Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CONTENTS
Introduction Techniques of capital budgeting Accounting Rate of Return Method Payback Period Method Net Present Value (NPV) Method Internal Rate Return (IRR) Method Issues with IRR Multiple IRRs Mutually Exclusive Projects Advantages of NPV Method Advantages of IRR Method Modified IRR Method
Prepared by Sumit Goyal - LPU
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Understand the nature and importance of investment decisions Explain the methods of calculating net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) Show the implications of net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) Describe the non-DCF evaluation criteria: payback and accounting rate of return Illustrate the computation of the discounted payback Compare and contrast NPV and IRR and emphasize the superiority of NPV rule
Prepared by Sumit Goyal - LPU
Capital Budgeting
Capital budgeting decisions relate to acquisition of assets that generally have long-term strategic implications for the firm. Capital budgeting decisions become fairly intricate as it impacts other areas of corporate finance like capital structure, dividends and cost of capital.
Types Of Projects
Small vs Large Projects New vs Expansion Projects Independent and Mutually Exclusive projects
Mutually exclusive projects are those where acceptance of one implies automatic rejection of the other.
Techniques Of Evaluation
The methods of financial evaluation of the projects are categorized into two: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) techniques and Non DCF techniques. DCF techniques value the projects with time value of money and include a) NPV Method and b) IRR Method Non-DCF based techniques of a) Accounting Rate of Return and b) Pay Back Period.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Non-discounted Cash Flow Criteria
Payback Period (PB) Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
PAYBACK
Payback is the number of years required to recover the original cash outlay invested in a project. If the project generates constant annual cash inflows, the payback period can be computed by dividing cash outlay by the annual cash inflow. That is:
C0 Initial Investment Payback = Annual Cash Inflow C
Example
Assume that a project requires an outlay of Rs 50,000 and yields annual cash inflow of Rs 12,500 for 7 years. The payback period for the project is:
Rs 50,000 PB 4 years Rs 12,000
PAYBACK
Unequal cash flows In case of unequal cash inflows, the payback period can be found out by adding up the cash inflows until the total is equal to the initial cash outlay. Suppose that a project requires a cash outlay of Rs 20,000, and generates cash inflows of Rs 8,000; Rs 7,000; Rs 4,000; and Rs 3,000 during the next 4 years. What is the projects payback? 3 years + 12 (1,000/3,000) months 3 years + 4 months
Acceptance Rule
The project would be accepted if its payback period is less than the maximum or standard payback period set by management. As a ranking method, it gives highest ranking to the project, which has the shortest payback period and lowest ranking to the project with highest payback period.
Initial cash outflow Cash inflows 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year
Payback period
A company is planning a major investment to expand its current manufacturing of digital clocks with initial outlay of Rs 350 Lakh. The finance department has projected a following cash flows over the next 7 years are, 100, 150, 400, 450, 300, 250, 50. What is the payback period of the project?
Evaluation of Payback
Certain virtues:
Simplicity Cost effective Short-term effects Risk shield Liquidity
Serious limitations:
Cash flows after payback Cash flows ignored Cash flow patterns Administrative difficulties Inconsistent with shareholder value
It is merely a number, which reflects the worthiness of the project in absolute terms. To enable the firm make a conscious decision whether to accept or reject a proposal, it needs to be compared with some acceptance/ rejection criteria.
or
A variation of the ARR method is to divide average earnings after taxes by the original cost of the project instead of the average cost.
Example
A project will cost Rs 40,000. Its stream of earnings before depreciation, interest and taxes (EBDIT) during first year through five years is expected to be Rs 10,000, Rs 12,000, Rs 14,000, Rs 16,000 and Rs 20,000. Assume a 50 per cent tax rate and depreciation on straight-line basis.
Practical Problem
A company is considering a proposal to purchase a new machine. The equipment would involve a cash outlay of Rs. 5,00,000 and working capital of Rs. 60,000. the expected life of the project is 5 years. Depreciation method is straight line method. The estimated before tax cash inflow (earnings before depreciation and tax) are as 180000, 220000, 190000, 170000, 140000. The applicable tax rate is 35%.
Acceptance Rule
This method will accept all those projects whose ARR is higher than the minimum rate established by the management and reject those projects which have ARR less than the minimum rate. This method would rank a project as number one if it has highest ARR and lowest rank would be assigned to the project with lowest ARR.
Limitations
Subjective Approach Ignore Time Value of Money Not Based on Cash Flow Inconsistent definition
Pre tax or post tax Accounting basis Total investment or equity
Estimate the initial cost to implement the project, CF0, Estimate the cash flows of the project for each period over its life, CFt, Sum the discount the cash flows at an appropriate rate to arrive at present value of the cash flows, Subtract the initial investment from the present value to get the Net Present Value of the project. NPV is value created by the acceptance of the project. It reflects the increase in the market value of the firm.
Acceptance Rule
Accept the project when NPV is positive NPV > 0 Reject the project when NPV is negative NPV < 0 May accept the project when NPV is zero NPV = 0
The NPV method can be used to select between mutually exclusive projects; the one with the higher NPV should be selected.
Practical Problem
A company is considering investment in a project that costs Rs. 200000. the project has an expected life of 5 years and zero salvage value. The company uses SLM of depreciation. The companys tax rate is 40%. .
Year EBDT
1
2 3 4
70000
80000 120000 90000
60000
Practical Problem
A company is considering a proposal to purchase a new machine. The equipment would involve a cash outlay of Rs. 5,00,000 and working capital of Rs. 60,000. the expected life of the project is 5 years. Depreciation method is straight line method. The estimated before tax cash inflow (earnings before depreciation and tax) are as 180000, 220000, 190000, 170000, 140000. The applicable tax rate is 35%.
5,00,000 5,00,000/1.1 = 4,54,545 5,00,000 5,00,000/1.12 = 4,13,223 5,00,000 5,00,000/1.13 = 3,75,657 12,43,425 10,00,000 = 2,43,425
Year 3
Year 3
Profitability index
Profitability index= present value of inflows/ present value of outflows
Advantages
In which different costs are there we can not rank as NPV method so profitability index can be used for the same.
For a project outlay of Rs. 200 and cash inflows for next 2 years at Rs 110 and Rs 121, the IRR may be found as follows:
Practical Problem
Suggest the company whether they should invest in the project or not as per 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Pay back period method Discounted pay back period method Net present value Internal rate of return Accounting rate of return. Net Profitability index
Prepared by Sumit Goyal - LPU
Practical Problem
A company is considering a proposal to purchase a new machine. The equipment would involve a cash outlay of Rs. 5,00,000 and working capital of Rs. 60,000. the expected life of the project is 5 years. Depreciation method is straight line method. The estimated before tax cash inflow (earnings before depreciation and tax) are as 180000, 220000, 190000, 170000, 140000. The applicable tax rate is 35%.
80.00 60.00
NPV 40.00
10
20
28.23
35
The implied assumption of IRR method is that interim cash flows are reinvested at IRR itself. NPV method assumes reinvestment at discount rate. This assumption of IRR is challenged as it defies conservatism
Flexibility in choosing discount rate Measuring wealth creation Ranking of the project in capital rationing situation Unambiguous acceptance and rejection criterion makes NPV rule superior to IRR rule.
Prepared by Sumit Goyal - LPU
Cost of capital not required to find IRR. It is required to make selection or rejection decision. For comparative purposes no need to know the cost of capital. Priority for early cash flows.