Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Organizational Behavior
What are Organizations?
Understand
organizational
events
Organizational
Behavior
Research
Influence Predict
organizational organizational
events events
Trends: Globalization
Employability
“New deal” employment relationship
Continuously learn new skills
Contingent work
No contract for long-term employment
Free agents, temporary-temporaries
Minimum hours of work vary
Employability vs Job Security
Multidisciplinary
Anchor
Systematic
Open Systems Organizational Research
Anchor Anchor
Behavior
Anchors
Multiple Levels
Contingency
of Analysis
Anchor
Anchor
Open Systems Anchor of OB
Feedback Feedback
Subsystem Subsystem
Subsystem Subsystem
Knowledge Management Defined
Group Level
•
•
Working With Others Workplace
Workforce Diversity
Individual Level
• Job Satisfaction
• Empowerment
• Behaving Ethically
The Rigour of OB
Systematic Study
Looking at relationships, attempting to attribute causes and
effects and drawing conclusions based on scientific evidence
Behaviour is generally predictable
There are differences between individuals
There are fundamental consistencies
There are rules (written & unwritten) in almost every setting
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field
Psychology
Sociology
Social Psychology
Anthropology
Political Science
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field
(cont’d)
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field (cont’d)
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field (cont’d)
Contributing Disciplines to the OB Field (cont’d)
Summary and Implications
Positive Attributes
Facilitated job specialization and mass production.
Demonstrated to managers their role in enhancing
performance and productivity.
Negative Attributes
Labor opposed scientific management because its explicit goal
was to get more output from workers.
Critics argued that Taylor’s methods and ideas would
dehumanize the workplace and reduce workers to little more
than drones.
Theorists later argued that Taylor’s views of employee
motivation were inadequate and narrow.
The Historical Roots of Organizational
Behavior
Henri Fayol
French executive and engineer.
Lyndall Urwick
British executive.
Max Weber
German Sociologist.
Proposed a “bureaucratic” form of structure based on logic,
rationality, and efficiency that was assumed to be the most
efficient (universal) approach to structuring for all
organizations.
The Emergence of Organizational Behavior
Legacy of Scientific Management and Classical
Organizational Theory
Rationality, efficiency, and standardization were the central
themes of both scientific management and classic organization
theory.
The roles of individuals and groups in organizations were
either ignored or given only minimal attention.
The Hawthorne Studies (1927–1932)
Focused attention on the role of human behavior in the
workplace.
Led directly to the emergence of organizational behavior as a
field of study.
The Hawthorne Studies (1927–1932)
x Contingency
Variables y
The Independent Variables
Independent
Variables
x
The Dependent Variables (cont’d)
The Dependent Variables (cont’d)
The Dependent Variables (cont’d)
The Dependent Variables (cont’d)