Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
This case relates to car manufacturing company Volkswagen. Pressure of high rates of return had led the company to change its policies. Short term profit orientation, increased dividend pay outs to investors and innovation potential of companies have to suffer. In this case, Volkswagen tried to reduced this gap.
QUESTIONS
Response of Volkswagens corporate governance to the shareholders value Role of stock market for the company Effect of incentive, target setting and controlling to shareholders value Effects of investment/disinvestments on innovation potential of the firm Effects on economic and financial performance of the company
BACKGROUND
German Car industry had a prominent role in German Economy regarding the manufacturing sectors share and growth. Car manufacturing firms are under the threat of hostile takeover. Pressure of Capital Markets - Institutional investors favoring change in the corporate governance systems.
PSA
0 00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4
5 6 7 8
Fiat
00 1 13% 2 3 3.30% 37.90% 2.00% 2.50% 4 5 6 7 8 51.40%
VW
0 10.20% 12.10% 3.50% 3.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
150
100
50
CONTD
High degree of Joint-ness between management policy and works councils in company policy. Union proposed general agreements on wages and salaries and working conditions which resulted with increase in the costs of production but quality improved.
BASE OF CG SYSTEM
A high degree of union membership. Top management committed to the goals of social responsibility and competivity. A priority on location and employment interests. A company-based bargaining system between IG Metall and the Executive Board of the Volkswagen.
CHANGES IN CG SYSTEM
Corporate governance of VW towards shareholder value orientation. Stock market now play a vital role in framing rules. Changes in the incentive system. Changes in target setting and controlling like were reframed to higher return on sales. Changes in investment and disinvestment policy of VW.
VW trying to establish the relationship between Work holder Value and Shareholder Value due to external pressure
350
300
250
200
Cash flow as % of capital investments in tangible fixed assets VW AG automo- tive division
150
100
50
0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
-20
-40
2000 1999
-60
-80
-100
Bonuses are also paid at the level of employees subject to collective agreements. The introduction of the 28.8 hour week and the corresponding reduction of wages.
VWs measures: Esops (Employee Stock Option Plans) Restructuring of the Pension Scheme Employment Protection Personnel Flexibility Short Term Liabilities (Overtime Pay, etc.)
FINANCIAL TARGETS
Financial targets:
Return on capital should be within a corridor between 9% and 11%; break-even of max. 60%; return on sales should reach 4.7% and increase to 6.5% by 2005; investments should be paid out of the cash flow and have a cap of DM 6 billion.
Various performance targets were set such as material price reduction of 2%, fixed cost reduction of 3%, etc.
INVESTMENT/DISINVESTMENT POLICY OF VW
There has been general increase in the investment in tangible assets due to increase competition. Same hold true for Research and Development as well. They have also started to concentrate on Conglomerate policy as well as mergers and acquisitions. As far as disinvestment goes, there has been no indication of shift towards downsizing or distribute. From the Investment policy the real gainers are State (Taxes), Creditors (Interests) and Company (Reserves).
INVESTMENT TO SALES
CONCLUSIONS
Distinctive corporate governance system Concentrates on benefits on all the stakeholders of the company All measures related to Shareholder Value is carried out by Management and Work Councils VW relies on Cash Flows for funding the investments except few time In the view of unfavorable conditions and negative response of investors, VW has not used this instrument There can be future expansion in the equity base for mergers and acquisitions
CONTD
Incentive system has been changed in the direction of capital market oriented performance measures ESOPS being used to increase the employees ownership Fixing the targets has been there to correspond to the shareholders expectations It would signify the strong commitment of top management and thus would help in maintaining goof investors relations Investment policy is still inclined towards long term perspectives Strongly supported productionist orientation vs financialisation