0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
35 просмотров17 страниц
This document discusses engineering as social experimentation and the ethical issues involved. It argues that when engineers create new technologies and innovations, they are effectively conducting social experiments on society. As with any experiment, there are risks and uncertainties about outcomes that could impact people. Engineers therefore have duties to consider the rights and welfare of those affected by their experiments. The document also examines challenges like obtaining informed consent from stakeholders and addressing unintended consequences. It analyzes how codes of ethics can provide guidance for engineers but also have limitations. Overall, the key is balancing progress with public safety and interests.
Исходное описание:
it is a course being introduced increasingly in all the universities
This document discusses engineering as social experimentation and the ethical issues involved. It argues that when engineers create new technologies and innovations, they are effectively conducting social experiments on society. As with any experiment, there are risks and uncertainties about outcomes that could impact people. Engineers therefore have duties to consider the rights and welfare of those affected by their experiments. The document also examines challenges like obtaining informed consent from stakeholders and addressing unintended consequences. It analyzes how codes of ethics can provide guidance for engineers but also have limitations. Overall, the key is balancing progress with public safety and interests.
This document discusses engineering as social experimentation and the ethical issues involved. It argues that when engineers create new technologies and innovations, they are effectively conducting social experiments on society. As with any experiment, there are risks and uncertainties about outcomes that could impact people. Engineers therefore have duties to consider the rights and welfare of those affected by their experiments. The document also examines challenges like obtaining informed consent from stakeholders and addressing unintended consequences. It analyzes how codes of ethics can provide guidance for engineers but also have limitations. Overall, the key is balancing progress with public safety and interests.
Professor and Head of the Dept. Dept. Of EEE MVGR College of Engineering, Vizianagaram Eeehod.mvgr@gmail.com
2
The ethics of social experimentation Conscientiousness: Respect for stakeholders rights: reasonable safety & informed consent Skill & expertise: Predicting outcomes & identifying risks Designing to maximise net benefits Protecting the rights of the disadvantaged Comprehensive perspective: Recruit expertise in other disciplines as required Utilise disinterested decision makers or advisers 3 Introduction Objective: Relate ethical theories to engineering practice A useful perspective: View engineering activities as social experiments: Engineers create experimental situations through innovation Society participates in these experiments as subjects Uncertainty about outcomes implies risk: Important to identify & quantify risks where possible Decision makers may make biased decisions unless accountable for (uncertain) outcomes 4 Engineering as Social Experimentation Ethical issues for engineers as experimenters: Duties to experimental subjects Rights of experimental subjects Assessment of costs & benefits of the experiment Relationship between experimenter & subject: Legal framework: Legal obligations on experimenter, but these may not address innovative situations Codes of ethics: Primary responsibility lies with the experimenter 5 Framing the Problem Concept Engineering: Design Produce Install Operate Intended outcomes: User satisfaction Company profits Unintended outcomes Corporate context: Time pressure Cost pressure Secrecy External context: Uncertainty Legal framework Social impacts Environmental impacts 6 Examples Computers: Developed & adopted over about three decades Significant impacts on society: Not well understood or nor always predicted, e.g: The Y2K bug However largely accepted as a positive technology Nuclear power stations Developed & adopted over about three decades Significant impacts on society: Not well understood nor always predicted, eg. Chernobyl Widespread concern & installed capacity in decline 7 Determining the Facts Codes of Ethics Legal framework sets the outer boundary Justice:- punishment, restitution, structural change: Designed to protect equity Industry codes reflect corporate interests: Often to mollify unfavourable public opinion, eg: Real estate, insurance sales, banking At their best, professional codes reflect the public interest: Can provide a check-list when considering an engineering experiment 8 Positive roles of codes of ethics Inspiration & guidance for professionals: Sustain an ethical standard in the profession Practical support for ethical actions: Reduce the risks of victimisation Education & mutual understanding (trust): Between the profession & the public Maintain public image (avoid regulation) Deterrence & discipline (paralegal proceedings): To investigate & rule on alleged unethical activities 9 Limitations of codes of ethics Protect the status quo (ethical conventionalism): Codes (like laws) tend to lag behind innovation Restrict and/or stifle dissent Protect the profession from competition: Now illegal under the Trade Practices Act Internal contradictions between tenets of a code: A common problem with professional codes Generality or vagueness of wording: Cannot be drafted with a particular situation in mind 10 Example: the IEEE code of ethics (www.ieee.org) 1. To accept responsibility in making engineering decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment 2. To avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest whenever possible, and to disclose them to affected parties when they do exist 3. To be honest and realistic in stating claims or estimates based on available data 4. To reject bribery in all its forms 5. To improve the understanding of technology, its appropriate application, and potential consequences 11 The IEEE code of ethics continued 6. To maintain & improve our technical competence and to undertake technological tasks for others only if qualified by training or experience, or after full disclosure of pertinent limitations 7. To seek, accept and offer honest criticism of technical work, to acknowledge and correct errors, and to credit properly the contributions of others 8. To treat fairly all persons regardless of such factors as race, religion, gender, disability, age or national origin 9. To avoid injuring others, their property, reputation, or employment by false or malicious action 10 To assist colleagues and co-workers in their professional development and to support them in following this code of ethics 12 Clarifying concepts Subjects: Individual consumers, groups or society as a whole: Those who can make informed choices, and Those requiring advocates: Disadvantaged, future generations, other species & the environment Impacts: Health, safety & the environment Changes to social structure & social status: Income & wealth distribution Lifestyles & personal empowerment Education, culture 13 Features of engineering experiments Absence of a control group ( equivalent non- participants): Products & services usually offered to all Benefits may such that they cant be withheld from a particular group Society may have little prior understanding: Innovative products & services Uncertainty in future impacts (positive or negative) Informed judgements are difficult to make: For both experimenter and subject ELEC4011 - Lecture5: Eng'g as social experimentation 14 Informed consent Stakeholders: Experimental subjects, experimenters, others who can affect the outcome, or may be affected by it Stakeholders have a right to informed consent: A voluntary & conscious decision made on the basis of all relevant information Issues: Identification of stakeholders (present & future) Adequacy of information Decision making opportunity & capability 15 Issues for informed consent Voluntary participation not always possible, eg: Technology that has widespread effects on the public: For example, the Y2K bug Future generations or citizens of other countries Stakeholders may be hard to identify, eg: Those affected by the Chernobyl nuclear accident Proxy group can represent unknown stakeholders: Adequate diversity & information Adequate decision making competence Strongly differing opinions may hamper consensus 16 Common Ground Objectives: deter poor practice; encourage innovation Balance between: Individual & corporate rights versus public welfare Heavy-handed regulation versus deregulation Consensus outcomes versus adversarial litigation Guidelines & standards versus innovation The key legislation is the Trade Practices Act: Goods must be fit for their intended purpose THE END