Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Questions
How do words/sentences have meaning? How do our utterances have meaning? Do our thoughts/intentions determine what our words mean? Does our environment determine what our words mean?
Foundational Semantics
Were focusing, for now, on foundational semantics. We want to figure out how it is that words, sentences and utterances have meaning.
Recap
We saw that Grice argued that our utterances have meanings given speaker intentions. This is a Foundational Semantic Theory.
Externalism
Earth H2O
Theyre psychological duplicates! Both would say water is wet and water is colorless
2. The meaning of a term determines its extension. That is to say, sameness of meaning entails sameness of extension.
The Cases
What do you think? Are you convinced by the arguments? Any objections?
An Objection
Oscar and Twin Oscar are not really psychological duplicates. In having water thoughts Oscar has a water concept. In having twin water thoughts, Oscar has a twinwater concept. These concepts are different. So, the psychological states (beliefs, desires) are different. This is Psychological or Mental Externalism (Burge)
An Objection
What does this mean for the two assumptions? Could meanings be in the head if this is the right way to think?
An Objection
What does this mean for the two assumptions? Could meanings be in the head if this is the right way to think? You might be able to hold onto both assumptions. Knowing a meaning is being in a psychological state. But, that state depends on environmental factors/society. And, meaning still determines extension (although extension kind of determines meaning too..)
Questions
Putnams argument is for natural kind terms. These are terms that pick out elements, chemical kinds, species, and other things that seem to be clearly delineated in the natural world. Will the view work for other kinds of words? table game
money
the
Questions
On Putnams view: Could some meaning be in the head? Could someone ever have an entire meaning in her/his head?
Questions
On Putnams view: Could some meaning be in the head? Could someone ever have an entire meaning in her/his head? This is a question for descriptive semantics. Its a question about what meanings are like. One might think: we all have bits of meanings in our heads. We might know that Curium is a metal and nothing else. Experts might have entire meanings in their heads.
Questions
On Burges View (Psychological/Mental Externalism): Could some meaning be in the head? Could someone ever have an entire meaning in her/his head?
Questions
On Burges View (Psychological/Mental Externalism): Could some meaning be in the head? Could someone ever have an entire meaning in her/his head? Concepts, on this view, are partially externally determined. So, meanings could be in the head although theyre not individual in the way in the head sounds.
Questions
What would Grice say about the Twin Earth case? Would he think that Oscar and Twin Oscar mean different things when they say water is thirstquenching?
Words have meaning through the environment were in (the nature of entities can shape meaning) and through shared knowledge about a kind of thing.
Internalism v. Externalism
Which view is best?