Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
host country (Black & Stephens, 1989; Gregersen & Black, 1990). General Adjustment Work Adjustment
Relevance of CCA:
Economic Globalization Migration of specialized work force High Number of Multinational companies based in The Netherlands Approximately 600.000 expats in The Netherlands
Impact of CCA:
Economic Performance, premature ending of expat assignments, work
disability due to psychological problems General well-being stress, burnout, depression, anxiety (Cohen, 1980)
INTRODUCTION
Factors
Traditionally have been considered as reliable predictors of cross-cultural adjustment GFP is a new trend in personality research (Just, 2011; Vander Linden et al. 2010). GFP similar to Spearmans general factor of intelligence
Cultural Intelligence (CQ)
New construct defined as the personas capability for successful adaptation to new cultural settings (Early and Ang, 2003). Based on the theory of multiple loci of intelligence (Sternberg & Detterman, 1986) Strategy CQ Cognitive CQ Motivational CQ Behavioral CQ
INTRODUCTION
Power Distance (PDI) (small vs. large power distance) Individualism (IND) Masculinity vs. Feminism (MAS) Uncertainty Avoidance (weak vs. strong)
RESEARCH MODEL
Cross-Cultural Adjustment General Adjustment
Work adjustment
CQ
Health
GFP
Performance
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Do GFP and CQ significantly predict cross-cultural adaptation? Is CQ a stronger predictor of cross-cultural adaptation than GFP? Does cross-cultural adaptation mediate the relationship between GFP/CQ and individual performance/health? Does cultural distance moderate the relationship between GFP/CQ and cross-cultural adaptation?
METHOD
Participants
200 questionnaires were distributed
91 Expats currently living and working in The Netherlands completed the
Measures
Cultural intelligence (CQ) scale Big Five personality questionnaire CCA scale (General Adjustment, Work Adjustment) Performance Health Cultural Distance
RESULTS
GFP and CQ combined explain 18% variance in general adjustment, 20% in work adjustment. GFP, CQ and general adjustment explain 23% variance in work adjustment. CQ is a significant predictor of general adjustment when CD is high.
t Sig. R
2
Low CD Countries General Adjustment GFP CQ Work Adjustment GFP CQ High CD Countries General Adjustment GFP CQ Work Adjustment GFP CQ
Sig.
R2
General Adjustment Step 1 CQ GFP Work Adjustment Step 1 CQ GFP Work Adjustment Step 1 General Adjustment GFP CQ
.20 .30
1.92 2.92
.06 .00
.18
.28
.47
.16 .35
1.59 3.42
.12 .00
.20
.16
.23
.04
RESULTS
Work Adjustment is a significant predictor of individual performance explaining 13% of variance GFP and Work Adjustment are predictors of individual health explaining 32% variance CQ is not a predictor of individual performance and health
Performance Step 1 General Adjustment Work Adjustment GFP CQ Health Step 1 General Adjustment Work Adjustment GFP CQ
Sig.
.13
.32
CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions
GFP is an important factor in cross-cultural adjustment and individual health. CQ is a relevant factor when CD is high CCA is an important factor for individual performance and health.
Practical implications
For Selection, assessment of individuals for expat assignments Expats might be at greater risk of developing psychological problems and related work
disability bringing considerable costs for the government, organizations and society Expats and their families need support to overcome CCA problems Results support the formulation of prevention strategies to reduce stress and burnout at work
Limitations
Use of survey questionnaire There are other factors that play a role in CCA of expats such as organizational culture Reliability of scales used Number of participants Results cannot be generalized