Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
QUALITY BY DESIGN
Dr Tom Sam President Industrial Pharmacy Section International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP)
QUALITY BY DESIGN
products
processes
Slide 3 May 2008
What is Quality?
Quality
Requirements = need or expectations Target Product Quality Profile
Patient
(or surrogate)
Good pharmaceutical quality represents an acceptably low risk of failing to achieve the desired clinical attributes.
Slide 4 May 2008
Best-in-class
Quantas, SAS
2
Slide 5 May 2008
7
Quelle: Motorola, Air SafetyOnline
Best-in-class
Quantas, SAS
2
Slide 6 May 2008
7
Quelle: Motorola, Air SafetyOnline
Yield
69.2% 93.3% 99.4% 99.98% 99.99966%
Cost of Quality
25-35% 20-25% 12-18% 4-8% 1-3%
2 3 4 5 6
by testing !!!!
Data from: Dr. Doug Dean & Frances Bruttin PriceWaterhouseCoopers
Dr Ajaz Hussain
Pharmaceutical GMPs
Desired State
Current State
DESCRIPTIVE KNOWLEDGE:
What?
Product
PAT Guidance
ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality Systems
EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007
Impact of QbD
Companies re-organize their science
Universities change their curriculum Health authorities change their assessment and inspection
QUALITY BY DESIGN
Step 1. Agree on the Target Product Profile Step 2. Determine the Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)
Step 3. Link the drug and excipient attributes and the process parameters to the CQAs
Step 4. Define the Design Space Step 5. Define the Control Strategy Step 6. Prepare QbD registration file Step 7. Product lifecycle management and continual improvement
Slide 17 May 2008
EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007
strength
release / delivery of the drug pharmacokinetic characteristics (e.g., dissolution; aerodynamic performance) drug product quality criteria (e.g., sterility, purity).
EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007
other delivery systems: can additionally include more product specific aspects, such as - aerodynamic properties for inhaled products - sterility for parenterals, - adhesive force for transdermal patches.
Chemical purity
Physical form
Raw Material quality
Formulation Parameters
Individual Value
105 _ X=99.63
100 95
90 LCL=87.71 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Observation 74 76 78 80
People
I Chart
115 UCL=112.65 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Observation 54 56 58 60 _ X=97.94
LCL=83.23
Individual Value
I N P U T S (X)
Equipment
I Chart
115 UCL=112.65 110 105 100 95 90 85 80 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 Observation 54 56 58 60 _ X=97.94
Individual Value
LCL=83.23
y = (x)
115 110 105 100 95 90 85 1 11 21 31
Individual Value
I Chart
UCL=114.17
Measurement
120 115 110 105 100 95 90 LCL=88.05 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 Observation 34 36 38 40 UCL=116.68
Individual Value
_ X=102.37
Individual Value
I Chart
_ X=99.95
Process
I Chart
115 UCL=111.55 110 105 _ X=99.63 100 95
LCL=85.72 41 51 61 Observation 71 81 91
90 LCL=87.71 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 Observation 74 76 78 80
OUTPUT
Materials
I Chart
110 UCL=111.17 105
Individual Value
100
_ X=98.76
95
85
Environment
Outputs:
CQA1
Critical CQA2 Quality Attributes
CQA3 P1 P2 P3
Process Parameters Relationships: CQA1 = function (M1) CQA2 = function (P1, P3) CQA3 = function (M1, M2, P1)
3. Analyze Data
Determine significant factors
1. Risk
Assessment
2.
Risk
Control
4.
Slide 29 May 2008
Risk Review
200
100
-100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 $Time (normalized)
SIMCA-P+ 11.5 - 05/02/2007 23:17:07
Design Space
1a
Response surface plot of in-vitro release as a function of two critical parameters
of the mixing and lamination process.
Slide 34 May 2008
EMEA/CHMP/ICH/518819/2007
Design Space
Design Space
Knowledge Space
Control Space
Slide 35 May 2008
5. CONTROL STRATEGY
Elements of a control strategy can include, but are not limited to, the following: Control of input material attributes (e.g., drug substance, adhesive polymer, primary packaging materials) based on an understanding of their impact on processability or product quality Product specification(s)
Controls for unit operations that have an impact on downstream processing or end-product quality (e.g., the impact of solvent on degradation)
In-process or real-time release in lieu of end-product testing A monitoring program (e.g., full product testing at regular intervals) for verifying multivariate prediction models.
Slide 37 May 2008
QbD Approach
Preventive
action
PAT/QbD
Quality by Design
quality assured by well designed product & process