Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Inputs
Market Conditions Competitor Action Consumer Tastes Products Life Cycle Season Customers plans
Economic Outlook
Business Cycle Status Leading Indicators-Stock Prices, Bond Yields, Material Prices, Business Failures, money Supply, Unemployment
Outputs Estimated Demands for each Product in each Time Period Other Outputs
Other Factors
Legal, Political, Sociological, Cultural
Processor
Sales Forecast Forecast and Demand for Each Product In Each Time Period
Production Capacity Available Resources Risk Aversion Experience Personal Values and Motives Social and Cultural Values Other Factors
Forecasting Methods
Forecasting
Qualitative Or Judgmental
Quantitative Or Statistical
Projective
Causal
Forecasting Basics
Types
Qualitative --- based on experience, judgment, knowledge; Quantitative --- based on data, statistics;
Methods
time series models (e.g. moving averages and exponential smoothing); causal models (e.g. regression)
Forecasting Approaches(1)
JUDGEMENTAL APPROACHES: The essence of the judgmental approach is to address the forecasting issue by assuming that someone else knows and can tell you the right answer. They could be experts or opinion leaders. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES: When an item is "new" and when there is no other information upon which to base a forecast, is to conduct a demand experiment on a small group of customers and extrapolated to the wider population. Test marketing is an example of this approach. RELATIONAL/CAUSAL APPROACHES: There is a reason why people buy our product. If we can understand what that reason (or set of reasons) is, we can use that understanding to develop a demand forecast. They seek to establish product demand relationships to relevant factors and/or variables e.g. hot weather to cold drinks consumption. TIME SERIES APPROACHES: A time series is a collection of observations of welldefined data items obtained through repeated measurements over time.
Forecasting Approaches(2)
In general, judgment and experimental approaches tend be more qualitative While relationship/causal and time series approaches tend be more quantitative
Still, these qualitative methods are also scientifically done with results that are expressed in indicative numbers and broad trends
Time series/causal methods are completely based on statistical methods and principles
Qualitative Approach
Qualitative Approach
Usually based on judgments about causal factors that underlie the demand of particular products or services Do not require a demand history for the product or service, therefore are useful for new products/services Approaches vary in sophistication from scientifically conducted surveys to intuitive hunches about future events. The approach/method that is appropriate depends on a products life cycle stage
Qualitative Methods
Educated guess Executive committee consensus Delphi method Survey of sales force Survey of customers Historical analogy Market research
Forecasting Methods
-judgmental approach(a)
Surveys - this involves a bottom up method where each individual/respondent contributes to the overall result; this could be for product demand or sales forecasting ; also for opinion surveys amongst employees, citizen groups or voter groups for election polls Sales Force Composites- where the similar bottom up approach is used for building up sales forecasts on any criteria like region-wise or product wise sales territory groupings from sales force personnel Consensus of Executive Opinion -normally used in strategy formulation by sought opinions from key organizational stakeholders- managers, suppliers, customers, bankers and shareholders Historical analogy- used for forecasting new product demand as similar to the previously introduced new product benefiting from its immediacy that same demand influencing factors will apply
Forecasting Methods
-judgmental approach(b)
Consensus thro Delphi method especially for new product developments and technology trends forecasting It is the most formal judgmental method and has a well defined process and overcomes most of the problems of earlier consensus by executive opinion This involves sending out questionnaires to a panel of experts regarding a forecast subject. Their replies are analyzed, summarized, processed and redistributed to the panel for revisions in light of others arguments and viewpoints. By going thro such an iterative process say 3-4 times, the final panel forecast is considered as fairly accurate and authentic Yet, difficulties do exist in planning, administering and integrating member views into a meaningful whole Course Booklet has a separate chapter on the Delphi method( page 107 onwards)
Forecasting Methods
-judgmental approach(c) Method
Short term accuracy
POOR POOR TO FAIR VERY GOOD POOR FAIR TO GOOD
Cost
Personal insights Panel consensus Market survey Historical analogy Delphi method
Forecasting Methods
- experimental approach
Customer surveys- thro extensive formal market research using personal or mail interviews, and newly thro internet modes; also build demand models for a new product by an aggregated approach Consumer panels- particularly used in initial stages of product development and design to match product attributes to customer expectations Test marketing- often used after product development but before national launches by starting in a selected target market/geography to understand any problems or issues to fine-tune marketing plans and avoid costly mistakes before going in a big way Customer buying data bases- based on selected and accepted individuals/families on their buying behavior , patterns and expenditures captured using electronic means direct from retailer sales data; gives extensive clues on buying factors, customer attitudes, brand loyalty and brand switching and response to promotional offers
Forecasting Methods
- relationship/causal approach(1)
Its basic premise is that relationships exist between various independent demand variables( like population, income, disposable incomes, age, sex etc to consumer needs/wants/expectations( dependent variables) Before linking these, we need to find the nature and extent of these causes/relationships in mathematical terms as regression( linear/multiple)equations Once done, they can be used to forecast the dependent variable for available independent variables Various types of causal methods follow in next slide
Forecasting Methods
- relationship/causal approach(2)
Econometric models like discrete choice and multiple regression models
used in large-scale or macro-level economic forecasting Input-output models used to estimate the flow of goods between markets
Forecasting Methods
- time series approach(1)
Fundamentally, uses historical demand/sales data to determine future demand Basic assumptions are that :
Past data/information is available This data/information can be quantified Past patterns will continue into the future and projections made( though in reality may not always be the case !)
They involve statistical methods of understanding and explaining patterns in time series data( like constant series e.g. annual rainfall; trends e.g. growing expenditure with incomes; seasonal series e.g. umbrella demand during rainy season; and any random/unexplained noise where actual value= underlying pattern+ random noise)
Forecasting Methods
-time series approach(2)
Static elements:
Trend Seasonal Cyclical Random
Moving average Simple exponential smoothing Exponential smoothing (with trend) Exponential smoothing (with trend and seasonality)
Adaptive elements:
7-15
Time Series
-static elements
Trend component- persistent overall downward or upward pattern; due to population, technology or long term movement Seasonal component- regular up and down fluctuations due to weather and/or seasons whose pattern repeats every year Cyclical component- repeated up and down movements; due to economic or business cycles lasting beyond one year but say every 5-6 years Random component- erratic, unsystematic, residual fluctuations due to random events or occurrences like one time drought or flood events
The moving average model uses the last t periods in order to predict demand in period t+1. There can be two types of moving average models: simple moving average and weighted moving average The moving average model assumption is that the most accurate prediction of future demand is a simple (linear) combination of past demand.
Apr
May Jun Jul
1,275
1,210 1,195 ?
FJul =
= 1,227
FJul =
= 1,268
What do we observe?
5-month average smoothes data more; 3-month average more responsive
Ft+1 =
Ft+1 is the forecast for next period n A w is the forecasting horizon (how far back we look), is the actual sales figure from each period. is the importance (weight) we give to each period
Time
For a 6-month SMA, attributing equal weights to all past data we miss the downward trend
Month
Jan Feb Mar Apr
Bottles
1,325 1,353 1,305 1,275
May
Jun Jul
1,210
1,195 ?
FJul =
= 1,277
In other words, because we used equal weights, a slight downward trend that actually exists is not observed
The higher the importance we give to recent data, the more we pick up the declining trend in our forecast.
WMA is better than SMA because of the ability to vary the weights!
1. Uses less storage space for data 2. Extremely accurate 3. Easy to understand 4. Little calculation complexity
1380 1360 1340 1320 1300 1280 1260 1240 1220 1200 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Actual a = 0.2 a = 0.8
Trend..
What do you think will happen to a moving average or exponential smoothing model when there is a trend in the data?
Impact of trend
Sales
Actual Data
Forecast
Regular exponential smoothing will always lag behind the trend. Can we include trend analysis in exponential smoothing?
Month
FITt Ft Tt
By using linear regression, we are trying to explore which independent variables affect the dependent variable
Y a bX
So, the error is
i yi - Yi
Where: is the error y is the observed value Y is the predicted value
Min
i2
Alcohol Sales
So LSM tries to minimize the distance between the line and the points! Average Monthly Temperature
Y a bX
a y bx
xy nxy b x nx
2 2
Forecast Error
Forecast error = Difference between actual and forecasted value (also known as residual)
MFE
A F
i 1 t
1. A more positive or negative MFE implies worse performance; the forecast is biased.
MAD
A F
i1 t
1. Higher MAD implies worse performance. 2. If errors are normally distributed, then =1.25MAD
Low MFE & MAD: The forecast errors are small & unbiased
An Analogy (contd)
Low MFE but high MAD: On average, the arrows hit the bullseye (so much for averages!)
High MFE & MAD: The forecasts are inaccurate & biased
Key Point
Forecast must be measured for accuracy! The most common means of doing so is by measuring the either the mean absolute deviation or the standard deviation of the forecast error
RSFE (At Ft )
i1
RSFE TS MAD
Positive tracking signal: most of the time actual values are above our forecasted values Negative tracking signal: most of the time actual values are below our forecasted values
If TS > 4 or < -4, investigate!
Month
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Actual
1,325 1,353 1,305 1,275 1,210 1,195
Forecast
1370 1306 1334 1290 1251 1175
Apr
May Jun
1,275
1,210 1,195
1,349
1,334 1,309
70
- 6.0
33
- 2.0
We observe that FIT performs a lot better than ES Conclusion: Probably there is trend in the data which Exponential smoothing cannot capture