Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Learning aims
-what usability testing is -why we do a usability test -how to prepare, organize and analyze a test -about important measurable variables -all info about your next assignment
Contents
Part-01
Part-02
Part-03
Design overview
Improving the usability of the product Improving the product in general Finding the information on how to improve the product
Not satisfactory
Design
Prototype
Satisfactory
Endproduct
Test-persons are real users and do realistic tasks (as you designed them)
Testers - observe and register what users do and say - analyze registered data -measurements, users remarks, observations - identify usability-problems - formulate advice for improvements
Time for a little video http://www.2c.nl/nl/usability_onderzoek/usability_test/video.p hp http://www.usefulusability.com/10-must-see-usability-videos And software http://silverbackapp.com/ Or search for usability software testing on Google
This lesson: 1. Plan and prepare the usability test. 2. Take the usability test. 3. Collect test data from the usability test. Next lesson: Analyze data of the test. Report test results.
Contents
Part-01
Sorts of Variables
Nominal Qualitative
(kwalitief)
Ordinal
Discrete Quantitative
(kwantitatief)
Continuous
Qualitative Nominal
Latin: nomen = name Concerns the naming of the registered parameter Example: Gender: Man / Woman City: Arnhem Animal sorts: Dog, cat etc
Qualitative Ordinal
Aggregation of information that can be organized in logical categories without reference to absolute measurable meaning or interpretation Ordinal measurements only show relative discrimination between categories Examples: Education levels: VMBO, Havo Grades in education: 1-10 Scales/scores/rankings: very difficult - little difficult - neutral little easy very easy
It shows that there is a difference between little and very, but without telling you how much difference
Quantitative Discrete
Quantitative Continuous
Continuous variables can have any kind of value: 1,3 5.000,92 0,001 - etc Example: If you register the weight of an item it can be any value even when limited between given thresholds like any value between 10 and 100: 30,5 40 60,58
Quantitative Continuous
Unlike discrete variables that can only hold discrete points on a scale, continuous variables can have any value. For example: To become a fire fighter ones weight must be between 75 and 100 kilo. Weight is an example of a continuous variable. The weight of a fire fighter van have any value between 75 and 100 kilo.
Qualitative or quantitative?
1. Determine what you want to measure and which values are allowed; 2. Determine how you want to respond to values that are not permitted;
Needed to present your results and draw conclusions from a usability test!
It is important to determine what you want to measure before you start!
Contents
Part-01
Part-02
Part-03
Determine aims
Determine aims
The target population can be taken from the user profiles described in the user analyses. Sample size: about 4-6, minimal 3 Create some subgroups
Number of users
The aim of your usability test is your starting point. Ask yourself: What problems can be expected? Check your Use Cases and scenarios (Structure Document)
Put some Use Cases in a sequence that seems to be natural for the user. Write (test)scenarios that are understandable for the user. N.B. These Use Cases perform tasks which the user will be testing.
Scenario example (wrong) Add a new examination. Enter todays date. Enter Project4 in field Teacher and Interface project in field Description. Enter 25 in field number of questions and 1 in field parts. Enable all controls. Enter IC2B in field class.
Scenario example (right) The results of an examination for the course user interfaces have to be processed in SVS. You have been teaching this course to class IC2B. The examination consisted of 25 questions for which there is only 1 version. You want SVS to warn you if an answer contains a value that is outside the range of possible values or if a questions was not answered at all. Add a new examination to SVS to process your results.
Write interview questions Possible questions: Pre-test Before the test, to get a clear picture of the tester. Necessary when using subgroups. Post-task After each task, to ask the tester his opinion about a task. Gives a wealth of information! Use this always! Post-test After the test, to ask the tester his opinion about the product/website.
Determine how usability will be measured? Possible measurements (per task) are: Number of errors; Number of menus and screens displayed; Number of times the tester asked for Help or support; If the tester was able to accomplish a task (without asking for help); Remarks from the tester about the product/website tested; Time to accomplish a task; . Determine objective criteria (for each variable) Determine what is acceptable and what not
Inhoud
Part-01
Part-02
Part-03
Important
Structuring and composition test team How to start Think aloud Help? List of problems identified
Organization testteam
Possible roles:
Tester
Facilitator Observer Observer
Introduction of the persons involved. Explanation of the process. Make clear that the product is tested and not the participant. Ask to think aloud.
Composition of the test team Start of the test Think aloud Helping? Problem list
Contents
Part-01
Part-02
Part-03
Structuring data
Legenda: Question 1: Was het moeilijk om uit te vinden hoe u uw risico op een hart of vaatziekte kon meten? Question 2: Waar bent u begonnen met zoeken naar de risicometer vanaf de homepage? Question 3: Wat vond u van het gebruik van de risicometer?
Processing data Conclusions: From the retrieved data we can conclude that: 1. Male testers were more able to find the Risicometer; 2. Female testers did do all the tasks in an orderly sequence and started with the Medische informatie part; 3. Male testers started by entering a search request; 4. The use of the Risicometer is rather easy; 5. Two participants complained because not all values can be entered. Someone who is younger than 40 (age) cannot use the Risicometer (value cannot be entered).
Structuring data
Legenda: Question 1: Kon u de functie om zorgverleners te vergelijken makkelijk vinden? Question 2: Waren de keuzes die u moest maken duidelijk? Question 3: Kon u de informatie vinden die u zocht en was deze informatie duidelijk? Question 4: Waren de knoppen om verschillende zorgverleners te vergelijken duidelijk? Question 5: Zou u, als u ooit zorgverleners op kwaliteit moet vergelijken, www.kiesbeter.nl nog een keer gebruiken hiervoor?
Processing data Conclusions: From the previous table we can conclude that: 1. The functionality to do the test was easy to find; 2. Some testers followed alternative routes to find the functionality; 3. The received information was clear to all testers. One tester did not recognize the outcome of the test; 4. Two testers think that the site is not user friendly. Two testers think that the site is bad. In general we can conclude that the steps to do the test are straight forward and easy to follow. The side is not really user friendly. Two participants will not visit the site and two doubt if they will visit the site again.
Be carefull
Write down positive remarks as well. Everybody is eager to hear the good news. Write them down in your conclusions!
Contents
Data presentation
Always in a table and/or graph! Purpose: present the data in an honest way No Puzzle
This is nice
Legenda: Question 1: Was het moeilijk om uit te vinden hoe u uw risico op een hart of vaatziekte kon mete Question 2: Waar bent u begonnen met zoeken naar de risicometer vanaf de homepage? Question 3: Wat vond u van het gebruik van de risicometer?
Antwoord
Totally agree
Agree
Do not know
Do not agree
Totally disagree
Relate conclusions to observations: - The suggested bike in relation to the profile does not fit. Advice: Improve usability Profiling a User and Selecting a Bike.
Task 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Name Totally agree Agree Do not know Renting a Bike Bike are easy to select 3 2 Pimping the bike makes fun 2 5 Suggested Bike type conforms to my profile 0 1 Accesoires are easy to select 1 4 Do not agree 3 3 6 5 2 0 1 0 Totally disagree 0 0 2 0
Antwoord
Totall y agree
Agree
Do not know
Do not agree
Totall y disagree
Other mistakes
Overload of graphs
Wrong use of diagrams (pie charts etc.)
max min
Assignment
Assignment 5.1
Start working on the first part of your usability test (look in your study guide)
Be aware: Use the provided structure document! Dont invent it yourselves (itll cost you time) Let us have a look.
Summarized
1. Design realistic tasks for the users. 2. Set up the observation. 3. Describe to the user the purpose of the observation. 4. Demonstrate the equipment in the room. 5. Explain how to "think aloud". 6. Explain that you will not provide help. 7. Describe the tasks and introduce the product. 8. Ask if there are any questions before you start. 9. Begin the observation. 10.Conclude the observation. 11. Use the results.
Tog On Interface, Bruce Tognazzini, Addison-Wesley, 1991, ISBN 0-201-60842-1 The Art of Human Computer Interface Design, Brenda Laurel, Addison-Wesley, 1991, ISBN 0-201-51797-3
Knowing more?
About face Alan Cooper A practical guide to usability testing Tom Brinck Usability for the web - JS Dumas & JC Redish