t .

c
po
gs
lo
.b
b
il m
oc
il t
c l
Chiew N Pang

/a
:/
tp
h t
o m
Acknowledgments: English-Speaking
Union, Chiew N Pang
 1
Chairperso

st Sp
r
3rd eake n&
Sp

r
ea

ke
2n eake

r
Sp

Timekeeper

ea
1 st
ke

ke
d

r
ke
Sp

ea
d
r

ea
Sp
3r
Op

Sp
ion
r

po

d
it

2n
p os sit
P r o io
n

JUDGES
The order of speeches:

1
Chairperso

st Sp
r
3rd eake
Sp
n&

r
2n eake

ea
3. 1st Proposition

ke
Sp
Timekeeper

ea
1 st
ke

ke
r
ke
Sp

ea
r
4. 1st Opposition

d
ea
Sp
3r
Op

Sp
r
io n po

d
5. 2nd Proposition it

2n
p os sit
6. 2nd Opposition P r o io
n
7. Opposition Summary
8. Proposition Summary

Speaking Time: 1st Speaker – 5 minutes

2nd Speaker – 5 minutes
Summary – 5 minutes
Motion: This House would legalise voluntary euthanasia (example)
Procedures:
3. The first duty of the chair is to call the debate to order and to welcome all that are
present. The chair explains the rules and the procedures. The timekeeper will be
called upon to demonstrate the time signals. There will be a warning bell 1 minute
before the maximum time allowed, and another signal when the maximum time is
reached. If the speaker continues, the bell is sounded every 15 seconds until he
stops.
4. The chair introduces the names of the speakers and the judges.
5. The chair calls upon the 1st speaker of the proposition.
6. The 1st prop. speaker defines the motion, previews proposition arguments, delivers
arguments and summarises.
7. The chair waits for a nod from the judges before introducing the 1st opposition
speaker.
8. The 1st opp. speaker previews opposition arguments, deals with (or rebuts) some of
the 1st prop’s arguments, delivers own arguments and summarises.
9. The chair waits for a nod from the judges before introducing 2nd prop. speaker.
10.The 2nd prop. speaker rebuts, presents own arguments and summarises.
Procedures, cont.:
10.The chair waits for a nod from the judges before introducing 2nd opp. speaker.
11.The 2nd opp. speaker rebuts, presents own arguments and summarises.
12.The chair invites speeches from the floor. Floor questions are not answered straight
away by the teams, but can be referred to by the summary speakers in their
summary speeches.
13.The chair introduces the opposition summary speaker (3rd speaker).
14.The opp. summary speaker summarises by referring to own case, opponents’ case
and the floor debate.
15.The chair waits for a nod from the judges before introducing the proposition
summary speaker.
16.The prop. summary speaker summarises by referring to own case, opponents’ case
and the floor debate.
17.The judges retire to decide the winners.
18.The chair takes an audience vote, and invites more comments from the floor until
the judges return.
19.The judges return and give some general feedback before announcing the winners.
Defining the motion

The definition is delivered at the start of the 1st proposition speech and is
very important, although it must be kept brief (about 20-30 seconds).

Without a solid definition, the debate may end up going nowhere, or worse,
all over the place. The definition is a way of making the point of the debate
clear.

Challenging the definition

Definitions may only be challenged if it is unreasonable, and only by the 1st

opposition speaker. He must state their reasons for the challenge and
introduces their alternative interpretation. This must be accepted by the 2nd
proposition speaker unless they can prove that their original definition was
valid.
Debaters have to show that they can respond to the arguments of the other side. They
do this in two main ways:

Rebuttal

It is important to address the other side’s arguments during your own speech. This is
called ‘rebuttal’. The aim of rebuttal is to undermine the opposition’s case, thus leaving
your case looking even stronger by comparison.

All speakers (except the first proposition) are expected to rebut the other side, even if
their arguments seem very convincing.

Summary Speeches

The aim of the summary speeches is to review the major issues of the debate and
leave a lasting impression in the audience’s (and the judges’) mind that is favourable
to your side.
v DO sum up the major areas of difference between the 2 sides, but DON’T focus
on trivial points or areas where you agreed.
v DON’T just list all the arguments that came up. This won’t show up the areas of
difference and is boring.
v DO refer to some of the points from the floor debate, if they support your
side, or if they were particularly damaging to your case.
v DO make sure your summary is well structured; it’s easy to panic and zigzag
Planning your debate:

Initial brainstorm

v Brainstorm everything you already know about the topic. It’s also important to
think about the other side’s possible arguments.
v Group the thoughts into different areas, and decide which team member will do
further research into each area.

Research

v Make sure your information is up to date and reliable.

v Keep a note of where your information come from so you can refer to your exact
source in your speech.

Secondary brainstorm

v After completing your research, brainstorm the topic again, but this time divide
your arguments into pros and cons.
v Note down ALL the arguments you can think of, including the weak ones.
v The first arguments you come up with often provoke questions about what the
motion means. These are useful in determining possible definitions.
Guidelines for Judges

v Total Score: 100 points (40 points each for the 1st & 2nd speeches and 20 points for the
summary).

Main speeches

v Reasoning & Evidence

Ø Clarity and logic
Ø Examples and analogies
Ø Relevance to the motion

v Organization & Prioritisation

Ø Team Structure
Ø Individual Structure
Ø Adaptability
Ø Timing

v Listening & Response

Ø Rebuttal (not applicable to the 1st speaker)

v Expression & Delivery

Ø Use of notes
Ø Use of voice
Ø Use of words
Summary

v Reasoning & Evidence

Ø Clarity and logic
Ø Revisited material - did the speaker choose the most powerful examples and analogies?
Ø New material – is only permitted if it elaborates or responds to material already
mentioned by another speaker. A small amount of interesting relevant new material of this
type can be rewarded. Totally new material should be penalised.

v Organization & Prioritisation

Ø Choice of arguments
Ø Structure
Ø Adaptability
Ø Timing

v Listening & Response

Ø Rebuttal
Ø Own Team
Ø Floor Debate

v Expression & Delivery

Ø Use of notes
Ø Use of voice
Ø Use of words
Ø Use of body language
R emembe R
 The 3
Golden Ms
how

u
M
M
sa
y
it
anner

yo
w
M
M atter
you sa
 M
M
S
T
R
U
C ethod
T
U
R
E strategy
R
emembe R
Q uantity isnno
Q
substitute for

Q uality!
© Slides Design:

Chiew N. Pang
Creative Commons

Creative Commons License Deed

Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Spain
You are free:
•to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
•to make derivative works
Under the following conditions:
•Attribution. You must give the original author credit.
What does "Attribute this work" mean?
The page you came from contained embedded licensing metadata, including how the creator wishes to be attributed
for re-use. You can use the HTML here to cite the work. Doing so will also include metadata on your page so that
others can find the original work as well.

•Non-Commercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
•For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the licence terms of this work.
•Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
•Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.