Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
Strategy is basically the creation of missions, setting of organizational objectives with full consideration of external and internal forces, formulation of specific policies to achieve objectives, and the assurances of implementation of the policies with a view to making it certain, and the purposes and objectives of the organization are achieved.
The integrative framework has been offered recently by Yeung and Berman. This framework identifies three paths through which HR practices can contribute to the business performance
Business plans
Enumerates
Identify
Review
Performance Measures
Development Need
Achievements define
Tap Potential
Resource Requirements
Enhances
Results in
INTRODUCTION
Cynthia Fisher has classified strategies into two categories
TRADITIONAL HR VS STRATEGIC HR
A traditional approach to HR was basically managing human resource by specialists in line with the rules and acts of the organization and laws of the land.
A strategic approach places the responsibly for managing people mostly on the line managers who basically manage their people at work.
The aim of strategic HR is to function as a business partner in aligning the HR activities with the business strategy of the organization.
Strategic HRM encompasses all those activities affecting the behavior of individuals in their effort to formulate and implement the strategic needs of the business.
TRADITIONAL HR VS STRATEGIC HR
Traditional HR Accountability Importance HR specialists Managing people to facilitate the activities Strategic HR Line managers & HR specialists HR strategy formulation and implementation in alignment with organizational strategy Strategic business partners Proactive, businessoriented results People ad organizations development in line with the business objectives
Role of HR
Custodian of HR policy implementation and compliance Ritualistic, reactive activities People development
Moreover, unique executive leadership camp and customer orientation programmes of ESSAR during 1997 and 1999 held them to achieve success in enhancing performance in the highly competitive steel market.
He encouraged managers to do the same at lower levels so that workers were also engaged in this dialogue.
The product division in turn were asked to rate the marketing regions in terms of their efforts at promoting and selling their products.
The Indian Oil Corporation, a fortune 500 company, also had adopted HRD as a strategic focus group and a means for strategy implementation in 1983.
The interventions that were adopted by HR managers included improving and strengthening of certain HRM systems like transfer, training, recruitment and performance appraisal.
Basically, the idea states that what is good for one company may not be good for another.
The proper strategy is determined by its unique interval characteristics like organizational dynamics, culture, politics, etc., and its specific environmental opportunities and threats. This is true of companies in the same industry what is right for ESSAR may not be right for Ispat or Jindal, and vice versa.