Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Tools for Technology Management David Poticha University of Colorado Technology Transfer Office (TTO)
1
Trade Secret
Definition: A trade secret can be any information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable. Among the things that can be trade secrets are a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process.
Loss of Rights
Losing the rights of Trade Secret protection is very simple, the information becomes public (whether by choice, accident or malice)
Copyrights
Implemented by various acts including the Copyright Act of 1976 and the DMCA. Protect literary, dramatic, musical, artistic, and computer works. Prevent others from displaying, reproducing, adapting, performing, or publishing copyrighted works.
10
Copyright
Copyright protection originates in the Constitution
Article 1, Section 8 gives Congress the power to promote the progress of Science and the Useful Arts by securing for limited times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and drawings.
Purposes
Limited monopoly provides incentives to create
11
What is Protectable?
Original work of authorship Independent creation Some amount of creativity Fixed in a tangible medium of expression Physical record Examples: Protectable: literary works, a/v works, computer programs NOT Protectable: titles, slogans, ideas, processes (use Trademark or Patent instead)
12
Rights
Exclusive rights to (or authorize others to)
Reproduce a work Prepare a derivative work Distribute copies Publicly perform or display a work
Notice: Is it Necessary?
Technically, legally, no.
However, it is HIGHLY recommended.
Best practices:
Notice should be placed on the work with the date being the date of first publication
For example, a work published today would say Copyright (c) 2006 The Regents of The University of Colorado
For computer programs, the copyright notice should appear on the first screen that is displayed when the program is executed.
15
Registration: Is it Necessary?
No. Copyright registration is not required for protection. HOWEVER, it is required to sue for infringement! Also, registering the copyright within three months of publication of the work affords certain statutory damages.
16
Copyright Infringement
Must be taken from the copyrighted source, not from an independent source. Must not have been created independently. Must be substantially similar to the copyrighted work Must have had access to the copyrighted work.
18
Typically courts look at whether money exchanged hands in the use of the work!
19
21
Availability
22
23
Trademark Infringement
Likelihood of confusion (Dreamworks vs. Dreamwerks) Marks need not be identical to conflict Nature of products, buyers, channels are key Highly subjective, factual inquiry
Policing Tips
Educate employees about the need to police Identify a point-person Notify counsel promptly Be sure of your rights before making a challenge Be consistent in your policing
27
30
31
PATENTS
the three different kinds of patents are utility, design and plant patent only confers the right to exclude others; no right to practice your own invention remedies include injunction and damages (often measured by reasonable royalty) treble damages for willful infringement (which is hard to prove)
32
Patent Requirements
In order to obtain a patent, the invention must: Be unique (novel) Be useful (utility) Be non-obvious Be disclosed Be described so others can make it (enablement) These requirements are established through the patent application process.
33
PATENTABILITY
claims (see examples) determine scope statutory subject matter (under U.S. Code) includes machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, processes (including new uses)
Human beings (organs?), raw DNA sequences, natural objects or organisms are excluded excluded subject matter also includes printed matter (subject of copyright) and pure algorithms
34
NONOBVIOUSNESS (103)
obviousness means that the invention is different from the prior art, but the differences are so trivial as to be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art
The bucket and spout analogy
requirements are (a) a teaching of each element in the prior art; (b) a motivation to modify the prior art to arrive at the invention; and (c) a likelihood of success in making and using the invention
38
39
SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS
Even if all elements are found, prima facie obviousness can be overcome by secondary indicia of nonobviousness: commercial success long-felt need/failure of others unexpected advantages unexpected difficulties in achieving
40
41
KINDS OF APPLICATIONS
provisional - not examined; a placeholder non-prov. - examined and issues as patent divisional - contains claims to restricted inventions; same specification as parent continuation - same specification, different claims than were presented before continuation-in-part - contains some new material (rarely advisable) and prior application is prior art to the new matter reissues (by inventor) and reexaminations (by another or inventor, challenge to validity)
42
PATENT OWNERSHIP
inventors are the default/initial owners employers generally include assignment obligations as a condition of employment U.S. government rights (must be noted in application); note march in rights sponsored research agreements and materials transfer agreements can create contractual encumbrances
44
Invention
Conception (the light bulb) Reduction to practice (RTP) Diligence from conception to RTP
45
INVENTION
Two elements to any invention:
conception - an idea that is complete enough that the invention can be made by others; the light bulb paradigm reduction to practice - has the invention in fact been made/practiced? reduction to practice may be actual or constructive
46
INVENTORSHIP
The threshold question in determining inventorship is who conceived the invention. Unless a person contributes to the conception of the invention, he is not an inventor ... [and] reduction to practice, per se, is irrelevant ....
However, while conception may be the key, reduction to practice may be very instructive.
47
INVENTORSHIP
first determine what the invention is; focus on the claims and what is patentable examine both conception and reduction to practice (i.e., was conception complete?) who did what, under whos instruction, and at what time? you can have single, joint or co-inventors correction can be made at any time so long as there was no prior deceptive intent
48
DOCUMENTATION
U.S. currently relies on a first to invent system (basis for interference practice; compare to opposition practice in other countries) need evidence of conception, reduction to practice, and diligence need corroboration by non-inventors invention disclosure is often used, but earlier information usually is needed
49
If you do not document, someone can and likely will steal your invention!
Conception
Idea of a complete and operative method or means to solve a problemin other words, the formation in the mind of the inventor(s) of the fully functional invention as it is to be practice in its final form.
1. In other words, you know what youve got, what youre doing and where youre headed.
52
Diligence
Inventors must account for time lapses between conception and reduction to practice otherwise abandonment
Testing/Experimenting Researching Fine Tuning
there is no defined time period for abandonment
54
Purpose = a document to convince a judge or jury that you were the first to invent Key - must be acceptable as evidence (e.g. electronic notebooks, while useful, have not faced legal challenge)
55
DUTY OF CANDOR
DUTY OF CANDOR
applicants must disclose all material/relevant information to Patent Office Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) violation is called inequitable conduct, but one needs to show materiality and intent (Purdue Pharma lost a series of patents to Oxycontin on this very issue) ongoing duty that continues until issuance if new art is discovered after issuance, the patentee or others may ask for reexam
57
INTERNATIONAL PATENTS
major difference is that whoever is first to file gets the patent, not the person to invent first also, there is no one year grace period for the inventors own publications (except CA and JP) Paris Convention gives you one year to file abroad in all signatory countries Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is a vehicle to maintain foreign rights for relatively minimal cost (few exceptions such as Taiwan exist) certain types of claims may not be available overseas (diagnostics and therapies on the human body, engineered plants & animals)
58
TYPES of INFRINGEMENT
direct infringement: making, using, selling, importing or offering for sale an invention patented in the United States (271(a)) inducement to infringe: actively induces the infringement of a patent (271(b))
59
TYPES of INFRINGEMENT
contributory infringement: offers for sale or sells a component that is known to be especially adapted to be used in infringement of a patent (271(c)) Importation infringement of product by process: product made anywhere in the world by a process patented in the United States (271(g)) cannot be imported to the U.S. literal infringement v. doctrine of equivalents
60
61
Allows one inventor to grant or assign a license to a third party without the consent of the others. Creates collaboration problems. *** CU deals with joint inventors through contracts addressing the rights of the joint inventor in the patent (IIA)
62
63
64
CU Policy on IP
Discoveries in which the University has an interest Assigns ownership of IP from inventors to the University Substantial Use of University Resources Addresses start-ups, consulting, distribution of revenues
65
Valuation of IP
Detailed business analysis undertaken. Valuation done by licensing professionals. Contract written.
66
67
Approved?
Patent Justification Invention Provide a short summary explaining what the invention is.
Market Size
Provide a summary of the potential markets to commercialize this invention. Potential Commercial Licensees List of potential companies who might be interested in licensing this invention including start-up potential. Patent Issues/Prior Art Provide a summary of the closest prior art and how this invention can be distinguished. Potential Freedom to Operate Issues Provide a summary of any dominant patents that might make it difficult to commercialize the invention. Action Plan
Request to engage ATTORNEY to file a provisional application for costs not to exceed $X.
69
Inventorship
Other Considerations
Before a patent application is filed, it is important to determine who are the inventors of the invention.
Co-Ownership
If inventors are from different institutions, it may be necessary to execute an Inter-Institutional Agreement to determine who will control the patenting and commercialization of the invention.
Government Funding
Any government sponsorship should be included in the patent application.
70
Pharmaceutical Strategies
Composition of Matter Patents (20 years from filing) Hatch Waxman (5 years exclusivity)
30 month (42) stays w/valid patents in Orange Book Pfizer v. Teva
Patent Term Extension (5/14 rule) Next Generation Patents: PK Patents, Formulation Patents, Metabolites, Enantiomers, Dosages, Dissolution Profiles, Methods of Use, New Indications
71
Biological Materials at CU
Routinely licensed in and out. UBMTA
Agreed by many institutions
72
Software at CU
Model licenses
Exclusive Non-exclusive Source code Object code
May include third party elements May include open source software
73