Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CFCs among other things chew up the ozone. They are inert at ground level but fall apart at high energy conditions in the stratosphere.
+ Cl
ClO + O ----> Cl + O2
The ozone layer is thinning at a rate of .5% per year since late 70s
Research Council predicts a 2-5% increase in skin cancer for each 1% depletion of ozone
Some success!
Because of the Montreal protocol, CFCs have been phased out around the world despite protests and foot dragging from US mostly in response to protestations from DuPont. They have been replaced by HCFCs and pother compounds, which are also harmful but possibly to a lesser degree Ozone loss will persist until 2045 (best estimate).
Post-industrial revolution
Humans add 25 billion tons of CO2 to atmosphere per year. USA produces 23.66 tons of CO2 per year per person (population 290 billion)
22 billion tons comes from fossil fuels 15 billion tons are removed by plants, soil and the ocean leaving a surfeit of 10 billion tons. Average tree absorbs about 26 - 40 pound per year. Calculate how many new trees we need to plant.
Personal responsibility
44 trees per year cancels your carbon dioxide fuel debt. Global Releaf costs 1$ per tree Tree People 818 753-4600 Go to carbonfund.org
Kyoto Conference in 1997 tried to reduce CO2 emissions. Clinton signed but Senate wouldnt ratify. Bush refused. Obama disappointed his environmental constituency by not signing it either. We have 4% of worlds population but emit 30% of the CO2
Cows fart and release methane. Eat beef and die warm. Methane is 20-30 times better at heat retention CFCs are 20,000 times better.
Temperature Predictions
Scientists predict a temperature rise of 3 degrees C by 2100. Politicians dispute this Who do you want to listen to about sciencea scientist or a politician?
These are all reputable scientific organizations that have come to similar conclusions
Consequences ??
Oceans rise 3 mm per year now If polar ice caps melt, oceans may rise between 20 cm and 14 meters! What happens to Fuji? Philippines? Jamaica? LA? Holland? New York? Formentera?
Why are we still arguing about data that the world scientific community agrees on? NOAA, UCS, NASA, Nature, Stratigraphy
The list is VERY long. Only a handful of scientists oppose the ideas that we are experiencing climate change. Why are they given equal weight? Since when do politicians interpret science data? Dont be suckered.
Commission of the Geological Society of London, EPA, ACIA, Caltech, MIT, Woods Hole, National Academy of Science, Nobel Laureates..
The key is the thermohaline circulation. The salt densities drive the circulation. Melted ice could disrupt this.
One possible method for stabilizing the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is to inject it into the deep ocean, either from shore stations or from tankers at sea. The consequences of doing this are unknown.
Personal solutions
Energy conservation Set your thermostat at a reasonable temperature or better yet, dont use air conditioning at all Drive less, use a bike, walk, car pool Oppose deforestation and slash and burn Covert to solar, wind, tidal and geothermal energies Buy and use less stuff! Reduce, reuse, recycle