Dont worry, be active: positive affect and habitual physical activity

Julie A. Pasco, Felice N. Jacka, Lana J. Williams, Sharon L. Brennan, Eva Leslie, Michael Berk

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.

Objective: The aim of ths study was to examine the association between habitual physical activity and positive and negative affect. Method: This cross-sectional study included 276 women aged 20 , from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Habitual physical activity and other lifestyle exposures were assessed by questionnaire, concurrent with anthropometric assessments. Physical activity was categorized as very active, moderately active or sedentary. Positive and negative affect scores were derived from the validated 20 item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) self-report and were categorized into tertiles. Results: There was a pattern of lower positive affect scores for lower levels of physical activity. With very active as the reference category, the odds for having a positive affect score in the highest tertile were sequentially lower for those who were moderately active (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.281.01) and sedentary (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.100.75). Associations were sustained after adjusting for body mass index and polypharmacy (OR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.260.96 and OR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.090.72, respectively). These associations were not explained by age, negative affect score or other exposures. No association was detected between physical activity and negative affect scores. Conclusions: This study reports that higher positive affect scores, encompassing emotions such as interest, excitement, enthusiasm and alertness, are associated with higher levels of habitual physical activity. These observations warrant further investigations into possible mechanistic interplay between neurobiological and psychosocial factors that underpin this association. Key words: affect, epidemiology, exercise, mood, physical activity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2011; 45:10471052 DOI: 10.3109/00048674.2011.621063 The benets of physical activity on mental well-being, as well as physical well-being, are widely recognized although mechanisms remain unclear. Research with clinical populations has shown that physical activity is
Julie A. Pasco, Associate Professor (Correspondence); Sharon L. Brennan, Research Fellow Barwon Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, School of Medicine, Deakin University, PO Box 281, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia; NorthWest Academic Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia. Email: juliep@barwonhealth.org.au Felice N. Jacka, Research Fellow; Lana J. Williams, Research Fellow School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 2011 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists

effective in alleviating depression and anxiety [1,2]. The inverse relationship between regular physical activity and depression [39] and the recognition of physical inactivity as a risk factor for depression [10] support the notion
Eva Leslie, Associate Professor School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia Michael Berk, Professor School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Orygen Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Mental Health Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

1048

AFFECT AND HABITUAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.

of a protective nature of the relationship between physical activity and mood. Physical activity programmes have also been shown to have benecial effects on positive emotion [1113], which independently promotes good physical health [14]. Physical activity may additionally decrease the risk of developing depression [9,15]. Negative affect includes feelings that reect unpleasant engagement, such as distress, anger, disgust, fear and shame [14,16,17]. By contrast, positive affect embraces pleasurable feelings and includes happiness, interest, joy, excitement, enthusiasm, contentment and alertness. It is unclear whether these two elements are polar extremes on the same scale, or whether they represent separate orthogonal factors [14]. This is of relevance as there is a large literature of the relation of negative affect to various disorders, including mental health. In particular, if the two constructs exist on a continuum, the benets of positive affect may reect absence of negative affect. However, if they are independent, positive affect could provide therapeutic benets that are independent of negative affect. The mood literature has tended to focus on depression as a unitary phenomenon; however, there are increasing data suggesting that positive and negative affect are independent, albeit related, constructs. The school of positive psychology has developed around the modulation of positive affect as a means of preventing depression [18]. However, while there is a theoretical basis for research underpinning positive psychology, it remains unclear if mood-modulating strategies operate via positive or negative affect, or have non-specic effects on both. We therefore aimed to examine the association between habitual physical activity, and both positive and negative affect.

participants provided informed, written consent. Participant anonymity has been preserved in this report. Data Data collected at the 8 year assessment were used to investigate cross-sectional associations between habitual physical activity and self-rated affect. Self-rated affect was derived from two 10 item scales that comprise the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) that recorded feelings and emotions over the few days prior to assessment [17]. The exposure of interest was habitual physical activity level categorized as very active if the subject moves, walks and works energetically; participates in vigorous exercise; moderately active if the subject walks at brisk pace, does normal housework or other work; engages in light exercise; otherwise they were described as sedentary. Body weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) calculated as weight/height2 (kg/m2) and categorized as normal if BMI 25.0 kg/m2, overweight if BMI was in the range 25.029.9 kg/m2, and obese if BMI 30.0 kg/m2 [20]. Tobacco smoking was recognized if smoking was practised regularly at the time of assessment; exposure to medications and diseases were self-reported; alcohol consumption was estimated (as average grams of ethanol per day) from a food frequency questionnaire [21] designed and validated by the Cancer Council of Australia (Victoria) [22]. Self-reported current use of prescription medications was recorded and classied as up to two, and three or more. Socioeconomic status (SES) was ascertained using the Socio-Economic Index for Areas (SEIFA) values based on 2001 census data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. SEIFA values were used to derive an Index of Occupation and Education (IOE), which was categorized into quintiles according to cutpoints for the Barwon Statistical Division. Statistics

Methods Subjects This analysis was conducted as part of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS), a study originally designed to investigate the epidemiology of osteoporosis in Australia but later expanded to study mental health. A cohort of 1494 women was selected at random from electoral rolls for the Barwon Statistical Division in south-eastern Australia, and enrolled in the GOS in the period 1994 1997, with a response of 77.1% [19]. This analysis focuses on the 304 women who completed questionnaires as part of their 8 year follow up assessment. Twenty-eight women were excluded because their questionnaire data pertaining to affect were incomplete; thus, data for 276 women were included. The Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study and all

Characteristics for women categorized by level of physical activity were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for parametric continuous variables, KruskallWallis for non-parametric continuous variables, and the 2 test for discrete variables. Odds ratios (OR), with 95% condence intervals (CI), were determined using logistic regression models to investigate associations between physical activity (the exposure of interest expressed as very active, moderately active and sedentary) and the likelihood of having a high positive or negative affect score (highest tertile compared to mid and low tertiles combined). Age, body composition, smoking, alcohol use, SES and exposure to medications were investigated as confounders and

J. A. PASCO, F. N. JACKA, L. J. WILLIAMS ET AL.

1049

Table 1. Characteristics of subjects categorized into different levels of physical activity. Values are presented as mean ( SD), median (interquartile range) or n (%)
Very active n 50 Age (yr) Weight (kg) Height (cm) BMI (kg/m2) Smokers Alcohol 20 g/day Medications antidepressants anti-anxiety 3 or more Socioeconomic status quintile 1 (low) quintile 2 quintile 3 quintile 4 quintile 5 50.8 (44.655.6) 66.7 ( 12.4) 162.9 ( 7.0) 25.1 ( 4.1) 4 (8.0%) 9 (18.0%) 4 (8.0%) 1 (2.0%) 6 (12.0%) 8 9 11 8 14 (16.0%) (18.0%) (22.0%) (16.0%) (28.0%) Moderately active n 187 55.3 71.5 161.1 27.5 27 20 (46.364.8) ( 15.0) ( 6.4) ( 5.3) (14.4%) (10.7%) Sedentary n 39 65.9 (52.976.3) 76.1 ( 15.6) 158.0 ( 5.6) 30.5 ( 6.1) 3 (7.7%) 2 (5.1%) 3 (7.7%) 3 (7.7%) 16 (41.0%) 10 5 16 3 5 (25.6%) (12.8%) (41.0%) (7.7%) (12.8%) P value 0.001 0.01 0.002 0.001 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.003 0.1

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.

17 (9.1%) 5 (2.7%) 38 (20.3%) 32 46 42 33 34 (17.1%) (24.6%) (22.5%) (17.7%) (18.2%)

effect modiers. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA (release 9.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX) and MINITAB (version 15, State College, PA). Results Among the 276 subjects, 50 (18.1%) were classied as very active, 187 (67.8%) as moderately active and 39 (14.1%) as sedentary (Table 1). Women in the very active group were the youngest, they had the lowest body mass index and fewer used 3 prescription medications. No differences were detected for other lifestyle exposures. There was a pattern of lower positive affect scores for lower levels of physical activity (p 0.001, Figure 1). With the very active group set as the reference, the odds for having a high positive affect score was sequentially reduced for those who were moderately active (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.281.01, p 0.05) and sedentary (OR = 0.28, 95%CI 0.100.75, p 0.01). These associations were sustained after adjusting for the confounding variables, body mass index and use of 3 prescription medications: OR 0.50 (95%CI 0.26 0.96), p 0.04; and OR 0.25 (95%CI 0.090.72), p 0.01, respectively (Figure 2). This association was not explained by differences in age, negative affect score or any of the other lifestyle exposures listed in Table 1. There was no association detected between physical activity and negative affect scores. With the very active group set as the reference, the adjusted odds for having a high negative affect score did not differ for those who were moderately active (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.341.31, p 0.2) or sedentary (OR = 1.14, 95%CI 0.462.85, p 0.8).

Discussion The data presented in this study support a relationship between higher levels of physical activity and better mood states as measured by positive affect scores. In this group
50

40 Scores

30

20

10

iv e

iv e

ta ry

e ac tiv

Se de n

M od

M od

ry

ry

Ve

(a) Postive affect

Ve

(b) Negative affect

Figure 1. Boxplot showing scores for (a) positive affect and (b) negative affect according to physical activity levels: very active, moderately active (mod active) and sedentary (Kruskall-Wallis test, p 0.001 and 0.3, for positive and negative affect scores, respectively). The median score and interquartile range is represented in each box, together with an indication of the range of values for each category of physical activity.

Se

de nt ar y

ac t

ac t

ac

tiv

1050

AFFECT AND HABITUAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

1.2 1 Odds ratio 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Very active Moderately active Physical activity Sedentary

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.

Figure 2. Histogram showing the likelihood for positive affect score in the highest tertile according to physical activity levels, after adjusting for body mass index and use of three or more prescription medications (error bars represent the 95% condence intervals). The very active group is the reference. of women we found that positive affect scores diminished with lower levels of physical activity. This association was independent of body mass index and medication use, and was not explained by age, smoking, alcohol intake, SES or negative affect scores. No association was found between physical activity and negative affect. Habitual physical activity is thus associated with emotions such as interest, excitement, enthusiasm and alertness, as they are indicative of high positive affect [16, 17]. Many previous studies have linked physical activity with mental well-being. Physical activity interventions have been shown to reduce depressive symptomatology [23] and alleviate symptoms with a magnitude of effect equivalent to that of antidepressant medication [24]. There are reports of enhanced positive affect following physical activity sessions in some [1113, 2527], but not all [28], investigations. In studies of college-age students, higher levels of total physical activity [26] and involvement in taekwondo exercises [13] were both reported to induce positive mood state changes. Improvements in affect have been reported in middle-aged individuals following aerobic line dancing [11] and maximal exertion through walking exercises has also been shown to elicit acute mood response in women by increasing self-esteem [12]. A randomized controlled trial among seniors residing in intermediate care and self-care retirement facilities demonstrated that programmes involving resistance and balance training on the one hand, and exibility and relaxation techniques on the other, both resulted in improvements in positive affect scores [27]. The inuences of self-initiated habitual physical activity on affect have been reported in a case-control study involving cases with major depressive disorder and controls who had never been depressed: in response to physical activity, both

groups reported higher positive affect scores whereas negative affect scores remained unchanged [25]. There are several psychosocial advantages to being physically active. Scheduling exercise into a productive routine has been shown to be useful in the management of mood [29]. Exercise increases ones sense of self-efcacy. It also is frequently associated with social engagement, and this has clear benets in modifying mood [30]. Outdoor activities may also increase exposure to sunlight, guarding against vitamin D deciency that is particularly common in affective disorders [31,32]. There are also several neurobiological sequelae to physical activity that are consistent with positive effects on mood. Regular exercise increases the availability of the monamine neurotransmitters, serotonin [33] and noradrenaline [34], attenuates the hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal axis response to stress [35], increases the levels of neurotrophins such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor [36], reduces inammation, which is well documented in depression [37] and reduces oxidative stress, which has similarly been shown to be present in depression [38,39]. Limitations of our study include the accuracy of selfreported physical activity, with the possibility of differential recall inuenced by mood and well-being. Multi-prescription use served as a surrogate for comorbid disease, which was not directly addressed. It is possible that other components of physical activity such as social engagement may have contributed to the benecial effects of exercise. Robust measures of depression and anxiety were not employed in this study; such measures would have been useful in elucidating links between physical activity, positive and negative affect, and mental health well-being. As this is a cross-sectional study, directional causality cannot be addressed. However, we found some agreement between the level of physical activity utilized in this analysis, and those reported by study participants approximately two years earlier ( 0.3, data not shown). Habitual physical activity thus remains reasonably stable over time, supporting the posited notion that physical activity inuences mood. This study supports the concept that the impact of physical activity on mood is associated with changes in positive affect rather than negative affect. Although causality cannot be claimed, these results warrant further investigations into the mechanistic interplay between neurobiological and psychosocial factors that might underlie this association. The ndings add further support to our previous work [9,4042] demonstrating that lifestyle plays a role in common mental disorders. Our ndings add to extant literature suggesting that positive and negative affect are independent constructs and support the tenet that mood-modulating strategies might operate via positive affect. Further studies are needed to

J. A. PASCO, F. N. JACKA, L. J. WILLIAMS ET AL.

1051

identify which aspects of positive and negative affect are inuenced by physical activity and to quantify dose response relationships to clarify how much physical activity and what type is required to optimize mood states. Declaration of interest: The study was supported by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly, but they played no part in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. F.J. and S.B. are recipients of NHMRC Early Career Fellowships. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References
1. Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, Kampert JB, Clark CG, Chambliss HO. Exercise treatment for depression: efcacy and dose response. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28:18. 2. Ng F, Dodd S, Berk M. The effects of physical activity in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder: a pilot study. J Affect Disord 2007; 101:259262. 3. Farmer ME, Locke BZ, Moscicki EK, Dannenberg AL, Larson DB, Radloff LS. Physical activity and depressive symptoms: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:13401351. 4. Camacho TC, Roberts RE, Lazarus NB, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD. Physical activity and depression: evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134:220231. 5. Strawbridge WJ, Deleger S, Roberts RE, Kaplan GA. Physical activity reduces the risk of subsequent depression for older adults. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:328334. 6. Brown WJ, Ford JH, Burton NW, Marshall AL, Dobson AJ. Prospective study of physical activity and depressive symptoms in middle-aged women. Am J Prev Med 2005; 29:265272. 7. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Doseresponse relationship between physical activity and mental health: the Scottish Health Survey. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43:11111114. 8. Cerin E, Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Associations of multiple physical activity domains with mental well-being. J Ment Health Phys Act 2009; 2:5564. 9. Pasco JA, Williams LJ, Jacka FN, et al. Habitual physical activity and the risk for depressive and anxiety disorders among older men and women. Int Psychogeriatr 2011; 23:292298. 10. van Gool CH, Kempen GI, Penninx BW, Deeg DJ, Beekman AT, van Eijk JT. Relationship between changes in depressive symptoms and unhealthy lifestyles in late middle aged and older persons: results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Age Ageing 2003; 32:8187. 11. Pierce EF, Pate DW. Mood alterations in older adults following acute exercise. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 79:191194. 12. Pronk NP, Crouse SF, Rohack JJ. Maximal exercise and acute mood response in women. Physiol Behav 1995; 57:14. 13. Toskovic NN. Alterations in selected measures of mood with a single bout of dynamic taekwondo exercise in college-age students. Percept Mot Skills 2001; 92:10311038.

14. Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect inuence health? Psychol Bull 2005; 131:925971. 15. Jacka FN, Pasco JA, Williams LJ, et al. Lower levels of physical activity in childhood associated with adult depression. J Sci Med Sport 2011; 14:222226. 16. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2004; 43:245265. 17. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54:10631070. 18. Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology. An introduction. Am Psychol 2000; 55:514. 19. Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA. Cohort prole: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Int J Epidemiol (in press). 20. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity 35 June 1997. Geneva: WHO, 1998. 21. Coulson CE, Williams LJ, Henry MJ et al. Patterns of alcohol use and associated physical and lifestyle characteristics according to new Australian guidelines. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2010; 44:946951. 22. Giles GG, Ireland PD. Dietary Questionnaire for Epidemiological Studies (Version 2). Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria, 1996. 23. Conn VS. Depressive symptom outcomes of physical activity interventions: meta-analysis ndings. Ann Behav Med 2010; 39:128138. 24. Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Doraiswamy PM et al. Exercise and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Psychosom Med 2007; 69:587596. 25. Mata J, Thompson RJ, Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Gotlib IH. Walk on the bright side: physical activity and affect in major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2011 May 9 (Epub ahead of print). 26. Oztekin C, Tezer E. The role of sense of coherence and physical activity in positive and negative affect of Turkish adolescents. Adolescence 2009; 44:421432. 27. Brown AK, Liu-Ambrose T, Tate R, Lord SR. The effect of groupbased exercise on cognitive performance and mood in seniors residing in intermediate care and self-care retirement facilities: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43:608614. 28. Lennox SS, Bedell JR, Stone AA. The effect of exercise on normal mood. J Psychosom Res 1990; 34:629636. 29. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27:318326. 30. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Smit F, Mihalopoulos C, Beekman A. Preventing the onset of depressive disorders: a meta-analytic review of psychological interventions. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:12721280. 31. Berk M, Jacka FN, Williams LJ, Ng F, Dodd S, Pasco JA. Is this D vitamin to worry about? Vitamin D insufciency in an inpatient sample. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008; 42:874878. 32. Berk M, Sanders KM, Pasco JA, et al. Vitamin D deciency may play a role in depression. Med Hypotheses 2007; 69:13161319. 33. Greenwood BN, Foley TE, Day HE, et al. Wheel running alters serotonin (5-HT) transporter, 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor mRNA in the rat raphe nuclei. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 57:559568. 34. Dishman RK, Renner KJ, White-Welkley JE, Burke KA, Bunnell BN. Treadmill exercise training augments brain norepinephrine response to familiar and novel stress. Brain Res Bull 2000; 52:337342. 35. Stranahan AM, Lee K, Mattson MP. Central mechanisms of HPA axis regulation by voluntary exercise. Neuromolecular Med 2008; 10:118127.

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.

1052

AFFECT AND HABITUAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

36. van Praag H. Neurogenesis and exercise: past and future directions. Neuromolecular Med 2008; 10:128140. 37. Pasco JA, Nicholson GC, Williams LJ, et al. Association of highsensitivity C-reactive protein with de novo major depression. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197:372377. 38. Berk M, Ng F, Dean O, Dodd S, Bush AI. Glutathione: a novel treatment target in psychiatry. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008; 29:346351. 39. Gomez-Pinilla F. The combined effects of exercise and foods in preventing neurological and cognitive disorders. Prev Med 2011; 52:S7580.

40. Pasco JA, Williams LJ, Jacka FN, et al. Tobacco smoking as a risk factor for major depressive disorder: population-based study. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 193:322326. 41. Jacka FN, Pasco JA, Mykletun A, et al. Association of Western and traditional diets with depression and anxiety in women. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:305311. 42. Williams LJ, Brennan SL, Henry MJ, et al. Area-based socioeconomic status and mood disorders: cross-sectional evidence from a cohort of randomly selected adult women. Maturitas 2011; 69: 173178.

Aust NZ J Psychiatry Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by HINARI on 06/19/12 For personal use only.