Al Fara'a Group Vendor Evaluation Form

Software Vendor Evaluation

Scoring Criteria
Score Level Description

3
2 1
Agreeya SAP NetWeaver and Morphx 1

Excellent Strong Cause for Concern

Quadra Jgrid Java 2 Infor Oracle, DB2, Informix, MS SQL Server 3 Nalsoft Oracle 4 A-Solutions AX 5

SI has fully addressed and comforms to best practices SI has adequately addressed this factor. Minor deviations from best practices. A critical issue raises doubt as to SI qualification with this factor. Factor is inadequately address. Large deviations from best practices
SAP Company SAP NetWeaver 6 Basis For Score

1. Reporting
Data resides in multiple system Data is difficult to extract Tools to support charts and graphs Report writing tool is difficult to use Limited What-If Analysis Ability to support change in business model Reporting has to be too detailed Does not support regulatory reporting Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. Business Processes
Process adopted to fit the software Processes are inefficient Extensive paper volume manually routed Multiple manual approvals Processes not standardized Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. Module and Functionality

Functionality not available Limited functionality within each module Third party applications required Does not support business model change Incomplete training on modules and functionality Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. System Integration
Application installed on disparate platforms Users enter date into multiple systems Islands of data created and maintained Strategy for best of breed application Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. Total Cost of Ownership

Software Implementation Hardware Maintenance Operational Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

Al Fara'a Group Vendor Evaluation Form

Software Vendor Evaluation

Scoring Criteria
Score Level Description

3
2 1
Agreeya SAP NetWeaver and Morphx 1

Excellent Strong Cause for Concern

Quadra Jgrid Java 2 Infor Oracle, DB2, Informix, MS SQL Server 3 Nalsoft Oracle 4 A-Solutions AX 5

SI has fully addressed and comforms to best practices SI has adequately addressed this factor. Minor deviations from best practices. A critical issue raises doubt as to SI qualification with this factor. Factor is inadequately address. Large deviations from best practices
SAP Company SAP NetWeaver 6 Basis For Score

6. Company Information
Financial viability Organization Structure Overall exposure to Government sector Services department/division Pending Litigation Partnerships Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. Project Understanding
Over all understanding of project objectives Understanding of the business requirements Understanding of the end state vision Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. Functional & Non-Functional Requirements

Functional Requirements: Completeness of vendor response Extent of proposed enhancements/extensions Extent of BPR required Non-Functional Requirements: Vendor ability to meet requirements Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------

9. Product Viability & History

Sustainable technology Investment in on-going research & development Product development life-cycle Process for beta-testing and new releases Ability to influence vendor development focus Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

10. License / Maintenance Agreement, Terms & Conditions

Buyer duties Agreement terms and conditions favorable General Services Administration (GSA Schedule) Blanket agency purchase agreement Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

Al Fara'a Group Vendor Evaluation Form

Software Vendor Evaluation

Scoring Criteria
Score Level Description

3
2 1
Agreeya SAP NetWeaver and Morphx 1

Excellent Strong Cause for Concern

Quadra Jgrid Java 2 Infor Oracle, DB2, Informix, MS SQL Server 3 Nalsoft Oracle 4 A-Solutions AX 5

SI has fully addressed and comforms to best practices SI has adequately addressed this factor. Minor deviations from best practices. A critical issue raises doubt as to SI qualification with this factor. Factor is inadequately address. Large deviations from best practices
SAP Company SAP NetWeaver 6 Basis For Score

11. Vendor Involvement in Project

Willingness to be involved Experience working with systems integrators Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

12. Vendor Demonstrations

Integrated solution Degree of alignment with objectives Third party products shown & demonstrated Ease of use - # screens & key strokes System performance Flow & simplicity Ability of system to handle requirements Ability to meet future needs Flexibility, tailor ability, and extensibility of system Ability to answer questions Adherence to script Aesthetics to process Robustness of the application(s) Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0

13. Fee Summary

License fees Maintenance fees Purchase timeline License period Maintenance period & fee adjustment Maintenance start date Other fees Average Score 0 0 0 0 0 0