Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OECd data on Gross Expenditure on R&d (GERd) confirm that the Japan, the US and Germany are investing relatively more of GDP in their research base. Chinas GERD has increased dramatically in absolute terms and is also growing as a share of an expanding GDP. This represents a huge additional investment in global research. Within Europe, the UKs level of investment shows signs of decline and the UK remains behind the general EU target on expenditure. Germanys GERD is substantially greater than any other EU country while France has broadly maintained its research spend. Research spend in Asia will be the major change factor in the next decade. More researchers as well as greater expenditure are characteristic of the research economy in Japan and the US. EU countries have around 8 researchers per thousand people in the labor force but the US is at 9 and Japan at 10. Chinas labor force remains relatively unskilled, but in absolute numbers it has as many researchers OECDs relatively more skilled category of workers as western Europe. PhD training in China is still expanding. It is evident that the balance of highly skilled, R&D competent workers in Asia will grow very significantly over the next decade. This is unlikely to be counterbalanced by established economies.
Research papers (journal articles and reviews) are the primary route to disseminating new knowledge in most science disciplines. The US share of world papers has been declining for some time. The US was impacted initially by research growth in Europe. In Europe, the UK and Germany remain well ahead of France but all three see their world share declining. The established economies are all now affected by Asia and particularly China. Chinas output has risen so rapidly that it has more than doubled its share of world papers in the last decade. This unprecedented trajectory shows little sign of flattening. Research impact is critical as a marker of output that will likely support new products and processes. We index impact by comparing the average number of citations per paper to the relevant world average for year and subject area. The UK is on average now producing higher impact papers than other leading economies. Research quality in Europe has improved over the last decade and the USA is no longer the world leader. In Asia, China has improved its average performance. Data confirm that it is producing many excellent papers. Much of its output explosion is more modest in quality, however, which means that its average impact remains well behind world average. A Research footprint deconstructs the picture of citation impact by major discipline area to compare one country with others in the analysis and with a world average (1.0). The UK has a clear advantage in the life sciences whilst the US has somewhat the highest citation impact in physical sciences and engineering. However, Germany and France are now close behind the US in engineering and ahead in biology. China is clearly strongest in engineering and weaker in molecular biology. That reflects its historical research investment but it is now diversifying its research base into the life sciences. It will become equally competitive in these key areas. The changing geography of knowledge requires us to review our assumptions. But the data on investment, workforce, outputs and impact point less to a weakening of old economies and more to unprecedented change in new research economies. What we see in China is written more finely but equally clearly for other Asia-Pacific countries, the Middle East, north Africa and Latin America. Brazil is a Latin-regional focus; Egypt is a key hub between the Middle East and Africa; China is diversifying a collaborative network around the Pacific basin. Future global research requires a shift in mindset towards balanced partnerships in which the old alliances will not always lead. New economies bring new ideas about problem definition and problem solving as well as innovative outcomes. Universities can lead the way in establishing knowledge partnerships, showing governments where national interest could be directed. Knowledge will be gained not only through intelligence and literature reviews but much more via hands-on engagement.
Thomson Reuters is the worlds leading source of intelligent information for businesses and professionals. Our Research Analytics solutions from the IP & Science business allow administrators to track, measure, analyze and compare research at their institution and others around the world. Based on the objective, reliable data in Web of Science, these offerings provide insight into trends and performance, giving leaders concrete evidence to define strategic direction. For more information, go to researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/impact/
Jonathan Adams is Director, Research Evaluation. He was a founding Director of Evidence Ltd, the UK specialist on research performance analysis and interpretation and was formerly a member of the science policy staff of the UK Advisory Board for the Research Councils.
researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/grr
Europe, Middle East and Africa London +44 20 7433 4000 Asia Pacific Singapore Tokyo