Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
context than in a well-defined context. When they arise, the analyst must rely on background information or, when such information is not available, choose the interpretation that is maximally argumentative
> negative standpoint refute the proposition to which the standpoint refers to
(2) Its not true that TV makes life more fun, because since weve had play card games anymore. television, we dont
- Once it has been determined what the standpoint is, it is easier to figure out
which utterances form the argumentation for this standpoint
Explicit indicators (the speaker announces that the utterances they are about to
produce have an argumentative function):
(5) a. My arguments for this are b. I have concluded my defense.
indicated explicitly. Only when absolutely necessary to avoid misunderstanding , for legal or formal reasons or for emphasis, is the function of an utterance explicitly characterized:
(6) a. I hereby declare this court in session. b. We strongly advise you to leave the university and put your talents to use in another way. c. It will never happen again. And thats a promise.
(5) Aries 21 March through 20 April Usually you are neither organized nor thorough. Making plans is foreign to your nature, and the very idea of following through on details makes you ill. Therefore you will never become a scientist and certainly never win the Nobel prize. Leo 21 July through 20 August In the course of the coming week you will again find yourself in a situation where your critical thinking is not appreciated. Especially when you use that sharp tongue of yours to express it. So keep this part of your anatomy under control, for, as the Bible says, The tongue is a great evil, full of deadly poison.
In practice, there is often no indicator of argumentation it is not immediately obvious whether the presentation=progressive or retrogressive
(10) Carla doesnt ever want to see Bob again. She wont call him.
1. 2. -
(retrogressive presentation) Carla doesnt ever want to see Bob again because she wont call him. (progressive presentation) Carla doesnt ever want to see Bob again, so she wont call him. The context may help with the interpretation: - it may contain hidden implicit standpoints and argumentation - it may contain additional information: e.g., Bob hasnt heard from her in weeks Carla doesnt want to see Bob again = the standpoint, She wont call him= an established fact - the presumed argument is directly preceded or followed by a claim so clearly unacceptable that it has to be a standpoint in need of defense:
(11) Religious fanatics are the best musicians in the world. They are very dedicated. - the assertion that religious fanatics are very dedicated can be recognized as an argument because the claim that precedes it is so remarkable
It is in the interest of a person trying to resolve a DO that the listener be able to interpret the argumentation correctly it is the speakers intention to make the arguments recognizable as such if this intention is not clear from the verbal context, it may become clear if the broader, non-verbal context is taken into account i.e., the specific situation in which something is said and the cultural context in which it happens:
(12) a. The meeting hasnt started yet. Martin is coming down the hallway. b. Thousands of homemakers use Andy! (from an advertisement)
a. situation: Martin is chairing the meeting his not coming down the stairs counts as an
argument justifying the assertion b. without knowing that the assertion is part of an advertisement, one would not guess that the widespread use of Andy is being used as an argument for buying it
When interpreting argumentation, both general and specific background information may be important
speed produce differences in air pressure. According to Bernouillis principle, when the speed is highest, the pressure is lowest, and viceversa. The pressure (force per unit area) on the underside of the discus is higher than that on the upper side. As a result there is a lifting force (l) which is perpendicular to the velocity vector of the discus
we must always guard against letting our opinions influence our interpretation beware of indicators: even when it seems to clearly mark something as an argument , it may still not be correct to interpret it as such
in interpreting argumentative discourse, one should start from exactly what the speaker/writer has said. Only when problems arise in the interpretation should other clues be considered.
e.g., because utterances may often give causes rather than reasons. Instead of being arguments, such utterances serve to explain, elaborate, or clarify: (14) The pudding didnt stiffen because I didnt put enough gelatin in it -whatever is being explained, elaborated on, or clarified = sth that is already accepted
whatever is being explained, elaborated on, or clarified = sth that is already accepted vs. arguments = always brought to bear on a standpoint that has not yet been accepted speakers may exploit this characteristic i.e., they may try to make their standpoint appear as a statement of fact and their argumentation, as merely an explanation, thus creating the impression that their standpoint needs no defense:
(15) However painful it may be, social welfare must be cut. I shall attempt to explain that. We have been living beyond our means for many years and the high costs of the welfare state inhibit economic productivity.
on the surface, the utterance seems to serve as some sort of explanation but on closer examination, it turns out to have a justifying function and must therefore be treated as argumentation.
Principle: when in doubt, it is advisable to be cautious and to treat the explanation as argument
an