Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Asian century?
Both China and India have large populations covering substantial and diverse geographical areas, large economies with even larger potential size. Current success stories of globalisation: two economies that have apparently benefited. Success defined by the high and sustained rates of growth of aggregate and per capita national income; the absence of major financial crises; and substantial reduction in income poverty.
Institutional conditions
India was a mixed economy with large private sector, so essentially capitalist market economy with the associated tendency to involuntary unemployment. China was mostly a command economy, which until recently had a very small private sector; there is still substantial state control over macroeconomic processes in forms that have differed from more conventional capitalist macroeconomic policy.
Indias economy has grown at around 5-6 per cent per year over the same period, breaking from Hindu rate of 3 per cent. But very recently the average growth rate for the last four years is just above 8 per cent.
Rates of investment
The investment rate in China (investment as a share of GDP) has fluctuated between 35 - 44 per cent over the past 25 years, compared to 20 - 26 per cent in India. Aggregate ICORs (incremental capital-output ratios) have been around the same in both economies. Infrastructure investment from the early 1990s has averaged 19 per cent of GDP in China, compared to 2 per cent in India.
Trade patterns
China: Rapid export growth involving aggressive increases on world market shares, based on relocative capital attracted by cheap labour and heavily subsidised infrastructure. India: Lower rate of export growth, with cheap labour due to low absolute wages rather than public provision and poor infrastructure development. So exports have not yet become engine of growth, except in services.
Poverty reduction
China: Officially 4 per cent of the population now lives under the poverty line, unofficially around 12 per cent. (Reflects earlier asset redistribution and basic needs provision in China under communism, plus larger mass market and recent role of agricultural prices.)
India: Official poverty ratio much higher and persistent, currently 28 per cent. Food deprivation is much higher.
Human development
China: earlier extensive public provision of health and education: universal education until Class X, and public services to ensure nutrition, health and sanitation. (In the 1990s, higher fees and some privatisation of such services led to reduced access and worsening indicators; since 2002 revival of public spending in these areas.) India: the public provision of all of these has been extremely inadequate throughout this period and has deteriorated in per capita terms since the early 1990s. Very recently slight increase in education spending but still well below China; government health spending still very low.
Inequalities
In both economies the recent pattern of growth has been inequalising. China: spatial inequalities across regions have been the sharpest. More recently, vertical inequalities, especially for migrant population vis--vis others.
India: vertical inequalities and the rural-urban divide have become much more marked.
Urban females
Agricultural self employment Agricultural wage employment Total agricultural employment Rural non-agri self employment Rural non-agri wage employment Rural total non-agri employment Urban non-agri employment Secondary employment Tertiary employment Total non-agricultural employment
2.53
4.66
1981
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Public Sector
Private Sector
Total
2003
0.10
1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-04
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Rural males Rural females Rural persons Urban males Urban females Urban persons
Chart 4: Per cent of self-employed workers who consider their own income remunerative, by income-range considered remunerative
80 70 60 50 40 30
<1000 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2500 2500-3000 >3000
20
Rural Males
Urban Males
Rural Females
Urban Females
China's exports
800 700 50 600 40 500 400 300 20 200 10 100 0 1981 1982 1983 1985 1986 1989 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total exports, $ bn Per cent processed in total exports 0 30 60
25
20
15
10
0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Unit value
Self-employed
TVEs
Private enterprises
Self-employed
22.5 -2.3 8.9 10.5 5.3 7.9 1.5 1.4 1.7 3.2 -1.7 11.0 10.9 9.7 9.9 9.3 8.0 10.4
52.0 50.0
Investment rate
Consumption rate
Lessons
For more inclusive growth, the generation of good quality productive employment is the most critical variable. Need growth strategy that allows and encourages labour productivity increases overall while significantly expanding expenditure and therefore income and employment opportunities in social sectors. Major role for state intervention, through direct public investment and through fiscal, monetary and marketbased measures that alter the structure of incentives for private agents.