Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Two Options for Taking Evidence in India For a Dispute Before a Foreign Court
1. Using the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters 2. Under the Indian Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC)
India has not enacted a special law to give effect to the Hague Convention The convention does not take away powers of the courts under the CPC. 2009 response to questionnaire the Hague Convention can implemented through S 78, O 26 and Rules 19-22 of the CPC
2
The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the Hague Convention)
The Hague Convention was concluded on 18 March 1970, and came into force on 7 October 1972. India ratified the Hague Convention on 7 February 2007. The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (the Hague Convention) establishes methods of co-operation for the taking of evidence abroad in civil or commercial matters.
Documenting Evidence
The Hague Convention applies only between state parties and provides for the taking of evidence:
Letter of Request
Article 1 of the Hague Convention authorizes a judicial authority of one state party to request the central authority of another state party, by means of a letter of request for the following purposes
to obtain evidence;
to perform some other judicial act.
Letter of Request
Article 2 requires each state party to nominate a Central Authority in accordance with its own law. India has designated the Indian Ministry of Law and Justice, and the high courts in all states and union territory as central authorities to receive letters of request from judicial authorities of contracting states. In practice these requests are handled by the courts.
Letter of Request
Article 3 sets out the material particulars that need to be specified in the letter of request.
Letter of Request shall specify
a) The authority requesting its execution and the authority requested to execute it, if known to the requesting authority (U.S. Courts); b) The names and addresses of the parties to the proceedings and their representatives, if any; c) The nature of the proceedings for which the evidence is required, giving all necessary information in regard thereto; d) The evidence to be obtained or other judicial act to be performed.
10
A Letter may also mention any information necessary for the application of Article 11regarding privilege or duty to refuse;
No legalization or other like formality may be required.
LawQuest 2012. All Rights are Reserved.
Contd 11
12
Article 8 and 9
Article 8 of the Hague Convention provides an option to allow the participation of members of the judicial personnel of the requesting state, the parties and/or their representatives in executing the letter of request. Under Article 9 The requesting authority may also request the use of a special method or procedure for execution of the letter of request, provided that it is not incompatible with the law of the state addressed or impossible to perform.
13
14
Article 15
Diplomatic officers or Consular agents of member states may take evidence from his fellow nationals in another member state: India has not provided for this as it is optional
15
Article
16
India may authorize diplomatic officers or consular agents to take evidence. Decision to be made by competent authority. India has designated:
a) The Ministry of Law and Justice and the High Courts in all States and Union Territories in India b) The district court in whose territory the evidence is to be taken. c) The Central Authority and the relevant court. as the Competent authority.
India has not waived the need for permission under this article though it has the power to do so.
LawQuest 2012. All Rights are Reserved.
16
18
19
Subject to prior authorization of the Central Authority and the concerned court, members of the judicial personnel of the requesting Contracting Party may be present at the execution of a letter of request. Evidence by diplomatic officers or consular agents of Indian nationals or nationals of a third State under Article 16 of the Convention can be taken with the prior permission of the Central Authority.
In accordance with Article 18, a diplomatic or consular officer or a commissioner authorized under Article 15, 16 and 17 may apply for appropriate assistance to obtain the evidence by compulsion to the District Court within whose territory the evidence is to be taken.
20
21
22
23
S78 of the CPC provides for leading evidence (examination of witnesses) under a commission in certain cases including when a request is made by (c) courts of any State or country outside India.
Order 26, Rule 19 to 22 of the CPC
24
Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed, the provisions as to the execution and return of commissions for the examination of witnesses shall apply to commissions issued by or at the instance ofa) Courts situate in any part of India to which the provisions of this Code do not extend; or a) Courts established or continued by the authority of the Central Government outside India; or b) Courts of any State or country outside India.
Section 78 of the CPC must be read with Order 26 Rules 19 to 22. The object of Section 78(c) of CPC is to facilitate collection of evidence pursuant to a request received from a foreign court.
25
26
a) b) c)
A foreign court situated in a foreign country wishing to obtain the evidence from a witness provided That the proceeding is of a civil nature That the witness is residing within the limits of the High Court's appellate jurisdiction, it may, subject to the provisions of Rule 20, issue a commission for the examination of such witness.
27
28
(b)
(c)
29
b)
30
32
33
34
Rule 17: Attendance and examination of witnesses before Commissioner The provisions of this Code relating to the summoning, attendance and examination of witnesses, and to the remuneration of, and penalties to be imposed upon, witnesses, shall apply to persons required to give evidence or to produce documents under this Order whether the commission in execution of which they are so required has been issued by a Court situate within or by a Court situate beyond the limits of 1[India], and for the purposes of this rule the Commissioner shall be deemed to be a Civil Court.
35
36
37
When the execution of the Letter of Request does not fall within the jurisdiction of the state addressed. When the state addressed considers that its sovereignty or security would be prejudiced.
LawQuest 2012. All Rights are Reserved.
38
Thank You
39