Dept.

of Collegiate Education
CEQE
CONTINUOUS EVALUATION FOR QUALITY & EXCELLENCE

State Quality Assurance Cell

Dept. of Collegiate Education, GoK

Quality
1 2

What is Quality !?!

Is Quality elusive !?! Quality is a moving target Quality is never static Quality is never a goal

3
4 5

1 2

Introspection
Quality through Benchmarking Continuous Evaluation Quality is Excellence Third Party Evaluation

3
4 5

1 2

NAAC has the mandate

NAAC A&A Mandatory 400 Universities 36000 Colleges 359 Government Colleges in K

3
4 5

Government Colleges Matrix

Old Colleges:

174

(prior to 2007) New Colleges: 186 (after 2007)

NAAC Accreditation
200

Eligible Colleges:

174

150 100 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Series1 Series2

Accredited:
Re-accredited:

114
34

Linear (Series2)

NAAC Accreditation

186
34 111

174

Eligible Coll Accredited Re-acc Not eligible

Quality concerns
More than 50% Colleges not eligible for NAAC A&A More than 50% Colleges to wait for 5 or more years Colleges first to get 2(f) & 12 (B) status Waiting period for Quality Assessment Are IQACs really functional???

??

Q
CEQE

Q
NAAC
Quality & Excellence

CEQE
Practices & Procedures

The Quality Wheel

IQAC CEQE

SQAC
NAAC

Synergy
NAAC
LoI IEQA
SSR

As-is As-is-to-be

Back 2 Back

Perspective Plan

Peer Team
Accreditation Re-accreditation

HYR AR Evaluation

CEQE

CEQE
RJD
Colleges

QFs SQAC

CEQE Roadmap
5. Submission of Halfyearly Progress Report 4. Colleges prepare the Perspective Plan : As-is-to-be Report

6. Submission of Annual Reports

Continuous Evaluation for Quality & Excellence

3. Sharing the As-is Report

7. Annual Evaluation and Grading by the Department

2. As-is Analysis

1. Preparation of Manuals and Training the Quality Facilitators

NAAC METHODOLOGY

7 Criteria

1000
196 Indicators

36 Key Aspects

NAAC Criteria- 7
Curricular Aspects 50 Points Teaching-Learning & Evaluation 450 Points Research, Consultancy & Extension- 100 Points Infrastructure & Learning Resources 100 Pints Student Support & Progression 100 Points Governance & Leadership 150 Points

1000 Points

Innovative Practices 50 Points

NAAC Criteria- 7
Curricular Aspects 5 Aspects 25 Indicators Teaching-Learning & Eva. 6 Aspects- 32 Indicators Res, Cons & Extension- 6 Aspects 36 Indicators Infras & Learning Res 6 Aspects 43 Indicators Stu Supp & Progre 4 Aspects 18 Indicators Governance & Leadership 6 Aspects 30 Indicators

1000 Points

Innovative Practices 3 Aspects 12 Indicators

Sample of Curricular Aspects

Curricular Aspects Weighta Key ge aspect Grade Points 10 3 2 KAGP Total Weighta Grade ge Points 10x3 15x2 30 30

1 Curriculum Design & Development 2 Academic flexibility 15

145/50 =2.9 GPA

3 Feedback on 10 Curriculum 4 Curriculum Update 05

5 Best Practices in curricular aspects Total 10 50

4
3 3

10x4
5x3 10x3

40
15 30 145

CEQE - Criteria
TeachingLearning
Practices & Procedures

Other Facilities
Facilities for Learning

CEQE

Student Services

Putting systems in place

356 Colleges to set up IQACs IQACs to be rejuvenated - Functional

CEQE

Regional Joint Directorates to oversee Eligible Colleges to submit AQARs in addition to CEQE 356 Colleges to host College Web-sites Colleges to be evaluated in phased manner from 2012

CEQE grading to form the basis for NAAC A&A

QFs Training & Consultative Meeting

Developing Methodology As-is & As-is-to-be
Continuous Evaluation for Quality & Excellence

QFs Training

Our context
Accredited Colleges

Non 2(f) and 12(B) Colleges

DCE

Not Accredited Colleges

Accredited but not Re-accredited Colleges

Instrument to make room for

Young Colleges Well established Colleges with A and B with more than 2.7 CGPA Colleges with 2(f) & 12 (B) status Colleges that doesnt have buildings of their own Identify uniqueness of Colleges

Criteria wise WeightagePoints

Criteria-I
Criteria Criteria-I Weightage 175

Criteria-II
20% 35% Criteria-IV 15% Criteria-V Criteria-III

Criteria-II Criteria-III
Criteria-IV Criteria-V

50 100
75 100

10%

20%

CEQE Roadmap
5. Submission of Half-yearly Progress Report 4. Colleges prepare the Perspective Plan : As-is-to-be Report 6. Submission of Annual Reports

Continuous Evaluation for Quality & Excellence

3. Sharing the As-is Report

7. Annual Evaluation and Grading by the Department

2. As-is Analysis

1. Preparation of Manuals and Training the Quality Facilitators

Continuous Evaluation for Quality and Excellence format

Part-I:Profile of the College: Part-II: Criteria-wise Instrument Part-III:
Strengths of the College: Areas of concern: Benchmarks recommended Quality Facilitators Remarks

Thank you Lets work now