Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 24

SNARC, ATOM, and synaesthesia

Lecture 9

Todays principle: Different forms of cognition interact

Coming up
Why do we think number, time and space are linked?

Evidence for a common magnitude system


Behavioural Neuropsychological

Development of a common magnitude system

This lecture is based on: Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483-488.

Learning outcomes
Be able to describe Walshs ATOM (A Theory Of Magnitude),
including the roles of phylogeny and ontogeny

Be able to describe evidence for ATOM:


Behavioural Neuropsychological

Be able to consider problems with and alternate


interpretations of the evidence

Why do we think number, time and space are linked?

Animal evidence
Quantity discrimination task (28 tones)

Duration discrimination task (28 seconds)

Rats generalise on both tasks

Church & Meck (1984)

Neuropsychological evidence
Parietal cortex damage can
lead to problems with: Number Time Space Size

More commonly combined


than isolated

Critchley (1953)

Developmental evidence

Bryant & Squire (2001)

What form might these links take?

Evidence for a common magnitude system

Behavioural: space and number


2 2

Odd

Even

Even

Odd

Slow

Fast

Behavioural: space and number


2 3 2 8

Slow

Fast

Behavioural: space and number


14 15

11 10 9

12

13

5 4 3 2 1

Behavioural: number and time

Time estimation

Mental arithmetic

Brown (1997); Casini & Macar (1997)

Behavioural: space and time

Aug

Sep Oct
Nov Dec Jan Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun Jul

Alternate interpretation: Task demands

Bchtold, Baumller, & Brugger (1998)

Alternate interpretation: Polarity matching


Numbers are not directly linked with space
Instead, the link is linguistic:
Numbers are implicitly divided into small and large polarities Labels left and right also have polarity When polarities match, response times are quicker: Small and left Large and right

Gevers et al. (2006); Proctor & Cho (2006)

Neuropsychological: lesion

Basso et al. (1996); Husain & Rorden (2003)

Neuropsychological: imaging and pseudolesion

Bjoertomt et al. (2002); Gbel et al. (2001); Walsh & Pascual-Leone (2003)

A warning
*fMRI scans+ represent the mind at three steps of removal: they represent physical magnitude correlated to blood flow; the blood flow in turn is correlated to neural activity; the neural activity in turn is supposed to correlate to mental activity. If all the assumptions are accurate, a brain-scan image may contain important information about neural activity related to a cognitive process. But we need to take care not to be misled by the visual, pictorial character of these images. Brain scans are not pictures of cognitive processes of the brain in action.

- No (2009)

Development of a common magnitude system

Phylogeny (evolution)

Leon & Shadlen (2003); Nieder et al. (2002); Onoe et al. (2001); Sawaura et al. (2002); Stein (1989); Wilson et al. (1993)

Ontogeny (development from infancy)


One-bit babies: we begin with a single, undifferentiated
magnitude system

Environmentally: space, time, speed, size and quantity are


often highly correlated

Later, children find it difficult to disentangle these things

Learning outcomes
Be able to describe Walshs ATOM (A Theory Of Magnitude),
including the roles of phylogeny and ontogeny

Be able to describe evidence for ATOM:


Behavioural Neuropsychological

Be able to consider problems with and alternate


interpretations of the evidence

Вам также может понравиться