Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Sustainable Development
Economy
Integrated Product Policy Policy instruments to encourage Sustainable Consumption and Production
Policy instruments Regulatory: standards, norms, EPR (environmental performance reviews), labelling, (enforcement) Economic instruments: taxes, subsidies, credits, financial incentives, etc. Social: awareness raising, education, information, voluntary initiatives Others: indicators, green accounting...
BACKGROUND
Responses of businesses to pollution
PASSIVE Ignore pollution REACTIVE Dilution and dispersion
Definition by UNEP
CLEANER PRODUCTION
Cleaner Production is the continuous application of an integrated, preventive environmental strategy towards processes, products and services in order to increase overall efficiency and reduce damage and risks for humans and the environment.
Continuous Processes Humans
Preventive
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY
Products
Integrated
Services
CLEANER PRODUCTION
Operational improvements to business
What are the benefits for industrials ?
> CP improves products and services > CP lowers risks (liability) > CP improves company image > CP improves workers health and safety conditions > CP reduces waste treatment and disposal costs > CP can be integrated with the business EMS > CP saves costs on raw material, energy and water > CP makes companies more profitable and competitive
IMPLEMENTING CP
Cleaner Production categories
OPERATION
TECHNOLOGY
PRODUCTION PROCESS
INPUT MATERIALS Relationship with MEAs: 1- UNFCCC/Kyoto Green House Gas emissions 2- Basel Convention Waste minimisation 3- Stockholm Convention Avoid unintentionally produced POPs (PCBs, dioxins and furans) PRODUCTS
METHODOLOGY
Barriers to CP implementation
INTERNAL BARRIERS
> Traditional philosophy of CEOs (low awareness) > Internal organisation and communication (initial constraints) > Limited information, data and expertise on waste and emissions > Focus on end of pipe solutions and short term profits > Inadequate cost/profit calculations CP options > Missing, outdated or unreliable process instrumentation > No or limited support of middle management > No EMS to achieve continual improvement
EXTERNAL BARRIERS
> Availability of investment capital > Availability of CP technologies
METHODOLOGY
CP methodology
> Obtain management commitment > Organise project team > Identify barriers & solutions > Set objectives > Pre-assess > Identify sources (WHERE) > Analyse causes (WHY) > Generate possible options (HOW) > Evaluate options on: Technical, environmental and economic feasibility > Select best options > Option implementation > Monitoring and evaluation > Sustain and continue
The recognized need for Cleaner Production 1.Planning and Organization 2.Assessment 3.Feasibility Analysis 4.Implementation Successfully implemented Cleaner Production projects Sustain & Continue (EMS)
CONCLUSION
About CP trends
UPWARD DIFFUSION
National policies Legislation Action plans CP Funds
DOWNWARD DIFFUSION
Local authorities NGOs CP Clubs Partnerships
The Environment
Inputs The Industrial System Outputs
Outputs
Water Effluents
Airborne Emissions Solid Wastes Products CoProducts
Raw Materials
Boundary
source: www.epa.gov.in
Advantages of LCA
Supports
decision-making for product/production systems with scientific data and competence Identifies opportunities of improvement Identifies key impacts and life-cycle stages of system Improves marketability of product (ecolabelling, environmental claim, product declaration) Identifies trade offs and information gaps Results in cost reductions, enhanced public image, competitive advantages, performance, productivity and profits Helps companies to adopt a remanufacture approach to reduce the resource use and cost Provides guidance towards optimizing the actual technology implementation by pinpointing process steps with high environmental impact (Schmidinger and Nardoslamsky, 2008)
Limitations of LCA
Availability and quality of life-cycle inventory data Uncertainties in the inventory and in the impact assessment methodology Impossible to assess the quality of results due to its complexity Differences in LCA problem formulation due to differences in values High cost associated with a comprehensive LCA Practical difficulty in carrying out detailed life-cycle inventories and also to translate the results into appropriate actions Time consuming and complex nature of LCA