Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.huawei.com
References
Page2
Objectives
Page3
Contents
1. TCH Congestion 2. SDCCH Congestion
Page4
TCH Congestion
TCH congestion
Basic principle Causes for high TCH congestion Case study of TCH congestion
Page5
TCH Congestion
Definition of TCH congestion rate Measurement point for TCH congestion and analysis
Page6
TCH Congestion
TCH congestion rate (excluding handover) =(TCH seizure failures for call + TCH seizure failures for very early assignment) / (Attempted TCH seizures + Attempted TCH seizures for very early assignment) *100%
Page7
TCH Congestion
TCH congestion rate (including handover) =(TCH seizure failures for call + TCH seizure failures for very early assignment + TCH seizure failures for intra BSC incoming cell handover (no radio resource) + TCH seizure
Page8
TCH Congestion
MS
BTS
Channel_Req
BSC
MSC
Channel_Active Channel_Active_Ack
IMMEDIATE ASSIGN COMMAND first SABM Establish_IND( CM Service Req) CR(Complete_l3_information) CC CM Service Accepted Setup Call Proceeding Assignment_Req Channel_Active Channel_Active_Ack ASSIGNMENT COMMAND first SABM Establish_IND UA ASSIGNMENT CMP Assignment_CMP Alerting Connect Connect Ack Communication Disconnect Release Release Complete
Clear_CMD Clear_CMP
Page9
TCH Congestion
When there is no resource for SDCCH allocation and very early assignment is permitted
When intraBSC incoming cell handover request message is received (nonSDCCH handover request).
When interBSC incoming handover request message is received (handover type is non-SDCCH)
Page10
TCH Congestion
TCH seizure failures for call, TCH seizure failures for very early assignment, TCH seizure failures for interBSC incoming cell handover, TCH seizure failures for intraBSC incoming cell handover, TCH seizure failures for intracell handover.
Page11
TCH Congestion
(3)CLEAR_CMD is received in process of assignment (4)RR_ABORT_REQ is received in process of outgoing BSC handover and the cause of handover is direct retry.
Page12
TCH Congestion
(8) ERR_IND is received in process of assignment. (9) When assignment failure message is sent. (10)TN_T7 (direct retry) timeout (outgoing BSC handover request)
Page13
TCH Congestion
(2)In very early TCH assignment process, the returned cause is (internal error) CVI_INTERNAL_ERR when channel is being allocated.
(3)In very early TCH assignment process, the returned cause is (channel request illegal) CVI_NO_ACCEPT when channel is being allocated.
(4)In very early TCH assignment process, no channel is allocated. (5)TN_WAIT_CH_ACT timeout in very early TCH assignment process.
Page14
TCH Congestion
TCH seizure failures for intraBSC incoming cell handover measurement point:
TCH seizure failure for interBSC incoming cell handover measurement point:
When interBSC incoming cell handover failure message is sent because there is no TCH channel
Page15
TCH Congestion
In the new TCH activation procedure, this item is measured when the serving cell receives the CHANNEL ACTIVATION NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGE message from the BTS. This item is measured if the implementation of intracell handover procedure fails because the encryption algorithm in Intracell Handover Request message does not support.
No response after the timer (internal timer, 5 seconds) timeout when the serving cell activates the new TCH.
In intracell handover procedure, When TCH requested but there is no TCH available in the serving cell, and this leads to the handover failure. In this case, this item is measured.
Page16
TCH Congestion
A interface
After MSC sends Assignment_Req, if trunk circuit at A-interface is fault, BSC will return Assignment_Failure directly.
Page17
TCH Congestion
1. TRX board is faulty or performance unstable 2. Unbalance of uplink/downlink level for BTS 3. Poor quality of uplink/downlink signal caused by interference 4. SDCCH and TCH belong to different TRX board which have different coverage.
Page18
Causes for high TCH congestion Troubleshooting for high TCH congestion
Page19
The transmitting power of BCCH TRX is too much higher than that of TCH TRX
in the same cell.
Interference causes the congestion TCH assignment failure due to isolated site and complicated topography result
Page20
TCH Congestion
1. Traffic statistics 2. Alarm information 3. BTS remote maintenance on OMC 4. Abis interface message analysis
Page21
TCH Congestion
not
If yes, perform load handover or suggest capacity expansion. If not, check interference bands 1~5. if the cause is interference, the call drop rate of the cell will also be high.
1. Check the result by object to see whether the numbers of uplink and downlink reports on the same TRX board are balanced. So we can know the uplink and downlink are balanced or not.
2. Check the result by time to see whether TRX measurement reports are
excessive. So we can know the congestion is related to TRX board or not .
Page22
TCH Congestion
Check alarms of the site which has high congestion rate. Check whether there is any abnormal alarm, such as voltage standing wave rate alarm, PCM out of frame alarm and uplink data bus alarm. Judge whether the congestion rate is associated with alarms in traffic statistics .
Page23
TCH Congestion
On the BTS remote maintenance console, block TCH board in turn. Observe whether the congestion rate is related to the TRX board.
Page24
TCH Congestion
If the assignment always fails on a specific TRX board, the cause may be one of the following:
TRX board faulty or performance unstable. Uplink/downlink unbalance, hardware problem in uplink or downlink. Bad quality of uplink or downlink signal. Analyze TA value of MS to locate interference.
If the assignment fails on the boards of the whole cell randomly, analyze the measurement reports. The causes may be the following:
The topography in the cell coverage is quite complicated. There is interference in the whole cell, such as interference from repeater.
Page25
TCH Congestion
Page26
TCH Congestion
Check antenna and feeder for any problem of uplink or downlink. Dial test at the same place to see whether the assignment failure always occurs in a certain TRX or in the cell randomly.
Search the interference source with a spectrum analyzer. Observe whether the topography in the cell coverage is complex.
Page27
Case 1: A interface data configuration mistake Case 2: TRX board fault Case 3: Uplink hardware problem Case 4: Downlink hardware problem Case 5: Effect from repeater in the cell Case 6: Other data configuration mistake Case 7: Isolated site and complicated topography
Page28
There is one BSC in the local network. From one day, TCH congestion rate (excluding handover) of the whole network increase to 4%, and most of cells are highly congested.
Page29
Case 1 analysis:
Since the frequency had not been changed, Um interface problem is excluded.
Congestion rate is abnormal for most BTS. In this case, we can search in a smaller range to see whether the congestion problem is related to a certain module or data modification.
Analyze the main cause of TCH seizure failure through traffic statistic and finally locate the problem caused by data or
hardware.
Page30
Case 1 Troubleshooting:
1.Analyze traffic statistics. The problem occurs after BSC data modified and reloaded. Maybe it is related to BSC reloading.
Analyze traffic statistics and find that the highly congested cells are all on module 1 of BSC, so the problem should related to module 1. Check TCH seizure failures (requested terrestrial resource unavailable), It shows that unavailability of terrestrial resource is the main cause of high congestion rate in module 1. The cause of terrestrial resources unavailability is mainly on Abis interface or A interface. It is quite unlikely that Abis interface is faulty for many cells in module 1 at the same time. Therefore, the cause should be the hardware or data at A interface.
Page31
Case 1 Troubleshooting:
2.Check the hardware of A interface and find that the hardware is normal. A interface hardware problem is excluded.
3. Check the data configuration of A interface trunk circuit and find that the CIC code of the first 32 timeslots of group 0, module 1 is 65535. But group 0 of module 1 in the trunk group table corresponds to the circuit from BSC to MSC. Obviously this CIC number is wrong. Change it to 0~31, and
Page32
Case 1 conclusion:
1. In trunk circuit data configuration at A interface, CIC must be correct, otherwise, TCH assignment will fail and the congestion rate will be high.
2. In the meantime, if the CIC of two FTC boards (multiple trunk circuits) are the same, this problem will also happen.
Page33
The configuration of a BTS is S6/4/2 and it had been on service successfully. One day, the result of traffic statistics shows that TCH channel in cell 1 (6 TRX) congestion rate comes to 20%.
At the same time, the times of TCH seizure failures for call
Case 2 analysis:
1. No data has been adjusted and there is no hopping in the cell and 6 TRXs use different frequencies, it is unlikely that they are subject to external interference at the same time. Therefore, it can not be Um interface interference or data problem.
2. Check hardware specifically. Since the problem only occurs to cell 1, we can block TRX one by one to determine which TRX causes the assignment failure.
Page35
Case 2 troubleshooting:
2. Block TRX4, there is no TCH congestion all the day. It indicate problem is on TRX4.
3. Unblock TRX4 and reset them, congestion appear again. 4. Go to BTS site and make a dial test on TRX4, TCH seizure failure still occurs. Interchange the slots of TRX4 and TRX5, make the dial test again on TRX5. The TCH seizure failure persists.
Page36
Case 2 conclusion:
1.Faulty TCH TRX board causes TCH seizure failures and high congestion rate.
2. Usually, the fault of TRX board can not be found on the BTS maintenance console. The problem can be confirmed by blocking TRXs in turn.
Page37
A certain BTS configuration is S6/6/6, the congestion rate of the 3 cells are all high since the BTS on service. Having checked and confirmed that there is no interference.
Page38
Case 3 analysis:
There is no interference but congestion always exists after the BTS on service in every cell. Check hardware of the BTS first.
Hardware fault: communication is normal for every cell, so it is unlikely that there is fault in the hardware of every cell.
Page39
Case 3 troubleshooting:
Register traffic statistics Receiving Level Measurement Function and query the result by time. It is found that when the receiving level and quality of different TRX boards in the same cell are the same, the number of downlink measurement reports is equivalent,
Check hardware and find that the connection of TRX and CDU in the same cell is incorrect. After correction, the problem is solved.
Page40
Case 3
Times of uplink receiving level rank 0 and receiving quality rank 0 Times of uplink receiving level rank 0 and receiving quality rank 1 Times of Uplink receiving level rank 0 and receiving quality rank 2
30 minutes starting from 11:00 18-3-2001 Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 12 Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 13
Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 14 Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 15 Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 16 Module ID 1, Cell ID 5, TRX No. 17
0 0 0 105 46 58
3
1 655 294 222
Page41
Case 3 conclusion:
Incorrect hardware connection will cause TCH seizure failure. The problem can be located accurately by analyzing traffic statistics. In this case, uplink hardware receiver problem is located through Receiving Level Measurement Function.
Page42
In a S6/6/5 BTS, one cell has high congestion rate one day. No adjustment has been performed in this period.
Page43
Case 4 analysis:
There is no parameter adjustment before the fault, so we should focus on the hardware, to see whether there is any fault or alarm.
Page44
Case 4 troubleshooting:
Trace Abis interface message of the BTS and analyze the signaling and find
that in process of TCH seizure failure, the uplink signal in the measurement
report from MS is good, after BSC sends ASSIGNMENT CMD, the downlink channel can not be seized. So the signal levels of uplink and downlink are not balanced, then ASSI FAILURE message is appeared. It is also found that the failure related to the last TRX board of the cell.
Block TRX board and congestion rate of the cell is less than 1%. There is
problem in TRX board of downlink hardware.
Check and find that the VSWR of TX antenna and feeder connected with this TRX board is higher than 2.5. Process the antenna& feeder VSWR alarm,
problem solved.
Page45
Case 4 conclusion:
Antenna VSWR alarm results in larger loss, less coverage and assignment failure. When MS is in BCCH TRX coverage, signal level is good enough, but after assignment a TCH in the board where VSWR alarm occurs, MS TCH seizure fails and
Page46
When an O2 BTS is expanded to O4, high congestion rate occurs. The peak value of congestion rate is as high as 40%.
Page47
Case 5 analysis:
Check whether the congestion occurs to all TRX. If yes, re-check the connection of newly added hardware of the BTS to see whether there is any fault.
When hardware problem is excluded, consider external causes. For example, the repeater is not expanded, which results in assignment failure.
Page48
Case 5 troubleshooting:
Block TRX of the last two newly added TRX on OMC and find that the
Analyze Abis interface signaling, the assignment failure occurs on the two newly added TRXs. And SDCCH measurement report analysis shows that the level on SDCCH is normal and TA value is large. However, there is no measurement report on SACCH (TCH). Because sometimes the assignment of the two TRXs succeed, so it is impossible that these tow newly added TRXs are both faulty.
Operator told that there is a repeater in the cell. When expansion, the repeater
did not lock on the two newly added TRXs. Confirm and reconfigure repeater,
problem solved.
Page49
Case 5 conclusion:
Because of the repeater, the actual coverage areas of the existing two TRX and the expanded two TRX are different, which results in the assignment failure.
Page50
In network optimization, the congestion rate (including handover) on busy hours of the two cells is as high as 10%. TCH seizure failures excluding handover and TCH seizure failures for call (no radio resource) are normal. Here, TCH seizure failures (all) is very high, 89 times and 61 times respectively, but TCH seizure failures for MOC is 0.
The traffic volume is a little lower than that before optimization. The interference band is normal.
Page51
Case 6 analysis:
When the network parameters are modified, the congestion rate of the two cells is higher and only the congestion rate (including handover) is higher, therefore, radio interference or hardware fault can be excluded. Mainly analyze whether the
Page52
Case 6 troubleshooting:
Failures of all handovers mean that there is problem with the handover data. Check the handover data of the two cells and find that there is co-frequency and co-BSIC as supposed, the two cells are adjacent cell of cell A, therefore the handover from the cell A to the two cells will fail.
Change the BCCH and BSIC of one cell, and then the handover
problem disappears and congestion rate become normal.
Page53
Case 6 conclusion:
Two cells (both adjacent to cell A) with co-frequency and coBSIC will result in result in low incoming cell handover successful rate, but also high TCH congestion rate (including handover).
Page54
An O2 site in a suburban county has suffered from high congestion rate (excluding handover), from 3% to 10% (in proportion to traffic volume). But the TCH seizure failures for call (no radio resource) is 0%.
Page55
Case 7 analysis:
1. Since the congestion rate is not very high, the problem may not be on the data or hardware.
3. Analyze the cause of assignment failure. Take call trop rate into consideration and analyze the receiving performance of uplink or downlink, including level and quality.
Page56
Case 7 troubleshooting:
Check Call Drop Measurement and find that TA value is large when call drop, the distance is about 25.6Km~31.1Km away from the BTS. View Receiving Level Measurement Function and find that there are many measurement reports of low signal level. Analyze Abis signaling and find that the uplink level is very low (about -98dBm) when the assignment fails. Drive test on-site and find the site is isolated, with large coverage and complicated topography. When the MS is more than 25 Km away from the BTS, it can receive -90dBm downlink signal. But the uplink signal is not enough, so TCH assignment fails.
Page57
Case 7 conclusion:
Poor uplink coverage causes the high congestion rate. Adding BTS can help to obtain a continuous coverage. Change the omni site into directional site or add TMA can improve uplink strength and avoid over shooting of downlink.
Page58
Contents
1. TCH Congestion 2. SDCCH Congestion
Page59
SDCCH Congestion
SDCCH congestion
Basic principle Causes for SDCCH congestion and solutions Case study of SDCCH congestion
Page60
SDCCH Congestion
SDCCH congestion rate=Attempted SDCCH seizures meeting a SDCCH blocked state /Attempted SDCCH seizures (all)
SDCCH assignment for MOC SDCCH assignment for MTC Location update SDCCH handover Short message
Page61
SDCCH Congestion
MS Channel Request (RACH) Channel Required BSC random access immediate assignment Cell SDCCH seizure request times Cell immediate assignment request times Attempted SDCCH seizures meeting a SDCCH blocked state (No SDCCH available) Cell SDCCH seizure failure BTSS008015 Immediate Assignment Command Immediate Assignment Reject BTS BSC MSC
Page62
Location area border results in excessive location update and SDCCH attempt
Page63
SDCCH Congestion
Increase RACH access threshold (overcoming interference). Decrease maximum re-transmitting times and increase extended transmission timeslots
Page64
Case 1: Too many times of location update Case 2: Transmission equipment board fault Case 3: Transmission timeslot multiplexer problem
Page65
In a network, the radio link call setup successful rate is low. Analyze the traffic statistics and find that SDCCHs congest in a few sites.
Page66
Case 1 analysis:
Since only a few BTS are congested, register SDCCH Measurement Function and analyze the ratio of SDCCH seizure for different causes, then we can find the real reason for SDCCH congestion.
Page67
Case 1 troubleshooting :
In congested cell, SDCCH is attempted about 300-400 times in a certain hour. The configuration are all S1/1/1. Each cell is configured with SDCCH/8 channels. Normally, they are enough to support 300-400 times seizure, but there are dozens of SDCCH congestion for each cell in busy hour.
It is found that most of SDCCH seizures are for location update. Analyze the cell
locations and find that the congested BTS are at the border of two location area
crossed by railway, most of location update are in a specific 5 minutes. Query the train timetable and find that 4 or 5 trains pass there within this period. When the trains pass by, a large amount of location update requests from MS.
Page68
Case 1 conclusion:
For SDCCH congestion due to location update, check whether it is caused by improper setting of location area. Add SDCCH channel or enable dynamic allocation function to solve the problem.
Page69
After a new BTS30 is on service, SDCCH channels are all in status A, TCH channels are in I or A. When the call is connected, the communication is normal. Observe the traffic statistics and find that SDCCH seizure failure times are more
Page70
Case 2 analysis:
First check data and hardware. Because the whole site suffers from congestion problem, interchange Abis link with another BTS
If there is no problem with data or hardware, we should analyze the Abis interface transmission system.
Page71
Case 2 troubleshooting:
Check alarm and find there are LAPD link fault alarm and recovery alarm (within one second). The alarms appear once per ten minutes. Check the data and then interchange Abis link with another BTS which is in the same configuration, the other site work normally. But problem of this site persists. So data and BSC hardware have no problem. Replace TMU and TRX board in the BTS and the problem persists. Measure the transmission and self-loop BIE, then It is found that there is high BER for transmission. Test the line section by section and find that one 2M transmission board is faulty. Replace the board and the problem is solved.
Page72
Case 2 conclusion:
In this case, due to transmission high BER there is too much SDCCH assignment message but missed, then SDCCH assignment message re-sent, these cause high congestion rate.
Page73
Many complaints from subscribers it is difficult to make a call through 4 sites (ABCD), but there are no related alarm information.
Check the 4 sites, the board status are all normal. Almost no TCH
Operator engineer said that BTS-A was attached with BTS-B, BTS-C and BTS-D, these 4 BTSs used a primary combiner (a transmission timeslot multiplexer) and shared one EI .
Page74
Case 3 analysis:
The locate information is helpful to judge that the problem is on the hardware or the transmission. But it is unlikely that faults occur to hardware of the 4 BTSs. The transmission lines of the 4 BTSs are related, therefore, check the transmission carefully.
Page75
Case 3 troubleshooting:
1. Observe BIE, there is BER indication for transmission. But there are no
2. Check Abis interface signaling and find there are a large number of PAGING_CMD messages, but only one RF_RESOURCE_INDICATION message appears occasionally. There is no CHAN_ACTIV, CHAN_ACTIV_ACK or IMMEDIATE_ASSIGN_COMMAND message. It indicates that SDCCH channel is not activated.
3. Check data O&M log, no data modified within a few days. 4. Reload and activate BTS software, and find that system response is slow even communication timeout. SDCCH is still congested after software reloaded.
Page76
Case 3 troubleshooting:
5. Reset the primary combiner and initialize the 4 BTSs, SDCCH are all seized and TCH can be seized successfully. Trace Abis interface signaling, CHAN_ACTIV, CHAN_ACTIV_ACK or IMMEDIATE_ASSIGN_COMMAND
Page77
Case 3 conclusion:
The transmission problem causes SDCCH congestion by MS channel request repeatedly. Transmission problem can be caused by different reasons. In this case, the fault on the primary combiner leads SDCCH can not be activated, so all
Page78
Thank you
www.huawei.com