Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BAFI1042 Investment
Reasonable research conducted Critical analysis of a wide scope of issues Issues are discussed in relation to each other Lack proper justification for future outlook Adequate references Proper referencing style
Wide base of research Deep and independent analysis of critical issues/factors related to the company Able to justify the future outlook based on current and historical developments Able to show the relatedness between issues Broad and credible sources of references Proper referencing style
Investment
RMIT University
No systematic demonstration of the Dupont ROE calculation No analysis of individual component in the approach Single year analysis No relation to the current issues No peer analysis
Minimal demonstration of the calculation Minimal analysis of individual component in the approach Minimal relation to current issues Inadequate peer analysis or inappropriate selection of peer company(ies)
Adequate demonstration of the calculation Adequate analysis of individual component in the approach Adequate analysis incorporating current issues and peer analysis
Proper demonstration and clear presentation of the calculation Critical analysis of the individual component and the relatedness between components Critical analysis by raising the key current issues and the relatedness between issues Able to dissect key issues that are specific and non-specific to the company and its peers
Investment
RMIT University
- Calculations
No demonstration of calculations Did not derive own variables, i.e. beta, growth rate or rate of return. Single year analysis No peer analysis
Proper demonstration of calculations Derivation of variables are well justified and assumptions are clear Consistent multi-year analysis
- Peer analysis
No justified comparison between the company and its peer(s) Did not provide proper assumptions for sensitivity analysis
Good comparison between the company and its peer(s) by identifying key specific and nonspecific issues
No sensitivity analysis
Investment
RMIT University
Minimal independent comments Did not identify the appropriateness of the valuation methods and their respective results Lack of conclusive valuation
Adequate independent comments Examined and explained the appropriateness of each valuation method and their respective results in relation to current issues
Critical independent comments Good comparison between the results and other current market analysis Clearly explained and justified the use of each valuation method and their results Considered key current issues and their relatedness
Investment
RMIT University
Notes (1)
This is only an assessment guidelines and does not represent rigid allocation of marks for each category in the table. Reports are assessed using this guidelines, against the requirements (Course Guide) and with considerations of the depth of analysis, presentation and clarity of the overall report. It is important to use credible sources of information for your analysis. Student assignments may be uploaded to turnitin for plagiarism detection.
Investment RMIT University
Notes (2)
Students are responsible for deciding between working in groups or individually. When making this decision, students must consider the pros and cons of each arrangement. For those who choose to work individually, you will forgo the benefits of teamwork; for those who choose to work in groups, your individual contribution will not be assessed separately. Once you have decided on how you want to work on this assignment, no contest to the arrangement will be entertained. No intervention to any group work issues/disputes will be undertaken by the lecturer.
Investment RMIT University