Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Questions???
a)How did liberal elements gain a foothold in our society and lawmaking bodies? b)What is our duty as Catholics in politics? c)How can Catholics be empowered to vote with an informed conscience?
One who lives by an immoral code of behavior loses the ability to reason uprightly. Soon after one ends up denying moral law if only to justify a behavior that is difficult to give up.
As more people succumb the easy, comfortable and enjoyable the clamor for ethical pluralism in the public sphere rises.
Complete autonomy political choices from morality becomes the political menu. Catholic lawmakers are asked to enact laws that ignore principles of natural ethics as if God did not exist.
.They will be asked to set aside their Christian understanding of the human person and the common good.
Catholic lawmakers will not be able to base their contribution to social and political life on their particular Christian understanding of the human person and the common good.
common good.
Temporal Order
This refers to economic, social, administrative and cultural areas, which are intended to promote organically and institutionally the common good.
Catholic Politicians have the Grave and Clear obligation to Oppose matters that Violate Natural Moral Law
The duty of the lay faithful is to infuse the social, cultural, economic and political life with values guided by a Christian conscience to promote the common good.
By avoiding dirty politics we Catholics relinquished the destiny of our country to others. We left public office to those motivated by self-interest and greed or by ideological agenda inimical to our Christian faith and morals.
In a democracy every citizen has the right and duty to participate in the policy making process at the very least by voting in elections for lawmakers and government officials.
Others can participate more fully by running for legislative positions which gives them a direct involvement in policy making, or for elective government positions where they can have a direct hand in managing political bodies.
These 3 non-negotiable ethical principles are at the peak of the hierarchy of values that Catholics have to defend.
These are matters of faith and morals that cannot be placed at the same footing as other temporal matters such as corruption, gun ban, clean elections, dynasties, etc.
Applying the 3 Non-Negotiable Ethical Principle is just the first level criteria. Catholics are then free to apply the 2nd level criteria based on more temporal issues which they deem importantcorruption, dynasty, etc. Catholics must agree on the 1st level criteria since this is what makes their vote specifically Catholic. In the 2nd level criteria there is plenty of room of freedom of choice.
HOW DOES RA 10354 STAND WITH RESPECT TO THE 3 NON-NEGOTIABLE ETHICAL PRINCIPLES?
RA 10354 includes hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, injectables in the National Drug Formulary and gives the FDA the function of certifying that these contraceptives will not be used as abortifacient.
RA 10354 promotes artificial contraception which encourages a marriage that is not open to life and facilitates marital infidelity.
We Catholics, who make up the majority, found ourselves helpless and vulnerable to fight the passage of RA 10354.
And our political enemies are now bent on exploiting this weakness to legalize abortion, divorce, same-sex marriage, etc.
The aim of Catholic Vote Philippines is to systematically database this information and make it available in its website (www.catholicvote.ph). This would put the data at the finger tips of Catholic voters nationwide.
There is no intent here to single out anybody. Those who voted for RA 10354 are entitled their opinion as persons. The Church unceasingly offers the sacrament of reconciliation to welcome them back to its fold. But we cannot risk putting in their hands the destiny of the sacredness of life, the sanctity of marriage and the right of parents to educate their children.
The 16th Congress will attempt to legalize divorce, abortion, same sex marriage and assisted suicide. It is politically imperative that in the May 2013 election we increase in both Houses the Catholic politicians who will staunchly defend our 3 nonnegotiables.
Although no particular candidate will be endorsed, Catholic Vote has a specific political goal.
Election is not a Fill in the blanks type exam where one aims for the highest score by filling in all the blanks. If we find only so many candidates that can meet our criteria we dont have to fill up the rest with candidates who do not meet any criteria at all! This would be senseless!
Some others think that they should vote for candidates who have the most chance of winning according to the election polls. Climbing the bandwagon of the winning team makes us the worst losers of all!
Arroyo
Cayetano
Lacson
Cayetano
We put to office these 13 Senators who voted RA 10354 to law. Among them three are running for re-election in May 2013: 1. Alan Peter Cayetano 2. Francis Escudero 3. Loren Legarda
Pangilinan
Angara
Drilon
Guingona
SBN 3156
They should be allowed to stop eating and drinking when they are too sick.
AN ACT PROVIDING FOR END-OF-LIFE CARE TO PATIENTS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS
Inserted Anti-Discrimination on the basis of Sexual Orientation to SBN 1213 (Anti-Ethnic or Racial Profiling and Discrimination Act)