrick@albanyca.orgl Galvan, Edward; Greenwood, Andnew; ohlson, Lynne; upson, Erik M' Andersen, Ryan M.; dannoflO@gmai1'com; Upson' Erik Subject: UASI: Tues 1/31 uPdate

Thank you

for the meeting today'

We

are

on

track to get oun proposals

completed '

As discussed: we are hampened with the fact state of flux. It changes from day to day'

that the information

pnovided bY UASI is

in

Today'

s meetings:

for our The vehicle group has come uP with some good sPecs . we have a good start' vehicle. At today's meeting there were some minor-adjustments, but with o EverYone: Please review the BATT S AP handout that was distributed with the specs ' everyone satisfied any stakeholders. We want to make sure that we have

.ThelssueofparkingcameUpasafundingissue.Perhapswe ior funding for a panking location' o Mike, Ed and Adan/Eric: please check on locations (GGF, village' BFD warehouse) to see if viable for parking
sfroufa consider asking

Do we use an Alarm access?

existing building? Build a

new one

(butler building style)?

. o

PnoPosal PreP:

grant proposal fonm' Rat passed out the latest draft version of the UASr ipply for the first responden This form is what will need to be io*pr"t"a in order to aiuiaed up sections to work vehicle. Adan and Rat reviewed the document with the gnoup'rna

AdanwillcheckwithEBRtoseeiftheirAVwasUASIpunchased.
Rat

will tny

and locate

a completed form to use as a model

Hart, Alyson L.
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:
Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, January 31,20124:41 PM Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine Ohlson, Lynne Specs for Proposed First Responder (armored) Vehicle Berkeley PD BATT S AP REV BY TAG JJ120126A.pdf

Attachments:

Attached are the armored vehicle specs.

UC, Albany andour own people are recorrunending this configuration, to include a beefed up suspension and a diesel engine.

I want to make

sure you have reviewed this material and are aware of what we are doing.

From: Jeremy Johnson Imailto;ieremy@armoredcars.com] Sent: Monday, January 30,ZALZ 7:00 AM To: Galvan, Edward Subject: Re: Quote #: JJ120119A - Berkeley, Ca.
Ed:

Please see attached quote with the added options you requested. I did not break them out on this, but rather just added them to the quote and made a final quotation with everything in. Please let me know if you need any further information.

Thanks Jeremy Johnson

Director of lnternational Operations

The Armored Group, LLC 817-332-4646 Office 817-291.-4956 Cell 817-394-2499 Fax

www.swat-vehicles.com www.armoredcars.com

From:'Ga lva n, Edward " <EGa lva n @ci. berkelev.ca. us> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:26:29 -0500
To: Jeremy Johnson <ieremv@armoredca rs.com> Subject: FW: Quote #: JJ1ZA1L9A - Berkeley, Ca.

HiJeremy,
Thanks for getting back to me last week on this via phone. Any luck finding me some "ball park" priced on these options?
Thanks,
Ed

From: Galvan, Edward Sent: Thursday, January 26,2012 10:28 AM To: ieremy@a rmoredca rs.iom Cc: Galvan, Edward Subject: Quote #: JJ120179A - Berkeley, Ca.
Hello Jeremy,

I was asked by Sgt. Rateaver to head up a work group to decide which AV vendor to endorse and provide a "firm" quote. We were able to narrow the list to two vehicles yours/ and the "Bearcat".
The work group has selected your vehicle, for two distinct reasons: 1. The interoperability of having the same vehicle as other agencies in the region, same model, same controls and the ability for drivers to 'Jump" into any of the vehicles. 2. The larger cargo area, for personnel and equipment. We were working off of your quote #JJ120119A. There are just a few options that we feel are needed to be added to this quote: 1. The diesel engine packaged 2. The suspension up-grade 3. A 16,000 pound electric winch (which ever model/poundage unit your recommend)

4. A tow package
Do you have an "options" cost sheet, that we could add or deduct from the quote,until while we figure out what

ultimately go with? A rough estimate for now will be fine. We are on a pretty aggressive time line for this project (Feb.
09,20L2 ).

If possibte, could I get the revised quote or options price sheet by Monday Jan. 30th.
Thanks Jeremy,
Ed Galvan

Berkeley Police Dept. Cell: 5i0-579-2L28

egalvan@ci. berkelev.ca. us

From: Sent: To:

Cc:

Subject: Attachments:
All:

Rateaver, Andrew Monday, January 23,2012 9:29 AM Daniel Adams; Adan Tejada Okies, Joseph; Smith, Katherine; Reece, Kevin A.; Hart, Alyson L.; Eric Tejada; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M. FW: BATT S AP Quote Berkeley PD BATT S AP BY TAG JJ120119A .pdf

This is an armored vehicle quick quote I got from the Armored Group. The following specs are very similar to what other Iocal agencies have received or ordered, including HPD, Alameda City, EBR/Parks, and ACNTF. In fact, this is the vehicle that was on display at the County Tactical Commanders meeting not too long ago. The manufacturer refers to it as the "bay area package" because most of his bay area business is ordering thls vehicle. The Armored Group also had this vehicle on display at a UASI convention as an "asset" that might be bought using UASI funding.

I am sending this on to you as an example of the type of information and specs we will need in order to complete our armored vehicle proposal. I am NOT suggesting this is the vehicle for us.
Note also the proposal says BERKELEY, That is in name only. From : Jeremy Joh nson Lieremy@a rmoredcars.com]

Sent: Friday, January 2A,2AtZ L2:37 To: Rateaver, Andrew Subject: BATT S AP Quote
Sgt. Rateaver:

AM

Thank you for the call today. I have attached a quotation based on the units I have in your area and that are currently ordered. As you will see, this particular BATT S AP has a lot of options and is quite the truck fo the money. The BATT includes; .50 Cal Ball Ammo Protection, Run Flat Tires Inserts, 360 Degree Rotating Turret, Multiple Height Sniper Step, Exclusive Flip Up Rescue Seat to allow entry/exit from side of vehicle, the V Mux Computer system, Back Up Camera, full insulation package, large HVAC system, etc.
appreciate the opportunity and I look forward to helping you with the procurement. need, don't hesitate to contact me. If you need references, let me know.

If there is anything you

Sincerely, Jeremy Johnson Director of International Operations The Armored Group, LLC 817-332-4646 Office 817-291-4956 Cell 817-394-2499 Fax www. swat-vehicles.com www.arnoredcars.com

Hart. Alvson L.

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:

Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, APril 03, 2012 9..02 PM Rateaver, Andrew Adan Tejada; DanielAdams; Eric Tejada; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; Curtin, Tom;Andersen, Ryan M. UASI UPdate: above the Line

Thanks to alt of you who responded to this urgent nequest. hJe were able to turn things around and get UASI a quick answer. I, myself, was out on a snowfield 3 miles fnom the nearest anything when my email buzzed. It was UASI calling saying we could have $ L67,AOO if we could make the purchase fon that amount. But we had like... hours to decide, before the monies wene passed on.

Putting out the ca1I, I got ahold of Tom, who put out the word.

In the meantime, I was hearing back fnom loe in Japan, Ryan in Hawaii, Alyson in in Vacavil1e... and many of you in places other than work.

Tahoe, Dave

Erik was able to get us a quote on the fly. It is fon a Bearcat, albeit a 2009 lease retunn. Don't know all the details, but as soon as they become available, they will be passed on.
updated $L67,O00.

UASI. Late word j-s our is actually $t6g+.

So...
Rat
-

Thank you everyone. Tom, Enik: good job.

0n Apr 3,'2A12, at 2:32 PM, "Rateaver, Andrew" <ARateaven@ci.berkeley.ca.us> wrote: '$L6t,000 tor us, as first up "be1ow the Iine". > UASI has > Can we purchase an AV > Need

for this

amount?

doubt

it.

to give UASI an answer soon. Like 24 houns.

>

BpD

has come up with a possible solution. Read next email. Advise me on what you think.
ASAP.

> Send me your feedback

> Sent via

tactical uplirik, from Tahoe

Hart, Alyson L.
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Tuesday, April 03, 2012 2:33 PM Adan Tejada; Daniel Adams; Eric Tejada; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Okies, Joseph Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K. UASI update: Urgent

Subject: UASI has $'l,67,AOO

fon us, as first up "below the lj-ne".

Can we purchase an AV Need

BPD

for this

amount?

doubt

it.
on what you think.

to give UASI an answer soon. Like 24 houns.

with a possible solution.
ASAP.

has come up

Read

next email. Advise

me

Send me

your feedback

Sent via tacticaL uplink, fnom

Tahoe

Hart, Alyson L.
From: Sent: To:
Upson, Erik M. Wednesday, April 04, 201212:50 PM Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne, mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward;Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Durbin, Michael R.; Rateaver, Andrew;Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation 9266 BERKELEY.pdf

Subject: Attachments:

From: Jim Massery fmailto:jmasserv@lencoarmor.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2AL212:AB PM To: Upson, Erik M. Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Erik,

Here is your official used Lenco BearCat Quotation We are very excited about the prospect of providing you a Lenco BearCat.

I promise you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

All that is needed is for your department to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9266 and the Dollar Value of the Quote. Upon receipt of an approved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediately added to our Schedule.
NO DEPOSIT is required and payment is NOT due until AFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat.

Give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you again for this oppotunity to assist you. Sincerely Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 800-444-5362 ext.114
CONFIDfNTIAI-l'1-\' NCTICE Thrs e-marl anci an,/ files transmrtted iviih ii rriay coniain coniidentiai, privlleged and proprieiary information of Lencc rlrn:ored t/ehicies and are iniended solely for the use of lhe i:rdivtdiral or eniity io \,c/nom they a;e addressed Any unai;thcrizeci use or cliscloslre is prohibited if yor-r have receii'ed ihis e-r"nail in error please notify the sender This emarl mar; also contaii-: technicaldata relaling to a "Defense Ai"iicle" vrrith;ri ihe meanlng cf the lnternatisnalTraffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Part 120) The iransferorctisclosure of this infornratlon to any non-U S pei-son or company urithout an expori iiiense approved by the Uniieci States Deparlmeni cf Siate, Directorate of D-^fense Trad* Conirols is prohibiteC urrder fecleral iaw

Adan: I am not able to send the RKB website info via email. I only have it hard copy. lf I may, I would ask theBpDmembersoftheAVcommittee: Ryan,EdandKatietohavethisassignment. lwillputthehard copy info in your boxes. All you will need to do is contact these other vendors and ask for a proposal similar to wfrat we did dn the BATTS. This needs to be done soon. I will let you decide who does what vender, etc.

o .
Thank you.

lhaverequestedacopyofaproposalthathasalreadybeensubmittedtouseasaguide.
forthcoming
Our next group meeting is slated for 2/6,1100 at the PSB'

Thatis

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, January 31,20123:47 PM To: Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Cc: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne; Upion, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanvca.org; Galvan. EdwardlrAndersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Upson, Erik
M.

Subject:

UASI: Tues 1/31 update

Thank you for the meeting today. We are orl track to get our proposals completed.

As discussed: we are hampered with the fact that the information provided by UASI is in a state of changes from day to day. Today's meetings:

flux' It

The vehicle group has come up with some good specs for our vehicle. At today's meeting there were some minor adjustments, but we have a good start. o Everyone: Please review the BATT S AP handout that was distributed with any stakeholders. rf! We want to make sure that we have everyone satisfied with the specs.
"i The Issue of parking came up as a funding issue. Perhaps we should consider asking for funding for a parking location. o Mike, Ed and AdanlEric: please check on locations (GGF, village, BFD warehouse) to see if viable for parking o Do we use an existing building? Build a new one (butler building style)? Alarm access?

Proposal Prep: o Rat passed out the latest draft version of the UASI grant proposal form. This form is what will need to be completed in order to apply for the first responder vehicle. Adan and Rat reviewed the document with the group and divided up sections to work on. o Adan will check with EBR to see if their AV was UASI purchased. o fu!-willtry and locate a completed form to use as a model

Bearcat

Our working group decided on the

Bearcat'

Please see attached quote (final)'

Bearcat Proposal (Pa$erwork) o Adan provided us a good working draft for this proposal. Thank you.

lhavetakenthedraftformandputitinto"UASl language". Notethat-inordertoqualifyforUASl,we need"nexus to terrorism , need to meet certain criteria and show among other things, regional

o o

forth' relationship to the 2012 UASI Strategic Goals and objectives and so ,- --,1.^ reviewed prior draft forms that were submittedI have been in contact with our Hub Coordinator and group's behalf- Please see attached and review Based on that, I have completed a final draft on our Everything in red is new/added'
lfthegroupisokwiththis"red"draft,thiswillbethedraftsubmittedtoUASl.
to finalize this.

Wehaveaboutaweek

BATT vehicle

Napa just took delivery of their new BATT Attached are their

vehicfe
I

'

comments

fr
ii'

'{'rmored

rncar was sent the The AV proposal waq seni to the Hub Coordinator in draft form

car o

It needs to be tweak a little, but otherwise, we are on solid grand and the proposal reads the way it needs to ftad.

o o .

The deadline for submittal is

3ll3ll2.

That will not be an issue for us.

Realize this is a long term project, and we will be into 2013 before this

red[

gets

off the groundo

Ryan has done some outstanding flollow-up with the Armored Group to address some of our concerns from the last meeting. Please see his comments attached. See also two quotes from the Armored Group that reflect our concerns.

Lastly on this issue, Ryan has gotten approval for us to visit Napa, where the latest BATT was group delivered. We can make arrangements to visit Napa and see another version of a BATT if the
/'

i
r
The Opportunity to rdquest funding for an armored car is here. Due to funding carry-overs and other UASI financial resources, we have an opportunity to submit a propoial for an armored car... now! To do this, we would need to complete yet another UASI proposalform and submit itby 2/9. There would be a follow-up oral presentation of the proposal as well... similar to what we d.id to obtain the MACIAC trqthing. This is a fantastic opportunity for us with a short event horizon: UASI is taking proposals on a firm deadline. This is not some arbitrary date in the future. We are already involved with UASI with our MACTAC proposal. Our MACTAC proposal involves regional collaboration with APD and UC. This is a strong point when applying for funding for the armored vehicle. We'apply for tfre armored vehicle with the other regionalagencies... we are more attractive to U{'$1.

r r r '

Action

ttem:
Complete the
FY 2072 Projeat Proposal Form,

i:'
frl/
,

to include: mission areas; H.S. alignment strategy; Funding; lmpacts and Outcomes, Project Management: and Sustainment.

Obtain specs for the armored vehicle we desire: c We might consider the "Bay Area" package from the Armor Group. AG has supplied or is delivering vehicles to several Alameda County agencies, including EBR, Napa, ACNTF, Alameda City and Livermore. AG is already known to UASI'

I need direction on these matters. How do you wish me

to proceed?

We owe our partners at APD and UCPD this information as well. However I am sending it to you for first perusal.

May I suggest that I call a meeting and invite interested parties and stakeholders? We also could then divide up the work. The 2/9 deadline is fast approaching. lf we move on this, I think we are in a unique position to be successful'
End.

w
File

a-

!fl,

https

, ,., rkb,us'

.,:-

Edit View Favorites Tools Help

i;y,Favorites . t&,

,i!::1fi,"j::::!!:Ir:*':{=-Tl

ffi${ffi
{
Fre',r

Ent gr,m*d #isp[*y Fmg*: &ffiL &

I
tr:ve-ol-srf *l
r,le:+

SffiL

i12'lE-00.C:l,ilD,oir

f';l

eur*pr:l i ta n

Fi ed ic a'i H a sp,on s

Sy s t e m
j

f"1

f,,lR SX P

rr:gra

nrl

Ye s

BLrffe

r Io ne

ro rer:

iiott

r,rgratti {BZPF
p

l'J,:
(

trii,.,er's
E

Li,c er:ls

e Security i: milt
n,gen"r

rng ra m n L Sfi p J: f.J0

fr

m erg en

c1 fJs,n

*rit

p,er-f'*rm

lu

e,G

t'ants

IJ F 6

Emeryency Opxra'rions Cenler

{Eil[i

frr:ar:r!

Frngrani:
l,Jo

Nn

Freight Raii Secur:it1 6,rant F'rr:gram {FRSGF}r

lnterciry Eus $ecu:l.itr1firanli Frugram IlESfiFl;

lriiE

Ye,s

rcitli

F,a

$,s,e{rger ft ail lAmtrfl

ki:

I,Jfi

hrreruperai:rle En: ergenry f onrfllllni[alinns Grant Pl u grnm (IECGFJ: l'Jo

I-ar.v ErrrF*rcen:,ent
La

Terrrrris,m Frler,snti+n Acti,dB {LETFA-SHSP}l \'es

ry Enf*r."re nr ent Te

rrtris rn F r,*Jenii

o.n

*r[ilJi ty { L ETP A -UA

l,lL:

}:

Ye s

Idonpr:eflr Secu$F} {irant pF*gr,Ent (l'lSSF}t Cirera tiotr StoneE a rden, fi

rurE

I Prod]ralrl

(,UF,SG ),::'fle

port Securiry Grant Frogranr {PSGPI: Yes

pLrllj,ic SEfetli lnfersp,flrfrblE" f,Bfiifitunjratirr,r+s {F SfCJ Grant Program: lnes

R*gion*l,f nfastr.opfric F,re p.a i:,edne ss S ffi rtt

$[ate
Tra
n

F rr:rg ra

RC F

F]:

No

t-lo,nreJsncl S,ecurity S+eur-i t?

G

Pr*grtnt i$l'*sFIl
l'.J

Ye-t

sil

ra

n,E F

r-oqla rn (TSGP Jt

Tritral tlr:urelunil

See Ll$tY

fir,nn[ Frr:"gram (-[H SSFJi YeB

Urban *re,ns $ec.ur;ily liritiative{U*$l) Frcqranl: Yes

Gran[ lJotes This categorr inrludes special-purpr-rse vehicl*s flir tfie transFort ,-rf CBEf IE terrnrisnt resF0nse equipn" tn the.incident site. Lil:ensing and registrslirn fees ale the resprtnsibilitt,rflhe jurisdiu-tisn snd,are no'l a,

From: Andersen, Ryan M. Sent: Wednesday, February 29,2A12 3:47

PM

Rateaver. Andrew
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Ohlson, Lynne Monday, April 09, 20121:26 PM Rateaver, Andrew RE: Confidential: BearCat Officlal Quotation

Anytime you are free, stop in

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Monday, April 09, 20L2 9:32 AM To: Ohlson, Lynne Subject: RE; Confidential: BearCat Official Quotation
May I meet with you... to review this new development? I am pretty much wide open.

From: Ohlson, Lynne Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 L2:52 ?M To: Upson, Erik M.; Rateaver, Andrew Subject: Confidential: BearCat Official Quotation

We need to discuss the process that we are about to undertake. We must be very clear howlwho is purchasing the vehicle. Please be mindful of the use of emails in disct-issions on this topic.
From: Upson, Erik M. Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:50 PM To: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, -loseph; Haft, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@omail.com; Durbin, Michael R.; Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Subject: FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

From : Jim Massery [mailto :imassery@ lencoarmor.com]

Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:08 PM To: Upson, Erik M. Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Erik,

Here is your official used Lenco BearCat Quotation. We are very excited about the prospect of providing you a Lenco BearCat.

promise you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

All that is needed is for your department to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9266 and the Dollar Value of the Quote.
Upon receipt of an aporoved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediatelir added to our Schedule.

NO DEPOSIT is required and payment is NOT due until AFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat.

Give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you again for this opportunity to assist you.
Sincerely

Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 800-444-5362 ext. LL4
i;*ruf l*[t,ll"lAllTy N*Tl*il. Ti.ri* *-rrt*il *nrj *ny fii*s tr*;rsnij*1*s !./ilh it rrray c;&$l*in L:*nlidsttiii*i, priyii*Eed u*ti ;:r*pri*lar5r i*{o1rx*iir:* *i l-**c* Ar**r**j V*hi*i** arci sr* i*tei;el*tJ sol*iy i'*r ih* ilse oi ih* individu*} *r *ntity.to wh*r,: pir:x** ii:*y or* arJr1r*g**rj. A*y;,rr';ai:th*i.i;*d us* *r *isel*sL;r.* i* pr*i-*rii:rt*r*. if y*u have r*r:*iv*d thi* *-r:"ixil it"r eri*r "fhis enrrit r-n;ly *ls* c*r:t*iir i*i:hnir:aliiet* relnii*g irr a "ile{sns* Articl*" vriihin thr *:**ning i:fth* n*tit', th* scnri*r. int*rnati*i:ri Trxffi* ii': Arr"*s ft*g}lalions 1?2 *fft F*ri 12*]. Th* t#rnsf*r +r clisci*s*;'* *t this i*f*irm*li*rl l* e*y n*;"r-U.S, ilir**t*rate *t **l*tts* $sr,sc6 *r **rrrpfily v,:ithqr.r; *r"r Jxp*ri li**ns* *p:pr*v*r* i:y th* Unit*tl $txt*s il*p*rirn*nt *f Si*t*, pr+hibii*rJ *n<J*r i*rlet*! law, 'lr*d* C**tr,tls i*

Responder Knowledge Base - Product Comparison

Page 1 of

Cootacl

Us Tutorial FAQ

Downloads Help

s"ur"h, FEIIA Prep.rednesa Grants & AEL

Other

[*-----------__l
Other
Ask An

l-61

rip,
LLIS

Grants

SEL & Integrated Display

i
My

saven

Training & Education

Content I

RKB

Focus

Areas

Expert

Related DHS Sites

Fnoduet eomparEson

Protech lllrnta Vehicles

7
M

General
an

ufacturer

Lenir

Armored Vehicles

Armor Holdings Protech Manta Vehicles

The Armored Group, LLC

Model Number Part Numbor

8C55003 8C55003

BATT

Availabllity Notes
contact manrracturer for Contact manufacturer Contact Manutacturer

Product Dimensions Weight lnformation Provided By

20 x8x 10 feel
16.5001bs

Lenco Armored Vehicles 10 Betnr lndustrial Or Piltsfield, Massachusetts 01 201 UNITED STATES Emai I : iitrj@le!@Altrgrcqrq

Deiense Technologies 3120 E Mission Blvd Ontario, California 91761 UNITED STATES

The Armored Group LLC 221 W Lancaster Ave Fort Worth 76102

WEbsite: !Au!!gl AflIggElEsB Page Last Updated Aptil25,2O11

Email: l@B@g!q.949ldjrssj9r8 WebBite: htto://M.defensetechnoloov.com December

1

Email: CdgelAaE[gteslgeEjq@ Websito: h!!pJ trww.swaLygblt l99-Q9E

3, 201

Octobet 24,2011

Home

Products

FEMA Preparedness

ccnts

&

AEL

Oher GEnts

SEL & htegraled

Display

SAVER

Trening &

Education,

Oher

Cof,ient

LLIS

Help

Releence herein to any specific commercialprcdqclq pDcesses, or sevice' by tnde name, t@demark, manhhdu@r, or otheui* does not necesfiily constitule or imply its endo6erent, @ommendation, orhvodng bythe lJniled StatesGovemment. Neitherthe uniled SbtesGovernment nor any of ils emptoyees make anyMftnty, expess otimplied, including but not imited to the wa@nties ol nerchantabilv and fitness lot a pafticular putpose lor any spEtfrc commercia! product, prccess, or seruice Eferenced herein. RKBVersion4.1.1(November2011)CopyrightO20032012DHSFEMA Securitv&PrivacvDisclaimer

https ://www.rkb.us/compare.cf,rn?content_id:

57 103,82120,206924

1/3U2012

Responder Knowledge Base - Product Comparison

Page 1

ofl

,*,"1'Elaii{E*:
PrBp.rcdoos! Grarrt3 & AEL
Other Grants
SEL & lntegrated Display SAVER

Training & Education

Other Content

Welcome, Lynne

Froduct eor*rparisoar

.ffi,
lncident Rsoont Vohlcle - MARSHALL
6XEX6

Gsnoral Armored Solutions, lnc TK.4

Manufactured on demand GBneral Purpose Vehicles (GPV) MARSHALL 6X6X6

Manufactlrer
Model Number Part Number

General Purpose Vahicles (GPV) SERGEANT

Availability Availability Notes

MSRP

Manufactured on demand
$'185,250.00 Base Price

Available Now! Contact Manufacturer Short

Available Nowl
Contact Manufacturer

Product Dimensions

20'Lx8.25'Hx8'W
't8,000 rbs

22:3'

(L) 9L '1' (H)

8'- 6' (W

24',4" (L) 8'6'.(H)

Weight

(Curb:) Short 34,000 lbs / Long 44,000

Pointofcontact
lnformation Provided By

lbs

Curb \ bight 24,600 lbs

Gailv. Lighi Amored Solutions lnc

20 Keeler St
PittsJield, Massachusetts 01 201 UNITED STATES

General Purpose Vehicles (GPV) 31291 Comcast Dr New Haven, Michigan 48048 UNITED STATES Email: oov@oov.com

General Purpose Vehicles (GPV) 31291 Comcast Dr Nw Haven, Michigan 48048

Em.ll:gpgagre@
Wabslte: VvVr/W.GPV. COM August 1, 2008

UNITED STATES

Websits: WWWGPV.COM Page Last Updated

January 3,2012 July 21, 2008

Home

Produds

FEMA Prcpaledness Grahb

I AEL

Othar

Gmnts

SEL & lDlegrated

Displsy

SAVER

Training &

Educetion

Other

Content

LL|S

Hetp

Releence heein to any spscilic commercislprcductq prc@sses, or seryices by tnde nare, tadema*, manuhcluer, or otheryise does not neEssatily constitute ot imply its endorerent, r*ommndation, ot hvodng by the United Slates GovemrenL Neither the Uni6d States Goyemnent nor any of its efrplot@s make aDy wannty, ex@ss or imptied, including bul not limited to the wamnlies of reEhantability and filness fot a padicular puryose lor any sp*ifrc commerciat prcduct, p@@sq or se?ice c6Bn;ed hebin. RKBVersion4.1.1(Novembe.2011)Copyright@20032012DHSFEMA Securitv&PrivacyDisclaimer ResoonderKnowtedoeBasePartners

https ://www.rkb. uS/compare.cfm?content_id:2 407 4 5,9 469 4,1 3 4821

U3U2An

Responder Knowledge Base - Product Comparison

Page 1 of I

ContactUs Tuto.ial FAQ Downloads

s.u'"h,
FEilA Pr.parsdness Grants & AEL
Other Grants SEL & lntegrated Display
Lynne

l*-

*--]

He,p

l-Ei-l
Olher

rip"

SAVER

fraining & Education

Content

LLIS

Ohlsonl

LoGoUT

Fnsdatet eompan6som

Ballistic Amorcd T.c{ic8l Transoort XL

v General Manufacturer
Model Number Part Number

BATT XL

Dolmen Corporation TRAC41

Amored Solutions, lnc

The Armored Group, LLC BATTXL BATTXL

Manufaetured on demand

Availability Notes

Depending on lhe configuration and installad equipment, but in most cases with 34 weeks ARO (afier receipt of confirmed order)
Depends on configuration
12'1" L X

Contact Menufacturer

MSRP

$185,250.00 Base Price

Contact Manufacturer

Product Dimensions Weight

Point of Contacl

69" WX 91"H

20'Lx8.25'Hx8'W
18,000 tbs

16,000 lbs (7300 Kgs)

GailV. Light
Dolmen Corporalion 216 Broome Corporate Parkway Conklin, New York 13748

lnformalion Provided By

Armored Solutions lnc 20 Keeler St

Pitisfl eld, Massachusetts 01201

Website: Page Last Updated

UNITED STATES dolmencoro.com

ffi

UNITED STATES

The Armored Group LLC 221 W LanstAr Ave Suite 12002 Fort Worth, fexas 76102 UNITED STATES

Email: odoar(Oarmoredears.mm Wcbait3:

Jaouary 3,20'12

May 26,2OOg

Oclobet 24.20't1

Home

Products

FEMA Preparedness

Grants 8

AEL

Other

Grants

SEL & lntegralBd

Displey

SAVER

Trainmg &

Education

ffier content

LL|S

Help

RefeEn@ heein to any speciltc comrercial prcducls, prc@sses, or lNies by tE& nafre, tademark, manu, ,cturer,-or gthe&lse does ,ot reessa ity constitute or imply its endo@ment, @mmendation, or lavoing by the United Slat6 GovemmenL Neither the l)nited States Governrent nor any of its enployees make any winnty, expess dr implied, including but not limiled to the wannlies ol merchantabilit! and fitness for a padicular putpose lot any sp@ifrc comrircial prduct, poes, or ieruice eflened herein. RKBVersion4.1.1(November2011)CopyrightO200$2012DHSFEMA Securitv&PrivacvDisclaimer RespondeiKnowtdoeBasepartners

https /lwww. rkb. us/compare. cfm?content id=2 1 97 8 5,2407

:

5,21 227 9

u3112012

Responder Knowledge Base - Knowledge Base Search

Page

I of2

Contact

Us

Tutoriat FAQ Oownloads lielp

s""r"h,
FEIIA Prepar6dn.gs GranB & AEL
Other Grants SEL & lntegrated Display SAVER

f------__l

l-61

rip,

fraining & Education

Other Conlenl
DHS Sites

Knowledge Base SeaneEn

Search:
Results for Search String: "armored" AND "vehicles"

Ir*.wsearcril@rip"
f-c..p*"]l-cEI
Result(s) 1 - 24 of 24

(ALL - 8s)

AEL / SEL ltems (14)

AEL (7) sEL (7)

Grants and Assistance Programs (1 Federal (1 ) LL|S

(1

fr
ry ry
)

Descriptjon .

DisPlaY: 35

T'l

Dolmen Corporation The T.R.A.C. fl is a multifunctional, very versatile, amored tactical response vehicle offering rsponders protection in numsrous dangerous situations. Dolmen is about saving and safeguarding life - Armored Solutions, lnc TK4 is a tactical rBsponse vehicle for law enforement and government dgencies built on a Ford F-550 chassis and armored to NIJ Level lV. Standard equipment include 4x4 for rugged terrain and 360' rolating tutret.

NIMS Resource Types (1i

Operational Assessments (4) NTOA Member Tests (4)

t"
E

f-

n
T

Biltistic Armored Tactical Transoort XL - BATT XL - The Armored Group, LLC. Ballistic Armorcd Tactical Transport XL (BAfi Xt) is an armored, tactical, and rescue vehicle built in the USA and designed for polie and military use.
- The Armored Group, LLC The Rapid Deployment Vehicle produced by The Armored Group srues as a mobile mmmand post and a launch pad for taclical operations.

Product (53)

E
E

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (2) Operational and US&R Equipment (35) Rope Safety/Rope Rescue Equipment (1 Lights and lllumination Equipment (1)

- The Operator's Choice for Tac6cal lnnovation (OCTI) The ASRV FIST is a retrofitted and customized Ford E350 HD Van with advanced patented ballistic technology capabla of penetrating any standard double door system allowing immediate respons to an A6{ive Shootgr incident.
-

General Purpose Vehicles (GPV)

Slructures/Shields/Physical Security Equipment (7) Vehicles {24)

Other Operational and US&R Equipment (1)

The GPV vehicles are designed, developad, and manufactured as a system of variants covering the nseds of the military, homeland defense, law entorcement, disaster response, fire, search & rescue, and emargency '5iEt responder" requirements.

E E

Law Enforment (1)

lnformation Technology (2)

5
i*

lncidsnt Rasoonse Vehicle - SERGEANT - General Purpose Vehicles (GPV) The Sergeanl 4x4 enables law enforcement to respond quickly, safely, and efieciively to critical situations involving special responss interyention, hazardous materials, NBC threats, search & rescue, and homeland security.

LncoB.E.A.R. -LencoArmoredVehicles

El Communications (9)

Oetection (2)

s
Efl
T&ET

Ths Lnco B.E.A.R. is a CBRNE lncident Response Vehicle.

n
tr

Lenco Bearcat - Lenco Armored vehicles The Bearcat is a CBRNE incident response vehicle.

EI Decontamination (1)

Protech Manta Vehicles -Armor Holdings The Manta Riot Contrcl Water Cannon is protecled from high powered rifle fire uP to and including the 7.62 NATO round. lt is equipped with a 2,000 gallon water storage tank and
can produce approximately 250 lbs. or pressure. 31ft Mobile Command - Mobile Concepts by Scotty 31 foot long mobile command trailer wilh 2 work

E E

Medical (2)

Publications & Relerences (2)

n
T

stations

E E E

Govemment

(1 ) (1 )

Non-Government

station.

35ft Communitv Policino Trailer & Work Station - Mobile Concepts by Scotty 35 foot long cbmmunity policing unit (trailer) with fingerprinulD area and computer work

Standards (6) Slandards (6) Training (2)

r*. ! -Eal
('1

n
D

- Mobile Concepts by Scotty 35 foot length community policing unit (trailr) with galley, bath and fingerprinvlD. Used to builC public awareness and promote safety lesscns to lhe comriunity. Mobile

classroom.

i.. - Mobile Concepts by Scotty

El Archived Grants & Assistance Programs

Federal (1 )

ffi
E B-

35 foot length mobile command trailer - Mobile ioncepts by Scotty 35 foot long mobile command trailor with 4 work slations

n
tr

36ft Mobile Command - Mobile Concepts by Scotty 36 foot length 5th wheel mobile command trailer with 3 work stations
- Mobile Concepts by Scotty 39 foot length mobile command trailer with 4 work stations and 4 rooms conference room, work room, galley and bathroom.

https ://www. rkb. us/search. cfm?query:arnored+vehicle

il3U2012

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent: To: Subject: Jim Massery [jmassery@lencoarmor.com] Tuesday, April 10, 20121:23 PM Rateaver, Andrew RE: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Rat,

The only place you will be able to go to see it is at Lenco.

Is it at a classified DoD Nuclear Weapons facility that does not permit visitors of their force
protection equipment.
Once it is put on our schedule, after it arrives here, you can expect turn around in approximately 90-120 days.
Jim From: Rateaver, Andrew Imailto:ARateaver@ci'berkeley.ca,us] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 3:04 PM To: Jim Massery Subject: FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation
Also....

Once we added the truck to your schedule, what is the turnaround time for the vehicle to be ready for delivery?

From: Rateaver, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, April 70,201211:36

To:'jmassery@lencoarmor.com'

AM

Subject: FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Jim:

Where would we need to go to have a first-hand look/inspection of this vehicle? Can you advise? rat

From: Upson, Erik M, Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:50 PM To: Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Haft, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson,
Lynne; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com; Durbin, Michael R.; Rateaver, Andrew; Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Subject: FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

From: Jim Massery [mailto:jmassery@lencoarmor.com] Sent: B/ednesday, Apri! 04, 2012 L2:08 PM To: Upson, Erik M. Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Erik, Here is your official used Lenco BearCat Quotation. We are very excited about the prospect of providing you a Lenco BearCat.

I promise you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

All that is needed is for your department to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9266 and the Dollar Value of the Quote.
Upon receipt of an approved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediately added to our Schedule.
NO DEPOSIT is required and payment is NOT due until AFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat.

Give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you again for this opportunity to assist you.
Sincerely Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 800-444-5362 ext. 114
i:#Nf:l,f i:l"jTl&i tTY l{{iTi{::ilr Tii!i; *-fi'':*il *nd snV lils,: ir":nsryirderJ ,*ith ii ffi*y c*t":tain l*riiidentia!, ;:rivilegod t*rI i* tuitolii srrjil*si.pi:, infarrnaii*n r:f L*n** Arm*rrrj '*'*hjcl*s *r"rii *i-r lnt*nd*iJ so1*ly f*r th* tts.; o{ thr* indiiiitiual r:r cntity ti:is *-maii in r:ii*l- piees* ii,*y *r* eilijr**s*<j. Any i"r*;l*iiir:rir*ij us* or di**i*si.irt* i* *rr:hrhli*d. if yr93 hav* i's**irr*d nriti, il:* **i":r;1*r. This *r"r"rrli rrri:y *is.* cr:*;aiir l**hni**i dnt* r*iating t+ il "ii*fens* ,s\r"tisi*" withln ihe i'n*itnin6 *i th* ii:tern*i!*r.:*tTr,*fiir i* Arr;s lt*gll*ti*n* i?2 Cf e I);rii i2*i. Ti:* ti;lt"'is{*:t *i,iisc}q:sili* *f thi* inf*rn"*li*n tr} *r:y ron-i}.$ ol $tat*, ilii**ior*t* *f Scf*ns* ix.1r:i*n *r {:omi:s1y wirh**l a* i>rp*rl lt**ilsf ap:pr*'.red il\r th* tJ*ii*ci $iL:};rs D*:p*rtr"l*nt
y--. -j... l,1rlrij
r*

- .I: r,i::,: L,r,ri ^,-a

:

- ;.",,.^r 1rl,'r1;!'.jiir.lU.;:1j-r: i, i-jrJl ii:it*,j

I

fIi;ir-r: 3"

jn1;il j:i,

!:i, !.i,.r.,

Rateaver, Andrew
From:
Sent: Andersen, Ryan M. Tuesday, April 03, 2012 4'.37 PM Rateaver, Andrew

To:

I have available to me here Sgt Rateaver, I got your message shortly after I landed in Hawaii. The only number with Jeremy from Armored is for Armored group. I can call futa tomorrow to get Lenco's contact info. I spoke send me our old quote as well Group briefly *a fr. deflnitely thinks that is a number we can work with. He will around 167,000. as the quotes he gave for Alameda and National City which were both
freight and taxes which is The question becomes if the city, or cities, are going to come out of pocket to cover willing to drive the vehicle about $15,000 or if that has to be apartof the uast money. If it helps, I would be back which means the city would have to cover fuel and time'

I speak with him' Feel once I review the quotes from Jeremy I will forward them to you for your review before free to contact me any time' My cell phone number is
Thank you,
Ryan Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

.':tril"fi#;*?Hif'ffir

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Andersen, Ryan M. Monday, February 06, 2012 2'.23 PM Rateaver, Andrew; Galvan, Edward Lenco

rl

sa

=t& rct= i&q=2012%

ideo
WLa

wlwAA&url=

.comYo2F
2

Tc

hAw&use=AFQ iCN Gzl

3 PJ H

irB M bx3 Btr-q rlwSVb

lfte

get a look the crew compartment of the Lenco is coNSIDERABLY smaller' You do not of the confined gives you an idea at the actual crew compartment, but this combined with the Leno video Matt sent out the operators heads where in the BATT the space compared to the BATT. The Lenco rear side windows are behind is less headroom as well' The windows are above the head. Not only is there room for less people in the Lenco but there headroom and crew crew compartment roof is about head levelwith a helmet on, where the BATT had ample and take comfort in knowing what a movement space. While I completely appreciate tried and proven equipment, worth reconnecting with BATT Bearcat will do under fire, I do not think a BATT should be thrown to the side. I think it is turret bearing and upping to answer the questions about glass thickness, about serviceability (o.r upgradeability) of the find it difficult to I the armor on the engine compartment. ultimately whatever we get is better than what we have. iust an end user which included feedback be outside and be so impressed by a vehicle and hear such positive feedback from and vote Lenco. when it comes down to it from other agencies that are Lenco users just to turn around and come inside vehicle into a mission, ljust do not see that the I am happy with either vehicle and am more than willing to drive either decision is so clearly one over the other'
As you can see in the video above,

Just my two cents. Thank you,

Ofc. Ryan Andersen #4 Crime Analyst - Officer Berkeley Police DePa rtment nvestigations Division 2100 M.L.K,, Berl<eleY, CA94104
I

Office
Email

510-981-5758 randersen@ci.berkelev'ca.us

Cell- 916-826-0063

Rateaver Andrew
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Thursday, February 16,2012 4:22 PM Rateaver, Andrew, Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams Reece, Kevin A.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L.; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne; Upson, Erik M.; mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward;Andersen, Ryan M.; danno136@gmail.com, Upson, Erik M.; Durbin, MichaelR. SSI MACTAC ProposalAlameda County.docx; Comments from Ryan Andersen.docx; BATT by TAG JJ12O213A.pdf 2-16-12"pdl; BATT S AP by TAG JJ120213B.pdf 2-16-12.pdt

Subject: Attachments:

UASI2/16 Update: Working GrouP

I want to thank you for yoq participation in this effort. Ireahze my update emails are lengthy and certainly not the only email you have to read. I am trying to keep them concise, and only send them out when I have several substantial items to convey to the group. Thalk you for being accommodating. MACTAC Update:

As mentioned in the previous update: UASI funding for our MACTAC proposal has been approved' UASI is pleased with our efforts and will be using us as a test/model. If we are successful, they may see if it is feasible to bring this training to the rest of the operational arealtegion.

UASI has identified and approved a vendor for our use. They are Security Solutions International (SSf, based out of Florida. Joe Witty, one of the developers of MACTAC out of LAPD is associated with this group, You may see more about their MACTAC programatthe following website:

SSI is proposing the following format for our training:

Hold 2 of these four day classes training all 3 departments in whomever they wish to
send.

r . . o
See attached

We send our prospective instructors to this TTT class

Note:

these prospective instructors should have attended one of the first 4-day classes.

draft contract.

Action Items

The funding is there and will not expire. However, it would be in our best interest to commit to scheduling.

UASI. We then work directly with the ssI to have the training.

-.

Armored Car The AV proposal was sent to the Hub Coordinator in draft form

o . . .

it needs to be tweak it needs to read.

little, but otherwise, we are on solid grand and the proposal reads the way

The deadline for submitt al

is

3113112.

Thatwill not be an issue for us.

Realize this is a long term project, andwe

will

be into

20i3 before this really gets off the ground.

of our concerns Ryan has done some outstanding follow-up with the Armored Group to address some Armored Group from the last meeting. please see his comments attached. See also two quotes from the
that reflect our concems,
was Lastly on this issue, Ryan has gotten approval for us to visit Napa, where the latest BATT the group delivered. We can make arrangements to visit N apa and see another version of a BATT if feels we need to re-visit this issue.

Please let me know

if you are available to meet on Thursda y,

2123,1000-

200

To: Rateaver, Andrew

Subject

FW: RKB Listing for BATT-S

Sgt. Rateavert
I spoke with the A,rmored group and confirmed that they are on

the FEMA list, See the link below. They are apparently

listed under the same vehicle type

Ryan Andersen #4

as

the Lenco. Hope this helps'

From: Edgar P. McGauley Imailto:edgar@armoredcars,com] Sent: wednesday, rebruary zs, iOti Zr++ prq To: Andersen, RYan M. Subject:
Cc: Jeremy Johnson RKB Listing for BATT-S

Mr. Ryan Andersen,

The FEMA SEL number for our armored vehicles is 12VE-00-MISS. I have provided a link to the RKB listing below. If you require anything else, feel free to give me a ring.

lrtt,s://www.rkb.us/contentdetail.cfm?content-id:207055&quely:the%20armored%20Eroup&ovemidesLlbtYPe

:689

Stay Safe, Edgar McGauley Contract Manager The Armored GrouP, LLC' + 1 .8 1 7.458 .8244 Mobile +1.817.332.4646 Offrce +1.817.394.2499 Fax e ds-ar @ anno redc ars. c o m www.armoredcars.com r.vww. swat-vehicles. com

GSA Schedule Contracts: GS-07F-9375S GS-30F-0020w

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent: To:
Cc: Rateaver, Andrew Monday, Marcfr fi,2A12 2:41 PM Adan Tejada; Mike Larrick dannol3'6@gmail.com, Daniel Adams; Eric Tejada; Andersen, Ryan M.

Subject:

Attachments:

bearcatiinal quote.doix; East Bay Hub Agenda 3-21-12 (2).doc; AV Proposal 3-21 Talking
Points.docx; Armored Vehicle proposal final.doc
be

With the paperworl< done, and the research submj-tted, our final step in this process will an oral presentation regarding our proposal to obtain UASI funds for the purchase of an armored vehicle.

Right now, I

am

scheduling Adan, Mike and

ACSO OES

I to

make

the pnesentation. Here is the plan:

. .

Location:
Prep:

4985 Broden

81.

Dublin

Let's

meet

in the OES Parking lot at 0830 to

review our pnesentation

o presentation:

See attached "talking points" sheet. The actual meeting starts a OgO0. tale could be called at any time after O9AA, and will need to be ready to go- oun presentation is should be about 3-5 minutes. After all the presentations are done, we Ieave the room, while the UASI approving team votes. I have made tentative assignments

as follows:

o o o o

Proposal Background (Rat) Proposal Details (Adan) The Product Specs(Mike) Summany (Rat)

These are tentative assignments. Let me know have attached the relevant material, I think.

if

you are not comfortable with anything.

Uniform of the day: Patrol Blues. I think we would make a better impression our unifonms on, and showed the 3 agencies wor king together...

if

we had

I hope this makes sense. If we meet out thene at 0830, that gives us 30 minutes to go over course, .the material. If you want to meet soonerr or even tomorrow to review, that is of fine. It is betten we have a tight presentation. Let me know if you have questions

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent: To: Subject:
Andersen, Ryan M. Thursday, March A1,2012 6:41 AM Rateaver, Andrew FW: RKB Listing for BATT-S

and it brought me to a screen Additionally, their RKB number is; L2vE-00:Mlss. I did a Google search on that number that had a tab for grant availability. See below. ls this what you were looking for?
Ryan

'

Protffiin1orrNatfrr#sDafeldsrsil

Quotation 9266
Quotation Date: 04104/12 Tax ID #: 04-2719777

l0 BeEr Indutrial Drive

PH (4 l 3) 443 -73se

- FAX (413)

Pissficld, MA 01201
44s-7 86s

BELCA

Berkeley Police Department 2100 MLK Way Berkeley- CA947A4 Terms and Conditions: Net 30 Days Item:
US Statg pgp?ftnp_!{..A11t91 levet E

F.O.B.: Destination Estimated Completion Date: TBD Shin Vi* Common Carier Pavment Ter&s.' Lenco Does Not Collect Tox or Resister Vehicles with DMV Inspection & Acceptance: At Lenco Factory, Pittsfield, MA

--

Transfer of Certificate of Oriein Upon Receipt of Payment

Product#

ItslIflgp_
$149,000.00

Osflons:

AEo includec &e fiollowinq items alreadv on 2fi19 BearCat w-gp- Atoul! EgtUUg F_qarCS _ llilEly-gspele v$! Pintel,tlps:t! 3600 Watt Power lnverter

RearAC/Heat
Heated Wndshield

_Up-g@g_Etpnt-an_o-_B_e{_QeglS_bvLegacyw[f

r.S1p*$9-q19

Run Fld Tires Seat Belts on Rear Bench Seats

_Ex!rs"rnsJleat.Beavsrrrel*ssra_qe.r-.::q:::::o*.'r*'-ea'ls:

-_-_

, _. --_sei9s.,..r1_,_

_-_

YARNING Infrrmation Subtect to Erryoft

he echnical data in f L979,as amended

CotrEOI Laws

tfiis document is restricted bythe Arms Export Controt e* lfiite 22, U.S.C., Sec 2751, et seq.) orthe ExportAdminisEation Act Title 50, U.S.C., App.Z40letseq. and which may not be orported released or disclosed to non-U.S. persons [i.e. persons who re not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents ["green card" holders]] inside or outside the United States, without first obtaining an export :ense. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe civil, criminal and administrative penalties.

eppnovll br rHE DTREcTonlTE oF us DEFENsE IRADE coNTRos AND rENco rNDUsrRrE rNc. MUsr BE oBTATNED BEFoRE RESELLTNG, IANSFERRING, TRANSSHIPING, OR DISPOSING OF A DEFENSE ARTICLE TO ANY END USER, END USE OR DESTINATION OTHER TTIAN A5 STATED ON TI.II5 :NCO QUOTE OR THE SHIPPER'S EXPORT DECLARAflON lN CISES WHERE AN EXEMPION lS CLAIMED UNDER THIS SUBCHAPTER ITAR 123.9(A).'
{E wRrrTEN

wE ARE PLEASED TO StrBlvrIT TIIE ABOVE QUOTATTON FOR YOUR CONSTDERATTON. SHOULD YOU PLACE Ahr )RDE& BE ASSIIRED rr WILL RECEryE OUR PROMPT ATTENTTON. THrS QUOTATTON rS VALrr) FOR 30 DAYS. IT IS SUB.'ECT TO CHANGEWTIIOUT NOTICE

{CCEFTANCE OF PROPOSAL
ul rn
ulfiocd

tcly reptad.
rboc

Yor

llt

rBthqiad

to do

tic writ rr

rprcdficd. Pryncot

- rr".u* r*B hrrnr.kr.Ereiy rill odc u

Auihorized Signature

LENCO INDUSTRIES INC.

l --rL J ^J-^ 1UI!rUTU'EU

iignature
Please

and refurn

Than* You

Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quote for Berkeley

PD

Here is your official Lenco BearCat Quotation. We are very excited about the prospect of building you a brand new Lenco BearCat.
I promise you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

AII that is needed is for your department to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9098 and the Dollar Value of the Quote.

Upon receipt of an approved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediately added to our Build Schedule. NO DEPOSIT is required and payment is NOT due untilAFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat. Give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you again for this opportunity to assist you. Sincerely Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 800-444-5362 ext. 114

NOTEl: A separate security/procurement advisory will be sent following this email.

NOTE 2'. The Lenco BearCat we will provide you will also include the following items below at no additional cost to Berkeley PD.

Standard Equipment List

4-Wheel Drive Electronic Shift on the Fly (Diesel) Dynamic Turning Radius; L26" Wheelbase, within its own length Auto Transmission (6) Speed with Tow Haul Feature 3 year Bumper to Bumper Limited Warranty on Chassis 3 year Lenco Parts Warranty .50 Caliber Defeat Capability, Exceeds NIJ IV 10-Shots on 1Bx1B" panel State Department Armor Level E (with documentation) Defeats .30 Caliber AP Rounds and all lesser threats .5 inch thick Mil Spec Steel Vertical Panels (A46100) All Windows Exceed NIJ IV, Defeat .50 Caliber and .30 Caliber AP, State Department Windows 2.5 inches thick(66mm) AII Doors, All Windows Overlapped with .5 inch thick Mil Spec Steel All Exterior Lights backed with Mil Spec Steel Rotating Roof Hatch with T" Vertical Gunport Heavy Duty Military Grade Gear Bearing For Rotating Roof Hatch Roof Hatch Operates with one Hand, Zero Gravity Feature Blast Resistant Floor Material, Mil Spec Steel Aberdeen Performance Tested, Minimum 36.8 degree side slope (with documentation Adjustable Height 19" 3- Position--Flush to the Floor Gunner/Sniper Stand (11) Standard Gunports, Including (3) T" Yertical Ports Extra Wide Running Boards, Side and Rear, made of Mil Spec Steel Ram Bumper with Locking Storage Compartment Fully Armored Hood Non Slip Tactical Surface on Roof Padded Bench Seats, Solid Steel with Storage underneath 40 Gallon Fuel Tank Armored Fuel Tank Traditional Opening Hood Front Ram Bumper with Bumper Guards Multiple Pull Points Front and Rear Front and Rear HD Floor Mats Interior Tie Offs Rear Door Flip-up Threshold Front and Rear Area LED's (your choice of color) Front and Rear Area Wig Wag Lights Rear Stealth Feature 200 Watt Siren anci Pn

(6) Interior Red & White Dome Lights Custom made Back Lit Panel Console Battle Bolts on all Doors Chemical Agent Resistant Coating Paint (S-Colors Flat Black, OD Green, AF Green, De Forward Opening Front Doors with Lock Open Feature Rear Doors Can Be Locked Open at 180 or 90 Degrees Numerous Interior and Exterior Tie Down Points
One Piece Side Walls 5 lb Fire Extinguisher Tilt Wheel Cruise Control Am/FM Radio, with CD Player Cup Holders Front and Rear Carpeting Emergency Exit Door-lock Override 12 Volt Plug-in adapter Tow Haul Feature with Compression Brake Electronic Idle Control Driver Seat Arm Rests

James Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 80A-444-5362 ext. 114 Outside US + 4L3-443-7359 ext. 114 email ji m @swattrucks.com

Rateaver. Andrew
From: Sent: To:
Upson, Erik M. Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:5A PM Reece, t<evin n.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph; Hart, Alyson L'; Reece, David K.; Greenwood, Andrew; Ohlson, Lynne, mlarrick@albanyca.org; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M., danno136@9mail.com; Durbin, Michael.R.; Rateaver, Andrew;Adan Tejada; Eric Tejada; Daniel Adams FW: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation 9266 BERKELEY.pdf

Subject: Attachments:

From: Jim Massery [mailto:jmassery@lencoarmor'com] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:08 PM To: Upson, Erik M. Subject: Lenco BearCat Official Quotation

Erik,

Here is your official used Lenco BearCat Quotation. We are very excited about the prospect of providing you a Lenco BearCat.

I promise

you the vehicle will exceed your expectations.

AII that is needed is for your department to issue a Purchase Order on Agency Letter Head referencing Quote Number 9266 and the Dollar Value of the Quote.

Upon receipt of an approved Purchase Order your Truck will be immediately added to our Schedule.
NO DEpOSIT is required and payment is NOT due until AFTER you inspect and accept the BearCat.

Give me a call if you have any questions.

Thank you again for this opportunity to assist you.

Sincerely Jim Massery Government Sales Manager LENCO Armored Vehicles 8AA-444-5362 ext.114
'i:'f;ruF:i]ilNlrlALlrY i'J*-ric[: Tiiis *-rrt*il *ncl *ny fil*s lran**ii'i*rj l""ith it n:n5r **r:t*in r::nfr<jent:al' prit"il+g*c nrrel pr*pii*iarrv inf*rm*tir:* *i Lsnr:* Arr**r*cj V*hic!*s iand ar* rfitsn'iJ^qd **l*ly i*i thr: us* tf th* indiviriual *r *liity t* wi';*m i;l *rtst !"'iease i1,*y *.rn aiJrirs*x;**. A.ny r:nauth*ri:ecj i;s* sr di$c!$$ure is pr,:itrlit*tl. lf y*ti have r***iv*rj thi* *-rr":xil 'i-l.ri* rJ*iltain t**hnir*1 dat;r r*l*ting tr) * "l)*istts* Arti*l*" v';ithin li:* *:**ning i:l th* *ri*il n"ray *:}s* ,r*tiiy tn+ **n**r '12Si. l-h* tt*n*l*r or ciistl*sure oithi* lniotmnlion l* un3'n**-i-i $ i:-ri*riiati**irl-fr.*flic i* Arm* ft*gi;i*li*n* tt3 CfR P*r{ $t;:t*, ilirsctor*t* tf il*f*t'ise r]*i.$rrl *i **mp#ily ,r"rithr:ut an Jxn*rt lir*nsa sppr*i:*ri *1, tn* {Jnli*ri $l*l** D*p**m*nt *l j"r:t*fi **ntr*is i* i:i"*Iibit*ri ilnd*r f***r*l i*rv.

BATT S AP BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT

iq otnsoycstp otlqno u.:*:; paicolorci sl pe,i3ope: ua1;oiu,ro1u;

trl'0) rcap 6qoc lueuJUreAoe DruJoJrlDS -

lnterior

.J

:iri:,:5i
ii.,..l ,i:l

ffi

BATT insulation paekage, large AIC System

our unlts comfortable in hot temperatures

rote

#:

JJ1201264

January 26,2012

BATT S AP

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT The Armored Group, LLC, Sgt. Andrew "RAT" Rateaver

221W. LancasterAve., Suite 12002

Fort Worth, TX 76102
817-3324646 Office

Email: arateaver@ci.berkeley.ca.us
Phone:
I

- includlng NIJ lV Weiqht & Velocitv Weapons Galiber Tvpe M2 .50 Cal 166 grain @2800 * 2900 M2 .30 - 06 M2 AP - MA grain @ 2693-2753 M60/M14 T.6ZxS1 M8O M16 5.56 x 45 M855/SS109 63 grain @ 3087-3147 fps AK-74 5.45 x 39 BallType PS/7N6 5g grain @ 2956-3016 fps AR-47 7.62 x 39 M1943iPS Ball 123 grain 6 zso0-2360 fps M2 .50 Caliber BallAmmo
A. Ballistic Performance Data B. Underbody Blast Protection

Hits & Spacinq

3 hit, 120mm triangle (Steel) Window

fps

hit, 2"

3_hits, 120mm triangle

3 hits, 120mm 3 hits, 120mm 3 hits, 120mm 3 hits, 120mm

triangle triangle
triangle triangle

The underbody armoring provides protection from the blast and fragmentation resulting from the detonationof two (2i simultaneously detonated DMS1. hand grenades placed on the ground at any location under the vehicle. The characteristics of the DMS1 hand grenade are as follows: DM51 Fragmentation Grenade

Diameter:57 mm Weight:425 grams

Explosive Weight: 60 grams

Guote

#: JJ120126A

January 26,2012

BATT S AP

BERKELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT

Ballistic Protection Packaqe;

' . "

All Cabin vertical panels and windows, except firewall, armored to defeat multi-hit 7 .62x 51mm NATO M-80 ammunition; 5.56x45mm (.223 Caliber) including penetrator (M193/SS 109 Rounds); .30-06 AP, '50 Cal Ball Ammo Vertical Panels %" Ballistic Steel Floor is armored with a blast mitigati

Windows bullet resistant glass.clad polycarbonate with-Low Spall Liner; NIJ lV Levels (Knox CO SO Trk Shown) . 2 piece windshield with sun band, Two (2) Front door windows, Four (4) Horizontal windows in side walls, Two (2) Rear windows . Windows in rear compartment are designed at an angle to allow for easier viewing of high ground threats

rote

#: JJ1201264

January 26,2412

Rateaver, Andrew
From: Sent: To:
Ccl.

Subject:

Meredith, Matt B. Thursday, February A2,2012 5:10 PM Rateaver, Andrew; Galvan, Edward; Andersen, Ryan M.; Smith, Katherine; Okies, Joseph Meredith, Matt B.; Burcham, StePhen Lenco/Bearcat Bid, FW: Lenco conference call

(Bearcat After talking to Ryan Andersen today he asked if I wouldn't mind getting an Apples to Apples bid from Lenco I maker) compared to the BATTfrom Armor Group, since I had a contact from the past few years of going to CAT0. jim Massery the Government sale Manager for Lenco. Jim was very interested in getting us a bid and said he contacted would do all he could to help us out. I explained to Jim that this was just the beginning of the process, to see if we could get the funding for the Armor Vehicle. He said that was fine and said he would get back to me today. At 1500-hrs Jim (UCPD, ialled me back, he told me that he wanted to explain the bid on a conference call with all the stake holders Albany & BpD), as soon as we can arrange a time. He said the bid included a new 4-door Bearcat, with many options, including free shipping, when I asked what the price would be, he said 5209,000. I asked him to send the below e-mail and I would forwarded it on. and has As most of you know Lenco has built over l-,000 Bears and Bearcats for police departments though out the USA, Bearcat was shot a great reputation. During CATO this year we had a debrief from Lt. Rusty Jacks from Tyler Texas. Their of the Bearcat and the windows with no rounds 47-times by an AK-47, by a murder suspect. The shots hit the sides

Hey All,

lf you,re interested in more information about Lencoyou can checkouttheirsecure website: www.Swattrucks.com
USERNAMEI
PASSWORD

I know time is short, but this may be the deal of a life time.

Let me know what you would like to do, or feel free to contact Jim at the below number.

Matt Meredith

From: Jim Massery [mailto:imassery@lencoarmor.com] Sent: Thursday, February 02,20L2 4:06 PM To: Meredith, Matt B. Subject: Lenco conference call

Matt,

I've gotten together with the owner of Lenco, Lenny III, the young man we
affectionately call 13.
We would like to speak with you and the other SWAT captains of the neighboring agencies who have a stake in your new SWAT truck. Since the proposal involves a few potential future changes to your unit and since Lenco your is iruilling to include nearly 16,000 worth of extra equipment I was hoping to have I.La ^- -t-L^.-^!^ ^nliana attentiOn fof aDOUt 13 minU1es eldUUidLe ulr LIrc uPLr'!iirr.
Please let me know if we can Set something up for early next week'
1

There is no obligation to make a commitment, we just want to let you know why we're so interested in working with you and your neighbors to fill your SWAT truck needs. Let me know.

Jim Massery BA0-444-5362

From: Meredith, Matt B, Imailto:MMeredith@ci.berkeley,ca'us] Sent: Thursday, February 02,20L2 6:02 PM To: Jim Massery Subject; Re: Have a great offer for you
.

Call when you can Matt

!j*t";i iir:t't

r;i.;-

P;:itl't i::ti?

On Feb 2,2AL2 L:28 PM, Jim Massery <imassery@lencoarmor.Com> wrote:

Call me when you get a minute.

Jarnes Massery

Government Sales Manager

LENCO Armored Vehicles

8A0-444-5362 ext.

ll4

Outside US + 413-443-7359 ext.l14

email i imIDswattrucks.com

Findu***

Faeebask

YHrlffi
have Samuet 1T: g "you knowyourfatherand his men. They are warriors asfierce as a'wild Bearwhose cubs been stolen. Your father is a trained soldier."

ll

Tratie C*fiirol$ is prohibited r:nder federal

e-r;raii anrl any i'iles lrarisirlitted with rt r:ray cantain c*nficier-'rtial, privileged anri pr+itiletary iniofi-nation .*i L*nco Arm*refi Ve hicies an,J ar"e irrtencjed saleiy for ths use af the ii"rdividual or erriit"v. io whom pleas* irruy *r* acldretsecl. Any unailihcrizeci use or disclosure !s prthibried. lf ycu have r*ceived lhis e-mail in errcr te*hnicsl data i'elating to a "Defense Attic!$" within tlre nreaning oi the nctily the ser:der. ?his eurail may alsa contain lilternationalTratfic in Armg Regulations {22 CFR Part 130) The traisfei- or disclosrtre of this information to any non-U'S ;;;.np*ny ,#irho6i an ixport ticense approv*d by the Uniied Sieies Depa;lnrent o{ -state, Directorate of Defens*

C,3Ni:iil[NTiALil-y ]{{J"itCE:

-Iiiis

;;;;

larv.

Sent: Thursday, March 27, 20L2 4:22 PM To: McCammon, Bill, ACFD; Stephen Roderick; Rateaver, Andrew; eklaus@ci.alameda.ca.us; jmoorhead@lpfire'org;
rkiefer@cillivermore.ca.us; Bruce Martin; Schnepp, Rob, ACFD; Houghtelling, Dennis, Sheriff; Pan M.D., Erica, Public Health, DCDCP; mpoirier@oaklandnet.com; csimm@so.cccounty.us; echri@so.cccounty.us; echri@so.cccounty.us; rkov@so.cccounty.us; LitwinA@usa.redross,org; dwats@cccfpd.org; byronberhel@richmond.ca.us; Lee Harris Cc: Craig Dziedzic {craig.dziedzic@sfgov.org); Serata, Teresa; Mary Landers (mary.landers@sfgov.org); Blau, Jeffl;
McKenna, Kathleen;'kevin.jensen@sheriff.sccgov.org'

Subject: East Bay Hub Planning Meeting Outcome

This email is being directed to everyone who presented/submitted project proposals to the East Bay Hub Group on Wednesday, March 21, 2012. I would like to thank all of you very much for the time and effort you put into developing your projects. The decisions for the voting members of Hub was very difficult. Every project submitted certainly would have provided a valuable benefit to the Region. As many of us recently discussed, interoperability has been and continues to be a very important priority for our Region, therefore, a significant amount of funding was earmarked for

that purpose.
have attached a spreadsheet that outlines the East Bay Hubt recommendation for the allocation of the funding. You recommended for. funding at this time, were ranked and placed below the will note on the spreadsheet that projects, Iine for future consideration in the event additional funding becomes available.

p!

As a reminder, the recommendations from the Hubs will be presented to the UASI Advisory Group at their meeting on, March 29,2012. From there, the Advisory Group will make recommendations to the UASI Approval Authority on, April 12, ZOt2, and the Approval Authority will make final decisions on how the funds will be allocated.
PLEASE NOTE: THE RECOMMENDATTONS

IN

THE ATTACHD SPREADSHEETARE NOT FINAL I.INTIL APPROI/ED BY THE UASI APPROVAL

AUTHORM,
Thank you again very much for your valuable participation in this process'
Dennis

Dewn6 rutryfrtzllin*, Qnmmandot

Alameda County Sheriffs Office Bay Area UASI iiegional Training and Exercise Program Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Services 4985 Broder Boulevard, Dublin, CA 94568 Cell (510) Zzs-sBgL