Excellence Uncontained

MINDANAO SHIPPING
CONFERENCE 2014
Limketkai Luxe Hotel
Cagayan de Oro City
June 18, 2014
Excellence Uncontained
Theme: Logistics and Trade
Opportunities in a
Developing Economy

Topic: Enhancements at the
Mindanao Container
Terminal (MCT)
Milestone on the Privatization of MCT Operation
March 28, 2008 Phividec Industrial Authority (PIA)
awarded to International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
(ICTSI) in a public bidding a 25 year concession to manage
and operate Mindanao Container Terminal (MCT) for having
submitted the highest and most responsive bid.

April 2008 PIA and ICTSI signed the Concession Contract
for the Management and Operation of the Mindanao
Container Terminal (MCT).

May 14, 2008 Mindanao International Container Terminal
Services, Inc. (MICTSI), a wholly owned subsidiary of
ICTSI, was created to manage and operate the MCT.

June 25, 2008 MICTSI officially took over from PIA the
management and operation of MCT.


MCT Particulars


Terminal Concession Area - 24 has., more or less

Cargo Handling Equipment:

Quayside Gantry Cranes - Two (2) units
Rubber Tire Gantry Cranes - Four (4) units
45T Reach Stacker - One (1) unit
Side Lifter Empty Handler - One (1) unit
5T Fork Lift - One (1) unit











MCT Particulars
Berth Particulars:
Berth Length - 300 meters
Depth Alongside - -13 meters MLLW
Berth Width - 30 meters

Container Yard (CY) Particulars:
Current Annual Throughput Capacity - 270,000 TEUs
Stacking Lanes Nine (9) Lanes
Stacking Bays Thirty-Eight (38) bays per lane
Stacking Height - Four (4) high over One 1 per bay
Stacking Rows Six (6) rows per bay

Reefer Container Yard Facilities:
Number of reefer plugs - 262 plugs at 440 volts
Reefer stacking height - 3 high stacking



MCT Particulars
Gate Particulars:

Number of Lanes - Eight (8) gate lanes
Weighing Scale - Two (2) units at 50T
capacity each.

Terminal Infrastructure Facilities:

1. MICTSI Administration Building
2. Control Tower equipped with VTMS
3. Checking Gate with two (2) units of 50T capacity
weighbridge
4. Port Workers Facility
5. Engineering and Maintenance Building
6. Main Power House with 2 units of 750KVA gensets







MCT Particulars
8. Two (2) Power House Sub-Stations each with 1 unit of
400KVA genset.
9. Water Utilities
10. Storm and Water Drainage System
11. High Mast Lighting Facilities
12. Sewage Treatment Plant
13. Four (4) units of buoy as navigational aid









Technology and Systems
Innovations
Terminal Operating System (TOS) :

1. Graphical Tracking System (GTS).

Tracks movements and yard location of containers from
gate-in until vessel loading and/or from vessel
discharging until gate-out.

Enables CY Planners to plan and allocate yard space
according container size, type, status and classification.

2. Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Capability.

Capable of electronically sending and/or receiving
information on vessel and gate movements known as
BAPLIE/COARRI or CODECO following the format of the
United Nations Rules on Electronic Data Interchange for
Administration, Commerce and Transport (UN/EDIFACT).
2.1. Vessel Operation.

2.1.1. Bay Plan of Occupied and Empty Slot of a Vessel
(BAPLIE).

Electronic receipt from Shipping Line of import
stowage/bay plan for purposes of vessel discharging
operation or electronic sending to Shipping Line export
stowage/bay plan after loading operation.

2.1.2. Container Arrival Message (COARRI).

Electronic receipt from Shipping Line of list of import
cargoes for discharge or electronic sending of export
cargoes to Shipping Line after loading operation.


2.2. Gate Operation.

2.2.1. Container Departure Confirmation (CODECO).

Electronic sending of container gate movements (gate-
in and gate-out) to Shipping Line.

2.2.2. Report for In and Out Transaction (RIOT).

In-house developed gate system capable of generating
report on container gate movements (In and Out)
available to Shipping Lines who are non EDI capable or
compliant.



3. Billing System.

Capable of extracting container information and details
from the GTS necessary for assessment, billing and
collection of port charges.

4. Cargo Handling Equipment Maintenance System.

4.1. Integrated Computer Aided Maintenance (ICAM) System.

Equipment logistic system designed specifically to support
cargo handling equipment maintenance planning including
inventory of cargo handling equipment spare parts.


5. Procurement and Purchasing System.

5.1. ARIBA - Serves as the main procurement system
handling processes from purchase requisitions to the
creation of the purchase orders until receipt of items
(goods, services and assets) by requesters. It will
employ standard approval hierarchy and threshold/limit
amounts as well as generation of Purchasing-related
reports.

6. Electronic to Mobile (e2m) Customs System.

5.1. On-Line Release System (OLRS) In compliance to the
requirement under CMO No. 27-2009 issued by the
Bureau of Customs on July 24, 2009, MICTSI is already
electronically interfaced with the OLRS system.


Key Performance Indicators:

The following are the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and
report generation that quantifiably demonstrate the benefits
derived from the technology and systems currently in placed
at MCT by MICTSI.

1. Vessel Operation.

1.1. Average Crane Productivity.

This performance is measured based on number of moves
made per hour per crane starting from first lift to last lift.

1.2. Average Berth Productivity.

This performance is measured based on number of moves
made per hour starting from first line to last line.

Key Performance Indicators:

2. Container Yard (CY) Operation.

2.1. Average Truck Turn-Around Time.

This performance refers to the dwell time of external trucks
in the container yard during receiving and/or withdrawal of
containers.

It is measured by the length of time each truck stays in the
terminal based on the number minutes per transaction
starting from gate-in to gate-out.

2.2. Generation of Reports on CY Operation:

2.2.1. Container Dwell Time Report

Key Performance Indicators:


2.2.2. Container Yard (CY) Utilization

2.2.3. Container Yard Occupancy Rate

Key Performance Indicators:

Key Performance Indicators:

Key Performance Indicators:





Container Throughput Handled
at Mindanao Container
Terminal (MCT)








CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 31,343 48,009 91,031 125,829 127,050 143,902
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 53.2% 89.6% 38.2% 1.0% 13.3%
Box 23,850 33,992 61,996 82,448 83,613 92,335
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 42.5% 82.4% 33.0% 1.4% 10.4%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.31 1.41 1.47 1.53 1.52 1.56
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Foreign Container Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 78,095 70,675 87,622 85,489 87,696 80,637
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -9.5% 24.0% -2.4% 2.6% -8.0%
Box 72,889 65,215 77,858 76,179 77,491 70,885
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -10.5% 19.4% -2.2% 1.7% -8.5%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.07 1.08 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.14
(10,000)
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Domestic Container Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
Foreign 31,343 48,009 91,031 125,829 127,050 143,902
Domestic 78,095 70,675 87,622 85,489 87,696 80,637
% Split:
Foreign 29% 40% 51% 60% 59% 64%
Domestic 71% 60% 49% 40% 41% 36%
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
T
E
U
s

Volume Split % (Foreign vs. Domestic)


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 17,171 26,063 45,966 61,470 64,870 71,344
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 51.8% 76.4% 33.7% 5.5% 10.0%
Box 13,063 18,293 31,199 40,558 42,791 45,474
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 40.0% 70.6% 30.0% 5.5% 6.3%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.31 1.42 1.47 1.52 1.52 1.57
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Total Export Container Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 12,960 20,163 36,934 50,040 47,903 61,523
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 55.6% 83.2% 35.5% -4.3% 28.4%
Box 9,371 13,340 23,521 31,850 30,398 37,734
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 42.4% 76.3% 35.4% -4.6% 24.1%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.38 1.51 1.57 1.57 1.58 1.63
(10,000)
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Export Laden Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 14,172 21,946 45,066 61,959 62,181 70,639
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 54.9% 105.3% 37.5% 0.4% 13.6%
Box 10,787 15,699 30,797 40,371 40,822 45,252
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 45.5% 96.2% 31.1% 1.1% 10.9%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.31 1.40 1.46 1.53 1.52 1.56
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Total Import Container Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 9,236 12,641 26,114 38,114 43,631 36,312
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 36.9% 106.6% 46.0% 14.5% -16.8%
Box 7,507 9,944 19,470 26,445 30,450 25,180
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 32.5% 95.8% 35.8% 15.1% -17.3%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.23 1.27 1.34 1.44 1.43 1.44
(5,000)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Import Laden Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 4,936 9,305 18,952 23,846 18,550 34,327
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 88.5% 103.7% 25.8% -22.2% 85.0%
Box 3,280 5,755 11,327 13,926 10,372 20,072
% Inc. (Dec.) 0.0% 75.5% 96.8% 22.9% -25.5% 93.5%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.50 1.62 1.67 1.71 1.79 1.71
(5,000)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Import Empty Container Volume


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
Export 12,960 20,163 36,934 50,040 47,903 61,523
Import 9,236 12,641 26,114 38,114 43,631 36,312
% Split:
Export 58% 61% 59% 57% 52% 63%
Import 42% 39% 41% 43% 48% 37%
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
T
E
U

Foreign Volume (Laden) Split % - Export vs. Import


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 30,685 30,521 34,477 32,331 34,552 33,614
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -0.5% 13.0% -6.2% 6.9% -2.7%
Box 29,634 28,744 32,473 30,358 31,912 30,886
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -3.0% 13.0% -6.5% 5.1% -3.2%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.04 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.08 1.09
(5,000)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Domestic Outbound Laden


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU 25,349 24,714 34,362 35,807 39,519 35,531
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -2.5% 39.0% 4.2% 10.4% -10.1%
Box 23,349 22,035 29,536 31,131 34,330 30,421
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% -5.6% 34.0% 5.4% 10.3% -11.4%
TEU/Box Ratio 1.09 1.12 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.17
(5,000)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Domestic Inbound Laden


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
Outbound 30,685 30,521 34,477 32,331 34,552 33,614
Inbound 25,349 24,714 34,362 35,807 39,519 35,531
% Split:
Outbound 55% 55% 50% 47% 47% 49%
Inbound 45% 45% 50% 53% 53% 51%
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
T
E
U

Domestic Volume (Laden) Split (%) - Outbound vs. Inbound


CY 2008 CY 2009 CY 2010 CY 2011 CY 2012 CY 2013
TEU - - 1,976 2,399 - 1,919
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 21.4% -100.0% 100.0%
Box - - 1,419 1,519 - 1,609
% Inc. (Dec) 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 7.0% -100.0% 100.0%
TEU/Box Ratio - - 1.39 1.58 0.00 1.19
(500)
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
T
E
U
/
B
o
x

Total Transshipment Containers
Commodities:
1. Export Cargoes:
1.1. Lumber products
1.2. Canned products
1.3. Chemical products
1.4. Rubber products
1.5. Activated Carbon (Charcoal)
1.6. Aquamarine products (Seaweeds)
1.7. Abaca Pulp
1.8. Fresh Bananas and Pineapples
1.9. Other agricultural products




Commodities:
1. Import Cargoes:
1.1. Fruit products (e.g. Mandarins, apples, dried fruits and
nuts)
1.2. Pastry/baked products
1.3. Rice
1.4. Food preparation stuffs
1.5. Dairy products
1.6. Juice concentrates
1.7. Soya beans
1.8. Veneer/Plywood



Terminal Users/Clients
1. Foreign Vessel Operators:
1.1. MCC Transport Singapore
1.2. Marianas Express Lines (MEL)
1.3. American President Lines Co. Ltd.

2. Domestic Vessel Operators:
2.1. NMC Container Lines Inc.
2.2. Lorenzo Shipping Corporation
2.3. MCC Transport Philippines




Terminal Users/Clients

3. Container Operators:
3.1. NYK Fil-Japan
3.2. Hanjin Shipping
3.3. ZIM Line
3.4. OOCL
3.5. CMA-CGM
3.6. MAERSK
3.7. MCC Transport Singapore
3.8. Safmarine
3.9. American President Lines (APL) Co. Ltd.









E N D