Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Session 2
Overview
Terminology
Safety System context Accidents Hazards Failures
Life cycle
Safety 1
this is obviously some strange usage of the word safe that I was not previously aware of
Douglas Adams Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy
no commonly accepted set of terms define key terms, consistent with ARP 4754 / 4761 usage influenced by BS 4778
Safety 2
Safety is concerned with physical artefacts an artefact is unsafe if it causes unacceptable harm, e.g. loss of life or environmental damage only physical systems can cause this sort of harm information (computer) systems can only cause harm indirectly Course will consider systems in aircraft context
Physical Context
Environment physical, e.g. weather peer platforms, e.g. other aircraft people, e.g. passengers
Accidents 1
Wish to prevent or reduce accidents accident unintended event or sequence of events leading to harm death, injury, environmental or material damage
e.g collision between train and road vehicle at a level crossing
Observations unintended only collateral damage of weapons harm some definitions exclude injury, or material damage (most exclude money) Also incident event which significantly degrades safety margins, but does not lead to an accident
Terminology & Definitions - 6
Accidents 2
Definition from ICAO:
Aircraft accident means an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft that takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked, in which any person suffers death or serious injury as a result of being in or upon the aircraft or by direct contact with the aircraft or anything attached thereto, or by direct exposure to jet blast, or the aircraft receives substantial damage. serious injury hospitalisation for more than 48 hours, fractures (except fingers, toes, nose), severe laceration, internal injury, 2nd degree burns, exposure to infectious substances or harmful radiation. death within 30 days of accident substantial damage Damage or structural failure that adversely affects the structural strength, performance or flight characteristics of the aircraft
Accident Risk
In assessing potential accidents, examine: severity assessment of extent of harm
how many people are likely to be killed / injured? extent of environmental damage?
probability probability (or rate of occurrence) of events that create the accident risk expression of the possibility / impact of an accident in terms severity and probability Note: acceptability of risk a complex issue
but in civil aerospace, framework for risk acceptance well established
and mapped to hazards
Terminology & Definitions - 8
Warsaw Accident 1
LH2904 Okecie, Warsaw, 14th September 1993 (A320 Warsaw approximate analysis)
D = 750 m S = 170 knots T=0s No Braking
D = 1700 m S = 154 knots T = 12 s Full braking D = 2800 m S = 70 knots T = 30 s? Full braking
2800 metres
Warsaw Accident 2
A320 Warsaw accident aircraft hit earth wall near end of runway (and ensuing fire) Consequences effects of accident human loss of two lives including co-pilot; 54 injuries (hospitalised) material hull (aircraft) loss
Hazards
Accidents arise from hazards hazard
an accident waiting to happen physical condition of platform that threatens the safety of personnel of the platform, i.e. can lead to an accident a condition of the platform that, unless mitigated, can develop into an accident through a sequence of normal events and actions
examples:
oil spilled on staircase failed train detection system at an automatic railway level crossing loss of thrust control on a jet engine
safety process structured around hazards, as there will generally be far fewer hazards than potential accidents
e.g. loss of braking in car one hazard, thousands of accidents
Terminology & Definitions - 11
Hazard Identification
In defining platform, carry out hazard identification identifying those situations (hazards) which could lead to an accident under credible conditions techniques employed include
brainstorming hazardous materials studies identification of energy sources and containment
Hazard Assessment 1
Investigate hazard risk factors: hazard probability probability (or rate of occurrence) of events that create the hazard hazard severity assessment of extent of harm; several ways to determine this:
most severe potential accident most likely potential accident expected outcome, factoring in probability that hazard will develop into each potential accident also need to factor in probability that hazard will develop into accident WARNING: Standards vary, and many are unclear!
Hazard Assessment 2
Hazard risk factors: qualitative or quantitative? hazard severity
Examples: quantitative: number of deaths qualitative classification: catastrophic, major, minor, negligible
hazard probability
Examples: quantitative: 1 per 1,000,000 operations, 1 per 900 hours qualitative classification: frequent, improbable, incredible
hazard risk
Examples: quantitative: expected deaths per operational hour qualitative: hazard risk index (HRI)
Terminology & Definitions - 14
Warsaw Accident 3
Hazard
travelling fast down runway, without braking
Environment
weather strong winds, veered from cross to tail winds in final approach; raining heavily runway standing water (caused aquaplaning) ATC didnt inform pilots of shift in wind direction
Other conditions
landed long and hot (i.e. faster than normal 170 knots) earth wall ...
Environmental (External) Hazards arising from external threats imply either threat has been misjudged
e.g. pilot flying into storm
Platform Decomposition
Platform Structures non-functional platform components e.g. wing spar, car chassis Systems multi-technology functional platform components, e.g. brakes and steering system (BSCU)
System Decomposition
Systems
Warsaw Accident 4
A320 Warsaw Platform Airframe on ground at T=0 one main landing gear compressed, other not; aircraft banked due to expected cross-wind
Warsaw Accident 5
A320 Warsaw Systems (approx.)
AG WoW L R LGCIU WS L R Brakes 40% BSCU WS Spoilers 40%
SEC2
RA
Commands
FADEC
Warsaw Accident 6
Landing Gear Control & Interface Unit (LGCIU) landing gear extension, retraction, etc synthesises AG (Air / Ground Transition) & WS AG = WoW > 12 tonnes (both LG) WS = Wheel Spinning > 72 knots (either LG) Spoiler Elevator Computer Secondary (SEC2) deploys spoilers, etc Full Authority Digital Engine Controller (FADEC) controls engine, & deploys thrust reversers Brakes and Steering Control Unit (BSCU) nosewheel steering, all braking and ABS
Terminology & Definitions - 22
Warsaw Accident 7
Logic distributed amongst systems apply thrust reversers AG true apply air and wheel brakes WS true or (RA true (radio alt < 10 feet) and AG true)
System Conditions AG (weight on both wheels) = False WS (wheels spinning > 72 knots) = False Alt (less than 10 feet) = True major systems LGCIU, SEC2, BSCU all functioned to specification no braking air brakes, thrust reversers or wheel brakes
Terminology & Definitions - 23
Warsaw Accident 8
Operators (pilot) misjudged conditions for landing
but incomplete information about wind
Classes of Failure
Different classes of failure systematic failures due to flaws in design, manufacture, installation, maintenance. Items subjected to the same conditions fail consistently random failures due to physical causes a variety of degradation mechanisms N.B. Random failures are a result of design decisions Normally treat design and physical failures separately, giving requirements in different terms random failure rates systematic in terms of integrity levels freedom from flaw or corruption
Terminology & Definitions - 25
Causal Analysis
In designing systems we need to carry out causal analysis determining potential causes of failures, and their likelihoods Causal analysis spans multiple technologies considers physical interaction, e.g. electro-magnetic interference, as well as logical interactions BEWARE: treatment of systematic failures varies across industries / nationalities
dependability
safety, availability, etc.
maintainability cost
recurring and non-recurring, or lifecycle
other constraints
weight, power consumption environmental, recycling
usability
Stakeholders
A stakeholder is an individual or organisation
who has a stake in the success of the product / system
Trade-offs 1
Many factors must be balanced (traded off) to meet customers needs
Aircraft Design
Intrinsic Safety
Ease of Maintenance
Maintenance of Safety
Unit Cost
Aircraft Availability
Training facilities
Fleet Size
Performance
Trade-offs 2
Key safety-related trade-offs safety safety
identifying least worst failure modes particularly important when there is no safe state
safety availability
often directly in conflict when there is a safe state
safety complexity
is the addition of safety systems worth the increase in complexity that will result (and effect on cost, availability)
Operate
Decommission
Support
Dispose
Specify
(From
INCOSE)
Simple V Model
Systems version of model
Requirements Delivered Platform
Validation
Platform
Implementation
Consequence Analysis
Causal Analysis
PHI
Consequence Analysis
FHA
Design & Decomposition
PSSA
(Predictive) Causal Analysis
SSA
Causal Analysis
Implementation
causal and consequence analysis evaluation of design (trade-offs) often predictive, i.e. produced before full design data available
analysis / design links how analysis results influence design development and option selection
PHI
FHA Prelim FTA CCA
FC&C
Arch req
FC&C
&P
FHA
FMES Prelim FTA
FE & P budget
PSSA
Arch req FE & P budget
SSA
FMES & CCA update
FMEA
To other systems
CCA
KEY:
To other systems
FMES
FHA - Functional Hazard Analysis FTA - Fault Tree Analysis CCA - Common Cause Analysis Arch req - Architectural Requirements FE - Failure Effect FM - Failure Mode FC & C - Failure Condition & Classification l - Failure rate P - Probability FMEA - Failure Modes & effects Analysis FMES - Failure Modes & Effects Summary
HW
FM l
FMEA
FE
SW
HW level SW level
Requirements - Platform Concept - Initial Hazard List Hazard Identification Platform Consequence Analysis
Integration of Safety Evidence Design & Decomposition Systems Integration & Test Units (Predictive) Causal Analysis Implementation Causal Analysis
Summary
We have introduced model of artefacts
environment, platform, systems, equipments / units and computing systems
key terms
hazard, failure, etc