Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Response to Intervention/Prevention
Primary
Early Intervention
Prevention
Literacy Universal
Screening
ALIGNMENT
Wraparound Multi-tiered
Support
MathEarly
Intervention
MEMBERSHIP
Common Common
Experience Vision/Values
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
SCHOOL-WIDE Individualized
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR Systems for Students
SUPPORT ~5% with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
~15%
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Primary Prevention:
School-/Classroom-
Wide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
27
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
TERTIARY PREVENTION
TERTIARY PREVENTION
•• Function-based support
•• Wraparound
~5% • Person-centered planning
••
•
~15%
SECONDARY
SECONDARY PREVENTION
PREVENTION
•• Check in/out
•• Targeted social skills instruction
•• Peer-based supports
•• Social skills club
••
PRIMARY PREVENTION
PRIMARY PREVENTION
•• Teach SW expectations
• Proactive SW discipline
•• Positive reinforcement
•• Effective instruction
• Parent engagement
~80% of Students ••
Supporting Social Competence,
Academic Achievement and Safety
School-wide
PBS OUTCOMES
Supporting
PR
Student
AC
Supporting
TA
Behavior
TI
Decision DA
CE
Making
S
SYSTEMS
Supporting
Staff Behavior
e SWPBS
i d Practices
o l-w
h o Classroom
Sc
• Smallest change
Non-classroom Family
• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
Student
Predictable
Consistent
Positive
Safe
Identify 3-5 Expectations
Short statements
Positive Statements (what to do, not
what to avoid doing)
Memorable
Examples:
Be Respectful, Be Responsible, Be Safe, Be
Kind, Be a Friend, Be-there-be-ready, Hands
and feet to self, Respect self, others,
property, Do your best, Follow directions of
adults
Over 9000 schools involved in SWPBS
◦ Pre-school 117
◦ Elementary 5669
◦ Middle Schools 1943
◦ High Schools 931
◦ K to (8-12) 124
◦ Alternative/JJ 344
Number of Schools
States
Illinois
Scott Spaulding, Claudia Vincent
Pbis.org/evaluation/evaluation briefs
Hawaii
Illinois
School-wide PBS is “evidence-based”
◦ Reduction in problem behavior
◦ Increases in academic outcomes
Horner et al., 2009
Bradshaw et al., 2006; in press
700
654
600 587
500 520
444
400 394
300 303
200 184
100 120
0 23
Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9/98 9/00 9/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08
PBS slope = -1.15
Heather R. Reynolds
NC Department of Public Instruction
Bob Algozzine
Behavior and Reading Improvement Center
http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/positivebehavior/
State PBS Coordinator
Heather R Reynolds
Dr. Bob Algozzine
Dr. Bob
Algozzine Non-PBS
Comparison
Levels of behavior
risk in schools
implementing
PBS were
comparable to
widely-accepted
expectations and
better than those
in comparison
schools not
systematically
implementing
PBS.
Proportion of Students Meeting State Academic Standard
Dr. Bob
Algozzine
50
0
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007
Existing Schools New Schools
Major Discipline
Referrals
DIBELS
Benchmark
100% Began MiBLSi
90%
Implementation
Percent of students
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
School District
Building an active continuum of support
4
N=223
N=223 N=38 N=38
3 N=17
N=169 N=17
N=169
2
PB PB
1
S S
0
School-wide Individual
Continuum of Support Practices
Early Intervention
Progress Monitoring Collection of data on a
monthly, weekly, daily
rate
implementing what
100%
90%
100
80%
70%
we claim to
60%
80
implement
50%
60
40%
20
10%
0%
0
05-Nov-03
24-Nov-04
05-Nov-03
07-Nov-03
08-Nov-04
01-Nov-03
22-Jan-04
02-Jun-05
03-Jun-05
21-Apr-03
05-Aug-03
01-Feb-05
12-Aug-04
01-Mar-05
12-Sep-02
31-Oct-02
01-Sep-03
05-Aug-03
11-Sep-03
06-Feb-04
01-Mar-04
03-Aug-04
08-Mar-05
23-Feb-04
28-Feb-03
01-Sep-03
Commit Team Self-Assess Expect. Expect. Rewards Violations Info. Function %Items %Total
1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3Define 4 Teach
4 4 4 4System
4 5System
5 5 5 6 6 6 Implemented
7 7 7 7 Points