Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
TITLE: Environment Disaster: Fukushima Tsunami and Nuclear Plant Disaster March 2011
By
Date:29/12/2012
*
NO 1 CONTENT BACKGROUND SLIDE NO. 3
2
3 4 5 6
SUMMARY
CAUSES IMPACT COSTS LESSON LEARNED
4
5-6 7-10 11-12 13-17
7
8
18-19
20
BACKGROUND
Fukushima nuclear power plant Owned by TEPCO, Tokyo Electric power
Company
suffered major damage from the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that hit Japan on March 11, 2011 and, as of December 2012, is not
expected to reopen.
SUMMARY
A massive 9.0 magnitude earthquake hit northeast japan on 11 March 2011, Friday. It causing dozens of deaths, more than 80 fires, and a 10meter tsunami along parts of the countrys coastline. Unfortunately, the earthquake and tsunami knocked down the backup power systems of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant that were needed to cool the reactors at the plant, causing three of them to undergo fuel melting,
4 hydrogen explosions, and radioactive releases.
CAUSES
Magnitude of 9.0 earthquake hits. Initiate 14-meter high tsunami Happen of Fukushima nuclear plant disaster
Human factors
TEPCO expected the power plant to withstand earthquakes with magnitudes reaching 8.2 to 8.6. The plant is built to withstand a maximum water height of 5.7 meters in the case of a tsunami. The facilities sit on bluffs 4.3 to 6.3 meters above this expected high-water mark. But in March, the 14meter-high tsunami waves overwhelmed the protective seawall and crippled the Fukushima plant. The one-two punch of the quake and tsunami, however, wrecked Fukushimas electric grid.
Geographical location
Nuclear facilities should be in areas not prone to natural hazards. But here we face a paradoxical situation: Nuclear power plants are there to generate electricity, which means they cannot be too far from centre's of populations and industrial activity, and these are largely located in world regions prone to natural hazards of one sort or another.
6
IMPACT OF TSUNAMI
Burning and explosion
The electric supply was shut down abruptly during the attack of tsunami and earthquake. Thus causing many residential and industrial area facing threat of burning and explosion.
Flash flood
The tsunami had bring in terrible amount of sea water into Fukushima in a short time thus causing floods around the disaster area. Many places including residential area, industrial area and even airport also flooding.
Human casualties
Many people were die and missing after the attack of Tsunami in Fukushima. A lot of residents were lost their homeland and properties.
Economic losses
A lots of companies and factories were destroyed in Fukushima Tsunami. Causing economical activities in Fukushima suspended indefinitely. 8
Deficit of economies
Japan is synonymous of many foods such as vegetables, beef, and etc. News of radioactive pollution on Japans production was disrupt the export industries of Japan. This was cause Japan lose a great amount of moneys. 10
COST
COST DEAD INJURED MISSING PEOPLE EVACUATED AMOUNT > 16000 people > 6000 people > 3700 people > 350,000 people
11
COST HOUSES DESTROYED ESTIMATED MONEY LOSS PEOPLE REMAIN EVACUATED ESTIMATED RECOVERY PERIOD
AMOUNT > 200,000 homes > 100,000 billion US dollars > 80,000 people > 10 years
12
1.
Can we produce nuclear energy without running the risk of irradiating people?
In theory, it may be possible: A large number of nuclear reactors have been operating
for decades and as far as we know, nuclear accidents have seldom occurred.
Nonetheless, such accidents have happened and can happen again. Indeed, given the reputation that Japan has for its management style, attention to details and advanced technology, the Fukushima accident suggests we cannot mitigate the risk entirely whether on the technological or management level. The current situation thus highlights the danger of nuclear accidents in other and especially in less prepared parts of the world now and in the future. This in turn highlights the critical role of international supervision in the nuclear sector globally, and enforcement of higher nuclear safety regulations on the national level.
13
2. Improvement of prevention structure There are many concrete sea walls around much of the Japanese coastline. However Japans concrete sea walls were not built to handle such high waves. The concrete seawalls in many places in Japan are about 10 meters, that's about 33 feet. In Sendai, they were about three meters, that's about 10 feet. So that shows you that at least in that area they were not expecting such a sizeable wave because they would have built a higher seawall.
14
3. Mitigation of risks
We also try to mitigate risks, by, for example, having plants shut down when an earthquake strikes, as Japans automated system does. But again, Fukushima
shows that the system isnt perfect: The nuclear disaster occurred after the
facility had already been shut down. On the day of the earthquake, three of the plants six units were not operating
(shut down for routine maintenance) and the other three units were shut down
by an automated system that sensed strong ground shaking. The Fukushima disaster has awakened the public to the fact that nuclear plants, even if not operating, require 24/7 maintenance because the radioactive fuels rods (even the spent rods) still release huge amount of heat and should thus be kept cool and safe.
15
underground storage, thousands of tons of spent fuel rods are sitting on the
ground at hundreds of nuclear plants around the world and are kept cool by water; how safe are they from natural hazards? Or for that matter, how safe are they from people who may be up to no good? These are important questions that the public needs to ask and officials must clarify. Nevertheless, we can see that how weak are human in front of radioactive pollution. Hence, the reliability and safety of nuclear power generation should be redefined.
16
Asia and Africa. Japan and the U.S. both import the bulk of their
uranium from overseas. So if more countries go nuclear, the price of uranium will rise because of increased demand.
17
Hence, Japan is said to be the most well-prepared countries on earth in terms of tsunami warning.
References
1. http://learningenglish.voanews.com/content/japans-early-warning-systemone-of-the-best-in-the-world-118258934/116824.html 2. http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/voices-nuclear-plants-and-naturaldisasters-fukushimas-fallout 3. 4. 5. 6. http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/voices-what-happened-fukushima http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/03/earthquake-in-japan/100022/ http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/fukushima_accident_inf129.html http://earthquake-report.com/2011/03/16/catdat-estimated-direct-lossafter-japan-tsunami-100-billion-us/ 7. http://www.fas.orgsgpcrsnukeR41694
20