Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Strategic Alignment
Attaining the appropriate structure and capabilities to
IT-Business Alignment is: NOT an event A process of continuous adaptation and change
business objectives
IS Strategy Lens
IS Role
Efficient, Comprehensive, Opportunistic Outsourcing, In-sourcing, Selective Sourcing Centralized, Shared, Decentralized
IS Sourcing
IS Structure
Alpha
Started in 1976 as an equipment sales company
Became independent equipment leaser in 1983 Net worth: $25 Million (1986) to $100 Million (1996) Low level of Alignment to start with Trajectories:
Prospector Defender (Paradoxical Decision) Defender Prospector (Uncertain Turnaround)
Consequence:
Still groping (at the time of the case); senior managers seriously
worried!
Alpha - Analysis
Operated in a decentralized fashion
IS personnel isolated from the business functions Ignored the impact of the Tax Reform Act Failed to recognize the decline in mainframes
Conclusions: Failed due to oscillating IS strategies Partial alignment achieved over years Still Struggling (at the time of the case)
Beta
Diversified Australian company
Consequence: Net Earnings Per Share increased by 20% from 1996 to 1997
Beta - Analysis
Recognized the competitive threats and switched the business
(shared structure)
Gamma
US subsidiary of a multinational corporation
Trajectories:
Defender Analyzer (Paradoxical Decision and Excessive Transform.) Realigned IS strategy to Analyzer
Consequence:
Uncertain turnaround in Period 3 towards the IS strategy of Period 1 caused
Gamma - Analysis
Increased competition and dipping financials led to hiring a
Pragmatics of Alignment