Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Presentation Structure
SAARC Regional Energy Trade Strategy Focus
Increasing energy deficits Single fuel dominance in energy mix Limited exploitation of renewable energy resources High dependence on traditional fuels Rising import dependence Lack of requisite energy infrastructure
SAARC Member Energy Reserves - 2010 (Figures in parenthesis are mtoe equivalents)
Countries
Afghanistan Bhutan Bangladesh India Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka TOTAL
Hydro MW 25000 (18.9) 30000 (22.7) 330 (0.3) 150000 (113.7) 0 42000 (31.8) 45000 (34.1) 2000 (1.5) 294330 (223.0)
Domestic supply constraints are evident from the resource development pace and the rate of import growth apart from environmental concerns with coal
Bhutan-India (about 5600 GWh) India- Nepal (about 600 GWh) Petroleum products Between India and Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka Inter-regional trade limited to Oil, coal and electricity (limited)
AfghanistanPakistan power transmission Additional power transmission links BhutanIndia, India-Nepal, Bangladesh-India Turkmen-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India pipeline Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline Myanmar-Bangladesh-India gas pipeline
Transport Expansion Regional LNG Terminal and Gas Transmission Expansion Regional Power Plant (s)
Incentives to resource rich countries to accelerate power development Cross-border connectivity, a prerequisite
Kyrgyzstan
Nurek HPP
Existing Surplus
Uzbekistan
Perspective Facilities
220/500 kV Uzbek by pass SS Datka (Kyrgyz) SS Hojent (Tajik) Cascade of Zarafshan HPPs (Yavan and Oburdon HPP)
Annual generation 1680 GWh
Tajikistan
Facilities Under Construction
500 kV OHL South-North
Financing: China Exim bank
China
Sangtuda 1 HPP
Financing: Russia
Sangtuda 2 HPP
Financing: Iran
Pakistan
Kabul Peshawar
Afghanistan India
India-Nepal
Dhalkebar-Muazaffarpur 400 kV 1,000 MW line HVDC line with sub-sea cable 500 MW in the shortterm
186 (2010 estimate) including internal transmission upgrade 339 (2006 estimate) 600 (Current)
India-Bangladesh
HVDC back-to-back asynchronous link 220 kV in the short term, 400 kV in the long term
500 MW
India-Pakistan
250-500 MW
1300 MW
Generators
Optimal Mix of Generation using Investment Optimisation with DC power flow constraints
Probability distribution of uncertain parameters Selected Generators given a transmission configuration
Performance of Selected Resources using Monte Carlo Simulation with DC-PF. Perform two runs with and without a transmission line to assess the benefit of the line
16
India-Bangladesh Three scenarios HVDC link around demand growth in Bangladesh that range between 9.000 MW to 12,000 MW in 2016/17.
17
Total cost range between USD 192 million to USD 250 million. Annualised cost of USD 25 million pa assumed for cost/benefit analysis.
Annual benefits range between USD 145 million to USD 389 million, depending upon demand-supply assumptions.
Surplus state: Annualized cost USD 8 (2000MWadded) million pa Deficit state: 650 MW delayed
18
Distribution of benefits
1200
The link is likely to be beneficial with USD 186 million in annual benefit on average. This is likely to yield a benefit to cost ratio of over 3
0
1 23 45 67 89 111 133 155 177 199 221 243 265 287 309 331 353 375 397 419 441 463 485
1200
1000 800 600 400 200 0 -200
0% 5% 9% 14% 19% 23% 28% 32% 37% 42% 46% 51% 55% 60% 65% 69% 74% 78% 83% 88% 92% 97%
Potentially very high benefits due to a combination of USE and fuel cost savings
21
India Bangladesh:
India Pakistan:
22
India would be the biggest beneficiary with a significant reduction in peaking gas/liquid based power generation as well as reduction of generation from less efficient and expensive coal-fired power stations
Collective fuel cost savings in India from coal-based generation alone (with all interconnection cases) is close to USD 300 million through displacement of 10,000 GWh of coal-based generation in 2016/17
The average emission intensity of less efficient coal plants in India is estimated at 1.35 tonne of CO2 per MWh The overall emissions reduction in India from a reduction in coalbased generation would be over 13 million tonne of CO2 in 2016/17 If the value of carbon credits is considered at USD 15 per tonne, the carbon reduction benefits would also be close to USD 200 million
The longer term savings through import of 40,000 GWh of hydro from Bhutan alone would be 3-4 times as high
24
Apart from India, thermal generation reduction can also save significant costs in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka
The fuel cost reduction potential in Pakistan is particularly noteworthy because of a low efficiency plant stock and high fuel cost (e.g., USD 11 per GJ for gas) fuel cost savings exceeding USD 100 million dollar is estimated in Pakistan
The following slide provides details on fuel cost savings POTENTIAL from 8 major thermal power stations in Pakistan
25
26
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Accelerated expansion of electricity trade in South Asia - a key recommendation of ADBs SAARC Regional Energy Trade Study Related economic analysis carried out so far establishes economic feasibility of all proposed interconnections Fuel savings from thermal energy displacement resulting mainly from expanded hydropower utilization has strong clean energy impact