Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
F.M.E.A.
Power Solutions ABSL STM Quality Limited 2007
Introduction
What is an F.M.E.A.?
Why do we need it? When do we do it? What do we do when its finished?
STM Quality Limited
might go wrong. By using a structured method, results can be quantified and hence compared.
eliminating product and process concerns and help prevent problems from occurring.
Purpose
Utilise individuals
knowledge and skills within a team environment Identify potential failures at the earliest possible stage of new design/process
manufacturing or in-service activity F.M.E.A.s are modular and can be carried out for single parts or large assemblies
F.M.E.A. - Types
System
Design FMEA
Sub-System Component
System
Process FMEA
Assembly
Manufacturing
Sub-System Component
STM Quality Limited
alternatives Aids in initial Design for Manufacture Increases probability of detecting failure modes and their effects Provides additional information for testing requirements Helps identify critical and significant characteristics Helps validate test methods
STM Quality Limited
modes which will effect internal/external customers Reduces costs of repairs due to faulty process methodology Increases efficiency Establishes a priority system for considering corrective actions Identifies confirmed critical and significant characteristics
STM Quality Limited
F.M.E.A
Identifies Risks
Control Plan
F.M.E.A. Model
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Generating F.M.E.A.s
Who initiates?
Who prepares? Who updates? Who is FMEA customer?
When to discard?
Managing F.M.E.A.s
updated when: Modification to a component, process or system is planned; Component is to be used in new environment; Customer concern arises.
Process F.M.E.A.s
Op.10 Preparation
Op.20 Mould
Op.30 Weld
Op.40 assemble
Store/Pack
Op.50.1
Op.50.2
Op.50.3
STM Quality Limited
Process/Function Requirements
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Process/Function Requirements
From Process flow:
analysed i.e. Place part on trim machine fixture; Indicate the purpose of the process being analysed i.e. Fully seat part in correct orientation; List separately other operations involved with that process; Process function contains both product and process characteristics.
STM Quality Limited
Process Purpose
Op.50 Trim
Locate part on fixture - correct Place part on trim machine fixture Op.50.1 orientation - fully seated
before packing
STM Quality Limited
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Failure Mode
Definition: Potential failure mode is the manner in which the process could potentially fail to meet the process requirements and/or design intent. It is a description of the non-conformance at that specific operation.
Failure Mode
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Definition: The effects of the failure mode on the customer. The customer could be the next operation, subsequent operations or the final customer / user.
Identify potential effects on: next user downstream user ultimate customer vehicle operation operator safety Compliance with government regulations machines / equipment
STM Quality Limited
Effects of Failure
Failure mode
Next user
Downstream Ultimate Vehicle Operator Government users customer operation safety regulations
Effects of Failure
Failure mode: Incorrect Trim Programme
Failure mode
Next user
Incorrect to checking fixture
Downstream Ultimate Vehicle Operator Government users customer operation safety regulations
Packaged in wrong stillage Cannot fit to vehicle. Stop Production line Cannot fit to vehicle None None
Severity
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Severity
Definition: An assessment of the seriousness of the effect of the potential failure mode on the customer.
None
No Effect
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
CRITICAL: Requirements that affect compliance with government regulations or safe vehicle / product function and require special controls (Score = 9 or 10)
SIGNIFICANT: Product and/or test requirements important for customer satisfaction, summarized on Control Plan and require special controls (Score = 5 to 8,)
Cause
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Cause
Definition: Potential cause of a failure is defined as how the failure could occur in terms of something that can be corrected or controlled.
Cause
Occurrence
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Occurrence
Historical manufacturing/assembly failure rates with similar parts Statistical data from similar process Existing process controls Customer concern data Rejects, PPM, Warranty data
STM Quality Limited
Moderate
6 5 4
Remote
Controls
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Controls
Controls
In Process Control column on FMEA: Prevention Controls Place a P before each prevention control listed Detection Controls Place a D before each detection control listed
STM Quality Limited
Prevention Controls
Detection Controls
Detection
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Detection
Definition: Detection is an assessment of the probability that: The process controls listed will detect a potential cause /mechanism (process weakness) , or The process controls listed will detect a subsequent failure mode.
STM Quality Limited
Likelihood of Detection
Process control will not and/or cannot detect a potential cause or there is no process control Moderately high chance the process control will detect potential cause
Moderate
Almost certain
Occurrence
Detection
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
questions:
What might go wrong?
What effect would this have?
How do we calculate the R.P.N.? We simply use the scoring criteria easily
remembered by:
Severity = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Occurrence = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Detection = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Each of these could be assessed in a rating from 1 to 10.
STM Quality Limited
overall risk?
priority numbers
worst problems those with the highest R.P.N. With limited resources, this must be a good idea We can now eliminate or reduce the potential failure
Recommended Actions
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Recommended Actions
The intent of any Recommended Action is to reduce rankings in the following order:
Severity Occurrence Detection
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Responsibility
member should be assigned responsibility for communication and feedback of action with a target date.
Actions Taken
Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
___ System ___ Subsystem ___ Component Model Year / Vehicle(s): Core Team: Item Potential Failure Mode Potential Effect(s) of Failure S e v C l a s s Potential Cause(s)/ Mechanisms Failure O c c u r Design Responsibility: Key Date:
Orig):
Function
D e t e c
R P N
Recommended Action(s)
Actions Taken
S e v
O c c
D R e P t N
Actions Taken
estimate and record the resulting severity, occurrence and detection rankings Calculate and record the resulting R.P.N. P.F.M.E.A. team must review the revised R.P.N.s to determine if further action is necessary. If no action write None.
Actions Taken
estimated values, the future, becomes the present and can be incorporated into the LHS of the form on the next F.M.E.A.
Advantages of F.M.E.A.s
Customer confidence
Improved quality & efficiency
boundaries
personnel/process knowledge to improve new & existing work Provides a vehicle for continuous improvement Supports product liability
STM Quality Limited
F.M.E.A.s Product Liability Need for in-depth product & process or design knowledge
there will be differing interpretations regarding to the failure modes and rankings - this does not matter, provided that the team does not get bogged down in this way!
sharp!
Design F.M.E.A. team - Chairman,