Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

Company Valuation Assignment

BAFI1042 Investment

Assessment Criteria Guidelines (1)


Criteria / Scale Not Demonstrated Marginally Demonstrated Meet requirements appropriately Exceptional

Current Issues (10 marks)

No research basis for analysis Merely reporting secondary information No reference

Minimal research conducted Limited scope of issues presented Limited references

Reasonable research conducted Critical analysis of a wide scope of issues Issues are discussed in relation to each other Lack proper justification for future outlook Adequate references Proper referencing style

Wide base of research Deep and independent analysis of critical issues/factors related to the company Able to justify the future outlook based on current and historical developments Able to show the relatedness between issues Broad and credible sources of references Proper referencing style

Investment

RMIT University

Assessment Criteria Guidelines (2)


Criteria / Scale Not Demonstrated Marginally Demonstrated Meet requirements appropriately Exceptional

Recent Financial Performance (10 marks)

No systematic demonstration of the Dupont ROE calculation No analysis of individual component in the approach Single year analysis No relation to the current issues No peer analysis

Minimal demonstration of the calculation Minimal analysis of individual component in the approach Minimal relation to current issues Inadequate peer analysis or inappropriate selection of peer company(ies)

Adequate demonstration of the calculation Adequate analysis of individual component in the approach Adequate analysis incorporating current issues and peer analysis

Proper demonstration and clear presentation of the calculation Critical analysis of the individual component and the relatedness between components Critical analysis by raising the key current issues and the relatedness between issues Able to dissect key issues that are specific and non-specific to the company and its peers

Investment

RMIT University

Assessment Criteria Guidelines (3)


Criteria / Scale Not Demonstrated Marginally Demonstrated No link to current issues Little analysis of the results derived Did not demonstrate a full understanding of each of the valuation methods Limited demonstration of calculations No justification for deriving the variables Inconsistent time period of analysis Meet requirements appropriately Exceptional Share valuation No research basis for analysis No independent analysis Critical analysis of the results based on key current issues Demonstrate a good understanding of the valuation methods Deep and independent analysis of critical issues/factors related to the company and its environments Able to show the relatedness between issues and results Excellent understanding of the valuation methods Proper demonstration of calculation and clear presentation Assumptions and derivation are tied in clearly with current issues and key factors Consistent multi-year analysis and properly justify for any inclusion or exclusion Clear explanation of peer selection and well-justified comparison of results and issues between the company and its peer(s) Provide proper assumptions and demonstrate extensive sensitivity analysis

- Calculations

No demonstration of calculations Did not derive own variables, i.e. beta, growth rate or rate of return. Single year analysis No peer analysis

Proper demonstration of calculations Derivation of variables are well justified and assumptions are clear Consistent multi-year analysis

- Peer analysis

No justified comparison between the company and its peer(s) Did not provide proper assumptions for sensitivity analysis

Good comparison between the company and its peer(s) by identifying key specific and nonspecific issues

- Sensitivity analysis (60 marks)

No sensitivity analysis

Provide proper assumptions and demonstrate adequate sensitivity analysis

Investment

RMIT University

Assessment Criteria Guidelines (4)


Criteria / Scale Not Demonstrated Marginally Demonstrated Meet requirements appropriately Exceptional

Comments (20 marks)

Merely reporting on results derived in previous section

Minimal independent comments Did not identify the appropriateness of the valuation methods and their respective results Lack of conclusive valuation

Adequate independent comments Examined and explained the appropriateness of each valuation method and their respective results in relation to current issues

Critical independent comments Good comparison between the results and other current market analysis Clearly explained and justified the use of each valuation method and their results Considered key current issues and their relatedness

Investment

RMIT University

Notes (1)
This is only an assessment guidelines and does not represent rigid allocation of marks for each category in the table. Reports are assessed using this guidelines, against the requirements (Course Guide) and with considerations of the depth of analysis, presentation and clarity of the overall report. It is important to use credible sources of information for your analysis. Student assignments may be uploaded to turnitin for plagiarism detection.
Investment RMIT University

Notes (2)
Students are responsible for deciding between working in groups or individually. When making this decision, students must consider the pros and cons of each arrangement. For those who choose to work individually, you will forgo the benefits of teamwork; for those who choose to work in groups, your individual contribution will not be assessed separately. Once you have decided on how you want to work on this assignment, no contest to the arrangement will be entertained. No intervention to any group work issues/disputes will be undertaken by the lecturer.
Investment RMIT University

Вам также может понравиться