Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
AND CORRELATION
Example 8.3.1.
A team of professional mental healt workers in a long stay
psyhiatric hospital wished to measure the level of response of
withdrawn patients to a program of remotivation therapy.
A sttandardized test available for this purpose, but it was
expensive and time consuming to administer.
Example 8.3.1.
The team was interested only in carrying out the analysis for
standardized scores between 50 and 100 since a score below 50
did not represent a significant level of response and scores
above 100 were seldom made by the type of patient under
concideration.
The team also felt that the use of scores in increments of 5
would give a good coverage of the range of scores between 50
and 100.
Accordingly, 11 patients who had made scores on the new test of
50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, and 100 respectively, were
selected to take the standardized test.
The independent and variables, respectively, are scores made
on the new test and scores made on the standardized test.
Example 8.3.1.
Construct a regression model and analyze the data
PATIENT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SCORE ON
NEW TEST X
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
SCORES ON
STANDARDIZED TEST Y
61
61
59
71
80
76
90
106
98
100
114
SCORE ON NEW
TEST
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
SCORES ON
STANDARDIZED TEST
61
61
59
71
80
76
90
106
98
100
114
y a bx
y na b x
x y a x b x
i
2
i
PATIENT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
total
SCORE ON
NEW TEST
SCORES ON
STANDARDIZED TEST
x2
y2
xy
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
825
61
61
59
71
80
76
90
106
98
100
114
916
2500
3025
3600
4225
4900
5625
6400
7225
8100
9025
10000
64625
3721
3721
3481
5041
6400
5776
8100
11236
9604
10000
12996
80076
3050
3355
3540
4615
5600
5700
7200
9010
8820
9500
11400
71790
a 0.9973
b 1.1236
y 0.9973 1.1236x
X 50
y 0.9973 1.1236 50 55 .1827
X 100
y 0.9973 1.1236 100 111 .3627
n xy x y
n x x
2
y b x
916 1.1236825
a
0.9973
11
yi y y y yi y
total
deviation
explained
deviation
unexplained
deviation
y y y y y y
2
total
sum of
squares
explained
sum of
squares
unexplained
sum of
squares
y y y n
y y
2
i
x x
916
SST 612 612 ... 114 2
11
x x n
2
i
3798 .1818
825
2
2
2
2
SSR 1.1236 50 55 ... 100
11
3471.8116
PATIENT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
total
SCORES ON
STANDARDIZED
TEST yi
61
61
59
71
80
76
90
106
98
100
114
916
y 83.2727
y
0.9973
1.1236 x
55.1827
60.8007
66.4187
72.0367
77.6547
83.2727
88.8907
94.5087
100.1267
105.7447
111.3627
yi y
-22.2727
-22.2727
-24.2727
-12.2727
-3.2727
-7.2727
6.7273
22.7273
14.7273
16.7273
30.7273
SST
yi y 2
496.07317
496.07317
589.16397
150.61917
10.710565
52.892165
45.256565
516.53017
216.89337
279.80257
944.16697
3798.1818
yi y yi y 2
5.8173
0.1993
-7.4187
-1.0367
2.3453
-7.2727
1.1093
11.4913
-2.1267
-5.7447
2.6373
SSE
33.841
0.0397
55.037
1.0747
5.5004
52.892
1.2305
132.05
4.5229
33.002
6.9554
326.15
y y
y y 2
-28.09
-22.472
-16.854
-11.236
-5.618
0
5.618
11.236
16.854
22.472
28.09
SSR
789.0481
504.9908
284.0573
126.2477
31.56192
0
31.56192
126.2477
284.0573
504.9908
789.0481
3471.812
y y
y y
2
i
xi n
y n
2
i
3471.8116
r
0.91
3798.1818
2
SSR SST
Ho : 0
HA : 0
0.05
SOURCE OF
VARIATION
Linear
Regression
Residual
Total
SOURCE OF
VARIATION
Linear
Regression
Residual
Total
SS
d.f.
MS
V.R
SSR
SSR/1
MSR/MSE
SSE
SST
n-2
n-1
SSE/(n-2)
SS
d.f.
MS
V.R
3471.8116
3471.8116
95.74
326.3702
3798.1818
9
10
36.2634
yi y n 2
2
~
r 1
2
yi y n 1
SOURCE OF
VARIATION
Linear
Regression
Residual
Total
SS
d.f.
MS
V.R
SSR
SSR/1
MSR/MSE
SSE
SST
n-2
n-1
SSE/(n-2)
SOURCE OF
VARIATION
Linear
Regression
Residual
Total
SS
d.f.
MS
V.R
3471.8116
3471.8116
95.74
326.3702
3798.1818
9
10
36.2634
326 .3702 9
36 .2634
2
~
r 1
1
0.9045
3798 .1818 10
379 .81818
326.3702
r 1
1 0.08593 0.91407
3798.1818
2
a2
y2| x xi2
n xi x
b2
y2| x
x x
Ho : 0
HA : 0
0.05
z
2
y| x
b 0
t
sb
b 0
yi y
n2
2
y| x
n 1 2
s y b 2 s x2
n2
2
y| x
yi y
n2
s 379.8182
2
y
2
y| x
b 0
t
sb
b 0
2
y| x
n 1 2
s y b 2 s x2
n2
s x2 275 .0000
10
2
sb2
s y2| x
x x
sb2
s
2
b
s y2| x
x x
2
i
36.2634
50
825
55 ... 100
2
1.1236 0
t
9.85
0.013
11
0.013
s
2
b
36.2634
50
825
55 ... 100
2
0.013
11
1.1236 0
t
9.85
0.013
The table t-value at for n-2 degrees of freedom and
=0.05 is 2.2622
Since the calculated value is much larger than the table value
we reject the null hypothesis
Confidence interval of
Estimator (reliability factor)(standard error of estimate)
y2| x
xi x
b t1 2
sb
s y2| x
x
i
s y2| x
x x
Confidence interval of
y2| x
x x
sb
b t1 2
s y2| x
x x
s y2| x
x x
1.1236 0.2579
0.8657,1.3815
x 70
y 0.9973 1.1236 70
78
xp x
1
1
n xi x 2
2
y t1 2 s y| x
xp x
1
1
n xi x 2
2
y t1 2 s y| x
1 70 75
78 2.2622 36.2634 1
11
2750
78 14
64, 92
y 0.9973 1.1236 70
78
xp x
1
2
n xi x
2
y t1 2 s y| x
y 0.9973 1.1236 70
78
xp x
1
n xi x 2
2
y t1 2 s y| x
1 70 75
78 2.2622 36.2634
11
2750
78 4
74, 82
x
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
y
55.1827
60.8007
66.4187
72.0367
77.6547
83.2727
88.8907
94.5087
100.127
105.745
111.363
lower limit
47.49842
54.17769
60.75701
67.17674
73.3468
79.16528
84.5828
89.64874
94.46501
99.12169
103.6784
upper limit
62.86698
67.42371
72.08039
76.89666
81.9626
87.38012
93.1986
99.36866
105.7884
112.3677
119.047
a 20.8928
b 0.8220
y 20.8928 0.8220x
r
2
2
i
xi n
2
y n
2
i
METHOD I x
132
138
144
146
148
152
158
130
162
168
172
174
180
180
188
194
194
200
200
204
210
210
216
220
220
total 4440
METHOD II y
130
134
132
140
150
144
150
122
160
150
160
178
168
174
186
172
182
178
196
188
180
196
210
190
202
4172
x2
y2
xy
17424
19044
20736
21316
21904
23104
24964
16900
26244
28224
29584
30276
32400
32400
35344
37636
37636
40000
40000
41616
44100
44100
46656
48400
48400
808408
16900
17956
17424
19600
22500
20736
22500
14884
25600
22500
25600
31684
28224
30276
34596
29584
33124
31684
38416
35344
32400
38416
44100
36100
40804
710952
17160
18492
19008
20440
22200
21888
23700
15860
25920
25200
27520
30972
30240
31320
34968
33368
35308
35600
39200
38352
37800
41160
45360
41800
44440
757276
0.8220 808,408 4440
4172
710,952
2
0.9112713
25
25
Alternative aproach
n xi yi xi yi
n x xi
2
i
n y yi
2
i
25757,276 44404172
25808,408 4440
25710,952 4172
0.95
Example 8.7.2.
H0 : 0
HA : 0
n2
tr
1 r2
23
t 0.954605
15 .37
1 0.9112713
Table value is 2.8, so the two variable is correlated and reject the null
hypothrsis
1 1 r
zr ln
2 1 r
ln
zr z
1 n 3
1
n3
H 0 : 0.98
H A : 0.98
r 0.95
zr 1.83178
0.98
z 2.29756
1.83178 2.29756
Z
2.18
1 25 3
Here the table value of z is -1.96 so we reject the null hypothesis and
conclude that the population correltion coefficient is not equal to 0.98
3z r
z zr r
4n
*
*
z
Z*
z* *
1 n 1
pronounced zeta z p
*
n 1
n 1
3z
4n
31.83178 0.95
z 1.83178
1.76733
425
*
32.29756 0.98
2.29756
2.21883
425
*
zr z 1
n3
1.83178 1.96 1
25 3
1.83178 0.41787
1.41391,2.24965
The following are the weights (kg) and blood glocose levels (mg/100mL)
of 16 apparently healty adult males:
a. Find the simple linear regression equation and plot a scatter graph of
the data
b. test Ho:=0 using t-test
c. What is the predicted glucose level for a man who weights 95 kg?
Let =0.05 for all the tests.
sample
Weight (kg)
62
75
73
82
90
96
59
93
Glucose
(mg/100mL)
82
95
79 110
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Weight (kg)
82
79
77
81
87
69
65
78
Glucose
(mg/100mL)
101
98
97 100 106
87
85
97
sample
Weight (kg)
62
75
73
82
90
96
59
93
82
79
77
81
87
69
65
78
Glucose (mg/100mL)
82
95
91
102
108
114
79
110
101
98
97
100
106
87
85
97