Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Mergers
Breaking Up
WhyThe business may be worth more outside the company than within HowSell to another company, or to the public, or give it to existing shareholders Tax AspectsAs a rule if you get paid in cash you realize a taxable gain; not otherwise Effect on ShareholdersThe bigger the part sold off, the greater the percentage gain
Pro-active (GM tracking/selling DirectTV) Defensive (ABB selling ABB Cap Lease) Involuntary (ATT breakup, Enron) Examples of each?
Post-acquisition disposals Shift of core business or strategy Underperforming business or mistake Lack of fit, refocus on core business Avoid competing with customers Antitrust compliance Need for funds Market or litigation risk
Tax Consequences
The spin-off and related techniques have the advantage that they can be structured so as to be tax free (USA) Tax Code Section 355 requirements:
Both
the parent company and the spun-off entity must be in business for at least 5 years The subsidiary must be at least 80% owned by the parent
Copyright 2002 Ian H. Giddy
Breaking Up
Breaking up Tax-Free Spin-Off Split-Up Tracking Stock Divestiture Taxable Equity Carve-Out Split-Off IPO Bust-Up
Tax-Free Breakups
Spin-Off
Spin-offspro-rata distribution by a company of all its shares in a subsidiary to all its own shareholders Split-offssome parent-company shareholders receive the subsidiary's shares in return for their shares in the parent Split-upsall of the parent company's subsidiaries are spun off and the parent company ceases to exist Tracking Stockspecial stock issued as dividend: pays a dividend based on the performance of a wholly-owned division
Corporate Financial Restructuring 10
Tracking Stock
Tracking stock, sometimes known as letter stock or alphabet stock, is a class of stock designed to reflect the value and track the performance of a part of the issuer's assets, usually a separate business or group of businesses. Claimed advantages:
preservation
corporation ability of the market to more accurately value the respective businesses of the issuer
Taxable Breakups
Taxable Divestiture Equity Carve-Out Split-Off IPO Bust-Up
Divestituresthe sale of a division of the company to a third party Equity carve-outssome of a subsidiarys shares are offered for sale to the general public
Split-off
Shareholders of the selling firm seem to gain, depending on the fraction sold:
% of firm sold 0-10% 10-50% 50%+ Announcement effect 0 +2.5% +8%
(Seller may gain from more managerial focus, lower WACC, less conglomerate discount)
Value of sub standalone value Value of sub acquisition value to another company
Break-up Computation
PPR with Finaref PPR without Finaref Finaref Standalone Finaref with CA EBITDA 800 500 300 330 Tax rate 40% 40% 40% 40% Beta 1.4 1 1.6 1.6 Growth rate 3.50% 2.50% 4% 4.50% Equity 8,000 6,000 3,000 3,500 Debt 7,000 5,000 0 0 Risk Free 3% 3% 3% 3% Mkt Risk Premium 7% 7% 7% 7% Debt spread 3% 2% 4% 2% Re 12.80% 10.00% 14.20% 14.20% Rd 6.00% 5.00% 7.00% 5.00% WACC 8.51% 6.82% 14.20% 14.20% Enterprise PV 16,538 11,868 3,059 3,555 Equity PV 9,538 6,868 3,059 3,555 Additional Gains/losses 1,187 0 - 1,400 Choice 9,538 11,114 10,155
Source: breakup.xls
5 Restructuring Framework 4
Disposal/ Acquisition opportunities
Operating improvements
3
Potential value with internal improvements
$ 635
Company value as is
Strategic and operating opportunities
2
Restructuring Framework
$ 1,635
$ 300
$ 10
3
Potential value with internal improvements
$ 1,275 Disposal/ Acquisition opportunities
Eg Increase D/E
$ 350
Copyright 2002 Ian H. Giddy
Marriott
The Choice the decision of whether to split Marriott Corp. into two companies--Marriott International and Host Marriott The Situation decline in real estate values has a significant percentage of assets in hotels it had planned to sell difficult for Marriott to pursue growth strategies market price of the company had declined significantly
Copyright 2002 Ian H. Giddy
Marriott: Assignment
Will this type of reorganization meaningfully improve the company? What are the different way of effecting break-ups? In the Marriott case, are there reasonable alternative approaches? Draw up a spreadsheet comparing the before-and-after capital structure of Marriott and its proposed component parts How are bondholders affected? How can they protect their interests? Make a recommendation, and justify it.
Corporate Financial Restructuring 19
Marriott Corp.
Marriott Intl.
Intangibles Franchises
Management Services
Distribution Services Timeshares
Marriott: Breaking Up
Breaking up Tax-Free Spin-Off Split-Up Tracking Stock Divestiture Taxable Equity Carve-Out Split-Off IPO Bust-Up
Marriott Corp. Marriott Intl Host Marriott Long-term debt 2732 378 2362 LYONs 228 205.2 22.8 Convertible preferred 200 200 Shareholders' equity 585 524 61 Total long-term capital 3745 1107.2 2645.8 Long-term debt/Total 73% 34% 89%
Corporate Restructuring
Divestiturea reverse acquisitionis evidence that "bigger is not necessarily better" Going privatethe reverse of an IPO (initial public offering)contradicts the view that publicly held corporations are the most efficient vehicles to organize investment.
Contact Info
Ian H. Giddy NYU Stern School of Business Tel 212-998-0426; Fax 212-995-4233 Ian.giddy@nyu.edu http://giddy.org