Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
=
( )
n h
v n v p q J
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ =
|
.
|
\
|
=
x
nx
x
hx n h
E
v
n
E
v
p q
E
v
n
E
v
p q
o
x
hx
p
E
v
=
x
nx
n
E
v
=
Important formulas
o: conductivity; : resistivity; J: current density; E: electrical field
v: velocity; q: charge; n, p: carrier concentration.
13
Sheet resistance
Q q Nx q x x
R
j j j
S
o
1 1 1
= = = =
N is carrier density, Q is total carrier per unit area, x
j
is junction depth
( ) | | ( ) | |
}
= = =
j
x
B
j j
S
dx x n N x n q
x x
R
0
1 1
c
c
c
c
=
c
c
=
c
c
x
t x C
D
x x
t x F
t
t x C , , ,
If D is constant:
( ) ( )
2
2
, ,
x
t x C
D
t
t x C
c
c
=
c
c
Figure 7-7
18
x
C
I
=0
C
*
C
s
C
g
SiO
2
Si
0
2
2
=
c
c
=
c
c
x
C
D
t
C
bx a C + =
Solution to diffusion equation
( ) ( )
2
2
, ,
x
t x C
D
t
t x C
c
c
=
c
c
At equilibrium state, C doesnt change with time.
Diffusion of oxidant (O
2
or H
2
O)
through SiO
2
during thermal
oxidation.
19
Gaussian solution in an infinite medium
C0 as t 0 for x>0
C as t 0 for x=0
}C(x,t)dx=Q (limited source)
This corresponds to, e.g. implant a very
narrow peak of dopant at a particular depth,
which approximates a delta function.
( ) ( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Dt
x
t C
Dt
x
Dt
Q
t x C
4
exp , 0
4
exp
2
,
2 2
t
Important consequences:
Dose Q remains constant
Peak concentration (at x=0) decreases as 1/ \t
Diffusion distance from origin increases as 2 \Dt
Figure 7-9
20
At t=0, delta
function dopant
distribution.
At t>0
21
( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Dt
x
Dt
Q
t x C
4
exp ,
2
t
Gaussian solution near a surface
A surface Gaussian diffusion can be
treated as a Gaussian diffusion with
dose 2Q in an infinite bulk medium.
Note: Pre-deposition by diffusion can also
be replaced by a shallow implantation step.
1. Pre-deposition
for dose control
2. Drive in for
profile control
Figure 7-10
22
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Dt C
Q
Dt
C
C
Dt x
B
T
B
s
j
t
ln 2
ln 2
( )
Dt
Q
t C C
T
S
t
= = , 0
( )
( ) t x C
Dt
x
x
t x C
,
2
,
=
c
c
( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
c
c
B
s
j
B
x
C
C
x
C
x
t x C
j
ln
2
,
Gaussian solution near a surface
Surface concentration
decreases with time
Concentration gradient
Junction depth At p-n junction
Error function solution in an infinite medium
An infinite source of material in the half-
plane can be considered to be made up of
a sum of Gaussians. The diffused solution
is also given by a sum of Gaussians,
known as the error-function solution.
This corresponds to, e.g. putting a
thick heavily doped epitaxial layer on a
lightly doped wafer.
At t=0
C=0 for x>0
C=C for x<0.
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) | | q q
t
q
o
o
o
t
t
d
C
t x C
Dt
x
d
Dt
x
Dt
C
t x C
Dt
x x
x
Dt
C
t x C
Dt x
n
i
i
i
}
}
+
=
=
=
=
(
A =
2
2
0
2
1
2
exp ,
2
4
exp
2
,
4
exp
2
,
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
(
|
.
|
\
|
=
(
|
.
|
\
|
=
}
Dt
x
erf c
C
t x C
x erf x erf c
Dt
x
erf
C
t x C
d z erf
z
2
2
,
1
2
1
2
,
exp
2
0
2
q q
t
erfc: complementary error function
Figure 7-11
23
Error function solution in an infinite medium
Evolution of erfc diffused profile
Important consequences of error function solution:
Symmetry about mid-point allows solution for constant surface concentration to be derived.
Error function solution is made up of a sum of Gaussian delta function solutions.
Dose beyond x=0 continues to increase with annealing time.
Figure 7-12
24
Error function solution in an infinite medium
Properties of Error Function erf(z) and Complementary Error Function erfc(z)
x x
t
2
) ( erf ~
For x << 1
( )
( )
x
x
x
2
exp 1
erfc
=
t
For x >> 1
( ) 0 0 erf =
( ) 1 erf =
( ) ( )
}
=
x
du u x
0
2
- exp
2
erf
t
( ) | |
( )
2
exp
2 erf
x
dx
x d
=
t
( ) | |
( )
2
2
2
exp
4 erf
x x
dx
x d
=
t
( ) ( ) ( )
}
= =
x
du -u x x
2
exp
2
erf 1 erfc
t
}
=
0
1
) ( erfc
t
dx x
( ) 1 0 erfc =
( ) 0 erfc =
25
Boundary condition: C(x,0)=0, x=0; C(0,t)=C
s
; C(,t)=0
Error function solution near a surface
Constant surface concentration at all times, corresponding to, e.g., the situation of
diffusion from a gas ambient, where dopants saturate at the surface (solid solubility).
Constant 1/2
( )
}
= |
.
|
\
|
=
Dt x
u
s
s
du e
C
Dt
x
C t x C
2
2
2
2
erfc ,
t
}
= |
.
|
\
|
=
0
2
2
erfc Dt
C
dx
Dt
x
C Q
s
s
t
Pre-deposition dose
Cs is surface concentration,
limited by solid solubility,
which doesnt change too
fast with temperature.
26
Dt
( )
tot
= D
i
i
t
i
Successive diffusions
Successive diffusions using different times and temperatures
Final result depends upon the total Dt product
( ) ( )
n eff
t t t D Dt + + + = ...
2 1
( ) ... ...
1
2
2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1
+
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ = + + =
D
D
t D t D t D t D Dt
eff
When D is the same (same temperature)
When diffused at different temperatures
As D increases exponentially with temperature, total diffusion (thermal
budget) is mainly determined by the higher temperature processes.
For example, the profile is a Gaussian
function at time t=t
0
, then after further
diffusion for another 3t
0
, the final profile is
still a Gaussian with t=4t
0
=t
0
+3t
0
.
(The Gaussian solution holds only if the Dt used to
introduce the dopant is small compared with the
final Dt for the drive-in i.e. if an initial o/delta
function approximation is reasonable)
27
( ) | | ( ) | |
}
= = =
j
x
B
j j
S
dx x n N x n q
x x
R
0
1 1
Irvins curves
Motivation to generate Irvins curves: both N
B
(background carrier concentration), R
s
(sheet resistance) and x
j
can be conveniently measured experimentally but not N
0
(surface
concentration). However, these four parameters are related by:
Irvins curves are plots of N
0
versus (R
s
, x
j
) for various N
B
, assuming erfc or half-Gaussian
profile. There are four sets of curves for (n-type and p-type) and (Gaussian and erfc).
( )
}
=
j
x
j
dx x
x
0
1
o o
1-
Irvins curves
Four sets of curves: p-type erfc, n-type erfc, p-type half-Gaussian, n-type half-Gaussian
Explicit relationship between: N
0
, x
j
, N
B
and R
S
.
Once any three parameters are know, the fourth one can be determined.
Figure 7-17
1-
Example
Design a boron diffusion process (say for the well or tub of a CMOS process) such that
s
=900O/square, x
j
=3m, with C
B
=110
15
/cm
3
.
From (half-Gaussian) Irvins curve, we find
C
s
<< solubility of B in Si, so it is correct to assume pre-deposition (here by ion
implantation) plus drive-in, which indeed gives a Gaussian profile.
The average conductivity of the layer is
30
( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Dt
x
Dt
Q
t x C
4
exp ,
2
t
( )
2 9
15
17
2
4
2
cm 10 7 . 3
10
10 4
ln 4
10 3
ln 4
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
B
s
j
C
C
x
Dt
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
Dt
x
C C
j
s B
4
exp
2
Example (cont.)
hours 8 . 6
sec cm 10 5 . 1
cm 10 7 . 3
2 13
2 9
in drive
=
t
2 13 9 17
cm 10 3 . 4 10 7 . 3 10 4
= = = t tDt C Q
s
Assume drive-in at 1100
o
C, then D=1.510
-13
cm
2
/s.
Pre-deposition dose
31
t
Dt
C Q
s
2 =
sec 5 . 5
10 2 . 4 10 5 . 2 2
10 3 . 4
15
2
20
13
dep pre
=
|
|
.
|
\
|
=
t
t
( ) ( )
9
in drive
14
dep pre
10 7 . 3 10 3 . 2
<< Dt Dt
Now if we assume pre-deposition by diffusion from a gas or solid phase at 950
o
C, solid
solubility of B in Si is C
s
=2.510
20
/cm
3
, and D=4.210
-15
cm
2
/s.
The profile of this pre-deposition is erfc function.
However, the pre-deposition time is too short for real processing,
so ion-implantation is more realistic for pre-deposition.
Example (cont.)
32