Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
&
Energy Systems
INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS
by
Ekanem Omomen Edet
(e.edet@tees.ac.uk)
Linear Nature of Industrial Systems
Input Output
Industrial System
(Materials, (Waste)
Energy)
Chicken Farm
Gas Tank
Households
Biogas
Digestor
Tea Processing
Fertiliser Market
Rice Paddies
Fish Farm
Fodder
Pig Farm
Industrial Food Web in Fushan Farm in China (Source: Graedel & Harper, 2004)
BIOMIMICRY
Industrial Product
Ecology Design
Industrial Closed
Symbiosis Loop
Business
Model
Renewable
Energy
Is a community of manufacturing
and service businesses seeking
enhanced environmental and
economic performance through
collaboration in managing
environmental and resource issues
including energy, water, and
materials.
(Lowe, 1997)
Reliance on self-organisation
Potential Triple Bottom Line
Exchanges
risks
Industrial Symbiosis Utility Sharing
Joint Management of
Park Facilities
Regional Resource Synergies
Kershaw, John The Recovery and 1928 / 1ST edition / Ernest Benn Limited
Baker Cannington / Use of Industrial 212 pages (London)
chemical
Main English engineer / and Other
language surveys Wastewaste recovery, 1876 – 1976 (Source: Desrochers,
on industrial
British
2005)
Lipsett, Charles
Resource S. / Industrial
Management WastesSystems
& Energy 1963 / 2ND revised Atlas Publishing
Industrial Co.
Symbiosis
Industrial Symbiosis – A History
• 1971 – Forrester, J. “Principles of Systems, 1968
and World Dynamics”
• 1972 – Meadows, D. and Meadows, D. “Limits to
Growth”
• 1972 – Small Japanese group called “Industrial
Ecology Working Group” publish 300 page
document on Industrial Ecology
• 1973 – Same group publish another report with
case studies
• 1977 – The term “Industrial Ecosystem” was first
used in a paper presented by Preston Cloud at the
Annual Meeting of the German Geological
Association
• 1983 – Group of Belgians publish “L’Ecosysteme
Belgique: Essai d’Ecologie Industrielle”
• 1989 – Frosch, R. and Gallopoulous, N., write
“Strategies for Manufacturing”
Type II
ecosystem
component
Type III
ecosystem
component
energy
ecosystem ecosystem
component component
• Is linear
• A large constant supply of raw
materials is required
• This system is unsustainable
Resource Management & Energy Systems Industrial Symbiosis
Allenby, 1992 – Type II
• Is partially cyclic
• Reduced materials and energy required
• Reduced waste produced
• Characterises most present day industrial systems
Waste Flow
Business Broker Manufacturer
roundput diversity
Ecosystem – Environmental win
roundput diversity
Industrial Recycling
(roundput) system –
Use of Environmental win Outputs that
renewables by nature
respecting the tolerates and
renewal rate locality gradual change re-uses
• Roundput
• Locality
• Diversity
• Gradual change
Diversity Diversity
•Biodiversity •Diversity in actors, in
•Diversity in species, interdependency and
organisms cooperation
•Diversity in •Diversity in industrial
interdependency and input, output
cooperation
•Diversity in information
Locality Locality
•Utilising local •Utilising local
resources resources, wastes
•Respecting the local •Respecting the local
natural limiting factors natural limiting factors
•Cooperation between
•Local local actors
interdependency, co-
operation
Benefits
• Reduced transportation
• Boost for local economy
• Enhanced cooperation with local
companies (Public vs Private;
Large corporations vs SMEs)
Drivers:
• Regulations on waste disposal
• Regional economic development
• Lack of natural resources
• Space limitations
• Increase in profit margins
Cooling
Steam
Water
Gas
Gyproc
Plasterboard
Scrubber
Plant
Lake Sludge
Water Asnæs Power
Tissø
Station (coal-fired)
Heat Fish
Farming
Steam
Water
Cement;
Fly ash
roads
Farms Sludge (treated) Novo Nordisk
Pharmaceuticals
• Kalundborg, Denmark
• Styria, Austria
• Landskrona, Finland
• Forth Valley, Scotland
• Tees Valley Petrochemical
Complex, Teesside, UK
• Humberside, UK, etc.