Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Pneumatic Implementation:
In the early implementation of automatic control systems, information flow was accomplished by pneumatic transmission, and computation was done by mechanical devices using bellows, spring etc. Problems associated with pneumatic implementation: Transmission. Calculation
Analog implementation:
Electrons are used as the medium of transmission in his type of implementation mode. Analog computation devices are used. Problems associated with analog implementation: Transmission. Calculation
History (cont.)
Digital Implementation:
Transmission: Digital signals are far less sensitive to noise. Calculation: The computational devices are digital computers.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
1959: The first industrial control computer system was built at the Texaco
Port Arthur, Texas, refinery of the Ramo Wooldridge Company. These computers could not be used for real time control. Instead they were used for supervision, printing instructions for the process operator, or changing set points of analog control equipment. The analog equipment then still performed the control, but with the help of a computer.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
1962:The next leap in process control was made in 1962 when the
British chemical company Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI) replaced a complete analog control system in an ammonia/soda plant by an Argus computer. Instead of just being used for supervisory tasks for the analog control system, a computer was now actually performing the control. This form of pure digital control would come to be called Direct Digital Control (DDC).
In the years to come DDC langauges emerged which made it almost trivial to implement control designs in DDC systems. No programming was required, one simply organized I/O configurations and connections in tables and the DDC system would then execute the control based on these tables.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
1970:With the birth of the minicomputers in the mid 60s came more
opportunities. Minicomputers meant that computers became cheaper, faster, and more reliable. Cheaper meant that it became profitable to implement smaller systems with computers instead of analog control systems.
The invention of the microcomputers in the early 70s was the final blow to the analog control systems. The price was brought down drastically.Then it was cheaper to implement it with a computer than with analog devices.
1975:
Both Honeywell and Japanese electrical engineering firm Yokogawa introduced their own independently produced DCSs at roughly the same time, with the TDC 2000 and CENTUM systems, respectively. Digital communication between distributed controllers, workstations and other computing elements (peer to peer access) was one of the primary advantages of the DCS. Attention was duly focused on the networks.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
A Z80 microprocessor.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
1990:With the introduction of distributed control came the necessity to
communicate between the devices and the controllers. One issue was that the systems were closed and that there was no standard communication protocol to connect them with. Another issue was that even though the controllers were now digitalized,the controller still communicated with the devices using analog signals. A large drive was thus towards digitalization of the communication with the devices and standardization of the communication. Several dominant fieldbuses are-Profibus PA, FOUNDATION,
ControlNet, DeviceNet, and ModBus. Probably the biggest transition undertaken during this time was the move from the UNIX operating system to the Windows environment. Practically everything above the real-time level was now written to run on Windows.
EVOLUTION OF DCS
Before the 90s the DCS companies were hardware centered, producing practically everything used in the control system themselves, both hardware and software. During the 90s commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) products emerged of which some could do almost the same thing as the self-produced hardware. Producing some of the hardware was thus no longer justifiable and the DCS companies slowly started to move towards being more software centered. This is transition that is still going on today.
group display
Shows the operating parameters of group of control loops such as four, eight, twelve, or sixteen control loops, arranged in rows so that they look like the faces of instruments on an instrument panel.
Trend Displays
- Trend displays are the distributed control system equivalents of chart records. - Shows change in process value that have taken place over a period of time
Detail Display:It is specific to a single loop or control function.The bar graph in the faceplate display can show the controlled process variable,the set pt,and the output.The transmitters or other sources from which these signals are received are also listed in the screen.
Alarm Summary Display: shows a list of Current Alarms and Unacknowledged Alarms. Eachtime an Alarm occurs, a line is entered in the Alarm Summary describing the alarm. Acknowledgement by the operator changes the color (or flashing color) to indicate acknowledgement. As alarms return to Normal, they disappear from the Alarm Summary.
Control Language
The IEC 61131-3 standard defines four control languages for process control and manufacturing automation . Three of these languages use graphical representation of the control,as follows: Function block: Allows both continuous and discrete control represented by reusable blocks of functionality.The information flow between blocks is by wiring between the functional block input and output connections.Basic blocks are-DI,DO,AI,AO,PID,PD,P,Control Selector(CS),Ratio Station(RS). Sequential function chart: Defines calculations and control where the logic evaluation is done in a sequential manner and may follow different paths depending on the operating conditions. Ladder diagram: Allows discrete logic to be implemented as rungs of contact,coils,and functional blocks.It has been utilized in discrete control and in motor control interlock and permissive logic applications.
Following functional requirements as a minimum should be met by DCS system: Control Data Acquisition: Data acquisition is the process of retrieving
control information from the equipment which is out of order or may lead to some problem or when decisions are need to be taken according to the situation in the equipment. So this acquisition is done by continuous monitoring of the equipment to which it is employed.
Advantages of DCS
Access a large amount of current information from the data highway. Monitoring trends of past process conditions. It can be used for any no of loop counts and system performance doesnt degrade with increasing loop count. System wide global database and automatic documentation. Readily install new on-line measurements together with local computers. Digital DCS systems are more flexible. Control algorithms can be changed and control configuration can be modified without having rewiring the system. Redundancy is available at various levels. Information regarding the process is presented to the user in various formats. Field wiring is considerably less. Maintenance and trouble shooting becomes very easy. Cost effective in the long run.
PLC SYSTEM
2.PROGRAMMING
PLC/ SCADA control logic, alarming, system communications and HMI are programmed independently. Control engineers are responsible for the integration/ linking of multiple databases to create the system. Redundancy is rarely used with PLCs. One reason is the difficulty in setting it up and managing meaningful redundancy for the application. When control logic is developed, HMI faceplates, alarms and system communications are automatically configured. Redundancy is set up in software quickly and easily, nearly with a click of a button.
4.TROUBLESHOOTING
PLCs have relatively little diagnostic status and may only be indicative. Limited use of diagnostic bits in logic. All key diagnostic bits reflecting system health status can participate in logics for proper safety actions.DCS diagnostics allow us to drill down all the way to the field instruments including HART & Fieldbus.
6.OPERATOR TRAINING
With PLC/ SCADA operator training is the responsibility of the developer of the application. There is no operator training from the vendor Training for operators is available from the process control vendor. This is owing to the standardized way that information is presented to operators.
The divide between DCS and PLC/ SCADA approaches is wide, even though some commonality at the hardware level can be observed; the single database is at the heart of the DCS benefit and is a feature that holds its value throughout its life.
DCS
PLC
2. What is the value of the product being manufactured and the cost of downtime?
Value of the individual component being manufactured is relatively low. Downtime mainly results in lost production. The value of a batch can be very high. Downtime not only results in lost production, but can result in dangerous conditions.
PLC
Downtime does not typically damage Downtime can result in process the process equipment. equipment damage (product hardens, etc.)
Return to steady state production after an outage is short and relatively straightforward
Return to steady state production after an unplanned outage can be long, expensive, and difficult
DCS
PLC
DCS
PLC
DCS
Analog Control: Simple PID only. Diagnostics to tell you when something is broken.
DCS
PLC
Customized routines usually required . Many algorithms (i.e. PID) are complex and do not vary among applications.
DCS
PLC
Solution is generic in nature, to be applied on a wide variety of applications. Use ladder logic to configure application.
DCS
PLC
System designed to make it "easy" to engineer process applications. Use of pre-defined, pre-tested functions saves time.