0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
53 просмотров26 страниц
Determinants of Rice Income and Access to Land by the Rice Farmers: The Case of Bangladesh by Kh. A. Mottaleb, T. W. Tsusaka, M. S. Rahman and S. Mohanty, International Rice Research Institute, Social Sciences Division
Оригинальное название
Determinants of Rice Income and Access to Land by the Rice Farmers: The Case of Bangladesh
Determinants of Rice Income and Access to Land by the Rice Farmers: The Case of Bangladesh by Kh. A. Mottaleb, T. W. Tsusaka, M. S. Rahman and S. Mohanty, International Rice Research Institute, Social Sciences Division
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPTX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Determinants of Rice Income and Access to Land by the Rice Farmers: The Case of Bangladesh by Kh. A. Mottaleb, T. W. Tsusaka, M. S. Rahman and S. Mohanty, International Rice Research Institute, Social Sciences Division
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате PPTX, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Bangladesh Kh. A. Mottaleb, T. W. Tsusaka, M. S. Rahman and S. Mohanty Presented by Kh. A. Mottaleb Postdoctoral Fellow-Agricultural Economist Social Sciences Division International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) August 08, 2012 8/15/2012 1 Importance of rice Contribution of agriculture to GDP: 20.29% -Rice to GDP: 11%. cultivated on 75 % of the total cropland. 93% of the total cereal production is rice (335 Mt out of 360 Mt) Total labor force: 54.1 million -Into agriculture: 25.59 million (47%) -Into rice: 19.19 million (35%) 93% 3% 4% Rice Wheat Maize 8/15/2012 2 Need to produce more rice! Demand for rice has been increasing-- Need to produce more rice. Projection is based on IGRM 8/15/2012 3 31.9 38.16 42.84 0 10 20 30 40 50 2010 2020 2035 rice required rice required Real Concern Rapidly shrinking rice farmland Area: 147,570 km 2 ( Ranked 94 th in the world ) Population: 149.77 million (ranked 9 th in the world) Population per sq.: 1015
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 per capita Arable land per capita Arable land Source: World Development Indicators, 2012 Source: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS): HIES 2000, 2005, 2010 0.78 0.9 1.15 0 0.5 1 1.5 2010 2005 2000 cropland 8/15/2012 4 40.7 49.5 54.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1990 2005 2010 labor force labor force Source: Labor force survey 1990 and Bangladesh Economic Review 2010. Change in global climate 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1956 1966 1976 1986 1996 2006 sylhet Jessore Bogra Chittagong Figure 1: Monthly avg. max Temp (0C) in four stations Source: Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council, 2012 8/15/2012 5 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 1956 1966 1976 1986 1996 2006 Sylhet Jessore Chittagong Bogra Figure 2: Yearly total rainfall (mm) in four stations 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 1967 1977 1987 1997 2007 Jessore Chittagong Bogra Sylhet Figure 3: Monthly total average bright sunshine (hours) 8/15/2012 6 South Asia Needs to Produce more Rice 8/15/2012 7 Actual Required 2012 2035 India 94.99 113.22 Nepal 2.97 3.36 Pakistan 2.5 5.5 Sri Lanka 2.8 3.2 Projection is based on IGRM And per capita arable land is declining too. 8/15/2012 8 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Bangladesh India Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka Bangladesh Source: World Development Indicators 2012 Research question-1 8/15/2012 9 How to ensure higher rice production and income of the farmers from increasingly declining arable land? Research question-2 How to reduce burden on arable land? 8/15/2012 10 Climate, infrastructure, household characteristics, physical and human capital Access to agriculture land market (rent in, rent out, purchase) Farm income: rice income fishery, livestock, forestry and agriculture wage income Nonfarm income (salary, nonfarm wage income, business income, remittance ) A working model on Rice income and Access to Land Market 8/15/2012 11 Research hypotheses Major hypotheses: 1. As rice income can be adversely affected by climate change, high rice income can be ensured by developing and disseminating more climate resilient rice varieties. 2. Increases in rice, and nonfarm income, on the other hand enhances access to land to poor farmers and indirectly reduces pressure on arable land, as rich farmers tend to adopt the role of managers by renting out their land. 8/15/2012 12 Materials and Method GOB: Household Income and Expenditure survey, 2000, 2005, 2010 Two stage stratified random sampling. Sample size: HIES 2000: 7440, HIES 2005: 10080 HIES 2010: 12200 In this study: 8630 households who were only rice farmers (rice income>0). Coverage: Entire Bangladesh: 7 divisions, 64 districts, 384 sub-districts. Climate data sources: -unpublished data collected from Bangladesh Metrological Office, Agargaon, Dhaka. -Online data from Bangladesh Agriculture Research Council (BARC). 8/15/2012 13 Demographic characteristics of the sampled households over the sampled periods Year 2000 2005 2010 No. of households 2624 3501 2505 Age of the HH head 45.90 47.01 47.61 % Male HH head 96.3 95.7 92.8 HH heads year of schooling 3.15
3.24
3.08
% Rural HH 92.5 83.1 84.6 No. of family members 5.61 5.28 5.01 Source: BBS, HIES 2000, 2005, 2010. Authors own calculation. 8/15/2012 14 Sources of Income and Income from Rice of the Sampled Households (BDT 000) Year 2000 2005 2010 Yearly total income (farm+ nonfarm) 60.78 71.38 137.12 Income from rice % 23.5 21.8 31.8 Non-farm income % 56.7 56.9 40.1 8/15/2012 15 Source: BBS, HIES 2000, 2005, 2010. Authors own calculation. Farm size and Information on Land Market access by the Sampled households over the years Year 2000 2005 2010 Farm size (ha) 1.15 0.90 0.78 % Purchased land 4.23 5.17 5.47 % Rented in land 49.77 50.47 59.32 % Rented out land 20.08 20.82 22.28 8/15/2012 16 Source: BBS, HIES 2000, 2005, 2010. Authors own calculation. Characteristics of the HH based on their access to land market Land purchased Rented in No Yes No Yes No. of households 2368 137 1019 1486 Farm size (ha) 0.76 1.24 0.82 0.76 Income from rice 42.14 68.43 45.88 42.01 Non-farm income 31.75 50.68 37.64 29.46 8/15/2012 17 Source: BBS, HIES 2000, 2005, 2010. Authors own calculation. Characteristics of the HH based on their access to land market Rented in Rented out No Yes No Yes No. of households 1019 1486 1947 558 Farm size (ha) 0.82 0.76 0.73 0.96 Income from rice 45.88 42.01 41.04 52.45 Non-farm income 37.64 29.46 29.88 42.93 Both rice and nonfarm income is positively related with land purchase -tively with rent in +tively with rent out 8/15/2012 18 Source: BBS, HIES 2000, 2005, 2010. Authors own calculation. Correlation between Rice & nonfarm income with some climate variables Rice income Nonfarm income Rice income 1 Nonfarm income 0.03*** 1 (0.00) Distance to Dhaka 0.07*** -0.10*** (0.00) (0.00) Length of metal road -0.03*** 0.05*** (0.00) (0.00) Monthly avg. max. Temp 0.21*** 0.02 (0.00) (0.14) Monthly average humidity -0.07*** -0.03*** (0.00) (0.01) Yearly total rainfall -0.03*** 0.07*** (0.00) (0.00) 8/15/2012 19 Model specification Y = 1 if purchased land 0 otherwise Y=1 if rented out land, 0 otherwise Y=1 if rented in land, 0 otherwise X is the vector of variables: age, sex, location, dummies for administrative divisions, and year dummies Z is the vector of exogenous variables: strictly correlated with income from rice (RI and nonfarm sector (NFI) and uncorrelated with the error term of equation (1): climate variables, distance to Dhaka and the length of metal roads at the district level. Simple linear probability model is used to estimate the model with clustered standard errors. 8/15/2012 20 ) 3 ( ) 2010 ( ) 2005 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ( ) 2010 ( ) 2005 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( ) 2010 ( ) 2005 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 2 1 0 2 1 0 4 3 2 1 0 + + + + + = + + + + + = + + + + + + + = it i ti it it it ti it it it i ti ti it it it dummy Year b dummy Year b X i Z b NFI dummy Year a dummy Year a i X i Z a RI X dummy Year dummy Year i X NFI RI Y o e | u | | | | | Determinants of rice and nonfarm income Rice income Non farm income Distance from Dhaka to district headquarter
0.02*** (3.00) -0.08*** (-6.59) Maximum temperature monthly average
26.68*** (3.12) -19.31 (-1.27) Variation in monthly average maximum temperature in the last 5 years 6.78*** (3.89) -3.72 (-1.32) Square of monthly average maximum temperature -0.40*** (-2.86) 0.35 (1.53) Years of schooling of HH head
0.97*** (10.65) 2.61*** (14.75) Total annual rainfall
-0.14 (-0.04) 0.42 (0.08) Variation in annual rainfall in the last 5 years
-0.01* (-1.88) 0.002 (0.44) No. of observations 8630 8630 First stage F 43.89 18.98 8/15/2012 21 2SLS-Determinants of land market participation Land purchased (yes=1) Land rented in (yes=1) Land rented out (yes=1) Rice income
0.002* (1.79) -0.01* (-1.86) 0.01*** (3.45) Nonfarm income
0.001* (1.66) -0.01*** (-6.38) 0.005*** (4.73) Distance from Dhaka to district headquarter 0.0001 (1.51) -0.001*** (-4.30) 0.0002 (1.15) Maximum temperature monthly average
-0.29*** (-3.75) -0.19 (-0.85) -0.13 (-0.73) Variation in monthly average maximum temperature in the last 5 years 0.01 (0.52) -0.004 (-0.09) -0.04 (-1.37) Square of monthly average maximum temperature 0.004*** (3.92) 0.004 (1.19) 0.001 (0.54) Hansen J statistic 4.99 3.92 2.95 Chi-sq(6) P-val 0.54 0.69 0.82 8/15/2012 22 Major findings Change in global climate may affect rice income negatively and significantly. Years of schooling of the HH head significantly and positively determine both rice and nonfarm incomes. Increase in rice and nonfarm incomes allows farmers to take managerial roles by rent out their land. 8/15/2012 23 Policy implications To reduce burden on farmland, both rice and nonfarm income should be increased. It can be done through the development and dissemination of more climate resilient rice varieties. Expansion of general education can play important roles. The provision of training can be an alternative. Intervention by the government with the help of International donor agencies. Short term/medium term 8/15/2012 24 Policy implications Climate resilient rice varieties should be combined with super high yielding traits (may be C4 rice) to break the yield ceiling. It can ensure more production/income even from small parcels of land -> even under volatile climate - >reduce extra burden on land. Long term 8/15/2012 25 Thank You 8/15/2012 26