Software Estimation

The ability to accurately estimate the time and/or cost taken for a project to come in to its successful conclusion It includes size estimation, effort estimation, duration estimation ,cost estimation etc

Size estimation
The project size is a measure of the problem complexity in terms of the effort and the time required to develop the project Two techniques for estimation LOC(lines of codes) FPA(function point analysis)

LOC
This metric measures the size of the project by counting the number of source instructions in the program. Comments and header lines are ignored. Accurate LOC count in the beginning of the project is difficult, one would have to make systemetic guess. Project managers divide the problem into modules and each modules into submodules until the sizes of the different leaf level modules can be approximately predicted. Past experience is imp here.

Disadvantage of LOC
It gives a numerical value of problem size that can vary widely with individual coding style. Loc is a measure of the coding activity alone.it ignores design,test etc It is difficult to estimate LOC from the problem specification.

Function Point Analysis(FPA)

It is designed to estimate and measure the time, and thereby the cost, of developing new software applications and maintaining existing software applications. This is in contrast to the LOC metric, Where the size can be accurately determined only after the product has fully been developed. The conceptual idea behind the function point metric is that the size of the software is directly dependant on the number of different functions or features it supports.

How is Function Point Analysis done?

Working from the project design specifications, the following system functions are measured (counted): number of inputs(Each data item input by the user is counted) number of Output(reports printed,screen outputs, error messages produced etc) Number of Files(data structure and physical files) Number of Inquires(are the user command which require specific action by the system) Number of Interfaces(interfaces used to exchange information with other systems)

These function-point counts are then weighed (multiplied) by their degree of complexity: Simple Average Complex Inputs 2 4 6 Outputs 3 5 7 Files 5 10 15 Inquires 2 4 6 Interfaces 4 7 10

A simple example:
3 simple X 2 = 6 4 average X 4 = 16 1 complex X 6 = 6 outputs 6 average X 5 = 30 2 complex X 7 = 14 files 5 complex X 15 = 75 inquiries 8 average X 4 = 32 interfaces 3 average X 7 = 21 4 complex X 10 = 40 Unadjusted function points 240

inputs

Value Adjustment Factor - The Unadjusted Function Point count is multiplied by the second adjustment factor called the Value Adjustment Factor. This factor considers the system's technical and operational characteristics and is calculated by answering 14 questions. The factors are:
1. Data Communications The data and control information used in the application are sent or received over communication facilities.

2. Distributed Data Processing Distributed data or processing functions are a characteristic of the application within the application boundary.
3. Performance Application performance objectives, stated or approved by the user, in either response or throughput, influence (or will influence) the design, development, installation and support of the application. 4. Heavily Used Configuration A heavily used operational configuration, requiring special design considerations, is a characteristic of the application. 5. Transaction Rate The transaction rate is high and influences the design, development, installation and support.

6. On-line Data Entry On-line data entry and control information functions are provided in the application.
7. End -User Efficiency The on-line functions provided emphasize a design for end-user efficiency.

8. On-line Update The application provides on-line update for the internal logical files. 9. Complex Processing Complex processing is a characteristic of the application. 10. Reusability The application and the code in the application have been specifically designed, developed and supported to be usable in other applications. 11. Installation Ease Conversion and installation ease are characteristics of the application. A conversion and installation plan and/or conversion tools were provided and tested during the system test phase. 12. Operational Ease Operational ease is a characteristic of the application. Effective start-up, backup and recovery procedures were provided and tested during the system test phase. 13. Multiple Sites The application has been specifically designed, developed and supported to be installed at multiple sites for multiple organizations. 14. Facilitate Change The application has been specifically designed, developed and supported to facilitate change.

Continuing our example . . . Complex internal processing Code to be reusable High performance Multiple sites Distributed processing Project adjustment factor

= = = = =

3 2 4 3 5

= 17

Adjustment calculation: Adjusted FP = Unadjusted FP X [0.65 + (adjustment factor X 0.01)] = 240 X [0.65 + ( 17 X 0.01)] = 240 X [0.82] = 197 Adjusted function points

But how long will the project take and how much will it cost? As previously measured, programmers in our organization average 18 function points per month. Thus . . . 197 FP divided by 18 = 11 man-months If the average programmer is paid $5,200 per month (including benefits), then the [labor] cost of the project will be . . . 11 man-months X $5,200 = $57,200

COCOMO
It is known as constructive cost model and was proposed by Boehm in 1981. According to Boehm,any software development project can be classified into three categories based on the development complexity:organic, semidetached, and embedded

 Organic: A development project can be considered of organic type, if the project deals with developing a well understood application program, the size of the development team is reasonably small, and the team members are experienced in developing similar types of projects. Semidetached: A development project can be considered of semidetached type, if the development consists of a mixture of experienced and inexperienced staff. Team members may have limited experience on related systems but may be unfamiliar with some aspects of the system being developed. Embedded: A development project is considered to be of embedded type, if the software being developed is strongly coupled to complex hardware, or if the stringent regulations on the operational procedures exist.
According to Boehm, software cost estimation should be done through three stages: Basic COCOMO, Intermediate COCOMO, and Complete COCOMO.

Basic COCOMO Model

The basic COCOMO model gives an approximate estimate of the project parameters The basic COCOMO estimation model is given by the following expressions: Effort = a1*(KLOC)a2 PM Tdev= b1*(Effort)b2 months Where KLOC is the estimated size of the software product expressed in KiloLines of Code; Effort is the total effort required to develop the software product,expressed in person months (PMs) a1 a2 b1 b2 are constants for each category of software product. Tdev is the estimated time to develop the software, expressed in months,

For the three classes of software products, the formulas for estimating the effort based on the code size are shown below: 1) For organic: effort=2.4(KLOC)1.05 PM 2) For semidetached: effort=3.0(KLOC)1.12 PM 3) For embedded: Effort=3.6(KLOC)1.20 PM Estimation of development time 1)For organic: Tdev= 2.5(effort)0.38 months 2)For semidetached: Tdev= 2.5(effort)0.35 months 3)For embedded: Tdev= 2.5(effort)0.32 months

 Example: Assume that the size of an organic type software product has been estimated to be 32,000 lines of source code. Assume that the average salary of software engineers be Rs. 15,000/- per month. Determine the effort required to develop the software product and the nominal development time

Intermediate COCOMO model

The basic COCOMO model assumes that effort and development time are functions of the product size alone. However, a host of other project parameters besides the product size affect the effort required to develop the product as well as the development time. Therefore, in order to obtain an accurate estimation of the effort and project duration, the effect of all relevant parameters must be taken into account.

The intermediate COCOMO model recognizes this fact and refines the initial estimate obtained using the basic COCOMO expressions by using a set of cost drivers (multipliers) based on various attributes of software development. Product related cost drivers:inherent complexity of the product, reliability requirements of the product, etc. Computer related cost drivers:execution speed required, storage space required etc. Personnel related cost drivers:the experience level of personnel, programming capability, analysis capability,etc. Development Environment related cost drivers:development facilities available to the developers

these different parameters for a particular project on a scale of one to three.

Complete COCOMO model

A major shortcoming of both the basic and intermediate COCOMO models is that they consider a software product as a single homogeneous entity. However, most large systems are made up several smaller sub-systems; These sub-systems may have widely different characteristics. For example, some sub-systems may be considered as organic type, some semidetached, and some embedded. The complete COCOMO model considers these differences in characteristics of the subsystems and estimates the effort and development time as the sum of the estimates for the individual subsystems

 The cost of each subsystem is estimated separately. This approach reduces the margin of error in the final estimate.

example
The following development project can be considered as an exampleapplication of the complete COCOMO model. A distributed Management Information System (MIS) product for an organization having offices at several places across the country can have the following sub-components: Database part Graphical User Interface (GUI) part Communication part Of these, the communication part can be considered as embedded software. The database part could be semi-detached software, and the GUI part organic software. The costs for these three components can be estimated separately, and summed up to give the overall cost of the system.