Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
By Caryl Bishop
Argumentation
. . . the art of influencing others, through the medium of reasoned discourse, to believe or act as we wish them to believe or act.
Structure of Argument
Claim
Proposition
Support
Evidence Motivational Appeals
Warrant
Assumption(s) that have been taken for granted
Features of Argumentation
Writer
Develop your own ETHOS or borrow from established authority
Audience
Know your audience and be sensitive to their views
Text
Use the language to make your point, but be careful not to misuse language
The Writer
Ethos
Your own
You
must look like you know what youre talking about Educate yourself on the issue(s) before writing
The Audience
The Text
Hasty Generalization Faulty Use of Authority Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc False Analogy Ad Hominem False Dilemma Slippery Slope
Hasty Generalization
False Analogy
Ad Hominem
Against the Man Attacking the person rather than attacking an issue.
If you dont like this administrations policies, and want to see them changed, dont attack the President, address the issues you want changed.
False Dilemma
Slippery Slope
The assumption that A will inevitably lead to B
Then B will inevitably lead to C
And so on
And so on
Begging the Question The Straw Man Fallacy Two Wrongs Make a Right Non-Sequitur Ad Populum Appeal to Tradition Faulty Emotional Appeal
The statement being argued actually assumes the issue has already been proven true. An argument that assumes itself
Set up a slightly different problem and attack it, rather than the problem at issue
Diverts attention away from the real issue
Non-Sequitur
Ad Populum
Appeals to the prejudices of the people Appeals to popular opinion Appeals to what you believe your teacher wants to hear
Appeal to Tradition
Dont base your whole claim on an appeal to emotion Dont use emotional appeals that are
Irrelevant to the argument Draw attention away from the real issue Appear to conceal another purpose
Adapted from: