Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
the National Shooting Sports Foundation and the Oregon Division of Fish and Wildlife
By
Southwick Associates
May 2011
INTRODUCTION In 2010, Oregon's Division of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the National Shooting Sports Foundation launched a statewide marketing campaign to boost hunting and encourage visits to their online hunting map. The effort included a direct mailing to lapsed big game and other hunters, and statewide advertising online, in newspapers and in magazines. An overview of the advertising media and dates are in appendices A and B, along with a sample of the advertising copy and imagery used in the campaign.
RESULTS Direct Mail Campaign In late summer 2010, postcards were mailed to 34,999 people randomly selected from among past hunters who had obtained a Big Game and other licenses in 2007, 2008 or 2009. The purpose was to test if direct mail promoting new hunting information tools (an online information map) could boost the rate of hunting license renewals. The postcard included a graphic image and message encouraging them to renew their licenses. Other hunters who had also obtained a license during that same period were not sent a postcard and were held as a control group to help measure the effectiveness of the mailing. Following the mailing of the postcard, the treatment and control groups were compared. It was determined that 14,432 hunters on the mail list (41.2%) obtained their licenses. However, from the control group, 41.7% obtained their licenses during the same period (Table 1). The results suggest that the postcard had no effect on hunting license renewal rates since no statistical difference in response rates were seen between treatment and control groups.
Table 1. Purchase Rates of Direct Mail Target Audience by Hunter Type # % Purchasing Control Increase Increase 2010 Group LiftValue inLicense inLicense #onMail Licenseor Purchase Purchase (Percentage &Tag &Tag HunterType List Tag Rate Rate Points) Sales Sales BigGame+Other 4,865 2,492 BigGameOnly 30,134 11,940 51.2% 39.6% 54.0% 39.7% 2.83 0.12 137 36 5.2% 0.3%
Oregonhuntingmap.com Promotions
ODFWs advertising campaign included verbiage that encouraged readers to visit their online hunting map. This map was developed previously via an Hunting Heritage Partnership (HHP) grant awarded by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). A screen shot of a page from the map is in Appendix C. Webpage usage was tracked, and pre- and post-season surveys were conducted asking a range of questions regarding map usage and hunting habits. The pre-season survey was designed to collect contact names for the post-season survey, and offered one of two free upland gamebird hunts as a means to gather this information. The post-season survey also offered one of two free upland gamebird hunts as an incentive to take the survey. Results and benefits of Oregons online map-oriented Models of Success program were calculated using estimates of user visits from Google Analytics and responses to the post-effort evaluation survey. Results include the following: Number of unique visitors to the website during survey period: 36,000 .2 (assumes 80% are incidental visitors) = 7,200 unique visitors Basic utility of website does it serve its purpose? 86% (705) found the map very helpful or somewhat helpful 12.5% (109) were neutral; 7% (61) found it somewhat or very unhelpful 60.4% (255) used the map to help plan their hunts 90.9% (229) of those used it to find a place to hunt (main purpose of map) Benefit to Oregons Economy 60.4% (255) used the map to help plan their hunts 34.8% (88) reported they hunted more frequently as a result of the map Of those, they hunted an average of 6.2 extra days because of map 7,200 unique visitors .604 .348 6.2 days = 9,383 additional hunter days due to the map. 9,383 hunter days $157 spent per hunter day1 = $1,473,000 in new expenditures (travel and equipment) that the map helped stimulate in the four month evaluation period in 2010. Benefit to Hunter Recruitment 84.2% (352) took someone hunting with them 34.4% (115) were people who had never hunted before 31.7% (110) used the map to assist in efforts to take that person hunting .842 .344 .317 = 9.2% of respondents used the map to help take someone hunting who had never hunted before.
Dean Runyan and Associates, Fishing, Hunting, Wildlife Viewing and Shellfishing in Oregon; 2008 State and County Expenditure Estimates
.092 7,200 = 662 hunters that the map helped recruit in the four month evaluation period in 2010.
Benefit to ODFWs Revenue: 84.2% (352) took someone hunting with them 50.6% (170) were people who would not have hunted otherwise 31.7% (110) used the map to assist in efforts to take that person hunting .842 .506 .317 = 13.5% of respondents used the map to help take a person hunting who would not have otherwise. .135 7,200 = 972 hunting licenses/tags that the map helped to sell 972 $54 (resident license + deer tag) = $52,488 in increased state hunting license revenues generated during the four month evaluation period in 2010.
Summary: Overall, the map appears to have generated additional days of hunting, which was the projects goal. The map helped provide a stimulus to the Oregon economy, and appears to have had an unintentional benefit of helping introduce more hunters to hunting. The additional license revenues the map provided Oregon during the four month evaluation period shows a positive return on investment for any other states considering doing the same.
Post-season Survey Detailed Results The tables below show results from all questions in the post-season survey. The results were used in the result calculations above, and are offered to help other states in their own online map design and promotion efforts.
Did you use ODFW's online Oregon Hunting Map* to help plan your hunt(s)?
N Yes No Total 255 167 422 % 60.4% 39.6% 100.0%
How did you use ODFW's online Oregon Hunting Map* to help plan your hunt(s)?
N Hunting locations Hunting opportunities Hunting regulations Hunting tips License purchase Other 229 114 103 48 40 15 % 90.9% 45.2% 40.9% 19.0% 15.9% 6.0%
How many more days did you hunt this past season that you can attribute to the website?
N 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 Total 1 3 16 11 7 14 4 4 1 1 13 5 4 84 % 1.2% 3.6% 19.0% 13.1% 8.3% 16.7% 4.8% 4.8% 1.2% 1.2% 15.5% 6.0% 4.8% 100.0%
Was that person someone who would not have hunted otherwise?
N Yes No Total 170 166 336 % 50.6% 49.4% 100.0%
Did ODFW's online Oregon Hunting Map* assist your efforts to take this person hunting?
N Yes No Total 110 237 347 % 31.7% 68.3% 100.0%
Do you recall seeing any advertisements for the online Oregon Hunting Map*?
N Yes No Total 204 249 453 % 45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
N=203
How did the advertising for the online Oregon Hunting Map influence your decision to hunt, or hunt more, in 2010?
N Major influence Moderate influence Minor influence No influence Total 12 34 44 113 203 % 5.9% 16.7% 21.7% 55.7% 100.0%
1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1xInsertions
Direct Mailer: