Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2 Thumb rules
3 Introduction
CONTENTS
4 Tube Sheet Details 5 Tube To Tube Sheet Joint 6 Tube Sheet To Tube Sheet Joint 7 Requirement Of Mock Up 8 Mock Up Testing
6.1 DIM. Report of Mock Up 6.2 Expn. Record of Mock Up 6.3 Pull Out Record of Mock Up
1
INFORMATION ON DOUBLE TUBE SHEET HEAT EXCHANGERS
HEAT EXCHANGERS
Distributes axial load. Distributes radial thermal expansion loads . The interconnecting element is capable of preventing individual radial growth of tubesheet.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Element is rigid enough to mutually transfer all thermal and mech. radial loads between t/sheets. Tubes are rigid enough to mutually transfer all mechanical and thermal axial loads between the tubesheets
BUSINESS TRANSITION THE ROAD AHEAD 4
HEAT EXCHANGERS
Distributes axial load between tubesheets by means of cylinder. The effect of differential radial growth between t/s is a major factor in tube stresses and spacing between t/sheets
ASSUMPTION:
Interconnecting cylinder and tubes are rigid enough to mutually transfer all mech. and thermal axial loads between the tubesheets.
BUSINESS TRANSITION THE ROAD AHEAD 5
HEAT EXCHANGERS
The tube sheets are connected only by inter connecting tubes. The effect of differential radial growth between t/s is a major factor in tube stresses and spacing between t/sheets
ASSUMPTIONS:
2
THUMB RULES IN STREAM
ALLOCATIONS
HEAT EXCHANGERS
The higher pressure fluid normally flows through the tube side. With smaller diameter and nominal wall thk. the tubes are better able to accept high pressures. Thus larger diameter is avoided for larger pressures. Generally corrosive fluids are in the tubeside. This is much less expensive to use the special alloys designed to resist corrosion for tubes than for shell. Flow of higher fouling fluids through the tubes are easier to clean using common mech. methods than the shell .
HEAT EXCHANGERS
It is best to place fluids requiring low pressure drops in the shell circuit since flexible combinations & configurations- affecting tube pitch, baffle use and spacing, and multiple nozzles etc can be used when laying out the shell circuit.
The fluid with lower heat transfer coeff. normally goes in the shell circuit with this setup, low-fin tubing, which will increase available surface area,can be used to offset the low heat transfer.
3
INTRODUCTION
10
HEAT EXCHANGERS
INTRODUCTION
Usually we come across inspection of straight tube and U tube Heat Exchangers with single Tube sheet at either ends or single Tube sheet at one end(U tube HE). TEMA provides option for using Double Tube sheet HE to get a better contamination-proof joint.( ref.TEMA RCB pg.55-62) Such design of exchangers are popular in Pharma industries where intermixing of shell side and tube side fluid are totally to be avoided for process reasons. It would be worthwhile attempting to describe how the double tube sheet avoids intermixing. Pl. refer the figure.
11
HEAT EXCHANGERS
INTRODUCTION
12
HEAT EXCHANGERS
INTRODUCTION
13
HEAT EXCHANGERS
INTRODUCTION
HCL Hydrogenation Heater for Reliance Industries Limited ,Hazira PROCESS FLUID:- SHELL SIDE - HCL / TUBE SIDE - STEAM* U Tube Double Tube sheet HE.
DIMENSIONS :
MATERIAL :
Shell / Dish end SA 516 Gr 70 Tube sheet SA 350 Gr LF2 46mm & 71mm ThK U Tubes SA 334 Gr 6 19.05 OD x 2.77 mm thk
* SINCE THE PROCESS FLUID WAS STEAM, CUSTOMER CONFIRMATION OF IBR WAS SOUGHT.
14
4
TUBE SHEET DETAILS
15
HEAT EXCHANGERS
16
5
TUBE TO TUBE SHEET JOINT
17
HEAT EXCHANGERS
Tube SA 334 Gr 6 Size 19.05mmx 2.77 mm Thk Fully expanded joint. 8 to 10% expansion % Thinning check and air test after expansion.
18
6
TUBE SHEET TO TUBE SHEET
JOINT
19
HEAT EXCHANGERS
Full penetration joint with 25 mm gap in between the Tube sheets. NDT as per drawing MPI NDT suggested PT and UT in addition to MPI.
20
7
REQUIREMENT OF MOCK UP
21
HEAT EXCHANGERS
REQUIREMENT OF MOCK UP
WHY THE MOCK UP WAS REQUIRED TO BE DONE: ( TEMA DOESNT CALL FOR SUCH TESTS FOR U-TUBE EXCHANGERS)
To establish expansion parameters. To check % thinning after expansion To check axial load (pull out ) of tubes after expansion.
To check proper flow of tube material in the T/s grooves after expansion.
To freeze the sequence of the expansion of the T/s to Tube joint.
SINCE TUBE SHEET ASSLY HAD DOUBLE EXPN. PORTION, IT WAS ESSENTIAL TO DEMONSTRATE THE EXPANSION ACHIEVED IN THE INNER TUBESHEET.
22
8
MOCK UP TESTING
23
HEAT EXCHANGERS
MOCK UP TESTING
Tube sheets with same configuration as required in job. 17 No of holes used. Pull out test carried out on Hole nos. 4,9&14 ,surrounded by at least two rows.
After satisfactory expansion, the joint with annular space was seal welded first and then subjected to pneumatic test at 2.0 kg/cm2(g). pressure followed by hydro test at 33.0 kg/cm2(g) and the results were leak tight.
24
8.1
HEAT EXCHANGERS
25
8.2
HEAT EXCHANGERS
26
8.3
HEAT EXCHANGERS
27
8.4
HEAT EXCHANGERS
The pull out loads were found to be satisfactory when the tests were done :-
1. 2.
Required load - 56 kn actual 80 kn Macro test was conducted after sectioning to confirm the proper flow of tube material in the grooves after expansion, the flow of material was satisfactory.
3.
Hardness test were done on the inner expanded & unexpanded surface of the tube and was with in 187 bhn.
28
9
PROBLEMS INCURRED
29
9.1
HEAT EXCHANGERS
PROBLEMS INCURRED
REQUIREMENT OF EXTRA LONG DIAL BORE GAGE FOR THE INNER TUBESHEET:
In mock up stage , both ends of the tube sheets were accessible and hence it was easy to check % expansion in both the tube sheets separately. In actual job, only one end was accessible. So it required a long bore gauge to check the expansion. Since the fabricator was not having the long bore gauge,expansion of the outer T/s was checked and reported. The same was referred to client for concurrence and was accepted by them based on satisfactory mock up results.
30
9.1
HEAT EXCHANGERS
BV insisted the above requirement for the T/S TO T/Sheet weld joint Due to the joint geometry, radiography could not be realised. UT was the next suggested alternative. Again due to joint configuration /lesser width of joint & limitation of scanning area only a small portion could be examined leaving out the critical root penetration. To counter this, special care for the root pass was undertaken by keeping 3 visible ports for examining the root penetration visually. The root penetration was found satisfactory. As per approved QAP only MP examination was specified for this joint and hence accepted on this basis.
31
9.2
HEAT EXCHANGERS
BV INSPECTION REPORT
32
9.2
BV INSPECTION REPORT
HEAT EXCHANGERS
CONTD..
33
10
CUSTOMERS CONCURRENCE
34
10
HEAT EXCHANGERS
CUSTOMERS CONCURRENCE
35
11
CONCLUSION
36
11
HEAT EXCHANGERS
CONCLUSION
TEMA does not give too much details about such type of Double T/s HE.
Maximum care was taken to do all possible testing and checks to establish fool proof joint.
Still a better version of checks and testing may be possible. Any additional information and experience on this topic is welcome.
37