MAIN CONCEPT

IDT views deception through theoretical lens of interpersonal communication Deception considers as interactive process between sender and receiver. IDT focuses on dyadic, relational, and dialogic nature. -dyadic comm; comm between two people. -relational comm; comm in which meaning is created by two people simultaneously filling the roles as sender and receiver. -dialogic activity; active communicative language between sender and receiver.

 The dyadic, relational, and dialogic activity can be use between therapist and patient relies upon honest if patient to recover. IDT's model of how deception is played out in interpersonal contexts is presented in the form of 18 empirically verifiable propositions. each proposition is capable of generating testable hypotheses The propositions able to explain the cognitions and behaviors of sender and receiver during each phase of the iterative process of deception.

 All the propositions are divided under this sub topics - The Superordinate Role of Context and Relationship - Other Communication-Relevant Preinteraction Factors - Effects of Preinteraction Features on Senders Initial Detection Apprehension and Deception Displays - Effects of Preinteraction Features and Initial Interaction on Receiver Cognitions - Interative Interactional Patterns - Postinteraction Outcomes

RECEIVERS ROLE IN IDT

most important of which is how the deceiver manages his or her verbal and nonverbal cues according to IDT, the more socially aware a receiver is, the better he or she is at detecting deceit. common mistakes are, social contract that people will be honest with one another and believe others will be honest with them. sender prepares the receiver to accept his or her information as truth, even if some or part of the dialogue is false.

EMOTION IN IDT
Plays a central role in IDT as a motivator and a result of deception. Emotion can be a motivator of deception, as the sender relies on relevant knowledgeinformational, relational, and behavioral familiarity Emotion can result of deception, as a physical response occurs within the sender, usually in the form of arousal and negative affect such

Emotional Leakage
Emotion in deception is clear most overtly in nonverbal signals Some studies have shown over 90% of emotional meaning is communicated nonverbally Fortunately, humans are highly sensitive to body signals. Leakage refers to communicative incidents in which nonverbal signals betray the true content of contradictory verbal messages. Examples of leakage :

Facial Expression
Eight basic emotions are communicated through facial expression: anger, fear, sadness, joy, disgust, curiosity/interest, surprise and acceptance generally recognized across cultures. There are two main "routes" through which these expressions are developed: "route one", held to be innate, and "route two", which depends on processes of socialization

Gaze
People use eye contact to signal threat, intimacy and interest. used to regulate turn-taking in conversation and is a key factor in deciding how interested the receiver is in what the sender is saying Receivers usually look about 70-75% of the time, with each gaze averaging 7.8 seconds. If receivers look only 15% of the time, they might considered cold, pessimistic, cautious, defensive, immature and evasive

Touch

Touch can be a valuable means of reassurance and demonstrating understanding Those who touch others are seen as having enhanced status, assertiveness and warmth, while those who are touched are seen as having less.

APPLICATIONS IN AVIATIONS
Most practice by licensed aircraft engineers to detect or trace the guilty person that responsible for that mistakes. Also widely practice by airport officer to detect and trace peoples with bad intentions such as terrorist and drug smuggler. Can be practice by head of department or group to detect whether his or her staffs is lying or be honest so further actions can be taken towards the guilty persons.

CRITICISM AND FUTURE

DePaulo, Ansfield, and Bell question the theoretical status of IDT. They write, We cannot find the 'why' question in Buller and Burgoon's synthesis. There is no intriguing riddle or puzzle that needs to be solved, and no central explanatory mechanism is ever described Applaud Buller and Burgoons 18 propositions as a comprehensive description but fault the propositions for lacking the interconnectedness and predictive power necessary to qualify as a unifying theory They also criticize IDT failing to distinguish between interactive communication, which emphasizes the situational and contextual aspects of communicative exchanges.