Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
: ME0003
Switzerland, Cuba and India: Addressing the Troika of Economic Problems in Three Economies
All the economies of the world face the problem of scarcity of resources, which limits the production activities. Scarcity of resources makes an economy face trade-offs as producing more of one commodity means producing less of another commodity. Such trade-offs compel an economy to answer the three fundamental questions: What goods will be produced? How will the goods be produced? And for whom will the goods be produced? Economic Systems (Market, Command and Mixed) are the ways through which countries address these three fundamental posers. Each type of economic system has its own way of deciding what commodities are to be produced, how and for whom.
RIGHTS
INDEX
(IPRI)
2009
Report,
http://
Private property rights is ones right to use their property, engage in lawful transactions related to the sale, purchase and mortgage of that property, and enjoy ones property to the exclusion of others. The 2009 International Property Rights Index (IPRI) is an international comparative study that measures the significance of
This case study was written by Hepsi Swarna under the direction of Akshaya Kumar Jena, IBSCDC . It is intended to be used as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. The case was compiled from published sources. 2009, IBSCDC. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, transmitted, reproduced or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner.
Background Reading: Chapter 1, The Fundamentals of Economics Markets and Government, in a Modern Economy, Economics (Paul A. Samuelson and William D. Nordhaus)
worlds freest economies. Switzerland was ranked 9th (Exhibit I) with a score of 79.4 in the 2009 Index of Economic Freedom4 .
Country Hong Kong Singapore Australia Ireland New Zealand US Canada Denmark Switzerland UK Netherlands Finland
Score 90.0 87.1 82.6 82.2 82.0 80.7 80.5 80.0 79.4 79.0 77 74.5
Compiled by the author from: 2009 index of economic freedom Ranking the Countries, http://www.heritage.org/Index/
Most of the countries figuring in the index, Hong Kong, Singapore, UK, US, Finland, Ireland, Denmark, Netherlands and Switzerland, are free market economies and these economies also have higher per capita income (Exhibit II). According to UNDPs 2008 statistical update, Switzerlands GDP per capita for a population of 7.5 million people is $37,3965 . Switzerland has also some of the highest wages in the world. Thus, a high standard of living prevails in the country. The market economy of Switzerland has earned it a Human Development Index (HDI)6 of 0.9555, ranked 10th out of 179 countries.7
4
Index of Economic Freedom is published by The Wall Street Journal and The Heritage Foundation every year. The index defines economic freedom as the fundamental right of every human to control his or her own labour and property. In an economically free society, individuals are free to work, produce, consume, and invest in any way they please, with that freedom both protected by the state and unconstrained by the state. In economically free societies, governments allow labour, capital and goods to move freely, and refrain from coercion or constraint of liberty beyond the extent necessary to protect and maintain liberty itself. 2008 Statistical Update Switzerland, http://hdrstats.undp.org/2008/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_CHE.html, December 18th 2008 The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and enrolment at the primary, secondary and tertiary level) and having a decent standard of living (measured by Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), income). 2008 Statistical Update Switzerland, op.cit.
Exhibit II Nations with Highest Per Capita Income, World Bank (Revised in 2008)
Rank 1 4 5 6 9 10 12 13 17 19 24 25 31 Country Liechtenstein Kuwait Norway Brunei Darussalam Singapore US Hong Kong, China Switzerland Netherlands Ireland Denmark Finland UK Per Capita Income (PPP* International$) 63, 590 49, 970 53, 320 49,900 48, 520 45, 850 44, 050 43, 870 39, 310 37, 090 36, 300 34,550 33,800
* Purchasing Power Parity. The most common way of presenting the per capita income data is PPP figures. Compiled by the author from: Gross national income per capita 2007, Atlas method and PPP, http:// siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf, October 17th 2008
In market economies, the means of production are owned by private individuals and most cost-efficient techniques of production are used. Holderbank, Switzerlands largest cement company, attributes its success to the best production technology and low production costs. Switzerlands market economy is based on international trade and banking. Swiss banks are known for very high standards of banking and financial services. The Swiss are the leaders in private banking. In 2003, it was reported that Switzerland with its 400 banks manage ... one-third of the worlds wealth that resides outside its country of origin.8 The Swiss banks are not subjected to any legal scrutiny. That is why the money (legal/illegal) from the entire world is deposited in Swiss banks. In September 2008, the UBS of Switzerland revealed to the US that it held 47,000 secret accounts for Americans.9 Capitalism results in generation of wealth the Swiss banking business is an attestation to this fact.
8
Beng Kim Phar, Capitalisms Mistress: Private Banking, http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/crisis/2003/0625mistress.htm, June 25th 2003 Aiyar Shankkar, Minting political capital, http://in.elections.yahoo.com/articles.html?feed=http://in.news.yahoo.com/ 248/20090422/1585/tnl-minting-political-capital_1.html, April 22nd 2009
The Swiss are also known for their world-class watches, pharmaceuticals, electronics, chemicals, metals, precision instruments, chocolates, cheese and also for their ground breaking research and advances in organic agriculture and poultry production. Chemicals and engineering products are the biggest exports of Switzerland. Watches occupy third place in the countrys exports. About 95% of Switzerlands watches are exported and it stands as the world largest watch exporter in terms of value. In 2006, Swiss watch exports were valued at 13.7 billion francs10 . The average export price of a Chinese watch in 2006 was $1, in Hong Kong it was $8, while Switzerlands export price of a watch was on an average $41011 . Switzerland has extremely well-developed infrastructure for scientific research. The Research Institute of Organic Agriculture is the worlds leading information and documentation centre for organic agriculture. Swiss companies spend a lot of money on Research and Development due to which they come up with very innovative products. Swatch, the famous Swiss watch company has always flirted with technology. Besides manufacturing watches, Swatch is into manufacturing microprocessors, smartcard technology, portable telephones, and other future-oriented designs, such as wristwatches that double as telephones, credit cards, even concert tickets.12 The innovation in the field of technology in Switzerland, along with other factors like first-rate infrastructure and efficient markets, has boosted Switzerlands global competitiveness, and it has been featuring among the top ten economies in the Global Competitive Index (GCI) for many years (Exhibit III). Switzerland was ranked as the second most competitive country in the global economy for the years 2007 and 2008. The other capitalist countries like UK, US, Finland, Denmark, Netherlands, Singapore and Hong Kong have also been featuring in top ten countries of the GCI index. Trade has been the key to Switzerlands prosperity and growth. It has very liberal trade and investment policies, with minimum trade barriers (Exhibit IV). In Global Enabling Trade Index13 released by World Economic Forum for the very first time in 2008, Switzerland was ranked 9th among 118 countries signifying its business-friendly environment and openness to international trade and investment. Exports generate lot of income and bost the economic growth. The Swiss economy earns roughly half of its corporate earnings from the export industry, and 62% of Swiss exports are destined for the EU market.14 Government has a very limited role to play in Switzerland. The new agricultural policy of Switzerland, which came into effect from January 1st 1999 began eliminating detailed market regulations and reducing direct government intervention in setting up of market prices.15 Most of the Swiss government
10 11 12
The Swiss watch industry, http://www.swissworld.org/en/switzerland/swiss_specials/swiss_watches/the_swiss_watch_industry/, Ibid. The Swatch Group SA, http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/The-Swatch-Group-SA-CompanyHistory.html The Global Enabling Trade Index, 2008 intends to present a cross-country analysis of the large number of measures facilitating trade. The report covers four areas: market access, border administration, and transport and communications infrastructure and business environment. Background Note: Switzerland, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3431.htm, January 2009 Switzerland,http://www.ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Reports_Publications/2003/2003_NTE_Report/ asset_upload_file346_6225.pdf, page 354
13
14 15
Switzerland Switzerland Denmark Denmark Sweden Singapore Finland Germany Netherlands Japan
Netherlands Canada Ireland Finland Canada Hong Kong SAR UK Singapore Australia Norway Taiwan
* Switzerland for the year 2001 ranked 15th Compiled by the author from Global Competitiveness Reports 20002008
12
15
Source: 2008 World Trade Indicators published by the World Bank, http://www.economist.com/markets/indicators/ displaystory.cfm?story_id=115860
activities are confined to provision of public services like defence, railways, infrastructure and post office. The government policy aims at maintaining macro-economic stability in the country. Corruption is less in market economies than in command and mixed economies. Even though the US financial crisis was alleged to be a result of corruption and greed, most of the market economies are characterised by low levels of corruption. In a market economy, the scope for corruption is preempted to a great extent. Switzerland was ranked 5th out of 180 countries in Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index16 2008 (Exhibit V). In contrast, command economy of Cuba was ranked 65th and the mixed economy of India was ranked 85th, which shows a very high level of corruption in these economies. The biggest drawback of Switzerland is that it is characterised by inequality of income and wealth. A study by the World Institute for Development Economics Research in 2006 using the statistics for
* A country or territorys CPI score indicates the degree of public sector corruption as perceived by business people and country analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt). Source: Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2008, http://webcasts.acc.com/handouts/ TI_CP_Index_2008.pdf, pages 4 and 5
the year 2000 came up with the data on wealth distribution for the whole world. According to the study, Switzerland had the highest concentration of wealth in the top 10% of the adult population (Exhibit VI). Other capitalist countries like US, Denmark, France, UK, Germany and Finland also have concentration of wealth in few hands. According a World Resources Institute report, Switzerlands
16
The CPI indicates the degree of public sector corruption, and it ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt).
Gini coefficient17 is 0.33. The percentage of total income earned by the richest 20% of the population in Switzerland is 40.3% and the percentage of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the population is 6.9%.18
Exhibit VI Percentage of Wealth Held by the Top 10% of the Adult Population in Various Countries
Country Switzerland US Denmark France Sweden UK Canada Norway Germany Finland Wealth Owned by the Top 10% 71.3% 69.8% 65.0% 61.0% 58.6% 56.0% 53.0% 50.5% 44.4% 42.3%
Source: Domhoff William G., Wealth, Income, and Power, http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html, September 2005 (Updated on December 2006)
Gini coefficient is the most commonly used measure of inequality of income distribution. The coefficient varies between 0, which reflects complete equality and 1, which indicates complete inequality (one person has all the income or consumption, all others have none). Economics, Business, and the Environment, http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/economics-business/country-profile174.html Roberts M. James, Cubas Phony Transition: Fidel Resigns, Raul Reigns, http://www.heritage.org/Research/ LatinAmerica/wm1820.cfm, February 19th 2008
18
19
very complex in Cuba. Even though the constitution of Cuba allows Cubans to hold private property, they cannot buy or sell property. This shows that Cuba does not have proper property rights in place and that could be one of the reasons why it did not feature in 2009 IPRI. The government controls all the spheres of life in Cuba. The governmental spending for the year 2008 equalled 72.6% of GDP20 . Cuba, once a colony of US, gained its independence through the Cuban Revolution in 1959. Fidel Castro (Fidel) overthrew Fulgencio Batistas US-backed army and established his empire. On account of the ongoing friction between Cuba and US, in 1960, Cuba nationalised three US oil refineries namely, Texaco (on June 29th 1960), Esso (on July 1st1960) and Shell (on July 1st1960). Thus, on July 3rd 1960, US suspended trading sugar with Cuba, by passing the Sugar Act in the Congress. Nearly 80% of the Cuban sugar exports to US were cut off. Cuba retaliated by nationalising all US businesses and commercial property on July 5th 1960. The following day, the then US President Dwight David Eisenhower cancelled the 700,000 tonnes of sugar remaining in Cubas quota for 1960. USSR decided to buy the 700,000 tonnes of sugar cut by US, and thus the sugar-for-oil exchange between Cuba and USSR was born. It was estimated at that time that Cuba was doing 85% of its trade with USSR. In September 1960, Cuba nationalised all US banks. On October 13th 1960, Fidel nationalised local firms, which included large agricultural estates, sugar refineries, banks, mining firms, large industries and privately owned urban property. Following this, US imposed a trade and economic embargo on Cuba excluding food and medicine on October 19th 1960. Cuba defended itself against the US invasion at Bay of Pigs on April 17th 1961 and defeated the US army after 3 days of fighting. On May 1st 1961, Fidel declared Cuba as a socialist country and declared himself as a Marxist-Leninist and extended his personal dominion over every dimension of government.21 Fidel established a centrally planned system and nationalised all means of production. Even after the imposition of US embargo, Cuban agricultural production remained high, with USSR buying sugar from it at more than the market price. But in early 1990s, as the USSR collapsed, so did Cuban economy and its agricultural production. Instead of choosing to open up its markets and agricultural production to the forces of free markets, Cuban government continued to control agricultural production and marketing. As a result of the socialist management, the sugar production started falling, and hence the once prosperous sugar industry lost all its glory. It was opined, Inefficient planting and cultivation methods, poor management, shortages of spare parts, and poor transportation infrastructure combined to deter the recovery of the sector.22 Sugar industry fell from 8.1 million metric tonnes in 1989 to 3.5 million metric tonnes in 1995. In June 2002, Cuba announced it would have to close half of the countrys 156 decrepit sugar mills.23 Shortages are common in Cuba, due to poorly run state factories and firms. Command economies result in the formation of shadow or black markets. Cubas black market has been flourishing because when the government controls the distribution of goods and services, producers start selling things
20 21
Cuba, http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/Cuba, Johnson Stephen, Time For Consensus On Cuba, http://www.heritage.org/research/latinamerica/bg1579.cfm, August 30th 2002 Cubas Phony Transition: Fidel Resigns, Raul Reigns, op.cit. Ibid.
22 23
illegally. Cubans have been increasingly buying the needed food and clothing from the black markets at very high prices. The black markets bypass all the government restrictions. Moreover, Cubans get to buy the very essential items which are not available at the government ration shops. In Cuba, government exercises control over employment issues. As per the Government statistics, about 75% of the labour force is employed by the state. The actual figure is however, closer to 93%.24 A meagre 3% of the total workforce (4.87 million) is allowed to be self-employed. If a foreign company intends to hire workers, it can be done only through the recognised state agencies. Workers are paid only a fraction of the amount that is charged to foreign companies. Cuba has a very hostile business and investment environment characterised by dense regulations and impenetrable communist bureaucracy. Trade is non-transparent and the government controls imports and exports. The non-tariff barriers to trade are very restrictive. All these put together are deterring foreign investment in Cuba. Most of the foreign investment in Cuba, takes place through joint ventures with state companies, which have majority of the ownership. A paper titled The Legal and Administrative Framework for Foreign Trade and Investment by European Companies in Cuba, given to the Cuban government by the European Union in July 2002 contained the problems that were encountered in the operations of joint ventures in Cuba. The paper pointed out the difficulty in obtaining work permits for foreign employees. It also complained that EU joint venture partners had no say in hiring employees and often they were forced by the Cuban government to hire employees who were professionally not suitable and securing finance was also very difficult.25 The Cuban government did not respond. Cuba has been witnessing fall in foreign investment due to such difficult investment environment Of the 540 joint ventures formed since the Cuban Government issued the first legislation on foreign investment in 1982 ... 287 remained at the close of 2005 ... Foreign direct investment flows decreased from $448 million in 2000 to $39 million in 2001 and were at zero in 2002.26 The citizens of Cuba are denied the freedom of expression the freedom of speech and press. Cuban jails contain prisoners of conscience, who have been detained just because of their beliefs. Cubans are denied the right to change their government. Assembly of more than three persons is punishable under the law in Cuba. Access to internet and outside media is heavily controlled. It is illegal in Cuba to own a TV satellite dish. The 2009 Index of Economic Freedom, ranked Cuba 177 out of 179 countries. The two countries ranked after it are Zimbabwe and North Korea; both of them are command economies. Command economies are characterised by equitable distribution of income and wealth. Cuba under Fidel in 1960s witnessed more equitable wages. The income gap between the farmers and the urban workers decreased as wages were controlled by the government. Fidelss agenda, employment for all, brought all the classes on the same platform. All Cuban children go to school and even a remote village has a school in Cuba. It has a literacy rate of 99.8%. Cubans also enjoy a good healthcare, and they have achieved many breakthroughs in the field of biotechnology. And that is why
24 25 26
HDI ranked Cuba 48th out of 179 countries (Exhibit VII). By 1986, Cubas Gini coefficient of 0.25 was among the lowest in the world. Cuba has set an example of an egalitarian economy.
But in 1990s, following the collapse of USSR, Cuban economy was in a deep crisis. To alleviate the crisis, Cuba introduced some market reforms, like legalisation of dollar, allowing foreign investment, opening of the country for tourism, legalisation of some private enterprises and self-employment for 150 occupations. Following the legalisation of dollar, the Cuban Peso became worthless and inequalities between the Cubans rose. The Cubans who had access to dollars earned higher incomes. Jobs like driving taxis and working at restaurants which earned salaries/tips in dollars from foreign businesses and tourists became highly desirable. Cubas Gini coefficient of 0.40 in 1999 turned up similar to US. The Cuban government tightly controlled the small private sector that evolved during 1990s. Fidel in his Cuba established Soviet-style rationing of housing, goods, and food27 . Cubas rationing system started in 1962, which severely limited the quantity and choice of Cuban consumers. People of Cuba for many decades have been surviving on ration books that provide limited amount of essential products like rice and beans. Cuban parents can buy subsidised milk powder (which comes to one glass a day) for children less than 7 years of age. Once a child turns 8 years old, it is not available. Fresh fruits and meat are scarce and beyond the reach of ordinary Cubans. The ration, which the government provides, lasts only 1015 days and many Cuban women, in a desperate attempt to feed their families, have turned to prostitution so that they get enough money to buy provisions for the remaining half of the month in the expensive Cuban black markets. In October 2008, it was reported that the Cuban government was putting a limit on how much fruits and vegetables Cuban people can buy in farmers market. Lettuce was limited to two pounds per person.28 Command economies have very low unemployment rate compared to market and mixed economies. Cuban government has been committed to provide employment to each of its citizen. Cuba also has a moderate level of inflation (Exhibit VIII).
27 28
Cubas Phony Transition: Fidel Resigns, Raul Reigns, op.cit Garcia Anne-Marie, Cuba Begins Rationing Food, http://www.infowars.com/cuba-begins-rationing-food/, October 12th 2008
10
Exhibit VIII Inflation and Unemployment Figures of Switzerland, Cuba and India 2008
Country Switzerland Cuba India Inflation (CPI) (%) 0.9 3.6 6.4 Unemployment Rate (%) 2.5 1.8 7.2
There are very few markets in Cuba and many of the farmers are prohibited from selling their extra produce in the markets. In February 2008, Fidel Castros nearly five decades of rule came to an end when his brother Raul Castro (Raul) was appointed the President of Cuba. President Raul in 2008 announced that farmers will be allowed to sell their extra produce in local markets and also, there will be large scale distribution of land to private farmers. However, farmers still face rules about what and how much they can plant, and risk losing their land if they fail to meet government production quotas. They are also required by law to sell any surplus to farmers markets.29 With the coming of Raul to power, some are hoping that Cuba may open up and witness some changes in the economic realm. But many analysts believe Cubas transition to a market economy is not possible as long as Fidel is alive. However, to make a start in loosening the Cuban economy, Raul in February 2008 made some announcements (Exhibit IX). Countries like Canada, Spain, China and Russia are emerging as prominent foreign investors in Cuba. Many analysts agree with the notion that Cuba will slowly make a transition to a conventional market economy.
Compiled by the author from: Background Note: Cuba, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2886.htm, August 2008
29
11
India, http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/India, 2009 Ibid. Indian consumers favour eco-friendly products: study, http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/business/indianconsumers-favour-eco-friendly-products-study_100129834.html,
12
determined by the interaction of demand and supply forces of goods and services. Even though Indian government does not tell people what to buy or sell, it is actively involved in regulating the market. Corruption is very highly prevalent in India (Exhibit VI). In India, the difference between the public and private sector is clearly visible. Public sector undertakings have become the property of a few politicians. Despite being run by the government, Indian economy is characterised by a great disparity between the rich and the poor. Indias Gini coefficient is 0.38 where 46.1% of the total income is earned by the richest 20% of the population, and just 8.1% of the income is earned by the poorest 20% of the population.33 Compared to market economies, mixed economies have a low standard of living measured in terms of HDI and per capita GDP. Indias HDI value34 is 0.609 with a rank of 132nd and its GDP per capita35 is $2,489. India is ranked 123rd in the 2009 Index of Economic Freedom. Out of all the three economies, Switzerland is the freest economy followed by India and Cuba (Exhibit X).
Exhibit X 2009 Index of Economic Freedom of Cuba, India and Switzerland A Comparative Analysis
Country Name Cuba India Switzerland Overall Score 27.9 54.4 79.4 Business Freedom 10.0 54.4 82.9 Trade Freedom 64.4 51.0 85.4 Fiscal Freedom 45.9 73.8 67.5 Government Size 77.8 65.3 Monetary Freedom 67.0 69.3 83.9 Investment Freedom 10.0 30.0 70.0 Financial Freedom 10.0 40.0 80.0 Property Rights 10.0 50.0 90.0 Freedom from Corruption 42.0 35.0 90.0 Labour Freedom 20.0 62.3 79.2
Most of the market economies of the world like Switzerland, US, Singapore, Hong Kong have relatively open market systems in their respective countries. Neither market economy nor command economy exists in pure form. The basic difference between the two is that while in a market economy buyers and sellers decide the three basic questions of the economy, in a command economy the government pulls the string. In some degree or other, all the economies of the world are mixed economies, with market features and government controls existing simultaneously. The question that remains to be answered is how much mixed an economy should be.
33 34
Country Profile India, http://earthtrends.wri.org/text/economics-business/country-profile-85.html 2008 Statistical Update India, http://hdrstats.undp.org/2008/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_IND.html, December 18th 2008 Ibid.
35
13