Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Why new investments in children and youth must be a priority for candidates in 2012
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
Washington, DC
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
Dear Reader,
April, 2012
As President Obama and the 112th Congress have struggled with rebuilding the nations economy, the critical new national investments America needs to make in its children have been postponed. Further compounding the problem: deep budget cuts in many states affecting tens of millions of children. But the development of human capital is central to U.S. global competitiveness, increased productivity, school readiness, caring for an aging population, and fulfilling the moral obligation each generation has to leave the world better off for the one that follows. This is not the time to step backwards. In fact, the 2009 federal budget and the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act actually pumped billions in temporary new spending for children. But now that spending has largely ended, and proven childrens programs face deep budget cuts. Such cuts would be a big mistake. The life chances of children are vastly improved when they are the top priority of families, communities, and governments. Most U.S. children live in secure environments and sail into young adulthood healthy, becoming productive members of society. But as the numbers in this report show, this happy ending eludes millions of children. And things may get worse since social problems are highly correlated with child poverty which has exploded by 17% since 2000. The data which follow focus on a few key issues: health, child abuse, school readiness, child care, afterschool, and poverty. These are big issues affecting millions of children and families. The disturbing trends in the data presented are understated. They lag by at least a year the sharp downturn in the economy and its impact on families. We can all agree: while families are the best place for children, often those families need a little help. The private sector is an essential allybut it lacks the resources to meet the needs of millions of children. State and local governments are critical players, but vast disparities in child well-being among states confirm the need for a national government which promotes a level playing field for all children. To spotlight the need for smart new national investments in our children, the Every Child Matters Education Fund is waging a public education campaign during the 2012 election to win support for proven health and social programs. Our goal is make homeland security a reality for all children and families. Please join us in assisting the next president and the Congress in their duty to make certain every child matters.
Homeland Insecurity
HOMELAND INSECURITY
A REALITY FOR MILLIONS OF CHILDREN
7 MILLION American children are without health insurance, nearly 3 MILLION are reported abused and neglected, and 16 MILLION live in povertys grip. A key ingredient in creating the nations great wealth has long been its willingness to invest in new opportunities for all its children, helping them become productive members of society. But in recent decades, as seen in Chart 1.1, national investments in a wide range of childrens health and social programs have been declining as a percentage of domestic spending in the federal budget.
Homeland Insecurity
Projected
Federal Spending on Children and on Major Entitlements as a Share of Domestic Federal Spending
1960-2020 Chart 1.1
1
Children's Spending
51%
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
This decline in relative spending on children will compound the already high degree of inequality in material, education, and health in the United States in comparison to other Western countries.
Greatest Equality Denmark Finland Netherlands Switzerland More Equality Iceland Ireland Norway Sweden
Less Equality Belgium Czech Republic Hungary Luxembourg Slovakia Spain United Kingdom Least Equality Greece Italy United States
2 1
Homeland Insecurity
This economic inequality within the United States has grown susbtantially over the last two decades. Children in middle-class families were losing ground even before the great recession, driven, in part, by declines in secure parent employment beginning early in the last decade. As Chart1.3 shows, the income gap between families is rising. The gap in real family income separating the typical child in a middle-class family from the typical child in a high-income family expanded by more than 60% from 1984 to 2008. This $93,100 divide is now nearly the size of the gap that separated children in low- and high-income families in the mid-1980s. Children in middle-families are increasingly relying on public programs for services that many of their parents
now cannot afford and can no longer take for granted, such as health insurance and pre-kindergarten education, two areas critical for long-term success. These public programs are under assault at the federal and state level. Since 2007, 47 states have made deep cuts to health, education, and safety programs. At the federal level, while substantial increases in programs like Head Start and child care were made through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, this temporary funding has now dried up. Unless Congress acts in 2012, most of these childrens programs will be cut by 9% or more in 2013 as part of the debt ceiling agreement passed in the summer of 2011. Some in Congress are proposing even deeper cuts to childrens programs at a time when families need them most. This is not what the public wants. Polling we commissioned over the last decade shows that across the nation and across the political spectrum voters support new national investments in children. Thats because the public knows intuitively what all research confirms: spending on kids has a great return on investment. It keeps the U.S. competitive in a global market. It allows better support for an aging population. It prevents minor problems from becoming major. And it fulfills a moral commitment every generation has to those which follow. WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS.
High-Income
$150,000 $125,000
$100,000 $75,000
Middle-Class
$50,000 $25,000
Low-Income
Abuse and neglect, imprisonment, poverty, lack of health carethese conditions confront American children on a scale unknown in the other western democracies. These countries, competitors and allies alike, recognize that smart investments which pull all children and families forward benefit everyone. Its time for America to make a renewed commitment to this same great goal.
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
Country United Kingdom Japan New Zealand Norway Sweden Italy France Germany Canada United States China
% of Costs Covered by Government 82.6% 80.5% 80.2% 78.6% 78.1% 76.3% 75.9% 74.6% 69.5% 47.8% 47.3%
Per Capita Costs $3,222 $2,817 $2,655 $5,207 $3,622 $2,836 $3,851 $3,922 $3,867 $7,164 $265
Infant Mortality 4.62 2.78 4.78 3.52 2.74 3.38 3.29 3.54 4.92 6.06 16.06
Life Expectancy 80 83 81 81 81 82 82 81 81 79 74
Cut $771 billion over ten years from current level of funding for the Medicaid program, resulting in massive shortfalls in every state. This will jeopardizes coverage for millions of children. States will also lose $582 billion in matching funds for an overall reduction of $1.35 trillion to Medicaid. Effectively end the SCHIP program by letting it expire in 2013 and by creating a $150 billion shortfall in funding, which would threaten the coverage of seven million children.
Overall, the United States ranks #113 in the world for percentage of health care costs covered by the government. Chart 2.2 shows that not only does the US government cover less, overall health care spending is highly inefficient. The percentage of what the US leaves to private insurers equals the total health care costs in many western countries. These higher costs in the US do not lead to better outcomes in either infant mortality or life expectancy.
Homeland Insecurity
Child abuse deaths in the U.S. are much higher than in other western democracies as seen in Chart 3.1.
1.4 1
0.9
0.8
Much is known about how to treat child abuse. But unless new investments are made to prevent child abuse in the first place, the sad story of child maltreatment will continue to repeat itself from one generation of troubled families to the next.
USA
6 Every Child Matters Education Fund
France
Japan
UK
Germany
Homeland Insecurity
$10,000,000,000
$10,054,693,069
$8,000,000,000
Allocated Funding
$6,000,000,000
$5,612,567,876 $4,263,708,502
$4,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$1,700,000,000 $1,443,952,750
Projected Funding
$0 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016
Outside of foster care, federal funding to address child abuse and neglect has gone steadily downward in recent decades. Chart 3.2 shows the funding level for the Social Services Block Grant since 1997. A major part of this program is to prevent or remedy neglect, abuse or exploitation of children unable to protect their own interest, and preserve, rehabilitate or reunite families. The amount of funding in
real dollars has stayed at $1.7 billion since 2002 and was cut over a billion dollars since the mid 1990s. Factoring in inflation, the program will be funded in 2016 at 14% what it was in 1977. Unless Congress addresses this imbalance, programs like this will be unable to effectively treat and prevent child abuse and neglect.
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
Percentage of Four-Year-Olds in Center-Based Preschool and Primary Education among Selected Countries
Chart 5.1
100% Enrollment France Full Italy 1% Less United Kingdom Japan 1% Less 8% Less 14% Less United Germany States
Percentage of Four Year-Olds Enrolled in State Supported Pre-K, Preschool Special Education, or Federal Head Start 32
top 5 and bottom 5 states Chart 5.2
State
Rank
Rate
Oklahoma West Virginia Florida Vermont Georgia Idaho Hawaii Utah Nevada New Hampshire
1 2 3 4 5 46 47 48 49 50
85.8% 78.4% 77.8% 68.8% 62.7% 14.7% 14.5% 12.8% 11.4% 11.4%
43% Less
The United States falls far behind most other western countries in the percentage of four-year-olds participating in center-based pre-k and primary education programs.
Chart 5.2 shows that some states have decided to actively invest in preschool education and others have decided not to. More than five times as many four-year-old children participate in a state pre-kindergarten, preschool special education, or federal Head Start program in the top five states than in the bottom five states. Almost 8 times as many four-year-olds participate in one of these programs in Oklahoma as participate in New Hampshire.
Every Child Matters Education Fund 9
Homeland Insecurity
AFTERSCHOOL IN AMERICA
BEYOND THE SCHOOL BELL
As many as14 million children are on their own after school. Among them are an estimated 40,000 kindergarteners.33 On school days, the hours from 3-6 pm are peak hours for kids to smoke, drink and experiment with drugs; to become crime victims; to be in car accidents; or to commit crimes.34 The millions of children and teens who begin self-care at young ages are at increased risk of poor educational and behavioral outcomes. Quality afterschool programs can cut crime immediately and transform the prime hours for juvenile crime into hours of academic enrichment, wholesome fun, and community service. Despite these positive outcomes, existing after-school programs do not meet the demand of elementary- and middle-school parents. Only one in ten K-12 grade children and youth participate in after-school programs.35 As many as 15 million would participate if a quality program was available. But millions of families are unable to pay for afterschool programs and require a subsidy. This situation has become even more challenging for families during the recent economic downturn: On average, parents pay more than three-quarters of the cost of afterschool through tuition and fees, which amounts to $2,400 per year per child. Even in low-income families, which have been hit the hardest by the current recession, parents pay more than half of the afterschool costs, more than $1,700 per year.
10
Homeland Insecurity
Meanwhile, the federal government contributes only 11 percent of the cost of afterschool, despite the fact that 29 percent of the children in afterschool meet the federal governments definition of low-income and in need of federal assistance.
Allocated Funding
$1,183,911,869
$1,206,724,658
$1,151,673,000 $1,100,000,000
Projected Funding
$1,067,724,976 $1,019,090,157 $969,984,683 $923,245,385 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
$900,000,000
The 21st Century Community Learning Centers are the main source of federal afterschool funding. Although the program received funding authorized at $2.5 billion in the No Child Left Behind Act, Chart 6.1 shows that actual federal funding comes nowhere close to this amount. Factoring in inflation, support for the programs declined every year from 2002 to 2007. After small increases from 2008 through 2010, funding has reverted downward. It is projected to decline further unless Congress acts to stop an automatic 9.3% budget cut to this program and others in 2013. While demand for the program will not change, it will less able each year to meet it if Congress does nothing.
11
Homeland Insecurity
CHILD POVERTY
IT DOESNT NEED TO BE SO HIGH
In Washington, DC, the worlds most powerful capital, wretched poverty and the drug use, violence and depression such poverty fosters begins a few blocks from the White House and Congress. The capitals 30.4% child poverty rate is higher than all but one states38. Nationally, child poverty rates have exploded, up 22.4% since the 2008 economic meltdown. Worse, recent data show not only that millions more children are entering poverty but that many are entering deep poverty, where household income is less than 50% of the poverty level. If the poverty rate for a family of two is $15,130, then a child in deep poverty lives in a single-parent household where the income is $7,565 or less.39 It has been more than a decade since Congress has had a serious debate about poverty. The welfare reform legislation of the 1990s was not about reducing child poverty; it was about reducing the number of families on the welfare rolls, which it did from 12.3 million recipients in 1996 to 4.4 million in 2010. There were 1.4 million fewer recipients in 2010, the height of the recession, than in 2000, the end of a long boom. Millions of children in working families live below the poverty level, and their numbers are surging. The U.S. ranks 23 out of 24 in child material well-being inequality among western countries.41 These countries have national policies which reduce child poverty much more sharply than those in the United States. The U.S. does know how to reduce poverty among large groups: over the last 45 years federal policies produced spectacular drops in elderly poverty rates; now the elderly are the least poor. During the same period, child poverty remained constant despite huge gains in Americas wealth (Chart 7.1). Federal spending in 2008 was 6.5 times greater for persons over age 65 than for those under age 18 $23,900 per elderly adult versus $3,660 per child.42 (new note)
12 Every Child Matters Education Fund
Homeland Insecurity
5
00 02 04 06 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 90 92 94 96 98 88 20 20 20 20 08 20 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 19 10
A principal reason for low poverty rates among the elderly and high poverty rates among children is that programs for the elderly, such as Social Security and Medicare, are identical in every state, national policy is set by the Congress not states. Poverty is Not a Character Builder Poverty is associated with negative outcomes for children. It can impede childrens cognitive development and their ability to learn. It can contribute to behavioral, social and emotional problems. [it]can lead to poor health [the risks]are
But big federal programs benefitting children, such as Medicaid and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are largely shaped by state policy, not federal, allowing huge disparities among the states
greatest among children who experience poverty when they are young and among children who experience persistent and deep poverty44
13
Homeland Insecurity
Chart 7.2 demonstrates the power impact of government policy reducing poverty among the elderly and disabled compared to families with children. While the differences in child poverty rates among the states are dramatic, as seen in Chart 7.3, child poverty has increased sharply in almost all states since 2000.
Child Poverty 2010 10.0% 12.8% 12.9% 13.0% 13.9% 27.3% 27.6% 27.7% 30.0% 32.5%
Change +56.7% +12.5% -4.3% -3.4% +9.9% -0.3% +10.6% +30.4% +13.6% +23.1%
Family Type
1 2 3 4 5 46 47 48 49 50
6.4% 11.4% 13.5% 13.5% 12.6% 27.4% 25.0% 21.3% 26.4% 26.4%
Non-Elderly Single Parent Two Parent Childless Elderly Disabled 36.9% 10.0% 19.5% 55.1% 71.9% 21.9% 5.9% 16.3% 9.3% 19.1% -41% -41% -16% -83% -73%
This chart shows the powerful effect of government policies in reducing poverty rates for the elderly and disabled. Current policies and spending levels in the US are not nearly as powerful at reducing poverty among families with children. Other countries have succeeded in dropping child poverty rates by applying the same principles as the US uses to reduce poverty among the elderly and disabled.
New Hampshire, despite having the lowest rates in 2000 and 2010, has seen a 56.7% jump in child poverty. Louisiana had one of the highest child poverty rates at both ends of the decade, but saw no increase. Overall, child poverty jumped 17% nationwide and increased in 45 states during the decade.
14
Homeland Insecurity
15
Homeland Insecurity
$9,000,000,000
Country
$8,392,192,659.79 $8,303,214,456.51
60% 31% 27% for children 0-3; free for children 3-6 20% 18% for children 0-3; free for children 3-6 15% 14% 9%
$8,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Sweden
Federal child care expenditures through the Child Care Development Fund declined starting in 2002, when factoring in inflation.48 It increased in 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Unless Congress acts, this funding will start to decline substantially in the decade ahead despite the high demand.
American families get little or no support in paying for child care compared to families in other rich democracies. Overall, the federal government underwrites 25% of costs, state and local governments 15%, and parents the remaining 60%. As Chart 8.2 shows, other countries cover a much larger share, and many children attend programs for free.49
16
Homeland Insecurity
17
Homeland Insecurity
18
Homeland Insecurity
MENTAL HEALTH
The Challenge Millions of children and youth experience emotional problems serious enough to impede learning and development. The Investment Provide a full array of prevention and treatment services to allow parents and providers of care to recognize the warning signs and intervene early. The Benefits Emotionally healthy children, youth and young adults.
CHILD HEALTH
The Challenge Seven million children still without health insurance with many more expected to be covered beginning in 2014, unless the Affordable Care Act is repealed. The Investment Guarantee the affordable health coverage to every child and young person that begins in 2014. The Benefits Healthier children and lower long-term health care costs.
19
Homeland Insecurity
20
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
2. 3.
Overall household income has dropped for middle- and lowincome families over the last decade. Q. What policies do you support that would increase family income? Nearly 3 million children nationwide are reported abused and neglected each year. Q. What are your plans to keep all children safe from violence in their homes, schools and communities? College tuition has increased substantially in recent years. Pell Grants cover only a fraction of public university tuition. Q. What will you do to make college more affordable for lower- and middle- class families? Q. What changes would you make to the Affordable Care Act, State Childrens Health Insurance Program, and Medicaid to address the 7 million children currently uninsured? product, do you support which would guarantee quality education, health care, and safety to every American child?
4.
5.
22
Homeland Insecurity
VOTE!!!!
Before voting, make sure to: Ask candidates for office where they stand on childrens issues, and urge them to adopt a comprehensive Invest-In-Kids plan so that every child really does matter. Visit our website for contact information: www.everychildmatters.org. Volunteer at events that raise the visibility of childrens issues, including the ECM-sponsored Step Up for Kids Day in September in your state. Write a letter to a newspaper and other media to reach a larger audience in your community about the importance of investing in kids. Stay informed!! Sign up for our regular e-mail updates to get the latest on childrens issues and the 2012 elections. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter @votingforkids Make an on-line donation to help us make children a national priority.
The Every Child Matters Education Fund is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, non-partisan organization working to make children, youth, and families a national political priority.
Every Child Matters Education Fund 23
Homeland Insecurity
CITATIONS
1 Adam Carasso, C. Eugene Steuerle, and Gillian Reynolds, Kids Share 2007: How Children Fare in the Federal Budget (Washington: Urban Institute, 2007), p. 8. 2 UNICEF, Child Poverty in Perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card 7 (Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2007), p. 2. 3 Adam Carasso, C. Eugene Steuerle, and Gillian Reynolds, Kids Share 2007: How Children Fare in the Federal Budget (Washington: Urban Institute, 2007), p. 22. 4 U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2006 Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Table HI08, accessed at http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032006/health/h08_000.htm 5 Families USA, One in Three: Non-Elderly Americans Without Health Insurance, 2002-2003, (Washington: Families USA, 2004), p. 7. 6 Jennifer Sullivan, No Shelter from the Storm: Americas Uninsured Children (Washington: Families USA, 2006), p. 7-8. 7 http://www.nchc.org/facts/coverage.shtml 8 WHO, World Statistical InformationSystem. http://www.who.int/whosis/data/Search.jsp?countries=[Location].Members 9 U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2007 Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Table HI05, accessed at http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032008/health/ h05_000.htm 10 The Annie E. Casey Foundation, KIDS COUNT State Level Data Online, www.kidscount.org 11 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Child Maltreatment 2006, (Washington: Government Printing Office, 2007). 12 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Child Maltreatment 2006, (Washington: Government Printing Office, 2007). 13 Prevent Child Abuse America, Total Estimated Cost o Child Abuse and Neglect in the United States: Economic Impact Study, (Chicago: Prevent Child Abuse America, 2007).
14 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Child and Family Service Reviews, Individual Key Findings Reports, 2001-2004, http://basis.caliber.com/cwig/ws/cwmd/docs/cb_web/SearchForm 15 FY2004 Child Welfare Spending Data from: Child Welfare League of America National Data Analysis System at http://ndas.cwla.org/data_stats/access/predefined/ Report.asp?ReportID=298; Population Data from U.S. Census Annual Estimates of the Population for the United States on 7/1/2004 16 NationMaster.com, Child Maltreatment Deaths per 100,000 population under 15 (1990s), at http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph/hea_chi_mal_ dea-health-childmaltreatmentdeaths&b_printable=1 17 Prison population from the International Centre for Prison Studies at www. prisonstudies.org; World Population from Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. Highlights, (New York: United Nations, 2007); U.S. Population from U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 American Community Survey. 18 Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online, Table 6.1.2005, Adults on probation, in jail or prison, and on parole United States, 1980-2005, at http://www. albany.edu/sourcebook/wk1/t612005.wk1 19 Kings College London, World Prison Brief, http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/ icps/worldbrief 20 NationMaster.com, Murders (per capita) (Latest available) by country, at http://www.nationmaster.com/red/graph/cri_pri_per_cap-crime-prisoners-per-capita&b_ printable=1 21 Childhelp, National Child Abuse Statistics, at http://www.childhelpusa.org/ uploads/Gl/ci/GlciCz0RJ5B-BqEfR8Bh_w/STATS-2006.pdf 22 Justice Policy Institute, The Punishing Decade: Prison and Jail Estimates at the Millennium, (Washington: Justice Policy Institute, 2000), p. 5. 23 Paige M. Harrison, & Allen J. Beck, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2004 (Washington: US Dept. of Justice, April 2005), p. 11. 24 The Eisenhower Foundation, To Establish Justice, To Insure Domestic Tranquility, at http://www.eisenhowerfoundation.org/docs/justice.pdf 25 The Sentencing Project, Factsheet: Women in Prison, (Washington: The Sentencing Project, 2005) 26 Prison Activist Resource Center, Women in Prison, at http://prisonactivist.org/ women/women-in-prison.html 27 The Curry School of Education at the University of Virginia, Women in Prison in the US: Facts and Figures, at http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/index.php?option=com_ content&task=view&id=728&Itemid=74 28 Every Child Matters Education Fund, Overall Child Vulnerability, at http://www. everychildmatters.org/homelandinsecurity/table-11geo.html
24
Homeland Insecurity
29 Prison Population from Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2007 NCJ 215092, Table 2. Prisoners under the jurisdiction of State or Federal correctional authorities, by region and jurisdiction, yearend 2006 to 2007; U.S. Population from U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates 2007. 30 National Center for Education Statistics 1995. 31 Schweinhart, L.J., Montie, J.,Xiang, Z., Barnett, W.S., Belfield, C.R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime Effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through Age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. 32 National Institute for Early Education Research, The State of Preschool 2007 at http://nieer.org/yearbook/pdf/yearbook.pdf. The results were calculated by combining the data for three-year-olds and four-year-yolds on pages 17 and 18 respectively. 33 The Afterschool Alliance, America After 3 PM, May 2004 34 Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, 2002 35 The Afterschool Alliance, America After 3 PM, May 2004 36 Funding from 2006, Department of Health and Human Services, Fiscal Year 2006 Child Care Development Fund All Expenditures By State Categorical Summary, includes Discretionary Funding, Federal March, and Mandatory Funding. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/ programs/ccb/data/expenditures/06acf696/exp_detailed.htm 37 Funding from 2006, Department of Education, http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/ budget/statetables/09stbystate.pdf 38 Income data from U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 American Community Survey; Poverty data from U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2006 Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Table POV46 at http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/pov/ new46_100125_03.htm 39 National Center for Children in Poverty. Basic Facts About Low-Income Children: Birth to Age 18. (New York, NY: National Center for Children in Poverty, 2006). 40 US Department of Health and Human Services, The 2008 HHS Poverty Guidelines accessed at http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/08Poverty.shtml 41 UNICEF. Child Well-Being in Rich Countries 2006. Innocenti Report Card No. 7. Figure 1.2, p. 6 (Florence: UNICEF Innocent Research Centre, 2005). 42 Cauchon, Dennis, Senior Benefit Cost Up 24%: Health Care Crisis Lead to 8-year Rise, USA Today, February, 14, 2008. 43 Poverty data: DeNavas-Walt, Carmen, Bernadette D. Proctor, and Cheryl Hill Lee, U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-233, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2006, Table B-2, p. 51, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2006. Dow Jones data: Accessed through a search at http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^DJI&a=11&b=1&c=1966&d=11&e=3&f=2008&g=m&z=66&y=0 Numbers represent value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average on the last day of the year. 44 National Center for Children in Poverty. Ten Important Questions About Child Poverty and Family Economic Hardship, http://www.nccp.org/faq.html
45 UNICEF. Child Poverty in Rich Countries 2005. Innocenti Report Card No.6. Figure 9, p. 21 (Florence: UNICEF Innocent Research Centre, 2005). 46 U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2007 Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Table POV46, http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032008/pov/new46_100125_03. htm 47 Parkinson, Deborah (1995). Work Family Roundtable: Child Care Services. The Conference Board, Winter. 48 National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, Parents and the High Price of Child Care, Page 1, http://www.naccrra.org/docs/press/price_report.pdf 49 National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, Parents and the High Price of Child Care, Page 21-22, http://www.naccrra.org/docs/press/price_report.pdf 50 Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Starting Strong II: Early Childhood Education and Care, http://www.oecd.org/document/63/0,3343,en_2649_39263231 _37416703_1_1_1_1,00.html#CP 51 Reynolds, A.J., et al., Age 21 Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Center Program, Executive Summary, Handed out for a briefing on Capitol Hill, June 2001. Further publication of this data is pending. 52 William T. Dickens, Isabel Sawhill, and Jeffrey Tebbs, The Effects of Investing in Early Education on Economic Growth, Working Paper (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, January 2006). 53 Michael Fletcher, Washington Post, Early Head Start Yields Benefits, HHS Study Says, 1/13/2001 54 Julia Isaacs, Brookings Institute, Research Brief #5: Nurse Home Visiting, http://www. brookings.edu/papers/2008/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2008/09_early_programs_isaacs/09_ early_programs_brief5.pdf 55 Source: Olds, D., Henderson, C., Tatelbaum, R., and Chamberlin, R., Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: a randomized trial of nurse visitation, Pediatrics, (1986) vol. 78, pp. 65-78. 56 Steve Seninger, Montana Business Quarterly, Economic Returns for Investing in Childrens Health, http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/183489957.html 57 Afterschool Alliance, Afterschool Programs: A Wise Public Investment, http://www. afterschoolalliance.org/issue_22_cost.cfm#_edn7 58 Brown et. al, The Costs and Benefits of After School Programs: The Estimated Effects of the After School Education and Safety Program Act of 2002, The Rose Institute of Claremont-McKenna College, September 2002.
25
Homeland Insecurity
Homeland Insecurity
Millions...
Millions of children without health insurance. Millions abused or neglected. Millions living in poverty. Millions alone after school. There are millions of reasons for making investments in children a national priority. We Can Do Better. We Must Do Better. BECAUSE IN AMERICA, EVERY CHILD MATTERS.
Every Child Matters Education Fund 1023 15th St Suite 403 Washington, DC 20005
www.everychildmatters.org
1 Every Child Matters Education Fund Every Child Matters Education Fund
Washington, DC