To see if our documentary, magazine spread and radio trailer were successful we devised a questionnaire for 18 classmates (our

target audience) to fill out. The questions included opinions, ratings and open and closed questions to gain quantative data from the people answering our questionnaire.

Results for this question illustrated that 16 people thought our documentary was of a good quality however 8 people thought it looked professional. This is a mixed opinion because the majority of our target audience thought we made a clear video however many of them thought it wasnt to a professional standard which means it looked childish and not clearly thought out.

15 viewers learnt something new from our documentary which fulfils our key objective to educate teenagers about the hazards of violent videogames. By 15/18 learning new information this means we managed to feed our audience with data they didnt know. 70% of our audience believed our sound levels were not consistent which means if we were to remake the documentary, the sound levels are something we should definitely consider fixing.

We received many positive comments about our soundtrack and 16/18 people thought our soundtrack was appropriate, this could be because of the war and middle eastern twist we added to it. 100% of our audience believed the voiceover fit the documentary correctly. This is because our documentary was concerning a serious matter which included clips of death and massacres therefore we decided to use a serious male tone that everybody agreed with.

We received positive criticisms where our documentary was concerned such as our sound levels and to use less voxpops are more effective pieces of footage. 5/18 people thought our documentary needed improving. The main favourites of our documentary was the soundtrack and the expert opinion of the head of psychology. The majority of the class rated our documentary 8/10 and the rest balanced between 6,7 and 9/10 with 1 10/10, we were ecstatic about these results as we as a group believed there was much improvement needed in our documentary.

Everyone thought our radio trailer was appropriate which is great news because this means our radio trailer was a lot more professional than our documentary. Also many people said they would listen to our radio trailer therefore we would get more views and this proves that our radio trailer was persuasive and affective on our target audience.

An issue concerning our radio trailer was that the voiceovers were louder than one of the voxpops in our trailer meaning the sound levels were inconsistent which our audience picked up on. The majority of the audience rated our radio trailer 8/10 or 9/10 which we were once again pleased with as these results are highly positive.

Our magazine spread was the least thought out of our 3 media conventions. Therefore many people picked up on this and we got many negative results as only 3 people said our magazine looked professional. This is off-putting feedback because it suggests nobody would want to read the page spread if it does not look appealing and professional.

Many people thought our spread was not appealing and they said there were too many black borders, and they didn't like that we failed to use columns like a professional article would. As well as the afore mentioned people suggested we shouldnt use borders for the images in the magazine because it creates a tacky look and not at all like something used in high end TV magazines.