Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Terrestrial origin (mostly plant remains from mild, moist climate of 250 million years ago) Occurs in different grades, depending on C content and S content
High grade coal is high in C, low in S S occurs as disseminated iron sulfides, when coal is burned is released as SO2, leads to acid rain
Coal is the primary world energy source for electricity Advantages: Easily transportable, convenient to store, cheap to mine (traditionally), relatively large reserves left (90% of remaining fossil fuel reserves in U.S.) Disadvantages:
Coal mining is a significant source of acid mine drainage, land disturbance from strip/pit mining & is dangerous Coal burning is a major source of pollutant ash, aerosols, heavy metals, soot, CO2, CO -- more CO2 per energetic yield than CH4 or petroleum
Grades of Coal
Carbon Lignite Sub-Bituminous Bituminous Anthracite 5% 30% 60% 90% Energy Content 12k - 15k BTU/kg 15k - 21k BTU/kg 21k - 32k BTU/kg 30k - 32k BTU/kg Sulfur Content Low Med 91% 9% 99% 1% 30% 27% 97% 3% High 43% -
Anthracite
Coal Consumption
30 Coal Consumption (Quads) 25
USA China Former USSR W.Europe C.-S. America Africa
20
15 10
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
OECD Countries:
United States Russia China Other Non-OECD Europe/Eurasia Australia/New Zealand India Africa OECD Europe Other Central & South America Other Non-OECD Asia Brazil Canada Other
1.2 105
Montana Illinois Wyoming West Virginia Kentucky Pennsylvania Ohio Colorado Texas New Mexico
EIA Data
Anthracite: 1.5% (nearly all in NE Pennsylvania) Lignite: 9% (Montana, Texas, North Dakota) Subbituminous: 37% (mostly Montana, Wyoming; all west of Mississippi River) Bituminous: >53% (mostly Illinois, Kentucky, W. Virginia; nearly all east of Mississippi River)
Clean Coal
Efficiency standard coal-burning electrical generation: ~33% clean-coal technology electrical generation: ~37% US-DOE 2025 efficiency target: 60% clean-coal plants: construction costs: 200% standard electricity cost: 20% > natural gas, 170% > older coal plants
Costs
Lansing, NY
Tampa, FL
Forms in association with petroleum 25% of U.S. Energy Budget (mostly used for heating, cooking; developing use in autos, power plants) Advantages: relatively clean, requires little processing, lowest CO2 emission per energetic yield than any other fossil fuel, contributes much less to smog compared to petroleum burning Disadvantages: more difficult/expensive to transport than coal or petroleum; a potent greenhouse gas with a long lifetime -- one methane molecule contributes 20x more to greenhouse effect than one molecule of CO2 (potential for leaks is problematic)
Used to produce gas (and sometimes petroleum) from deep underground (>5000 ft) reservoirs with low permeability & porosity
Pump large volumes of water mixed with small amount of sand and chemicals (including some known carcinogens) to fracture the rock and release the gas Concerns:
Mobilization of methane and hydrocarbons (from source rock and from fracking fluids) into shallower aquifers Methane is non-toxic, but highly flammable Very small quantities of benzene & other hydrocarbons can be toxic Increased global warming, due to escaped methane
http://www.safewatermovement.org/what-is-hydrofracking/
http://www.otsego2000.org/
Pumped & consumed at phenomenal rate: estimate = 1 million years is required to form fossil fuels consumed by world every 12 months!