0022-3565/01/2972-746 752$3.

00 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Copyright 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics JPET 297:746752, 2001

Vol. 297, No. 2 3531/898982 Printed in U.S.A.

Amphetamine Normalizes the Electrical Activity of Dopamine Neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area following Prenatal Ethanol Exposure
CHANGQING XU and ROH-YU SHEN
Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York Received November 7, 2000; accepted January 3, 2001 This paper is available online at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org

ABSTRACT Prenatal ethanol exposure has been shown to produce a persistent reduction in the spontaneous activity of ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine (DA) neurons and in DA neurotransmission. Amphetamine-like stimulants are effective in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is a major symptom in fetal alcohol syndrome. Because there is a link between reduced DA neurotransmission and ADHD, we investigated the possibility that amphetamine could restore the spontaneous activity of VTA DA neurons. Pregnant rats were administered 0 or 6 g/kg/day ethanol via intragastric intubation during gestation days 8 to 20. The spontaneous activity of VTA neurons was studied in 6- to 8-week-old male offspring using extracellular single-unit recording in unanesthetized (paralyzed, locally anesthetized) or chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats. Prenatal ethanol exposure reduced the number of spontaneously

active DA neurons without changing the firing rate or firing pattern in both groups of animals. Acute amphetamine administration (2 mg/kg, i.v.) increased the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure. Because amphetamine inhibited DA neuron firing rate in ethanol-exposed animals, it is possible that amphetamine restored the number of spontaneously active neurons by alleviating the depolarization block. These results show that the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons resulting from prenatal ethanol exposure is not confounded by using general anesthesia. Furthermore, acute amphetamine treatment can normalize the activity of DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure. This mechanism may contribute to the therapeutic effects of amphetamine-like stimulants in attention problems observed in children with fetal alcohol syndrome.

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

Results from previous studies have shown that prenatal ethanol exposure leads to profound changes in midbrain dopamine (DA) systems. Evidence from animal studies demonstrates that prenatal ethanol exposure causes reductions in DA uptake and receptor binding sites, DA content, and the DA metabolites homovanillic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid in the somatodendritic and terminal areas (Rathbun and Druse, 1985; Cooper and Rudeen, 1988; Druse et al., 1990). Prenatal ethanol exposure also results in morphological changes (e.g., smaller cell bodies and retarded dendritic growth) in midbrain DA neurons (Shetty et al., 1993). In addition, DA receptor-mediated behaviors, such as locomotion and catalepsy, are altered following prenatal ethanol exposure (Hannigan and Randall, 1996). In the past few years, using the electrophysiological approach, we have observed a persistent reduction in the number of spontaneously active midbrain DA neurons without a loss of DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure (Shen et

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant AA 12435 (to R.-Y.S.).

al., 1999). We have also seen changes in the functions of DA receptors after prenatal ethanol exposure (Shen et al., 1995). The DA receptor changes include a supersensitivity in the somatodendritic DA autoreceptors and a subsensensitivity in postsynaptic D-1 DA receptors in nucleus accumbens (Shen et al., 1999). Because the spontaneous activity of DA neurons plays an important role in controlling the synthesis and release of DA (Gonon and Buda, 1985; Suaud-Chagny et al., 1992), the reduction in DA content and its metabolites produced by prenatal ethanol exposure could be caused by a reduction in the spontaneous activity of DA neurons. Interestingly, acute administration of the DA agonist apomorphine at a low dose can restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure, suggesting that the depolarization block is the underlying mechanism for the reduced number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure (Shen et al., 1999). Several lines of evidence suggest that decreased DA neurotransmission may contribute to the etiology of the attention/hyperactivity problem commonly observed in children with fetal alcohol syndrome/fetal alcohol effect (FAS/FAE;

ABBREVIATIONS: DA, dopamine; FAS/FAE, fetal alcohol syndrome/fetal alcohol effect; VTA, ventral tegmental area; i.v., intravenous; i.p., intraperitoneal; HSD, honest significant difference; ANOVA, analysis of variance; MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance. 746

Amphetamine Normalizes DA Neuron Activity

747

Nanson and Hiscock, 1990; Streissguth et al., 1991). For example, in experimental animals, hyperactivity during early development can be induced by selectively depleting midbrain DA neurons with 6-hydroxydopamine (Shaywitz et al., 1976). A reduction in the DA metabolite homovanillic acid in the cerebrospinal fluid has been observed in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (Shaywitz et al., 1977). Although amphetamine-like stimulants are effective in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, including the attention problems in children with FAS/FAE (Morrow, 1991; Oesterheld et al., 1998), the underlying mechanism of their therapeutic effects is not clear. Because acute apomorphine and amphetamine exert similar inhibitory effects on DA neuron firing rate, it is possible that, similar to the effect of apomorphine, amphetamine can reverse the depolarization block and restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure. The restored number of spontaneously active DA neurons in turn compensates for DA hypofunction and leads to the alleviation of attention problems. In the present study, we examine the possibility that acute amphetamine can restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons. The majority of the experiments investigating the spontaneous activity of DA neurons, including our previous studies, are conducted in anesthetized animals. Recently, a group of investigators have raised the possibility that the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons and the depolarization block seen after experimental treatment are artifacts due to the use of general anesthesia (Mereu et al., 1995). Therefore, to verify the hypothesis that the depolarization block is the underlying mechanism for the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol and examine if amphetamine can restore this deficit by reversing the depolarization block, recordings in the present study are performed in unanesthetized (paralyzed, locally anesthetized) rats. Additional recordings are performed under chloral hydrate anesthesia for the purpose of comparison. We focus our studies on DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) because these neurons project to the prefrontal cortex, which is important in mediating the attention process (Smith and Jonides, 1999). We believe the results from the present study can further our understanding of the cellular mechanisms leading to reduced DA neurotransmission after prenatal ethanol exposure, as well as help to clarify how amphetamine-like stimulants can ameliorate the behavioral symptoms in children with FAS/FAE.

Materials and Methods

Prenatal Ethanol Administration. Timed-pregnant SpragueDawley rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were delivered on gestation day 6 to allow time for handling. To mimic the binge drinking behavior that produces high blood ethanol concentrations in humans at risk for FAS/FAE, rats were administered ethanol via intragastric intubation from gestation day 8 through gestation day 20. Animals were treated with a daily dose of 0 or 6 g/kg ethanol (20% w/v in 0.9% saline), except during weekends. Treatment was carried out by two intubations at 0 or 3 g/kg (5 6 h apart; between 10:00 AM and 5:00 P.M.) during weekdays. A single daily dose of 0 or 4 g/kg ethanol was given during weekends. Sucrose (30% w/v in 0.9% saline) was substituted for ethanol for the 0 g/kg control group to equalize caloric intake with animals treated with ethanol. The blood ethanol concentration measured 1.5 h after the second

daily dose of ethanol was between 281 and 341 mg/dl (measured in additional three pregnant rats) on gestation day 20. Although our previous studies showed that intubation-related stress did not affect DA neuron activity, we did observe that food intake was reduced by ethanol treatment. To control for the possible effect of undernutrition, rats in the 0 g/kg control group were pair-fed with ethanoltreated dams. An additional control group, which was not intubated or pair-fed, was also included. Dams in the ethanol group also received thiamine injections (8 mg/kg; i.m. twice a week) to avoid thiamine deficiency induced by ethanol treatment. Rearing and Cross-Fostering. We had observed a certain degree of negligence toward pups by ethanol treated dams in our current laboratory setting. Therefore, a cross-fostering procedure was used. On postnatal day 1, pups were individually weighed and examined for gross physical abnormalities, and the litters were culled randomly to 10 pups of 5 males and 5 females when possible. The litters were then transferred to surrogate dams that did not receive any treatment and had delivered two days earlier. The pups were mixed with bedding from the surrogate dams cage and then transferred to the surrogate dams. The surrogate dams litters were removed before the transfer. Litters were weaned and weighed on postnatal day 21. Only male offspring were used in the present study. To control litter effects, no more than three littermates were used in the same experiments. The offspring used in the present study were acquired from 44 litters. Surgical Procedures. The electrophysiological recordings of DA neurons were performed in unanesthetized or in chloral hydrateanesthetized rats between 6 and 8 weeks old. When the unanesthetized preparation was used, all surgical procedures were performed under temporary halothane anesthesia. All incision sites and blunt pressure points were infiltrated with a long-acting local anesthetic, bupivacaine (0.25%, Abbott Laboratory, North Chicago, IL) before surgical procedures. Although anesthetized with halothane, each rat was tracheotomized, cannulated with a tracheal tube, mounted in a stereotaxic apparatus, and the skull and dura overlapping the VTA were removed. The tail vein was cannulated. Rats were then paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide [25 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.), Sigma-RBI, St. Louis, MO] injected through the i.v. cannula, and halothane was withdrawn. Each rat was respired immediately with a mixture of O2/N2O (70%/30%) by connecting the tracheal cannula with a rodent ventilator (Edco Scientific, Inc., Chapel Hills, NC). Each rat was respired for minimum of 20 min before each electrophysiological recording. Expired CO2 levels were continuously monitored with a CO2 monitor (Biochem 9000 Capnograph-Oximeter, Biochem, Wankesha, WI) and maintained between 28% and 43%. Body temperature was monitored and maintained between 36C and 37C. Heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were monitored with an oximeter (Nonin 8600V, Plymouth, MN). Heart rate was maintained between 280 to 400/min. Blood oxygen was maintained above 90%. Gallamine triethiodide was administered every 30 min. For comparison purposes, some recordings were performed under chloral hydrate anesthesia. Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate [400 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.)] and underwent the same stereotaxic surgical procedures as used in the other groups (see below). A ventilator was not used, and only body temperature was monitored. Supplement of chloral hydrate (100 mg/kg i.p.) was administered every 30 to 60 min. Electrophysiology. Electrophysiological recordings were carried out as previously described (Shen et al., 1999). Extracellular action potentials were recorded with single-barrel glass micropipettes (1.5 mm o.d.; Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA) filled with 2 M NaCl (in vitro impedance, 2 4 M at 135 Hz) lowered into the VTA and monitored with a high input impedance amplifier (bandpass filter settings, 0.33 kHz). The output was sent to an analog oscilloscope, audiomonitor, window discriminator, and a 486 personal computer. To perform the cells-per-track technique, the recording electrode was passed systematically 12 times through a stereotaxically defined block in the VTA. The electrode tracks were separated by 200 m

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

748

Xu and Shen

Fig. 1. Prenatal ethanol exposure reduces the numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons, but not their firing rates in the VTA in unanesthetized (paralyzed, locally anesthetized) and anesthetized (chloral hydrate-anesthetized) rats. A, the numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons are shown as cells-per-track (mean number of DA neurons encountered from each electrode penetration S.E.M. value). ***P 0.001, Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons between the 0 g/kg control group and the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed group in unanesthetized or anesthetized animals. The number of animals used in each group is indicated within each bar. B, the average firing rates in the VTA after prenatal ethanol exposure in paralyzed or anesthetized animals. The number of cells recorded in each group is indicated within each bar.

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

(coordinates: 2.8 3.4 mm anterior to lambda, 6.0 9.0 mm below the brain surface, 0.6 1.0 mm lateral to the midline). In some animals, the cell-per-track sampling procedure was extended to the anterior VTA (3.6 4.2 mm anterior to lambda) and a total of 24 tracks were sampled. Spontaneously active DA neurons were identified by their characteristic waveforms and firing patterns (Chiodo, 1988). Each DA neuron was recorded for 1 to 5 min, depending on its firing rate. Average firing rates of DA neurons were determined from all DA neurons sampled within each group. To test the acute effects of amphetamine (d-amphetamine sulfate, Sigma-RBI) on the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure, cells-per-track experiments were performed in the right VTA first. VTA DA neurons in the left midbrain were sampled in the same animals beginning 20 min after a single intravenous amphetamine injection (2 mg/kg). To analyze the firing pattern, interspike intervals of individual DA neurons were determined from 500 consecutive action potentials obtained from each DA neuron. Firing pattern analysis was performed on the interspike interval data with the Burstan program (Shen et al., 1999). The onset of a burst was defined by an interspike interval of less than 80 msec and a burst termination with the next interspike interval of 160 msec or greater. Burst firing patterns were compared by burst number (percentage of the 500 spikes that were present within the burst), burst length (mean number of spikes within each burst), doublet (number of bursts that are consisted of two spikes), interburst interval (mean interval between bursts), within burst interval (mean interval between spikes within each burst), and percent bursting cells in each group (a bursting cell was defined as a neuron with a burst number greater than 10%). In some animals, dose-response curves for the inhibitory effect of systemically administered amphetamine on VTA DA neuron firing rate was examined. Amphetamine was administered at cumulative doses (i.v.) of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, 6.4, and 12.8 mg/kg. Firing rate was counted every 10 s. The first dose was administered after a minimum period of 60 s of stable baseline activity. Incremental doses were administered at 60-s intervals. This procedure was continued until no spike discharges occurred for a 60-s period. The neuron was then considered completely inhibited. A DA receptor antagonist, haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg i.v.; Sigma-RBI) was subsequently administered to all animals to reactivate the same neuron to ensure a true inhibition by amphetamine instead of a loss of signals. The prenatal ethanol treatment and surgical procedures were con-

ducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health and American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care animal care guidelines, and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University at Buffalo. Data Analysis. The comparisons between groups for numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons and firing rates were made by one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)/multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA), followed by Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc comparison (Statistica Software, Tulsa, OK). Percent bursting cells were compared between groups with 2 square tests.

Results
The Number of Spontaneous Active DA Neurons and Their Firing Rates after Prenatal Ethanol Exposure. Prenatal ethanol exposure significantly decreased the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in the VTA in 6- to 8-week-old male rats in both unanesthetized and anesthetized preparations (two-way ANOVA; F1,40 71.66; P 0.001; Fig. 1A). Although there was a slight increase in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in unanesthetized animals when compared with that in anesthetized animals, it did not reach statistical significance (two-way ANOVA; P 0.05). The mean numbers of cells-per-track in the 0 g/kg control groups acquired from unanesthetized and anesthetized animals were 1.06 0.10 (mean S.E.M.) and 1.02 0.09, respectively. These two groups did not differ from each other. The mean number of cells-per-track in the untreated control group was 0.94 0.05, which was not different from the two 0 g/kg control groups (one-way ANOVA; P 0.05). In animals from the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed groups, the numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons in unanesthetized and anesthetized animals were 0.48 0.07 and 0.35 0.04 cells-per-track, respectively. This represents a 55 to 66% decrease in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in the VTA produced by prenatal ethanol exposure relative to the 0 g/kg control groups. In some animals, the cells-per-track sampling procedure

Amphetamine Normalizes DA Neuron Activity

749

was extended to the anterior VTA (24 tracks were used; see Materials and Methods). Results acquired from these animals were similar to that obtained when only the more posterior VTA was sampled. There was a significant reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure regardless of the use of general anesthesia (two-way ANOVA; F1,27 54.6; P 0.005). In unanesthetized animals, the mean number of cells-per-track was 0.77 0.07 in the 0 g/kg control group and 0.28 0.08 in the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol exposed group, respectively. In anesthetized animals, the mean number of cells-per-track was 0.62 0.02 in the 0 g/kg control group and 0.22 0.04 in the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol exposed group, respectively. Despite the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure, there were no differences in firing rates of those neurons that were spontaneously active (two-way ANOVA; P 0.05; Fig. 1B). The mean firing rates in the 0 g/kg control groups acquired from unanesthetized and anesthetized animals were 4.82 0.21 and 4.98 0.20 spikes/s, respectively. The mean firing rate of VTA DA neurons from the untreated group was 4.87 0.20 spikes/s. After prenatal ethanol exposure, the mean firing rates in unanesthetized and anesthetized animals were 5.29 0.20 and 5.33 0.37 spikes/s, respectively. Although small increases in firing rates were observed in prenatal ethanol-exposed groups when compared with the 0 g/kg control groups in both unanesthetized and anesthetized animals, they did not reach statistical significance (two-way ANOVA; P 0.05). Because there were no significant differences between the untreated and 0 g/kg control groups in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons, or in their firing rates, there was no evidence that undernutrition associated with the pair-feeding procedure influenced the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in these offspring. Therefore, the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons was a specific effect of prenatal ethanol exposure. Burst Firing Pattern. To determine the influence of prenatal ethanol exposure on the burst firing pattern of VTA DA neurons in the unanesthetized and anesthetized animals, interspike intervals of 500 consecutive action potentials from each individual spontaneously active DA neuron were analyzed. A two-way MANOVA was conducted to detect overall group differences in these parameters except in percent bursting cells, which was tested by 2 tests. One advantage of MANOVA over a series of ANOVAs (one for each dependent variable) is to avoid type I error (Tabachnick and Fidell,

1983). In addition, MANOVA is generally more powerful than individual ANOVAs because it considers dependent variables in combination and maximizes group differences (Tabachnick and Fidell, 1983). When MANOVA is performed, regular univariate ANOVAs can still be used to reveal relative importance of each independent variable. The results from MANOVA showed that prenatal ethanol exposure did not influence the firing patterns of spontaneously active DA neurons (Table 1; two-way MANOVA; P 0.05). However, there were significantly higher burst activities in DA neurons recorded from unanesthetized animals, compared with those recorded from anesthetized animals (Table 1; two-way MANOVA; Wilks Lambda2, 10 6.89; P 0.01). This effect was reflected in all burst parameters tested except in burst length as revealed by individual ANOVAs (Table 1). Further post hoc comparisons following individual ANOVAs (Tukey HSD post hoc test) also showed that a significantly higher bursting activities could be detected within either the 0 g/kg control groups or the 6 g/kg ethanol-treated groups in unanesthetized animals. Separate 2 tests indicated that there were more bursting cells (measured by percent bursting cells) in unanesthetized animals compared with those in anesthetized animals (between the two 0 g/kg control groups: 2 5.98, df 1, P 0.05; between the two 6 g/kg ethanol-treated groups: 2 8.82, df 1, P 0.01). However, prenatal ethanol exposure did not influence percent bursting cells in unanesthetized or anesthetized animals ( 2 tests; P 0.05). Effects of Systemically Administered Amphetamine on the Number of Spontaneously Active DA Neurons. Systemically administered amphetamine at 2 mg/kg (i.v.) exerted opposite effects in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in the 0 g/kg control and 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed groups. In the 0 g/kg control group, amphetamine decreased cells-per-track from 1.15 0.06 to 0.45 0.06 (61% reduction; n 10). On the contrary, in animals exposed to 6 g/kg ethanol during gestation, amphetamine administration within the same animal increased the number of spontaneously active DA neurons by 49%; from 0.45 0.03 to 0.89 0.05 (Fig. 2A). The opposite effects of amphetamine in the 0 g/kg control and in the 6 g/kg groups were reflected in a significant interaction effect between ethanol treatment and acute amphetamine administration (two-way ANOVA; F2,18 232.97, P 0.001). Amphetamine seemed to slightly decrease the average firing rates of DA neurons in the VTA (Fig. 2B). A significant difference was detected as an amphetamine main effect when

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

TABLE 1 Burst firing patterns of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons following prenatal ethanol exposure in unanesthetized and anesthetized animals
No. of Cells % Coefficient of Variation Burst No. No. of Doublets Interburst Interval (ms) Within Burst Interval (ms) Burst Length % Bursting Cells

0 g/kg Unanesthetized 6 g/kg Unanesthetized 0 g/kg Anesthetized 6 g/kg Anesthetized

119 61 81 26

103.5 116.5 89.1 85.9

4.4* 8.1* 5.2 8.2

80.6 71.4 55.3 50.6

4.6** 4.7** 3.6 6.3

33.0 31.6 25.5 22.8

2.2* 3.1* 2.2 3.7

351.0 383.6 304.9 300.0

15.3* 27.9* 19.8 25.7

60.7 61.9 68.8 74.7

1.0* 1.5** 1.4 2.7

3.8 4.6 3.7 3.4

0.3 0.6 0.2 0.2

96.6* 98.4** 87.7 80.8

When combining all burst parameters except % burst number, results from a two-way MANOVA indicated a significant difference between unanesthetized and anesthetized animals (Wilks Lamda2, 10 6.89; P 0.01). * P 0.05; ** P 0.01, differences between unanesthetized and chloral hydrate-anesthetized animals in either the 0 g/kg control groups or the 6 g/kg ethanol-treated groups. Two-way ANOVAs followed by Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used to test for group differences in all burst parameters except % bursting cells. 2 test was used to test for group differences in % bursting cells.

750

Xu and Shen

Fig. 2. Numbers of spontaneously active DA neurons and their firing rates sampled before and after systemic intravenous amphetamine administration (2 mg/kg i.v.) in the VTA in the 0 g/kg control group and 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed group. A, the numbers of cells-per-track in each animal sampled before and after amphetamine administration are presented as individual data points connected by solid lines. The average number of spontaneously active DA neurons in the 0 g/kg control group is decreased by amphetamine, whereas an increase is observed in the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed group. B, the average firing rates of spontaneously active DA sampled before and after systemic intravenous amphetamine administration in the 0 g/kg control and 6 g/kg prenatal ethanolexposed rats. The number of cells recorded in each group is indicated within each bar.

Fig. 3. Cumulative log dose-response curves for the inhibitory effects of d-amphetamine on the spontaneous activity of the VTA DA neurons in the unanesthetized rats. Prenatal ethanol exposure significantly shifted the amphetamine dose-response curve to the left, indicating a supersensitivity in somatodendritic DA autoreceptors. The points on each curve represent the mean percentage of inhibition, whereas the vertical bars represent the S.E.M. The relevant 50% effective concentration (EC50) values are presented.

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

all groups were analyzed (two-way ANOVA, F1,347 5.01, P 0.05). However, amphetamine did not significantly change DA neuron firing rate in either the 0 g/kg control or the 6 g/kg prenatal ethanol-exposed group (Tukey HSD post hoc test). The firing rates in the 0 g/kg control groups were 4.61 0.11 (n 139) and 4.23 0.22 (n 54) spikes/s before and after amphetamine treatment, respectively. In the 6 g/kg ethanol group, the firing rates were 4.52 0.17 (n 52) and 4.18 0.14 (n 103) before and after amphetamine treatment, respectively. Spontaneously Active VTA DA Neurons Were Inhibited by Amphetamine. Our previous findings indicate that prenatal ethanol exposure can lead to a supersensitivity in the somatodendritic DA autoreceptors (D-2 type) and a subsensitivity in postsynaptic D-1 receptors in nucleus accumbens (Shen et al., 1995). Systemically administered amphetamine is known to suppress the firing rate of spontaneously active DA neurons by activating both pre- and postsynaptic DA receptors, including the somatodendritic DA autoreceptors. Because of these changes, it is possible that the acute amphetamine effect is altered after prenatal ethanol exposure. Therefore, the acute effect of systematically administered amphetamine was examined. In Fig. 3, the dose-response curve for the inhibitory effect of intravenously administered amphetamine in animals exposed to ethanol prenatally was significantly shifted to the left (two-way ANOVA, F12,161 2.18, P 0.05).

Discussion
The results from the present study show that prenatal ethanol exposure produces a significant reduction in the number of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons in young adult rats (6 8 weeks old), similar to that observed in older rats (35 months old and 14 16 months old) previously (Shen et al., 1999). These observations suggest that, after prenatal ethanol exposure, the hypofunction in DA neurotransmission mediated by the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons occurs throughout adulthood.

We used both the unanesthetized (paralyzed, locally anesthetized) and anesthetized (chloral hydrate-anesthetized) preparations to avoid possible confounding effects of general anesthetics on the spontaneous activity of DA neurons. The extracellular single-unit recording and cells-per-track techniques were initially developed to examine the mechanisms of antipsychotics (for review, see Chiodo, 1988; White, 1996). With these techniques, many investigators have observed a reduction in the number of spontaneously active VTA DA neurons after chronic antipsychotic treatment and suggest that this mechanism mediates the efficacy of antipsychotics. Recently, a group of investigators have argued that the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after chronic antipsychotic treatment can be observed only in the anesthetized preparation (Mereu et al., 1995). In other words, a reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after chronic antipsychotic treatment is an artifact caused by the use of general anesthesia. To verify if this was what happened previously when we examined the spontaneous activity in DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure under chloral hydrate anesthesia in older animals, and to truly understand the impact of general anesthesia on the spontaneous activity of DA neurons in young adult animals after prenatal ethanol exposure, we have chosen to use both the unanesthetized and anesthetized preparations. Our results show that prenatal ethanol exposure causes similar reductions in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons whether or not general anesthesia is used. These results do not support the view that the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons is an artifact produced by general anesthesia. They also validate our previous observations performed under chloral hydrate anesthesia in which prenatal ethanol exposure reduces the number of spontaneously active DA neurons in older rats (35 months old and 14 16 months old). Although general anesthesia does not appear to alter the number of spontaneously active DA neurons, it does significantly decrease their burst activity. Therefore, the unanesthetized preparation appears to be a better approach to ex-

Amphetamine Normalizes DA Neuron Activity

751

amine burst activity in DA neurons. Interestingly, despite a significant reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons, prenatal ethanol exposure does not alter either burst activity or firing rate of the remaining spontaneously active DA neurons, indicating that there are independent mechanisms underlying burst activity and the number of spontaneous active DA neurons. Increased burst activity can elevate DA release (Suaud-Chagny et al., 1992) and has been proposed to play an important role in maintaining adequate DA release after a loss of DA neurons in animal models of Parkinsons disease (Hollerman and Grace, 1990). The lack of changes in burst activity in DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure suggests that this type of compensatory mechanism does not occur after prenatal ethanol exposure. The results from the present study also demonstrate that acute amphetamine administration can normalize the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure. What could be the underlying mechanism for this phenomenon? Acute amphetamine administration typically exerts an inhibitory effect on DA neurons by activating somatodendritic DA autoreceptors due to amphetamine-induced increases in dendritic DA release (Mercuri et al., 1989; Pothos et al., 1998), as well as by activating a feed back input to DA neurons due to increased DA release in the forebrain (Bunney and Aghajanian, 1976). The inhibitory effect of amphetamine on DA neurons is similar to the effects of other inhibitory agents that can restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons. For example, systemically administered apomorphine has been shown to restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons following chronic prenatal or postnatal ethanol treatment, or chronic antipsychotic treatment (Bunney and Grace, 1978; Shen et al., 1993, 1999). Other manipulations that normally inhibit of DA neurons such as locally applied GABA or membrane hyperpolarization can also restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons (Bunney and Grace, 1978; Grace and Bunney, 1986). Based on these observation, it is hypothesized that the reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons is produced by excessive depolarization leading to an impairment in action potential generation. This is called the depolarization block hypothesis. Because acute amphetamine has the same effect on DA neuron firing rates as acute apomorphine, we believe that amphetamine may also restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure by reversing the depolarization block. Although the reversal of the depolarization block appears to be the most likely mechanism mediating the amphetamine induced restoration of the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure, other possibilities should also be considered. Amphetamine has been shown to increase excitatory amino acid neurotransmission to DA neurons by activating 1 adrenergic receptors after blocking inhibitory inputs (Shi et al., 2000). The unmasked excitatory effect of amphetamine may play a role in the restoration of the number of spontaneously active DA neurons because prenatal ethanol exposure-induced morphological changes in DA neurons (Shetty et al., 1993) could potentially alter the afferent regulation of DA neurons. If this is the case, amphetamine would have to exert a direct excitatory effect only in previously silent DA neurons because no such effects were observed in spontaneously active DA neurons in the present study. This possibility also does not seem

to reconcile with the fact that apomorphine can also normalize the number of spontaneously active DA neurons. Future studies using specific receptor antagonists are required to clarify the roles of DA autoreceptors and 1 adrenergic receptors in the amphetamine-induced reversal of the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure. In the present study, prenatal ethanol exposure also produced a left shift in the dose-response curves for the inhibitory effect of systemically administered amphetamine on VTA DA neurons, indicating that DA neurons are more sensitive to the inhibitory effect of amphetamine after prenatal ethanol exposure. This result could be due to a supersensitivity in somatodendritic DA autoreceptors first observed in our previous study (Shen et al., 1995). We have speculated that DA autoreceptor supersensitivity may be mediated by understimulation of these receptors due to either insufficient dendritic DA release or decreased dendrodendritic contacts among DA neurons (Shetty et al., 1993) after prenatal ethanol exposure. The results from the present study indicate that insufficient dendritic DA release may indeed occur due to decreased number of spontaneously active DA neurons. Interestingly, the sensitivity of DA autoreceptors returns to normal after chronic amphetamine treatment (Shen et al., 1995). This effect is similar to the down-regulation of DA autoreceptors in the VTA in response to chronic amphetamine treatment in nonethanol-treated rats (White and Wang, 1984). It is also noteworthy that chronic amphetamine treatment in normal rats could increase the number of spontaneously active DA neurons and their firing rates presumably by decreased sensitivity in DA autoreceptors (White and Wang, 1984). These results suggest that, under chronic amphetamine treatment, the doses of amphetamine required to optimally restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons after prenatal ethanol exposure may need to be changed as the sensitivity of somatodendritic DA is modified. Recently, the efficacy of amphetamine-like stimulants in treating attention problems in FAS/FAE has been clearly demonstrated (Oesterheld et al., 1998). Based on the results from the present study, we believe that, other than causing a direct increase in DA level in DA terminal areas (Kalivas and Stewart, 1991), the therapeutic effect of amphetamine in FAS/FAE may be due to its ability to restore the number of spontaneously active DA neurons. The restored spontaneous activity in DA neurons may consequently increase DA levels in the forebrain via elevating the release and synthesis of DA (Gonon and Buda, 1985; Suaud-Chagny et al., 1992). Several lines of evidence suggest that a reduction in the number of spontaneously active DA neurons is not a unique outcome after prenatal ethanol exposure. For example, early postnatal lead exposure, prenatal cocaine exposure, or chronic ethanol treatment prenatally or postnatally all decrease DA neurotransmission and the number of spontaneously active DA neurons (Shen and Chiodo, 1993; Wang and Pitts, 1994; Shen et al., 1999; personal communication with D. K. Pitts). Interestingly, attention problems are major symptoms in all these conditions (Winneke et al., 1983; Nixon et al., 1995). It appears that the reduced number of spontaneously active DA neurons contributes to DA hypofunction and attention problems. The efficacy of amphetamine-like stimulants in treating attention problems in these conditions could also be partially mediated by normal-

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

752

Xu and Shen
Effectiveness of methyphenidate in native American children with fetal alcohol syndrome and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a control pilot study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 8:39 48. Pothos EN, Davila V and Sulzer D (1998) Presynaptic recording of quanta from midbrain dopamine neurons and modulation of quantal size. J Neurosci 18:4106 4118. Rathbun W and Druse MJ (1985) Dopamine, serotonin and acid metabolites in brain regions from the developing offspring of ethanol treated rats. J Neurochem 44:57 62. Shaywitz BA, Cohen DJ and Bowers MB (1977) CSF monoamine metabolites in children with minimal brain dysfunction: evidence for alteration of brain dopamine. J Pediatr 90:6771. Shaywitz BA, Yager RD and Klopper JH (1976) Selective brain dopamine depletion in developing rats: an experimental model of minimal brain dysfunction. Science (Wash DC) 191:305308. Shen R and Chiodo LA (1993) Acute withdrawal after repeated ethanol treatment reduces the number of spontaneously active dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Brain Res 622:289 293. Shen R, Hannigan JH and Chiodo LA (1995) The effects of chronic amphetamine treatment on prenatal ethanol-induced changes in dopamine receptor function: electrophysiological findings. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 274:1054 1060. Shen R, Hannigan JH and Kapatos G (1999) Prenatal ethanol reduces the activity of adult midbrain dopamine neurons. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23:18011807. Shetty AK, Burrows RC and Phillips DE (1993) Alterations in neuronal development in the substantia nigra pars compacta following in utero ethanol exposure: Immunohistochemical and Golgi studies. Neuroscience 52:311322. Shi WX, Pun CL, Zhang XX, Jones MD and Bunney B (2000) Dual effects of D-amphetamine on dopamine neurons mediated by dopamine and nondopamine receptors. J Neurosci 20:3504 3511. Smith EE and Jonides J (1999) Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science (Wash DC) 283:16571661. Streissguth AP, Aase JM, Clarren SK, Randels SP, LaDue RA and Smith DF (1991) Fetal alcohol syndrome in adolescents and adults. J Am Med Assoc 265:1961 1967. Suaud-Chagny MF, Chergui K, Chouvet G and Gonon F (1992) Relationship between dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens and the discharge activity of dopaminergic neuron during local in vivo application of amino acids in the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience 49:6372. Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS (1983) Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance, in Using Multivariate Statistics (Middendorf GA and Helfgott N eds) pp 222291, Harper & Row, New York. Wang L and Pitts DK (1994) Prenatal cocaine exposure decreases the number of spontaneously active midbrain dopamine neurons in neonatal rats. Synapse 17: 275277. White FJ (1996) Synaptic regulation of mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:405 436. White FJ and Wang RY (1984) Electrophysiological evidence for A10 dopamine autoreceptor subsensitivity following chronic D-amphetamine treatment. Brain Res 309:283292. Winneke G, Kramer U, Brockhaus A, Ewers U, Kujanek G, Lechner H and Janke W (1983) Neuropsychological studies in children with elevated tooth-lead concentrations. II. Extended study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 51:231252.

izing the spontaneous activity in DA neurons. We believe the current animal model is an appropriate approach to investigate the detailed mechanisms of amphetamine-like stimulants in treating attention problems caused by the above conditions.
Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. David Asdourian for reading the manuscript and Dawn Dolan for excellent technical assistance.
References
Bunney BS and Aghajanian GK (1976) d-Amphetamine-induced inhibition of central dopaminergic neurons: mediation by a striatonigral feedback pathway. Science (Wash DC) 192:391393. Bunney BS and Grace AA (1978) Acute and chronic haloperidol treatment; comparison of effects on nigral dopaminergic cell activity. Life Sci 23:17151727. Chiodo LA (1988) Dopamine-containing neurons in the mammalian central nervous systems: electrophysiology and pharmacology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 12:49 91. Cooper JD and Rudeen PK (1988) Alterations in regional catecholamine content and turnover in the male rat brain in response to in utero ethanol exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 12:282285. Druse MJ, Tajuddin N, Kuo A and Connerty M (1990) Effects of in utero ethanol exposure on the developing dopaminergic system in rats. J Neurosci Res 27:233 240. Gonon FG and Buda MJ (1985) Regulation of dopamine release by impulse flow and by autoreceptors as studied by in vivo voltammetry in the rat striatum. Neuroscience 14:765774. Grace AA and Bunney BS (1986) Induction of depolarization block in midbrain dopamine neurons by repeated administration of haloperidol: analysis using in vivo intracellular recording. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238:10921100. Hannigan JH and Randall S (1996) Behavioral pharmacology in animals exposed prenatally to alcohol, in Fetal Alcohol Syndrome: From Mechanism to Prevention (Abel EL ed) pp 191213, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Hollerman JR and Grace AA (1990) The effects of dopamine-depleting brain lesions on the electrophysiological activity of rat substantia nigra dopamine neurons. Brain Res 533:203212. Kalivas PW and Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain ResBrain Res Rev 16:223244. Mercuri NB, Calabresi P and Bernardi G (1989) The mechanism of amphetamineinduced inhibition of rat substantia nigra pars compacta neurons investigated with intracellular recording in vitro. Br J Pharmacol 98:127134. Mereu G, Lilliu V, Vargiu P, Muntoni AL, Diana M and Gessa GL (1995) Depolarization inactivation of dopamine neurons: an artifact. J Neurosci 15:1144 1149. Morrow JD (1991) Psychostimulant medication: the pharmacotherapy of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, in Attention Deficit Disorders and Hyperactivity in Children (Accardo PJ, Blondis TA and Witman BY eds) pp 303331, Marcel Dekker, New York. Nanson JL and Hiscock M (1990) Attention deficits in children exposed to alcohol prenatally. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 14:656 661. Nixon SJ, Tivis R and Parsons OA (1995) Behavioral dysfunction and cognitive efficiency in male and female alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:577581. Oesterheld JR, Kofoed L, Tervo R, Fogas B, Wilson A and Fiechtner H (1998)

Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org by guest on March 18, 2012

Send reprint requests to: Dr. Roh-Yu Shen, Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 1021 Main St., Buffalo, NY 14203. E-mail: shen@ria.buffalo.edu