Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
matt.woolgar@kcl.ac.uk
http://www.national.slam.nhs.uk/services/camhs/camhs-adoptionfostering/
Can they obscure the individuality & diversity that the science tells comes from maltreatment?
DSM-IV
both (a) loss of "physical integrity", or risk of serious injury or death, to self or others, and (b) a response to the event that involved intense fear, horror, or helplessness
Good science re. the biological, psychological & social impact of maltreatment & neglect Consequences quite different for different types of maltreatment & neglect More precision if we state the type, frequency and timing of maltreatment?
Service planning for adopted children should be based on a sophisticated understanding of the science and the bio-psycho-social implications of maltreatment
Environment
Psychological
Cognition
Behavioural
Aggression
Attach ment
Crying Avoiding
Physi ology
Motiv ation
Prosocial
Environment
Psychological
Cognition
Behavioural
Aggression
Attach ment
Crying Avoiding
Physi ology
Motiv ation
Prosocial
Environment
Differential Susceptibility
People differ [e.g., genetically] in how much they respond to both positive & negative experiences
Differential Susceptibility
People differ [e.g., genetically] in how much they respond to both positive & negative experiences
Younger girl had less maltreatment, yet struggling in all domains [except some peers]
Challenging to family & system [needy & volatile] Very keen for treatment sensitive, curious & rewarding Great potential, but how to help her?
Attachment Mood
ADHD
???
Behavioural
But UK adopted children largely from Looked After Children (LAC) & have experienced maltreatment / neglect
Excellent epidemiological data for UK LAC
From the Office of National Statistics (ONS) study
Comparing ONS LAC data with Tier 4 Adoption & Fostering Service (AFS)
(Woolgar et al, 2013)
ONS LAC Any disorder Anxiety disorders PTSD Depression Behavioural disorders ADHD ASD Neurodevelopmental Learning disability
AFS
CAMHS Referrals
46%
11% 2% 3% 39% 9% 2.6% 12.8% 10.7%
66%
9% 3% 4% 55% 38% 4% 12% 10%
31%
5% 1% 1% 4% 12% 4% 0% 3%
Unique and subtle presentations with individual responses to extent [dose] of maltreatment
Biology responds to adversity with diversity in presentation Dandelions & orchids each have a role to play Need a personalised approach to service delivery
Complexity in practice:
help with school; they just dont get him Domestic violence in utero & polysubstance misuse; 3 week detox in SCBU; adopted by his first carer History of multiple NHS CAMHS contacts
Series of Tier 3 assessments, discrepant diagnoses each discounting the previous ones
ADHD, no autism Autism, no ADHD ADHD again, but no autism Behavioural problems & poor parenting, but no ADHD or autism
Not meeting high CAMHS thresholds so no treatment Family bemused, angry & let down
Outcome
Complex but subtle neurodevelopmental profile Several common disorders, low severity but cumulative high needs Requires substantial school support Liaison with school to explain profile not a horrid child Support School Action/Statementing processes
Develop personalised care plan (& revisit) Liaise with network, especially school Primary therapeutic input is the Parents, but various evidence based treatments can support them in this task by addressing complexity.
9yrs
Specific, but not secure, attachments to parents evident, so no longer DAD or RAD Autism Spectrum Disorder ADHD Normal IQ, but severe deficits in adaptive functioning & literacy
ASD
ADHD
ODD
RAD
Specialist assessment
Social skills
School liaison
Medication
Parenting Intervention
Presented with
Severe mood swings Self-harm Theft, aggression; running away; threatening behaviour Associating with risky & inappropriate adults Early & persistent school [& work] failure
Existing diagnosis
Attachment disorder only (not a recognised diagnosis)
Previous treatment
None, as no local CAMHS provision for attachment disorder family left without any support
Assessment
History
Conduct problems
ODD then CD
Assessment
Low mood Low self-esteem Learning disability Reading disorder Charming & easily engaged No attachment disorder now or ever any evidence for it
Complex presentation & developmental course, with accumulating risks All obscured by general, impersonal & incorrect diagnosis of attachment disorder which also allowed services to avoid helping the family Failure to see the individual child Brother done well & at university differentially susceptible siblings same good adoptive parenting
Outcome
Celebrated 18th birthday by running away Found 3 days later by police investigating another matter, bleeding & agitated Taken to A&E, admitted and assessed by adult services - in the here and now Went out as a child with attachment disorder, sent home as an adult with a personality disorder diagnosis
Summary
Big concepts such as Trauma and Attachment are important for adoption formulations But the science tells us that
Adversity breeds diversity not similarity, so dont let big concepts obscure individual needs Common, treatable disorders are very common & treatable in looked after and adopted children Adopted families require comprehensive assessments and personalised treatment plans including evidencebased interventions
Resources
I have included some further rather technical references next The excellent Chaffin et al article brings together world leading attachment and maltreatment researchers and clinicians to make recommendations about how to assess and treat maltreated/ neglected children with attachment issues.
Assessment Use expert clinicians Prioritise common disorders Assess neurodevelopmental factors Family context not just the child Consider cultural issues; situations & contexts; multiple time points Avoid extreme prognosis (e.g., psychopathy); pejorative terms (e.g., manipulative); distress as mechanism of change; broad checklists Treatment Use evidence based approaches for 1st line common disorders Brief, goal-directed interventions for increasing parental sensitivity for children with attachment problems Use parent training techniques, e.g., Time Out etc. for behaviour Include the family & not just the child. Avoid attachment parenting techniques using: holding, coercion; regression etc., as unproven & harmful
Readings
Chaffin, M., Hanson, R., Saunders, B. E., Nichols, T., Barnett, D., Zeanah, C., et al. (2006). Report of the APSAC Task Force on Attachment Therapy, Reactive Attachment Disorder, and Attachment Problems. Child Maltreatment, 11, 76-89. Ford, T., Vostanis, P., Meltzer, H., & Goodman, R. (2007). Psychiatric disorder among British children looked after by local authorities: Comparison with children living in private households. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 319-325.
McCrory, E., De Brito, S., & Viding, E. (2010). Research Review: The neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 15, 10791095. Belsky, J. & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885-908. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Research Review: genetic vulnerability or differential susceptibility in child development: the case of attachment. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 48, 1160-1173. Woolgar, M. & Scott, S. (2013). The negative consequences of over-diagnosing attachment disorders in adopted children: the importance of comprehensive formulations. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry doi:10.1177/1359104513478545 (April 2013 Online First).